Understanding the Different Modes of Freight Transport: Road, Rail, Sea, and Air

October 29, 2025

In today’s interconnected economy, the efficient movement of goods underpins almost every industry. Whether it’s raw materials heading to a manufacturer, or finished products en route to retailers, the right freight transport mode can make all the difference in cost, speed, and reliability. Each option — road, rail, sea, and air — comes with its own advantages and limitations, and understanding them helps businesses make smarter logistics decisions. For instance, when companies need to compare air vs road freight, it’s often a balance between urgency and budget.

Let’s break down the key features of each freight transport mode and when they work best.

Road Freight: Flexibility and Accessibility

Road freight remains one of the most popular and versatile methods of transport in Australia. Trucks can access regional towns, rural areas, and city centres alike, offering door-to-door delivery that other modes can’t always achieve.

This mode is commonly used for vehicle transport, where customers can choose from various Las Vegas car shipping options available when moving cars domestically or coordinating road transport as part of a broader logistics plan.

Advantages:

Door-to-door service: Minimises handling and reduces risk of damage.
Short-distance efficiency: Ideal for local and interstate transport.
High flexibility: Schedules can be easily adjusted to meet delivery timelines.

Limitations:

Vulnerable to road conditions, weather, and congestion.
Typically less fuel-efficient for long hauls compared to rail.
Limited load capacity for oversized or heavy goods.

Road freight is often used in conjunction with other modes, serving as the first or final leg of multimodal transport — a critical link in the logistics chain.

Rail Freight: Cost-Effective for Bulk and Long Distances

Rail transport offers an economical solution for large, heavy, or bulk commodities such as minerals, coal, grain, and building materials. Australia’s vast geography makes rail an efficient option for intercity or interstate shipments.

Advantages:

High load capacity: Perfect for heavy or bulk freight.
Cost-effective over long distances: Lower per-tonne costs than road freight.
Environmentally friendly: More energy-efficient and produces fewer emissions.

Limitations:

Less flexible — restricted to fixed rail networks.
Longer transit times and potential delays at terminals.
Often requires additional handling at origin and destination points.

Rail freight is best for predictable, large-scale supply chains that prioritise cost over speed.

Sea Freight: The Global Backbone of Trade

Sea freight carries around 80% of global trade by volume, making it the backbone of international shipping. It’s especially suited for heavy machinery, bulk commodities, and containerised goods.

Advantages:

High capacity: Ideal for large or heavy shipments.
Cost-effective for international trade: Cheaper per unit weight than air transport.
Lower carbon footprint: A more sustainable choice for long-distance transport.

Limitations:

Slower transit times: Ships move at a fraction of the speed of aircraft.
Weather dependency: Can face delays due to maritime conditions.
Port accessibility: Inland areas may require secondary transport links.

Sea freight is the go-to choice for businesses moving non-perishable goods across continents — balancing affordability with capacity.

Air Freight: Speed and Precision

When speed is critical, air freight is unmatched. Ideal for high-value, time-sensitive, or perishable goods, it allows products to reach markets across the globe within hours or days.

Advantages:

Fastest delivery mode: Perfect for urgent or time-bound cargo.
High reliability: Consistent schedules with fewer delays.
Global reach: Connects remote markets efficiently.

Limitations:

High cost: More expensive than sea, rail, or road freight.
Limited cargo size and weight: Unsuitable for very large or heavy items.
Environmental impact: Greater carbon emissions per kilogram of cargo.

Air freight is best for goods where time is money — pharmaceuticals, electronics, and perishables are common examples.

Choosing the Right Freight Mode

The choice of transport mode depends on factors such as distance, speed, cost, cargo type, and environmental impact. Many companies use a multimodal transport approach, combining modes for efficiency and reliability.

For example:
• A shipment might start by road to a regional depot, travel interstate by rail, then complete its journey by truck.
• International exports often rely on sea freight for bulk shipments, while urgent imports may go by air.

By understanding each mode’s unique advantages, businesses can design logistics strategies that balance speed, cost, and sustainability — ensuring goods arrive safely, efficiently, and on time.

No single mode of freight transport suits every situation

The most effective supply chains are those that adapt — using the right mix of road, rail, sea, and air transport depending on demand and destination. Whether your priority is speed, cost, or environmental performance, understanding the strengths and trade-offs of each freight mode is key to optimising logistics in today’s competitive market.

Go to top

Set Collaboration Hours, Not Five-Minute Panic Deadlines

October 29, 2025

Employees working remotely being monitored by the boss

By Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

A viral email about a work from home “five minute rule” lit up social feeds recently and was covered in prominent newspapers, complete with a demand that employees “notify the team” before even taking a bathroom break. That kind of policy mistakes motion for progress and fear for leadership. It also collides with basic human needs and well established research on what actually creates productive, high trust teams. The backlash shows a natural reaction to rules that treat adults like children and confuse instant replies with real results.

Such monitoring promises clarity yet delivers strain. A 2022 meta-analysis of electronic monitoring across 70 independent samples tied surveillance to higher stress, lower job satisfaction, and more counterproductive behavior. The pattern shows up in broader psychology summaries as well. The American Psychological Association describes how continuous monitoring communicates distrust, constrains autonomy, and links to burnout.

Leaders face a choice between signaling respect or suspicion, and the signal matters more than any dashboard.

What managers do with data changes outcomes. When monitoring feeds control and discipline, employees disengage and push back. When the same information supports coaching, relationships hold and performance improves. That distinction appears in an analysis that contrasts control uses of monitoring with feedback-oriented uses. Leaders face a choice between signaling respect or suspicion, and the signal matters more than any dashboard.

Rules that police bodily functions create additional risk. U.S. workplace regulations require prompt access to restroom facilities. Remote status changes neither biology nor law. Policies that force adults to announce every short absence send a message that outcomes carry less weight than green dots. That message repels high-agency talent and fuels compliance theater rather than quality work.

Surveillance also distracts leaders from root causes. Teams drowning in unclear ownership and messy handoffs need system design, not more tracking. Clean role definitions, visible queues, and clear escalation paths reduce the need for interruptions. Tightening the leash produces busier channels and thinner results.

Expectation of immediate response fractures attention. Laboratory and field research shows that interruptions push people to work faster while raising stress and frustration, with no quality gains to justify the tradeoff. When chat badges and email previews become a live scoreboard, the nervous system never settles. Switching costs linger beyond the moment. Experiments on attention residue show that unfinished or abruptly switched tasks leave cognitive traces that reduce performance on the next activity. Knowledge work depends on long stretches of undivided attention, and instant-response norms slice those stretches into confetti.

The harm goes beyond momentary stress. The concept of workplace telepressure captures the urge to respond quickly to message-based communications and the preoccupation that follows. A three-wave study linked higher telepressure to lower psychological detachment, more exhaustion, and more sleep problems through impaired recovery. Follow-on studies echo the mechanism and show how rumination grows when responsiveness expectations rise. People do not need to spend hours online after dinner for the damage to occur. The expectation alone creates anticipatory anxiety that blunts recovery.

Telemetry from large-scale workplace platforms shows how coordination sprawl expands the workday. Microsoft’s Work Trend Index tracks the rise of ad hoc meetings and after-hours activity that crowd out focus time. Journalists reviewing the 2025 data reported increases in late-evening meetings and out-of-hours messaging. The cultural drift away from bounded work creates a treadmill of pings that never quite stops.

Families absorb the shock. Research from Virginia Tech and collaborators found that the mere expectation to monitor email after work correlates with anxiety and harms both employees and their partners. People cannot recover while bracing for the next notification. Over time, sleep erodes, patience thins, and creativity fades.

There is a better operating model for modern teams. The teams I work with define collaboration hours when a fast response actually matters. The standard is clear. For up to four hours in a workday, people keep notifications on and respond within thirty minutes. Outside those hours, the default is heads down work with transparent queues. Messages land in places where the sender can see status without demanding a synchronous reply. Meetings respect the calendar. Escalations follow known paths. Everyone understands when to interrupt and when silence means progress.

This approach aligns with the evidence above. Consolidating real-time coordination into predictable windows cuts unplanned interruptions and preserves longer focus blocks, a change that counteracts the stress pattern seen in the interruption study. Clear norms lower telepressure by stating exactly when responsiveness counts and when deep work takes priority, which fits the mechanisms documented in the telepressure research. The model builds trust because managers manage outcomes rather than keystrokes. Leaders still get speed where speed matters. They also get fewer performative pings and more shipped work.

Organizations can reinforce the model with structural changes. Rotate coverage for genuine real-time roles so that no one lives in a permanent alert state. Publish team charters that spell out collaboration hours, response standards, escalation procedures, and service-level expectations. Protect blocks for focus across the company by pruning recurring meetings and adopting meeting-light days, an intervention associated with higher autonomy and lower stress. Use asynchronous briefs for status and decisions. Managers who write clear, documented requests need fewer follow-up pings, and teams that read before meetings spend the meeting deciding rather than retrieving context.

Organizations can reinforce the model with structural changes. Rotate coverage for genuine real-time roles so that no one lives in a permanent alert state.

Leaders sometimes worry that collaboration hours will slow the business. The opposite tends to happen. Speed depends on clarity and concentration. Hustle depends on availability and optics. Concentration produces designs, analyses, code, and content that move customers. Availability produces threads and reactions that feel like progress and fade by afternoon. Platform telemetry documenting the infinite workday should caution any executive who equates busyness with outcomes. Protecting deliberate focus restores the conditions that make bold work possible.

A five minute rule that demands bathroom disclosures treats presence as the product and reduces adults to status lights. Surveillance-driven management drains trust and sparks counterproductive behavior. Instant-response culture slices attention into fragments, raises stress, and erodes recovery, which shows up in interruption research, telepressure findings, and the study on after-hours expectations. A simple operating shift changes the arc. Define collaboration hours with a half-hour response standard for up to four hours per day. Protect deep work the rest of the time. Measure shipped outcomes and customer impact instead of keystrokes. Teams will move faster with fewer pings because attention finally has room to do real work.

Go to top

About the Author

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky PhD, serves as the CEO of the hybrid work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts and authored the best-seller Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams. He was named “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with Generative AI. He serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his two most recent ones are Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams and ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI. His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles and 550 interviews in Harvard Business Review, Inc. Magazine, USA Today, CBS News, Fox News, Time, Business Insider, Fortune, The New York Times, and elsewhere. His writing was translated into Chinese, Spanish, Russian, Polish, Korean, French, Vietnamese, German, and other languages. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, and speaking and training for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox. It also comes from over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist, with 8 years as a lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill and 7 years as a professor at Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

Trump, Takaichi Seal Rare Earths Deal, Pledge ‘Golden Age’ in US-Japan Ties

October 28, 2025

Alliance - Japan and United States handshake

U.S. President Donald Trump and Japan’s new Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Tuesday finalized a rare earths agreement that both leaders described as the beginning of a “golden age” in relations between their countries. The meeting, held in Tokyo, marked Takaichi’s first major diplomatic engagement since taking office and was seen as an early test of her leadership on the global stage.

The deal strengthens cooperation on rare earth minerals, a critical resource for high-tech manufacturing and defense industries. It also finalizes an earlier agreement that imposes a 15% tariff on Japanese exports to the United States. Officials said the discussions aimed to balance trade relations while deepening strategic ties between Washington and Tokyo.

During the meeting, Trump also met with families of Japanese citizens abducted by North Korea in the 1970s and 1980s, pledging to support Japan’s efforts to bring them home. “We will do everything in our power,” he told the families, reaffirming his previous commitment to the long-standing issue.

The Japanese government has identified 17 people as victims of North Korean abductions between 1977 and 1983, though some experts believe the actual number is higher. “I’ve met the families before and I’m with them all the way, and the U.S. is with them all the way,” Trump said, adding that resolving the issue remains a priority.

Takaichi presented Trump with a map highlighting Japanese investments across the United States, underscoring Japan’s role as one of America’s key economic partners. In July, Tokyo pledged $550 billion in new investments in the U.S. as part of a trade deal aimed at reducing American tariffs on Japanese goods.

After concluding his visit to Japan, Trump is scheduled to travel to South Korea for a trilateral meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, where trade, technology, and regional security are expected to dominate discussions.

Analysts say the rare earths deal and the reaffirmation of alliance commitments signal a renewed focus on economic and strategic cooperation between Washington and Tokyo, setting the tone for what both leaders hope will be a stronger partnership in the years ahead.

Related Readings:

Crimes Against Humanity with Impunity Japanese Biowarfare, US Collusion, Chinese Victims

Sanae Takaichi Becomes Japan’s First Female Prime Minister

Japan’s Prime Minister Ishiba to Step Down Amid Party Pressure

Go to top

U.S. and China Near Trade Deal to Avert Tariffs and Ease Tensions

October 27, 2025

Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials reached a preliminary framework for a trade deal that could halt Washington’s planned 100% tariffs on Chinese imports and delay Beijing’s new export controls on rare earth materials, according to American officials on Sunday.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that negotiations held on the sidelines of the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur helped ease immediate trade threats, including President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs set to take effect on November 1. He added that China is expected to postpone its rare earth licensing policy for at least a year while it undergoes review.

The tentative agreement is set for final approval when President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping meet Thursday at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Gyeongju, South Korea. While the White House has confirmed the meeting, Beijing has yet to issue an official statement.

“I think we have a very successful framework for the leaders to discuss on Thursday,” Bessent told reporters after his talks with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng and top negotiator Li Chenggang. The officials have met five times since May in efforts to stabilize economic relations between the two countries.

Bessent also signaled that the current tariff truce will likely extend beyond its November 10 expiration date and that China plans to resume large-scale purchases of American soybeans. “U.S. soybean farmers will feel very good about what’s going on both for this season and the coming seasons for several years,” he said on ABC’s This Week.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Fox News Sunday that the talks achieved progress in pausing punitive actions and improving access to Chinese rare earth materials. “We can try to balance out our trade deficit with sales from the United States,” he said.

Chinese officials confirmed that both sides reached a “preliminary consensus” but noted that internal reviews are still underway. “The U.S. position has been tough, whereas China has been firm in defending its own interests and rights,” Li Chenggang said.

Trump, who arrived in Malaysia on Sunday for the ASEAN summit, expressed optimism about the upcoming meeting. “I think we’re going to have a deal with China,” he told reporters.

The possible breakthrough comes after weeks of escalating tensions. Trump had threatened sweeping tariffs in retaliation for China’s expanded export controls on rare earth magnets and minerals. Beijing currently dominates more than 90% of global supply of these critical materials, which are used in electric vehicles, semiconductors, and defense technology.

The two countries have been operating under a fragile trade truce since May, when both sides agreed to reduce certain tariffs. However, new sanctions and export restrictions in recent weeks have reignited economic friction.

In addition to trade issues, U.S. and Chinese negotiators discussed cooperation on curbing the U.S. fentanyl crisis, reviewing port entry fees, and finalizing a plan for the transfer of TikTok to U.S. ownership. Bessent told NBC’s Meet the Press that both countries are “working to iron out the details” before Trump and Xi “consummate the transaction” in South Korea.

Trump also hinted at future meetings with Xi in both China and the United States. “We’ve agreed to meet. We’re going to meet them later in China, and we’re going to meet in the U.S., in either Washington or at Mar-a-Lago,” he said.

Among Trump’s agenda items for Thursday’s meeting are expanding U.S. agricultural exports, addressing tensions over Taiwan, and pushing for the release of jailed Hong Kong media tycoon Jimmy Lai, a prominent figure in the city’s pro-democracy movement.

Trump is also expected to seek China’s cooperation in managing relations with Russia as the war in Ukraine continues.

As both nations work to finalize a deal, the outcome of this week’s Trump-Xi meeting could determine whether the world’s two largest economies stabilize their trade relationship—or reignite another round of economic confrontation.

Related Readings:

Trump Presses NATO to Sanction Russia and Tariff China

Markets Rally as US and China Slash Tariffs in Trade Reset

US and China Resume Trade Talks in London Amid Rare Earth Dispute

Go to top

Choosing Between Gel and Cream Removers for Tough Lash Glue

October 27, 2025

When it comes to removing lash extensions, using the right eyelash extension remover is just as important as applying the extensions themselves. Professional lash artists know that improper removal can compromise natural lashes, irritate the client’s eyes, or leave behind stubborn adhesive residue that makes the next set harder to apply. This is especially true when working with strong lash glue formulations designed for long retention. In these cases, choosing between a gel lash remover and a cream lash remover becomes a crucial professional decision.

Both gel and cream formulas are popular professional lash products, but they have distinct properties that make them better suited to different scenarios. Understanding their differences in safety, control, and speed will help you remove lash extensions effectively while maintaining client comfort and lash health.

Why Removers Are Essential for Safe Lash Removal

Attempting to remove lash extensions without the correct lash glue remover can lead to damage, discomfort, and unnecessary risk. Professional removers are formulated to break down cyanoacrylate — the main ingredient in most lash adhesives — without pulling or tugging on the natural lashes.

Strong retention glues are fantastic for keeping extensions in place for weeks, but they can be challenging to dissolve during removals. This is why every lash artist should have both gel lash remover and cream lash remover in their toolkit. Choosing the right one depends on factors like lash density, skill level, and the speed required for the procedure.

A well-chosen eyelash extension remover ensures that:

Extensions slide off smoothly without resistance.
Natural lashes remain intact and undamaged.
The process is comfortable and non-irritating for the client.
The lash line is left clean, making the next application easier.

Gel Remover: Benefits and Best Uses

Gel lash remover is a popular choice among lash artists for its fast-acting formula and ability to penetrate even the toughest lash glue bonds. It has a thinner, more liquid-like consistency compared to cream, which allows it to seep between individual extensions and the natural lash quickly. This makes it highly effective for dissolving strong adhesives in less time.

Key Benefits of Gel Lash Remover

Speed

Gel removers typically work faster than cream. In many cases, they begin breaking down adhesive bonds within a few minutes. This is especially useful when dealing with high-retention glues that have been cured for several weeks.

Precision

Because of its fluid texture, gel can reach areas that are harder to access with cream, such as dense lash lines or extensions applied in very fine layers.

Efficiency for Full Sets

Gel removers are ideal for removing full lash sets quickly when time is limited. For example, if a client is returning for a complete removal and new application in one appointment, gel may be the best option to keep the schedule on track.

Best Practices for Gel Remover

Always apply gel with closed eyes and under proper eye pads to prevent accidental seepage into the eyes.

Use micro brushes or lint-free applicators to apply the remover precisely along the bonding area.

Allow adequate dwell time (usually 3–5 minutes) for the remover to fully dissolve the lash glue before sliding off extensions gently with tweezers or brushes.

Rinse thoroughly afterward to ensure no residue remains.

Because of its potency, gel should be used carefully on sensitive clients or during partial removals near the eye’s inner corners.

Cream Remover: Benefits and Best Uses

Cream lash remover has a thick, buttery consistency that stays exactly where it’s applied, making it the safest and most controlled option—especially for beginners or sensitive clients. This type of eyelash extension remover is designed to sit on the lashes without dripping or spreading, drastically reducing the risk of the product entering the eyes.

Key Benefits of Cream Lash Remover

Safety and Comfort

Its dense texture ensures the product remains in place, making it ideal for clients with watery or sensitive eyes. It’s also the preferred option for removals near the lash line or inner corners where precision matters.

Control

Cream is less likely to migrate toward the skin or eyes, allowing lash artists to work at a relaxed pace. This is especially useful for remove lash extensions on specific sections rather than the entire set.

Gentle Action

While cream removers can take slightly longer to dissolve strong lash glue, they provide a softer experience for the client and allow you to control the process step by step.

Best Practices for Cream Remover

Apply cream generously to the bonded areas using a micro brush.

Allow the product to sit for 5–10 minutes, depending on the adhesive’s strength.

Once the glue has softened, gently slide off the extensions without tugging.

Always rinse and cleanse the lashes afterward to ensure a residue-free surface for the next application.

Cream removers are excellent for targeted removals, sensitive clients, or technicians who prefer maximum control during the procedure.

Key Differences: Safety, Control, and Speed

While both gel and cream removers are effective eyelash extension removers, they differ in three main aspects:

Feature	Gel Remover	Cream Remover
Speed	Acts quickly (3–5 min)	Slower (5–10 min), more gradual
Control	Less controlled, can spread	Very controlled, stays in place
Safety	Effective but must avoid eye contact	Safest for sensitive clients
Best Use	Full removals with strong glue	Partial removals or sensitive clients

Gel is your go-to when you need to dissolve lash glue quickly and efficiently, particularly with dense or aged extensions. Cream excels when precision and client comfort are top priorities.

Choosing the Right Remover for Strong Lash Glue

When working with particularly stubborn or professional lash products formulated for extra retention, consider the following factors to decide between gel and cream:

Extent of Removal: For full sets, gel is often more time-efficient; for partial touch-ups or selective removal, cream offers better control.
Technician Skill Level: Experienced artists may prefer gel for its speed, while newer lash techs may find cream easier to manage.
Environment: In warmer or more humid conditions, gel may spread more easily, while cream stays put.

Sometimes, using both can be beneficial. For example, a lash artist might apply cream remover near the inner corners for safety and use gel on the outer and middle sections for speed.

Picking the Best Remover for Each Client

No single lash glue remover is universally “better” — it all depends on the situation. Gel lash remover delivers speed and efficiency, making it ideal for full removals and tough, aged adhesives. Cream lash remover offers superior control and safety, perfect for sensitive clients and partial removals.

By understanding the unique properties of each eyelash extension remover, lash professionals can tailor their approach to ensure safe, effective, and comfortable removal every time. Stocking both options in your professional kit ensures you’re ready to handle any lash removal scenario with confidence and precision.

Go to top

The Post-Gaza Rebalancing in the Middle East

October 27, 2025

By Dan Steinbock

The fragile ceasefire in Gaza reflects accelerating recalibration in the Middle East, as U.S. military maneuvers are giving way – so the story goes – to economic development promoted by the Arab states, China and the Global South.

On October 9, when the Gaza ceasefire took effect, it was regarded as the first phase of a 20-point peace plan drafted by the White House. Neither Israel nor Hamas liked the full plan. But the former was pressured by Trump and the latter by a set of Arab states, particularly Qatar, Egypt and Turkey. That’s what made the imposed ceasefire unique.

It is a fragile ceasefire scheme that could be developed into something more lasting over time; or easily undermined like the previous ceasefire efforts.

But it’s no peace plan. It is a fragile ceasefire scheme that could be developed into something more lasting over time; or easily undermined like the previous ceasefire efforts. Unsurprisingly, the plan is mum on Israel’s genocidal atrocities.

What this brittle ceasefire plan heralds is the rebalancing by major Arab states in the broader Middle East as they seek a gradual shift from decades of destabilization to economic development.

From ceasefire to peace?

In the first phase of the peace plan, the two sides agreed to a set of parameters – including ceasefire, a military drawdown, a hostage and prisoner release, troop deployment and, most importantly, aid delivery increases.

Gaza strip map — *Source: White House, CFR*

But the devil is in the implementation details. With Israeli violations, the White House was compelled to send special envoy Steve Witkoff, Vice-President JD Vance, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio basically to force the Netanyahu cabinet to stick to the plan. Worse, infrastructure rehabilitation hasn’t really started and inadequate food aid has left almost 2 million Palestinians in a dangerous limbo at the eve of winter.

What sold the Trump plan to Arab states was the stipulation that no Palestinians will be militarily forced to leave Gaza and that Israel will agree not to occupy or annex the Gaza Strip. Yet just days later, the Israeli parliament advanced a bill precisely to annex the West Bank.

To reach the aspirational goals, the plan offers little guidance, except for the formation of an International Stabilization Force; technocratic transitional governance by a Palestinian committee, under an international board chaired by Trump and led by the controversial former British Prime Minister Tony Blair; demilitarization by an independent monitor group; and economic reform by a panel of experts.

The plan doesn’t address the funding for reconstruction, which is estimated to cost more than $50 billion. That’s significantly less than the $68 billion Israel paid for its Gaza war in 2023-24 alone, with weapons and financing mainly by the U.S.

Nonetheless, only a month ago, even a ceasefire seemed like a distant dream – until Prime Minister Netanyahu’s gross miscalculation.

How Qatar attacks sped up recalibrations

On September 9, Israeli missiles slammed into an office in Qatar where Palestinian group Hamas’s top negotiators were discussing President Trump’s latest proposal for a ceasefire. Targeted assassinations have been an Israeli norm for decades. But this attack occurred on the soil of a major U.S. security partner, with no prior warning to Qatar.

Concerned that their peace efforts would go off the rails, Trump and his special envoy Witkoff decided to try to turn the crisis to his advantage by initiating the talks that led to the ceasefire.

What the two did not see coming was the Saudi-Pakistani defense pact just two weeks later, between Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif. According to the pact, “any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both.”

Afterwards, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif suggested that the pact included a nuclear umbrella. Subsequently, he retracted his comment.

Downplaying the pact and its long-term ramifications is in the U.S. interest. Yet, other sources say Pakistan has extended a nuclear umbrella to Saudi Arabia.

Eclipse of Israel’s nuclear primacy

Ironically, the nuclear stakes were first raised by the White House in June, with the U.S. attack against three major nuclear sites in Iran. But the U.S.-Israel path to nuclear risks in the region was paved already before the 1967 Six-Day War. That’s when Prime Minister Levi Eshkol secretly ordered the nuclear reactor scientists in Dimona to assemble two crude nuclear devices, in case “Arab forces overwhelmed Israeli defenses.”

In the early days of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, PM Golda Meir’s cabinet had thirteen 20-kiloton atomic bombs assembled with greater destructive potential than the atom bomb in Hiroshima. In 1981, Israel destroyed Iraq’s nuclear reactor Osirak. The attack gave rise to the Begin nuclear doctrine, which allows no “hostile” regional state to possess nuclear military capability.

Today, the conventional estimate is that Israel’s nuclear stockpile comprises 90 nuclear warheads, which makes the tiny country the world’s 9^th largest nuclear power (with 170 nuclear warheads Pakistan is the 7^th). Yet, some analysts suggest the Israel could have as many as 200, up to 400 nuclear weapons.

*World Nuclear Forces*
*Source: Author’s The Fall of Israel, 2024*

The Begin doctrine relies on Israel’s nuclear monopoly as regional deterrent. But with the Saudi-Pakistan pact, that doctrine is in limbo.

Who’s driving regional instability?

Since 1945, the U.S. hegemony in the Middle East has relied on oil buys, weapons sales, aid dependency and regime change. After his first term, President Trump has built on the Abraham Accords (2020-1); a series of bilateral agreements to normalize relations among Israel and Arab states, led by United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain. With massive oil buys from and arms sales to Riyadh, the goal is to have Saudi Arabia join the Accords.

In the U.S.-Israeli view, Western interests in the region have been threatened by “Iran proxies” in Gaza (Hamas), Lebanon (Hezbollah), Yemen (Houthis), Iraq (various groups). Following the Gaza wars, they believe the Axis has been severely weakened.

*Western view of Iran’s influence in the Middle East.*
*Source: Master Strategist/Axis of Resistance, CC BY-SA*

But here’s the problem: this view effectively ignores a century of colonial interventions in the Middle East, Israel’s ethnic cleansing and forced population transfers (1948-49, 1967, 2023-25), U.S. sanctions (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Yemen), U.S. efforts at regime change (e.g., Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Gaza), and U.S. post-9/11 wars in the region (Iran, Iraq, Yemen).

The regional states attribute most of the destabilization in the region to Israel and the United States, due to the huge adverse spillovers to adjacent Arab states.

Rebalancing in the changing Middle East

Saudi Arabia has concerns both with U.S. disengagement from the region, which would undermine the Gulf countries’ current security arrangements, and with excessive U.S. engagement in the region, which is seen to foster Israel’s increasing military boldness and growing hegemony in the region.

As Riyadh is fostering its strategic autonomy and diversifying its partnerships, China has replaced Washington as the kingdom’s main trade partner.

As Riyadh is fostering its strategic autonomy and diversifying its partnerships, China has replaced Washington as the kingdom’s main trade partner. In parallel, major regional Arab states, including Egypt, Turkey and Gulf states, such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain, and Iran, build on the China-led Belt and Road Initiative.

Selling oil in multiple currencies, Saudi Arabia is one of China’s largest oil suppliers. It has been invited to join the BRICS, which features Egypt, Iran and UAE as its members. In fact, the Gulf-China trade and investment ties are now growing well beyond energy industries.

For decades, U.S. administrations fostered divides between Saudi Arabia and Iran. But in March 2023, these two countries resumed relations, after a China-brokered deal. The détente has proved resilient after October 7, shielding the kingdom from Iranian and Houthi attacks; most – if not all – of the time.

In August 2024, Beijing established a Second Silk Road in the region. In July 2025, China and Egypt expanded their bilateral cooperation across various economic sectors.

What Saudi Arabia wants

Until the Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iranian facilities, Saudi Arabia was said to benefit from mounting U.S. pressure on Iran and Israel’s weakening of Iran’s proxy network. However, a regional order dictated by Israel and enabled by the U.S. would leave inadequate room for a solid Saudi position.

The Saudis recognize their reliance on the U.S. for security, but they are leveraging ties with China and building increasingly on their national and regional Gulf interests. The Saudi-Pakistani defense pact reflects this quest for greater security independence, with Washington reportedly made aware of the agreement only after it was signed.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s main priority is the huge modernization initiative Vision 2030. Its future hinges on the kingdom’s integration in the international economy, safety and security, to attract tourism and foreign investment driving innovation-led economic transformation.

The massive project requires the kind of peace and stability that Chinese investment fosters in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. But it also is premised on the kind of regional balancing that Washington can no longer reinforce.

A version of the commentary was published by China-US Focus on October 24, 2025.

Go to top

About the Author

Dr Dan Steinbock The author of The Obliteration Doctrine (2025) and The Fall of Israel (2024), Dr Dan Steinbock, a strategist of the multipolar world, is the founder of Difference Group and has served at the India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institute for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net/

From Education To Revenue With AI Agent Building

October 27, 2025

By Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

Laptops opened, teams formed, and within hours non-destructive testing professionals moved from whiteboard sketches to working artificial intelligence agents tied to real inspection scenarios. At the American Society for Nondestructive Testing’s annual meeting in Orlando, the format shifted from listening to building as members advanced through a guided sequence that culminated in a live demo round. The energy came from doing real work on real problems with coaching in the room.

This approach transfers skills, strengthens a tech-forward brand, and creates a clear business case for sponsors who want meaningful engagement. The playbook below shows how any professional association can adapt this model for member learning, positioning, and non-dues revenue.

Hands-On Builds Transfer Skills And Confidence

Professionals learn faster when they create something useful. Evidence from a recent peer‑reviewed systematic review found that time‑bounded, collaborative builds develop capability, teamwork, and persistence when they are designed with clear goals and coaching. A complementary scoping review in health professions education showed accelerated skill uptake in short, structured cycles that put learners in the driver’s seat. An evaluation study in 2024 documented gains in teamwork and problem solving when participants moved from passive content to concrete projects. By tying instruction to a tangible build, participants absorb ideas and retain them through direct application.

By tying instruction to a tangible build, participants absorb ideas and retain them through direct application.

The ASNT program made that research visible in practice. The two‑day sequence began with a plain‑language session on agent fundamentals, progressed into a coached build, and concluded with judged demos. Members could preview the structure in the public workshop description and the conference schedule. This cadence kept cognitive load manageable while ensuring that every team shipped a usable prototype that mapped to real inspection and reporting tasks.

Facilitation powered the learning. As the workshop facilitator, I framed problems in clear, nontechnical language, set expectations for measurable outputs, and circulated to unblock teams quickly. In my experience facilitating and consulting for organizations, I find that strong facilitation turns curiosity into momentum and safeguards quality. It helps newcomers take the first step without fear while nudging advanced participants toward stretch goals that fit the clock. The room stayed focused, inclusive, and productive because facilitation set the tone and modeled good practice.

ASNT took steps to prepare well for the learning before the meeting. For example, members got to preview the event through a webinar I led a month before the conference that introduced practical agent patterns for inspection workflows. Likewise, I sent the workshop participants links to sample agents for non-destructive testing for them to try out before the event, such as:

Report Generator Agent – drafts compliant NDT reports of tests
NDT Method Selector & Advisor – helps choose and apply the most effective method for a specific inspection scenario
NDT Buyer’s Guide – vendor-agnostic advisor across NDT methods and equipment
Evident Scientific NDT Equipment Advisor – supports technicians, engineers, and buyers on specialized Evident Scientific NDT tools

Facilitation And Brand: Position Your Association As The Tech‑Forward Convener

A well‑run build signals that the association convenes the practical frontier of its field. Members arrive expecting rigor and leave with new capability that they can use the next day. That shift elevates the association from a passive content publisher to an active guide for applied innovation. In Orlando, the AI Agent Battle sat alongside technical sessions, council meetings, and the main stage program in a way that integrated learning, community, and visibility. The conference hub reinforced that placement and helped prospective attendees understand the value of participating.

High-quality facilitation also served the brand. An experienced facilitator sets an inclusive tone, enforces transparent judging criteria, and moderates demos so that contributors at different experience levels feel seen. That atmosphere matters to sponsors as well as members. Partners such as Evident Scientific, which provided the materials that formed the basis for one of the sample agents I built prior to the workshop to demonstrate NDT agent case studies, want their tools used in real workflows, not only in demos. They also want credible guardrails that preserve the association’s neutrality. The combination of clear rules, consistent coaching, and a public showcase gives sponsors a setting where their products helped teams ship working agents without overshadowing the educational goal. That balance strengthened trust in the room and online, including among members exploring ASNT’s broader learning resources and considering whether to return for the next conference cycle.

The educational upside is durable when the design follows the research and facilitation stays strong. Time‑boxed teamwork builds shared vocabulary and confidence. Participants leave with working artifacts and a plan for next steps at the worksite. For many professionals, that experience changes what training means inside their organizations, because they can now point to concrete outputs rather than course notes.

As Barry Schieferstein, the Chief Operating Officer of ASNT noted after the event:

“I was struck by how the AI Agent Challenge transformed what a conference experience can be. Instead of talking about innovation, our members were building it, creating real AI agents that connect directly to nondestructive testing practice. For ASNT, this was more than a workshop; it was a statement about how associations can lead their industries into the future. We proved that hands-on, coached learning not only transfers skills faster but also creates deeper engagement for members and sponsors alike. It showed that associations can be at the forefront of applied technology, not just in what we teach but in how we learn together.”

Fund The Program And Launch A Member Agent Library

A build‑and‑battle format creates distinct value for multiple stakeholders, which leads to a durable revenue model. Attendees are willing to pay for premium, hands-on learning that advances their careers. Sponsors are willing to pay to feature products in realistic use with engagement that goes deeper than a booth drop‑by. Research shows that well‑designed activation outperforms passive exposure. A longitudinal activation analysis demonstrated stronger brand outcomes than advertising‑style sponsorship, and a 2022 Nielsen analysis linked smart activation to improvements in conversion‑related metrics. These findings translate outside sports when the activation is authentic, measured, and connected to real tasks in the room.

Structure the economics to reward quality. Offer a premium build track with limited seats and a clear syllabus, a spectator pass for the final demo session, and a virtual clinic included with build registration. For sponsors, define a limited number of integration slots tied to specific use cases. Require that any product featured during the build directly supports those use cases and is presented through coaching, not sales pitches. Publish transparent judging criteria and keep the judging panel independent of sponsoring companies. These design choices protect trust while creating meaningful engagement that sponsors value.

With training and oversight, these internal tools improve service levels and model responsible use for the community.

Treat the event as a product launch. ASNT can turn the build into an ongoing library of member‑facing agents for nondestructive testing. Start with common patterns such as report drafting, method selection assistance, and equipment advisory. Invite volunteer members to contribute agents that solve everyday problems and credit them prominently. Where appropriate, co‑develop specialized agents with sponsors, with clear governance that discloses roles and preserves editorial control. Offer access as a member benefit or a modestly priced subscription that includes quarterly updates and clinics aligned to the events calendar. The same approach can power internally oriented agents for staff and volunteers that accelerate tasks like drafting conference emails, answering routine member questions, and assembling technical recaps. With training and oversight, these internal tools improve service levels and model responsible use for the community.

Conclusion

Hands‑on building turns members into creators and positions the association as the trusted convener for applied innovation. The Orlando build showed how a clear structure, strong facilitation, and transparent judging can lift learning outcomes and sponsor value at the same time.

The next step is to productize the momentum. Curate a member library of field‑ready agents, welcome volunteer contributions, collaborate selectively with sponsors, and pilot internal agents that streamline staff and volunteer work. With this approach, ASNT and peer associations deliver immediate skill transfer, strengthen a tech‑forward reputation, and build a repeatable source of non‑dues revenue that grows with every cohort of builders.

Go to top

About the Author

The Hidden Business Advantage: How to Build Accessibility As a Core Principle for Your Organisation

October 26, 2025

By Lisa Riemers and Matisse Hamel-Nelis

Accessibility is more than just a checkbox exercise. Forward-thinking organisations are embedding accessibility into their operations to unlock innovation, expand market reach, and build resilience in an increasingly diverse world. Read on to learn about how accessible products and services can deliver value for your organisation.

In boardrooms around the world, accessibility is shifting from a compliance checkbox to a strategic imperative. Forward-thinking organisations are discovering that embedding accessibility into their core operations isn’t just about meeting legal requirements; it unlocks innovation, expands market reach, and builds resilience in an increasingly diverse world.

While legal frameworks like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the European Accessibility Act, and the U.K.’s Equality Act provide important guardrails, the real opportunity lies in recognising accessibility as a business advantage.

Beyond the ramp: What do we mean by accessibility?

When we consider accessibility, we mean making sure products and services can be bought and used by people regardless of their needs. From mobility ramps to hearing loops, organisations may have been considering accessibility in the physical world for a number of years. However, the last few decades of technological developments have presented a number of opportunities – as well as creating new digital barriers that must be overcome to make sure people aren’t accidentally or intentionally excluded.

Driving innovation

One of the most compelling business arguments for accessibility is its capacity to drive innovation and deliver value. The constraints of accessible design often lead to breakthrough solutions that benefit everyone. Curb cuts, designed for wheelchair users, benefit everyone from parents with strollers to delivery workers.

Voice interfaces, originally developed for users with visual disabilities, now power smart homes and virtual assistants, which present new routes to market and ways to interact with services.

Accessibility can also enhance business processes. Companies that design inclusive hiring practices often improve their overall talent acquisition. Organisations that create accessible customer communications frequently see improvements in customer satisfaction and reduced support costs.

Unlocking a bigger share of your market and your audience

Consider this: people with disabilities represent a global market of over one billion consumers with a combined spending power exceeding $13 trillion annually (when you include their family and friends too). When you also consider that 1 in 6 people globally have a disability, 1 in 10 people are dyslexic, and 1 in 3 of us will need assistive technology at some point in our lives, it’s not an edge case, it’s a missed opportunity.

Yet many organisations still approach accessibility reactively, scrambling to retrofit solutions when issues arise. This piecemeal approach is both costly and ineffective. Instead, leading companies are weaving accessibility into their organisational DNA, making sure products and services are fully usable from the outset.

Legislation driving innovation

While it may feel as though some legislation is going backwards in some markets, we’re seeing a global legislative landscape accelerating this shift. The European Union’s Web Accessibility Directive requires public sector websites and mobile applications to meet accessibility standards, while the European Accessibility Act has extended these requirements to private sector services in 2025. Australia’s Disability Discrimination Act has prompted significant corporate action, particularly following high-profile legal cases in the banking sector. In Asia, Japan’s Act for Eliminating Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities and similar legislation in South Korea are creating new expectations for business compliance.

This global convergence means that multinational organisations can no longer treat accessibility as a regional consideration. A truly accessible organisation must navigate multiple regulatory environments while maintaining consistent standards across all operations.

Leading from the top

Building accessibility as a core principle begins with leadership commitment that goes beyond token gestures, with clear accountability. The most successful organisations treat accessibility as everyone’s responsibility, creating champions across departments from support services to operations, from product development to customer service. These champions become internal advocates, ensuring these considerations are woven into every project and decision.

Providing practical, actionable guidance

Training plays a crucial role, but it needs to be practical and relevant. It may start with building awareness, but effective programmes focus on skills teams can use immediately. A marketing team might learn about alternative text and colour contrast, while human resources focus on accessible recruitment practices and workplace accommodations. HR practices need particular attention: job postings should use inclusive language and clearly communicate available accommodations, while interview processes must be flexible.

The transformation extends to every aspect of operations. Procurement processes should include accessibility requirements, ensuring that purchased software, services, and physical spaces meet standards from the outset. This proactive approach prevents costly retrofitting later.

For organisations serious about accessibility, communication becomes a strategic differentiator. This goes far beyond adding captions to videos or ensuring websites meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). It’s about fundamentally rethinking how information is shared and consumed.

Clarity drives effective communication

Research shows that even lawyers don’t like legalese; plain language uses the words your audience understands the first time they read it. This clarity becomes essential, not just for people with cognitive disabilities, but for anyone trying to understand complex financial products, legal documents, or technical specifications. When major banks redesign their application processes using plain language principles, they consistently see improvements in completion rates across all customer segments.

Accessible visuals have more impact

Visual design needs to also consider users with various visual abilities. It’s not just those with sight loss; 1 in 10 men (and 1 in 200 women) are estimated to be colourblind. This means not relying on colour to convey information, making thoughtful colour choices with sufficient contrast ratios, and using layouts that work well with screen readers and magnification software. These considerations result in cleaner, more intuitive designs that have a bigger impact to your audience.

Services that work for all users

Digital accessibility deserves particular attention given our increasingly online way of life. Websites and applications need to be navigable by keyboard, compatible with assistive technologies, and usable across different devices and connection speeds. The good news? Many accessibility features improve search engine optimization and mobile usability, creating additional business benefits.

Customer service protocols must account for diverse communication needs. This might mean training staff to communicate effectively with customers who are D/deaf or hard of hearing, providing information in multiple formats, or ensuring phone systems work with hearing aids and other assistive devices.

Measure what matters

Organisations that successfully embed accessibility create robust measurement systems that go beyond tracking compliance metrics to include user experience indicators, employee feedback, and customer satisfaction data. Regular audits can help identify gaps and opportunities, but the most effective organisations create feedback loops that turn insights into action.

The importance of lived experience

Employee resource groups and customer advisory panels that include people with disabilities provide invaluable perspectives. These groups can highlight blind spots, test new initiatives, and ensure that accessibility efforts stay grounded in lived experience rather than assumptions.

Progress not perfection

The organisations positioning themselves for long-term success recognize that accessibility is not a destination but a journey of continuous improvement. They start with leadership commitment and clear accountability structures, invest in education and tools that empower teams to make inclusive choices, and design systems that make accessibility the default, not the exception.

Most importantly, they see accessibility not as a constraint to navigate around, but as a design principle that unlocks better solutions for everyone. In an increasingly connected and diverse world, the question isn’t whether your organisation can afford to prioritize accessibility; it’s whether you can afford not to.

Go to top

About the Authors

Lisa Riemers is a communications strategist and accessibility advocate who helps organisations tell powerful, inclusive stories that connect and inspire.

Matisse Hamel-Nelis is an award-winning Métis communications and digital accessibility consultant based in Toronto. Together, they are the co-authors of the new book, Accessible Communications.

Practical Strategies to Improve Staff Retention Using Company Perks

October 26, 2025

Boss together with the employees having a meeting

By Frank Mengert

Employee retention remains one of the most pressing challenges for modern businesses. Frank Mengert, founder and CEO of ebm, explains how strategic company perks can significantly boost engagement and loyalty. By focusing on well-being, flexibility, skill development, and financial security, organizations can strengthen staff retention and long-term productivity.

If you were to ask a business what its most valuable asset is, you’d likely get a range of different answers. Some might focus on their customer service, the quality of their products and services, or their overall market positioning. However, it’s important not to underestimate the value that employees bring to the table.

Staff engagement and retention can often mean the difference between steady growth year-over-year and stagnation. However, finding ways to reduce turnover isn’t something that happens on its own – it usually requires real effort and a strategic approach by businesses to keep employees long-term.

Although the first place many employers look when trying to retain their employees is their compensation, providing other company benefits and perks can often help ensure teams feel valued and motivated to stay long term.

Below, we’ll cover a variety of practical strategies you can use to introduce perks that help improve your staff retention initiatives.

Investing in Employee Well-Being

In today’s job market, most businesses offer standardized benefits to their employees, including health insurance coverage, disability insurance, and extended coverage such as vision and dental benefits. However, these types of offerings can be enhanced with other initiatives that support your teams’ “complete” overall well-being.

For example, mental wellness resources like Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) or providing access to counseling services can be a great way to show you’re employees you view them as individuals, not just workers. These kinds of support services help teams navigate more nuanced challenges they may face, which can impact both their workplace satisfaction and their physical or mental health.

Providing Flexible Scheduling

There has been a lot of talk about having a healthy “work-life balance” in modern businesses. While some have viewed this as simply a preference for employees to work from home, the fact is that there is a lot of business value that comes with supporting employees’ ability to have more flexible working arrangements outside of a typical 9-5 schedule.

There is a lot of planning and stress that can come with commuting through heavy traffic while juggling a range of personal obligations. This stress can inadvertently affect an employee’s performance, leaving them less motivated or capable of focusing throughout the day. Offering more flexibility by allowing for hybrid or remote working can help to minimize or eliminate much of this stress.

Flexibility on where and when to work helps employees have more control over their own schedules, allowing them to create an optimal working arrangement that’s best for them. This helps teams work at their best, allowing them to focus more intently on their tasks while being less distracted.

Implementing Skill Building Opportunities

No employee wants to feel they’re stuck in a position with no apparent path for growth. While certain staff members may be more than happy to stay in the current role they’re in, it’s important to consider individuals who may have certain career goals they’d like to achieve.

Investing in your team’s career development and incorporating this initiative as part of their employee benefits can be an effective way to show that you care about their current and future success with the company. Career-building opportunities could include perks such as offering partial or complete tuition reimbursement or helping them find certain educational courses that can help them become ready for a promotion.

This can be especially helpful if your business is positioned in a fast-moving industry or the company is experiencing periods of rapid growth. Another benefit you could incorporate is to create a program where you pair up newer employees with more tenured ones, giving them the ability to learn new skills on the job and build a deeper connection with the business.

Helping Employees Save for the Future

Financial stress doesn’t stay at home. It can easily follow your employees to work, distracting them from their core responsibilities and overall satisfaction. By offering perks that help them to build financial stability, you can reduce that anxiety and build a deeper connection with the business.

A great place to start is with a retirement savings plan. 401(k) plans help demonstrate your investment in your team’s long-term future, with even a small contribution to employee savings showing your commitment to their family’s security beyond their regular paycheck.

You can also help to improve your team’s money management by giving them access to financial assistance resources. Hosting workshops on practical topics like budgeting, managing debt, or investing can also help your employees make smarter financial decisions in their lives to help reduce financial stress and save for the future.

Increasing Paid Time Off

Another impactful perk you can offer to your teams is generous paid time off. When you give your employees the freedom to recharge their batteries, they often come back to work more focused and productive. Companies that only offer the bare minimum PTO often struggle with employee burnout and higher turnover.

Outside of simply increasing the allowance on your standard vacation policy, you can also show your support to employees by offering leave for significant life events. Whether employees are having a child, caring for sick family members, or doing volunteer work, having additional paid time off can go a long way to helping build a stronger relationship with the business and its team.

Keep Your Benefits Programs Flexible

When you administrate employee benefits that support your team’s health care needs, career goals, and financial well-being, you help to show them just how important they are to your business. This, in turn, allows you to build the kind of trust and loyalty that makes people want to stay with the company and grow within it.

Go to top

About the Author

Frank Mengert continues to find success by spotting opportunities where others see nothing. As the founder and CEO of ebm, a leading provider of employee benefits solutions. Frank has built the business by bridging the gap between insurance and technology-driven solutions for brokers, consultants, carriers, and employers nationwide.

Human-Centred Social Media Management in an AI-Driven World

October 25, 2025

Man using social media with glowing notifications and signs on screen. Modern tech backdrop

By Jon-Stephen Stansel

In an era of AI-driven automation, replacing social media professionals with artificial intelligence undermines authenticity and effectiveness. Human insight, creativity and taste are irreplaceable in building genuine audience connections. AI should serve as an assistant – enhancing efficiency and creativity – while skilled social media managers remain essential for strategy, storytelling and meaningful engagement.

Every day, I hear about brands cutting social media teams and replacing them with AI. And while I understand why businesses might see this as a good way to save money, it also shows a lack of understanding of what social media managers do, the skills they have, and what makes social media marketing effective. Social media marketers aren’t just content making machines. They are highly skilled professionals that use data-driven insights to craft highly specialized and platform specific content that will move your business forward and businesses that try to replace them with AI will be doing so to their detriment. I predict that in a few years, these brands will see their sales suffer and will be rebuilding their social media teams at an even greater cost. Because, for a brand’s social media marketing efforts to truly be effective, they must be human first.

While AI can be a powerful tool for time-strapped social media managers who need to feed content to the hungry machine of social media, it will always need the guiding hand of a human to perfect the content it creates and add the human element so vital to effective social media as AI lacks two major qualities that can only come from a social media manager, taste and a human insight into your target audience.

Because here’s the truth: AI can generate content, but only humans can create connection. Without the expertise, taste, and intuition of real people, AI will churn out endless streams of generic, repetitive, and uninspired content. And audiences will notice. They already do. There’s a reason why so many refer to AI generated social media content as “slop.” Consumers are starting to take notice. And while older generations might not be able to tell the difference, younger generations definitely can and have very vocal and negative opinions about it.

With AI generated content finding its way to every corner of social media, the brands whose content still has a human touch will be the ones that stand out. In a sea of AI generated content, that if we are truly being honest, all kind of looks and sounds the same, it will be the brands who create content that stands apart from the rest that succeed. This will mean taking risks, experimenting with new kinds of content, and being willing to be a bit more human on social media.

Yes, AI can create, but can’t tell you if that creation is good or not. It can’t look at an image and tell you if your audience is going to respond positively to it or absolutely hate it. And honestly, most humans can’t do that either. But your social media team can. They have also developed both a relationship and understanding with your audience so they know what content audiences will react positively towards. Sure, AI can assist in content creation, but allowing your social team to choose the content and tweak the wording or adjust the image slightly, can have a major impact on the success of your social media efforts.

The most effective brands will be those that put skilled, experienced social media professionals in charge of their brand’s social media efforts, while using AI to augment their efforts, help analyze data, and take over repetitive tasks; freeing up social media professionals to do the creative work. On top of that, social media teams are already severely understaffed and overworked. (Not to mention underpaid) Attempting to streamline these already understaffed teams by replacing them with AI is a recipe for disaster. Rather than using AI as a replacement for social media managers, AI should be helping them work better and more efficiently.

AI should work as an assistant to social media teams, not as their replacements. AI is a great tool for brainstorming ideas, creating demo content that will serve as the model for human designers, writers, and other creatives to build, and streamlining some of the repetitive tasks that will free up social media managers’ time to focus on creative tasks. But the true reality is that the best uses for AI in social media marketing have yet to be discovered. As impressive as the technology is, it’s still in its early stages. But I think we can safely say that the best uses of AI in social media marketing will put skilled and experienced social media professionals in control.

AI has incredible potential for marketers, but without the guiding hand of knowledgeable and experienced human beings, it will only produce content that is generic, repetitive, and ineffective. Overall, when using AI in your social media marketing efforts, it’s important that there is always human oversight to review, adjust, and make sure that whatever comes out of it, is ultimately a product of a human using the technology to augment their own talents. AI should be seen as a tool to make social media teams stronger, not to be their replacement.

Go to top

About the Author

Jon-Stephen Stansel has worked on social media accounts for Amazon Prime’s INVINCIBLE and HAZBIN HOTEL animated series, Better Place Forests, Texas State University, and the Texas Department of Transportation, as well as consulting for many other television series, films, and small businesses. In addition, he has taught courses in social media management and presented at many national and international conferences. He is the author of The 10 Principles of Effective Social Media Marketing: Strategies to Guarantee Impact.

1...575859...1,134 Page 58 of 1,134

FOLLOW US!

EDITOR'S PICK OF THE WEEK

CFO's new mandate. CFO explaining the presentation

The Performance and Transformation Orchestrator: The CFO’s New Mandate in the Age of AI

Anglea 0

By Terence Tse CFOs are evolving into AI-driven transformation orchestrators, balancing finance, technology, and strategy while upskilling teams, managing risks, and driving measurable business value. A key insight from this year’s AI for CFOs event, organized...