The almost universal collapse of British foreign policy could not have been timed any more accurately than right now – a time of real and perceived deepening uncertainties around the world. Graham Vanbergen argues that Without Brexit, merely a scheme of political self-harm devised solely by the ruling Conservative party decades ago, Britain would now be revelling in its new-found powers by being the global super league mediator with its characteristic calm and cool Britannia charm.
Unfortunately for Britain, it decided to be the forerunner of isolationism by abandoning the close relationships it had built that firmly anchored America with an ever more confident European Union. Both were trading partners that were more recently advancing on a more adversarial trajectory, now currently locked in a war of words and finger-pointing with all the possibilities of a crumbling relationship that could lead to a future trade war.
“Keep Calm – It’s only a trade deal.”
Britain with hundreds of years of diplomatic experience could have been the trusted umpire of Atlanticism while taking full advantage of its position in the meantime.
Today, global Britain is witnessing the complete opposite of “taking back control”. If anything, as the London School of Economics recently put it, the real Brexit dividend, if ever there was one, is that we are facing “a decade of economic underperformance against its peers.” 1
After the two years since Britain’s EU referendum, it has become clear there never was a plan B. Aspirations of reviving its past global influence have fallen into what looks like a nightmarish delusion espoused by the political and media mouthpieces of the right wing. Far from being a small island nation punching way above it weight – Great Britain, as it was once known, is the now the weakest link of the global power super league.
Britain has already lost so much influence in the world in just those two years. With fast-changing geopolitical alliances and strategies at play today, the world requires a calm head. Britain’s attributes and skillsets in cyber-warfare and defence, energy, security and diplomacy could have been key. Years of policymaking and planning now lay in tatters.
Europe and America have demonstrated that political extremists are on the rise – and Britain’s liberal democratic values would have been invaluable at a time like this. Sadly, Britain is now in the same boat as those stoking nationalistic sentiment and trampling all over civil liberties and human-rights whilst political infighting consumes the attention of everyone and everything.
Weak and wobbly
In the meantime, Britain is not just facing the challenge of negotiating Brexit – it is demonstrating in front of the world stage its incompetence and more than anything that it lacks the confidence to do so in a manner befitting a world power.
The Financial Times wrote this month that: “The British prime minister’s insistence that the UK could leave the EU without a formal agreement was always an empty threat. It was never taken seriously in Brussels, still less in Whitehall.”
Even more recently there has been talk of a no-deal Brexit with the EU. And as the FT opines the result of that would be acrimony and an isolated Britain – “guaranteeing chaos on all sides” and a “series of co-ordinated unilateral actions would be required to avoid a national crisis.”2
Unfortunately for Britain, it would then be reduced to asking the EU for help simply to function – a far cry from Conservative party promises at the last election of a strong and stable government.
The expected economic Crash?
Although Britain’s economy has not yet crashed due to the Brexit vote as some had predicted, growth and productivity are now rapidly slowing and investment in the UK is currently on hold – pending years of squabbling with the unknown. There is no chance that Brexit will be over any time soon no matter who decides what.
One thing that is becoming clear, the Brexit decision is now having a negative impact on daily life. And the one bit of good news there is – employment, hides a nasty truth. According to the latest figures, the UK’s employment rate stood at 75.6% of the working age population, the joint highest since comparable records began in 1971. However, the UK now has the weakest wage growth in the G7 – a fall from the top to the bottom in little more than 18 months. It now also boasts the worst performance in wage growth in all the 34 OECD countries – except Mexico and Greece – an accolade many have taken note of.3
The news about Brexit just keeps getting worse now that organisations are investigating its reality to determine their own prospects.
A survey of 600 Eurozone corporations by UBS recently found that as much as three-quarters of companies headquartered in EU countries – plan to shift at least some of their investments away from the UK. About 10 percent intend to leave the UK entirely. For instance, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, investment in Britain’s car industry has been reduced by almost 50 percent already.4
No one, not even the Conservatives knows what kind of Brexit might be agreed at this late stage. Why would any organisation invest in a business environment like that? And while most reasonable people would agree there is likely to be some economic transition cost, Brexit is little more than a game of Russian roulette encouraged by a party ill at ease with itself and the world around it.
Crisis after crisis – then tension
Britain has suffered more than many as a result of the banking-induced disaster that still pervades civil society a decade after its almost universal implosion. Austerity has caused a crisis of daily life, not least a health crisis, a housing crisis, a social care crisis, a pensions crisis, a poverty crisis and much more.
The prospect for Britain does not look anywhere near as rosy as hard-Brexiteers would have you believe. Two elections in 2022 and 2027 will define the next decade and enduring its political tensions will permeate through every family, every community, every corporation and the decisions they all make. The opportunity to make hay with the Brexiteers dream of a new economic era looming on the horizon appears to be a just a mirage the further down the road we go.
Muted wage growth and anticipated restrained investment decisions will cause a weakened economy to contract further. The combined effects of a soon to be felt fall in house prices and commercial buildings will signal what is in store. What confidence remains will evaporate in uncertainty and instability – a self-perpetuated recession will grip the nation. However, Britain has weathered these storms before.
Some of Britain’s post-war recessions have been brutal. In the mid-1970s recession, the economy contracted 6.1 percent between 1973 and 1975. In the early 1980s recession, it was 5.2 percent. The Great Recession we have just experienced caused the economy to contract by 6.2 percent whilst doubling the national debt to nearly 90 percent of GDP – way beyond that of both world wars. Unemployment spikes reached an eye-watering 11.9 and 10.7 percent in the 1980s and 90s respectively – but the nation ploughed on.
Not just economic threats
What the Brexiteers won’t tell you though is the sheer body of information becoming available as institutions prepare themselves for the storm ahead. And there are threats other than economic ones.
Again, in front of the world stage, democracy in Britain has taken a savage beating. The Electoral Commission’s investigation into the official pro-Brexit referendum campaign was leaked, revealing colluding campaigners such as “Vote Leave” guilty of seriously breaking electoral laws on multiple accounts. So far, politicians have failed to act amid insignificant fines. Stories are emerging of Think Tanks and charities pushing Brexit for climate deniers, pharmaceutical and agribusiness corporations with disinformation, propaganda and fake news.5
The Scottish nationalists are already salivating over the Brexit bomb and its resultant fallout. Will the Scottish National Party go for an early referendum in spring 2019 or wait for a couple of years when the full extent of the Brexit apocalypse will have become apparent to all? The point is that the British Union is much less likely to survive when all is said and done.6
All in all, the greatest post-Brexit threat for Britain is that its legitimacy as a global power has completely disintegrated in little more than a couple of years and by the time its economy has recovered and politicians have stopped fighting, the world will have moved on without her.
The hard-right vanguard of Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Liam Fox, et al driving Brexit into rough waters equals little more than political anarchy for Britain. Being millionaires and with the benefit of revolving doors, they will, no doubt be ready to jump ship like David Cameron did once reality and the repercussions and resentment starts to bite back in the years to come.
About the Author
Graham Vanbergen’s business career culminated in a Board position in one of Britain’s largest property portfolio’s, owned by one of the biggest financial institutions in the world. Today he is founder and contributing editor of TruePublica.org.uk and director of the Equity Research Centre that focusses on Britain’s housing crisis.
References
1. Zenghelis, Dimitri. “The real Brexit ‘dividend’: a decade of economic underperformance and political crisis,” LSE. (2018): http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-real-brexit-dividend/
2. “The Dire Consequences of a No-deal Brexit,” Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/0ebec84c-8e64-11e8-bb8f-a6a2f7bca546
3. “UK Wage Growth Weakest in G7 since Financial Crisis,” Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/c4437c9e-7ec4-11e8-bc55-5 0daf11b720d
4. “A Third of European Firms to Cut Investment because of Brexit – Survey,” Reuters. (2018): https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-investment/a-third-of-european-firms-to-cut-investment-because-of-brexit-survey-idUSKBN1JM1MS
5. Vanbergen, Graham. “Brexit: The Great Con That Will Ruin Britain,” TruePublica. (2018): http://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/brexit – the – great – con – that – will – ruin – britain/
6. Deer Chris. “Is the SNP Reviving the Idea of Another Scottish Independence Referendum?” New Statesman. (2018): https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/scotland/2018/04/snp – reviving – idea – another – scottish – independence – referendum






























































Hindu Nationalism and the Consolidation of Hate Politics in India
By Kalim Siddiqui
When we look back, since the demolition of the Babri Masjid a quarter of century ago, it seems a well-planned and well-thought act, as it paved the way for the dramatic rise to power of Hindu nationalists. It raises a question: is there really an irreconcilable contradiction between liberal democratic institutions and the takeover of the state by the extreme far right Hindus?
For the last quarter of a century, Indian polity seems to be undergoing a historically unprecedented process of change and the irresistible rise of far right Hindu parties (i.e. BJP, RSS, Shiv Sena also known as Hindutva) to dominate the areas of culture, educational institutions, judiciary and administration. It raises a question: is there really an irreconcilable contradiction between liberal democratic institutions and the takeover of the state by the extreme far right Hindus?
The ascendency of the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) in politics has coincided with a sharp rise in sectarian hatred and attacks against Muslims. Then, a number of riots took place in north and west part of India where thousands of Muslim lives were lost and the police was criticised for acting in partisan manner. Jurist B.N. Srikrishna in the Commission on Enquiry Report on 1992 riots in Bombay (now Mumbai) indicted Bal Thackeray, then leader of the Shiv Sena, to incite riots. The Commission also indicted the police who have indulged in violence, looting and attacks against Muslims. Moreover, those responsible of burning properties and killing Muslims in Mumbai who were identified by the Srikrishna judicial commission are now in power and despite the judicial inquiry report, almost no one was punished. This happened despite India being a home to a tenth of the world’s Muslims of around 180 million people, making it the largest Muslim country after Indonesia and Pakistan.
When we look back, since the demolition of the Babri Masjid a quarter of century ago, it seems a well-planned and well-thought act as it resulted in huge electoral dividends for the Hindu extremists, especially BJP and its allies. Clearly, the mobilisation to attack and destroy the mosque was a political move, as L.K. Advani, then leader of BJP, acknowledged during the Rath Yatra that he is “a political, not a religious leader”.
The mobilisation by the far-right Hindu groups is based on religious identities, which is shaping the Indian politics towards Hindu nationalism. This means a further subordination and subjugation of minorities. These semi-fascist groups achieved legitimacy by claiming that Hindus were subject to discriminatory treatments, even though this is completely false as the upper-caste Hindus dominate all institutions and are very powerful politically, economically and culturally. The far right has spread lies that Hindus have received unfair deal in the post-independent India. They are changing educational syllabus, and textbooks to incorporate views of history based on mythology and religious texts as they define it. To accomplish this, Hindutva sympathisers are being appointed to top positions in the country’s prime educational and cultural institutions to promote extremist ideas of Hindu nationalism. Such steps will mark the end of secular India and the creation of a Hindu nation. However, Hinduism remains a very varied religion and India is a very diverse country with an ancient, pluralist tradition.
It is important to emphasise that in India, the BJP government is run by the RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh), which not only provides the cadres and money but also the muscle during elections. The RSS officials also serve as secretaries in the BJP. The RSS/BJP main agenda is to establish “Hindu Rastra” and to undermine secularism in India.1 Their strategy of arousing fear of the alien, particularly Muslims and Christians is the cornerstone of the Hindutva movement. As a result, atrocities against Muslims in the country have risen sharply, since Narendra Modi became Prime Minister of India three years ago. In India, cow slaughter is banned in most states. Since Modi and his party assumed power in 2014, this beef ban has been used by Hindu nationalists to justify their attacks on innocent Muslims in public.
The recent report on mob violence in India says since 2015, in cow vigilantes attack 34 persons (mainly Muslims) have been murdered and these attacks are not spontaneous expressions of mob anger, but product of incitement to violence and hate propaganda. As the report Lynching Without End (2017): “The shift in method, from mass violence to low intensity individualised ones, being perhaps a deliberate strategy by those behind the violence, to at once avoid too much public scrutiny, whilst also ensuring that the minorities [Muslims] are constantly under attack” (Indian Express, New Delhi, 17 March, 2018).
Last month Hapur, near Delhi, two Muslim men were attacked on the street while police stood by guarding the mob. One of the two was kicked and dragged along as he lay unconscious and later died of his injuries. The other, an elderly man, was pulled by his beard and dragged through a field and attacked by the BJP members. A recent report by news organisation called IndiaSpend noted that “Muslims were the target of 51% of violence centred on bovine issues over nearly eight years (2010 to 2017) – and they comprised 84% of 25 Indians killed in 60 incidents. As many as 97% of these attacks were reported after Narendra Modi’s government came to power in May 2014.”2
On 17 July 2018, the Supreme Court of India condemned the rising incidence mob lynching in India and asked the Indian parliament to draft legislation that would stop people from taking the law into their own hands. The attackers are often members of BJP.
India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi is creating a dangerous precedent before the next general election, setting the tone for an India whose syncretic values and democratic principles are under threat. He was Head of the State of Gujarat when thousands of Muslims were killed in front of the police in the riots of 2002. As he gears up for re-election, that legacy looms large over the whole country.
Moreover, Hindu far right parties would like to declare India as a Hindu nation, which poses a challenge to its multi-faith constitutional commitment. Harsh Mander, activist and former bureaucrat, says there is a “growing climate of hate” in India. “We have a political leadership now in the country that has created an environment which is permissive of acting out hate speeches and hate actions. Lynching of this kind is a growing phenomenon in many parts of the country.”
Despite the hate propaganda and exaggeration of occurrence of violence about the past between Hindus and Muslims, the truth is very different. As eminent historian Professor Mukhia noted: “there is no record of what we know as communal riots anytime from around 1200 (establishment of Delhi Sultanate) to the first quarter of 18th century, when the Mughal state had started to run its downward course. The first communal riots was recorded in 1713-14 in Ahmedabad on the day of Holi rivalry, instigated by two rivals in the jewellery business, one Hindu and the other Muslim. This was brought under control within two days”.3
In fact, the present government of BJP in India is not a normal rigt wing political party such as the Republican Party in the United States or the Conservative Party in the UK or the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU), but it is a mass political front of semi-fascist organisation, the RSS, which describe itself as “cultural” and “non-political” organisation, but has declared its intention to transform India’s political, cultural and social life. The RSS was founded in 1913 and its founders had nostalgia for a Hindu Golden Age, which totally ignores caste subjugation, atrocities against women and the socio-economic marginalisation of Dalits at hands of upper caste Hindus. There was plenty of evidence of RSS that the organisation had been inspired by German and Italian fascism and also had collaborated with the British colonial rulers. The RSS declares itself “cultural” organisation, which is to exempt any kind of accountability and scrutinising that is required of political parties.
About the Author
References:
1. Siddiqui, Kalim. 2016. “A Critical Study of Hindu Nationalism in India”, Journal of Business and Economic Policy 3(2):9-28. ISSN 2375-0766. (Print), 2375-0774 (Online) USA. http://jbepnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_2_June_2016/2.pdf
2. IndiaSpend. 2017. “Dead In Cow-Related Violence Since 2010”, http://www.indiaspend.com/cover-story/86-dead-in-cow-related-violence-since-2010-are-muslim-97-attacks-after-2014-2014
3. Siddiqui, Kalim. 2017. “Hindutva, Neoliberalism and the Reinventing of India”, Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 4(2):142-186, June. ISSN 149-0422