Home Blog Page 25

Trump’s Theatrical State of the Union Signals No Shift in Strategy

Trump’s Theatrical State of the Union

President Donald Trump delivered a combative and highly staged State of the Union address Tuesday night, declaring that America had staged a “turnaround for the ages” while offering little indication that he plans to change course.

Speaking before a sharply divided chamber on Capitol Hill, Trump leaned into familiar themes: rising incomes, a strong stock market, lower gas prices and tougher border enforcement. He framed the country as resurgent and credited his policies for reversing what he called years of decline.

The nearly two-hour speech broke records for length and featured made-for-television moments. Trump recognized Olympic gold medalists and honored decorated service members, drawing bipartisan applause. But when he defended his sweeping tariff policy — recently curtailed by the Supreme Court of the United States in a ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts — the mood shifted. Republicans reacted cautiously, while Democrats sat in visible opposition.

Trump pledged to continue pursuing tariffs under other legal authorities and renewed calls for stricter immigration enforcement. He did not address recent controversies surrounding federal immigration actions, instead doubling down on border security rhetoric that energized his base.

Despite polls showing approval ratings near 40%, Trump offered few new policy proposals. With midterm elections approaching, he appeared focused on rallying supporters rather than broadening his appeal.

The address underscored a central theme of his presidency: confrontation over compromise, spectacle over recalibration — and a belief that political momentum may yet swing back in his favor.

Related Readings:

Trump’s 2026 SOTU Speech

Global Tariffs raised

Tariffs label

Power Rankings: The 11 Leading AI Infrastructure Companies

AI Infrastructure - hands are touching AI

AI is no longer just about clever models; it’s equally about the infrastructure that trains them, scales them, and delivers real‑world performance at enterprise scale. Today’s AI economy is powered by companies building everything from shared GPU clouds to distributed inference engines, sovereign compute stacks, and next‑generation data fabrics.

The companies below have not only carved out meaningful technical differentiation in this crowded field but have also attracted major funding and marquee backers, signaling where capital and innovation are moving next.

1. Impala AI

Impala AI is building the only hyperscaled AI inference engine designed for enterprise‑grade production workloads, automatically handling capacity, scaling, and performance without the babysitting or rate limits common in traditional deployments. The company emerged from stealth with an $11 million seed funding round led by Viola Ventures and NFX, which will help expand the team and accelerate product development for large‑scale enterprise use cases. Its platform enables enterprises to run large language models (LLMs) inside their own secure virtual private clouds. Combined with enterprise‑ready security and compliance features, Impala helps teams focus on building AI‑driven business value rather than managing infrastructure complexity.

2. Mistral AI

Mistral AI is a French AI infrastructure and models company that has quickly become one of Europe’s most heavily‑funded AI startups, securing around €1.7 billion (~$2 billion) in a Series C round led by semiconductor giant ASML. It develops a suite of open‑weight large language models geared for enterprise and developer use, and its technology has been adopted on cloud platforms like Azure. Mistral is now pushing beyond models into integrated compute and infrastructure services, with strategic partnerships to host AI platforms across sovereign data centers.

3. Anduril Industries

Anduril sits at the intersection of AI infrastructure and autonomous systems, building hardware‑software stacks that integrate edge compute, robotics, and AI for national security. While often known for defense tech, its Lattice AI platform is foundational infrastructure, powering connected devices and autonomous agents across land, sea, and air. The company has raised billions in funding and leverages deep learning and computer vision to link sensor data with real‑time decision‑making systems, making it a strong example of AI infrastructure applied to real‑world distributed compute problems.

4. Databricks

Databricks has become a central player in AI infrastructure by combining unified data analytics with model training, serving as the backbone for many enterprise AI initiatives. With years of strong funding, including a reported ~$10 billion late‑stage round, Databricks has powered analytic pipelines and AI services for companies across industries. Its Lakehouse platform unifies data and AI workflows in a way that accelerates experimentation and deployment, reducing friction between raw data and production models. For companies modernizing their data ecosystems, its cloud‑native infrastructure is a competitive advantage.

5. CoreWeave

Originally built as a specialized cloud optimized for GPU‑heavy workloads, CoreWeave has become a key alternative to hyperscale public clouds for AI compute capacity. Its infrastructure supports training and inference with flexible pricing and direct access to the latest accelerators. CoreWeave has deep partnerships with large model users and has signed multi‑billion‑dollar agreements to support expanding compute footprints. 

6. Nscale

Nscale is a UK‑headquartered AI infrastructure provider that raised $1.1 billion to build sovereign AI data centers and compute platforms for global enterprises. Backed by Nvidia and other strategic investors, it offers infrastructure stacks optimized for high‑performance AI workloads with localized data sovereignty. Its long‑term contracts, including a multi‑billion‑dollar five‑year agreement with Microsoft, indicate strong demand for diversified AI infrastructure outside traditional cloud providers.

7. Together AI

Together AI delivers cloud‑based platforms and tools for training, fine‑tuning, and deploying generative AI models at scale. Its infrastructure is geared toward organizations seeking cost‑efficient options for running custom models in private environments. Together AI has attracted significant funding and a valuation in the multibillion‑dollar range, demonstrating investor confidence in infrastructure stacks that support enterprise adoption of AI services. It also emphasizes open‑source ecosystems, enabling flexible integrations and avoiding lock‑in.

8. Perplexity AI

Perplexity AI combines enterprise search with generative AI, building an infrastructure that powers RAG (retrieval‑augmented generation) workflows for real‑time context search across document sets. With hundreds of millions raised and a valuation in the multibillion-dollar range, it is among the better-funded AI infrastructure startups outside the core model makers. Perplexity’s platform represents a new class of AI infrastructure focused on knowledge access and retrieval, enabling developers and enterprises to build contextually rich services.

9. Zyphra

Zyphra is a full‑stack AI startup developing both foundation models and its Inference Cloud, a scalable platform for deploying generative AI across applications. Based in San Francisco, it raised a large Series A at a $1 billion+ valuation, signaling strong investor belief in its infrastructure vision. With products spanning from general LLM capabilities to domain‑specific services, Zyphra blends model development with the infrastructure needed to deliver inference at scale.

10. SambaNova Systems

SambaNova builds AI hardware and software infrastructure with its own custom AI accelerators and cloud platform, targeting enterprise performance and efficiency improvements. The company recently raised $350 million in a Vista Equity Partners‑led round to scale its AI compute products and SambaCloud services. (Reuters) With partnerships that integrate its systems into global data centers, SambaNova exemplifies vertical integration in AI infrastructure, combining silicon, software, and cloud capabilities under one roof.

11. Neysa

Neysa is an India‑based AI cloud platform that provides GPU‑optimized infrastructure and managed services for large‑scale AI workloads. Its significant funding, reportedly around $1.2 billion, puts it on the map as one of the largest AI infrastructure rounds outside Western markets. By focusing on accessible compute clusters and enterprise‑grade tooling, Neysa targets organizations seeking alternatives to traditional global hyperscalers.

The Infrastructure Arms Race: Winners Build More Than Models

These eleven companies show that AI success is as much about compute, networking, and systems as it is about algorithms. From GPU clouds and sovereign data centers to integrated hardware‑software stacks and edge compute fabrics, the future of AI will be defined by platforms that optimize performance, cost, and scalability simultaneously. The winners won’t just deliver smarter models; they’ll deliver the infrastructure that makes smart AI practical at global scale.

5 Best Revenue Cycle Management Solutions for Law Firms

Revenue Cycle Management Solutions for Law Firms

Revenue cycle management (RCM) is becoming increasingly important for law firms looking to improve cash flow, the speed of the billing cycle and financial visibility. Increasingly complex client needs and the rise of alternative fee arrangements have also been driving legal practices seeking RCM services to find additional value. The best solutions combine technology, process expertise and financial understanding to accelerate collections while protecting client relationships.

Why Revenue Cycle Management Matters for Law Firms

Revenue cycle performance is essential to profitability. The American Bar Association’s journal states that firms collect 80.9% of their billable rates after write-downs, write-offs and collection failures. Even small increases in realization can have a considerable impact on firm profitability.

As realization rates have fluctuated, finance teams are increasingly looking for solutions that standardize billing workflow, reduce the administrative burden and improve reporting accuracy. RCM goes beyond invoicing. It includes time capture discipline, billing optimization, collections strategy and financial analytics that drive long-term, sustainable growth.

Methodology Used to Evaluate Solutions

Selection criteria for the list of top providers focused on functionality for legal tasks, operational impact and scalability. Each company was reviewed regarding how their systems supported billing speed, realization improvement and financial reporting. Integration with existing practice management systems and adaptability to firm size were also considered.

Top RCM Solutions for Law Firms

All of the companies listed serve law firms, have established products and have capabilities to reduce revenue cycle inefficiencies for improved billing.

1. Frontline Managed Services

Frontline Managed Services delivers a suite of AI-optimized managed services and solutions that increase profitability and drive growth for law firms. Rather than running on a stand-alone software platform, Frontline uses a suite of optimized products to drive billing efficiency and revenue capture for every firm. It emphasizes measurable financial results, such as higher realization rates and shorter time-to-bill.

Frontline is for midsize and enterprise businesses that require a structured operational improvement plan but cannot afford to increase the burden on internal resources. It enables finance leaders to reduce revenue leakage and comply with financial reporting obligations.

Key Features

  • AI-optimized managed services to increase realization and billing speed
  • Operational capabilities focused on the financial workings of law firms
  • Holistic billing and collections processes for clients
  • Scalable service delivery for midsize and enterprise businesses

2. Aderant

Aderant provides law firm financial management software, including automated billing workflow, accounting and reporting tools for the legal community. It may also integrate with broader practice management tools for financial and operational continuity.

Aderant’s analytics-driven platform is geared toward finance personnel who value data visibility and internal controls and provides systematic billing and revenue tracking, which are designed to scale as firms grow.

Key Features

  • Software for managing legal finances
  • Automated billing workflows and accounting processes
  • Advanced reporting and analytics tools
  • Integrates with larger practice management systems

3. Elite

Elite provides enterprise-ready financial management software to large and multinational law firms. The platform includes advanced support for complex billing practices, international regulations and transaction volumes, as well as advanced forecasting and reporting tools linking operational billing data to financial planning.

Enterprise firms require governance of financial performance and revenue operations while responding to executive priorities. Elite eases governance among the firm’s distributed offices and scales billing and collections processes efficiently. The infrastructure may be particularly suited to large organizations with cross-border units that operate in complex accounting environments.

Key Features

  • Infrastructure for enterprise-grade financial management
  • Support for advanced billing and international regulation compliance
  • More advanced forecasting and financial planning tools
  • Scalable systems for multinational law firms

4. SurePoint

SurePoint combines practice management and billing into a single platform. It’s designed for small to midsize firms looking to integrate time tracking, financial reporting and billing workflows to reduce operational silos between departments. Greater integration of administrative and financial functions increases revenue visibility.

Additionally, for midmarket companies, control over cost and billing processes is often as important as usability, and SurePoint’s consolidated structure improves administration. The features of this platform may appeal to firms that require organizational coordination, but are not necessarily enterprise-level.

Key Features

  • Integrated practice management and billing platform
  • Time entry and financial reporting combined
  • Aimed at small to midsize companies
  • Consolidated operational oversight

5. LawPay

LawPay focuses on secure, compliant payments specific to the legal profession. While not a complete revenue cycle platform, faster client payments can improve the collections function of the revenue cycle. Trust account safeguards and compliance features provide tools for proper handling of funds.

Improved payment convenience may lessen the effect of delays on cash flow performance. LawPay integrates with broader billing and accounting software, sharing a structured system for revenue management. Firms that are primarily focused on rapid cash collection may view payment optimization as a core element.

Key Features

  • Payment processing systems compliant with applicable law
  • Trust account protections and regulatory support
  • Online client payment capabilities
  • Can interface with billing and accounting

Comparison Chart of Law Firm Revenue Management Cycle Providers

Solutions vary in terms of architecture, service model and scalability. Some focus on enterprise financial systems while others specialize in operational services or payment optimization. The table below shows a high-level comparison of some leading providers.

Company Primary Focus Legal Expertise Service Model Scalability
Frontline AI-optimized operational services High Managed services Midsize to enterprise
Aderant Legal financial software High Software platform Midsize to large
Elite Enterprise financial management High Software platform Large to global
SurePoint Legal practice management and billing Moderate to high Software platform Small to midsize
LawPay Legal payment processing Moderate Payment solution Solo to midsize

Aligning Revenue Operations With Financial Strategy

RCM can affect realization, billing velocity and long-term profitability for law firms. Finance leaders should assess operational skills and system integration to improve billing and collections. Systematic revenue processes prevent leakage and yield predictable cash flows. Sustainable growth requires discipline in revenue execution and in building the right operating model.

6 Questions to Ask Before Buying a DST

Buying a DST

A prominent goal for any real estate investor is to move away from active property management and achieve steady passive income. For high-earning accredited investors, the Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) can be a highly effective vehicle for bringing long-term stability to their portfolios, especially if they utilize a 1031 exchange to defer capital gains taxes.

However, a DST’s passive nature means purchasers have minimal control over how their capital is invested. Given the immense long-term commitment required to participate in DSTs, real estate investors must carefully consider both the assets and the property owners they are investing in. Having a meticulous selection process that includes thoughtful questions is imperative for anyone considering integrating DSTs into their portfolio.

The Importance of DST Due Diligence

DSTs are experiencing a 30% annual growth rate, making them an increasingly popular choice for real estate investors. It is important to understand that buying a DST implies an ownership interest in institutional-grade real estate — it isn’t just a financial product. While the opportunity to use a 1031 exchange in a DST is significant, they are largely illiquid. Investors typically have to hold them for five to 10 years, making due diligence an absolute necessity.

Potential investors are advised to take the time to evaluate the real estate in the trust and the sponsor managing it. This is imperative since they can’t decide when to sell the investment or fire the property owner if they are performing suboptimally. Asking attentive questions can help ensure that DST investors have a thorough understanding of the structure and whether or not it’s an asset they are willing to commit to. We’ve partnered with Sera Capital to bring you six essential questions to ask.

1. What Is the Sponsor’s Track Record?

Sponsors are in charge of acquiring, managing and eventually selling the property. Understanding their performance history provides valuable information on the trust’s potential. Intermediate investors should look past the marketing brochure and seek full-cycle data. Investors should know how many DSTs the sponsor has successfully sold.

2. What Are the Total Fees and Load?

DSTs often carry up-front loads, which can include selling commissions, organization costs and acquisition fees. Ask for a breakdown of every fee in the private placement memorandum. Assessing the net investment value is also key.

3. How Is the Debt Structured?

Most DSTs include nonrecourse debt, which allows investors to meet the “equal or greater debt” requirement of a 1031 exchange. Is the leverage appropriate for the asset class? A 60% LTV on a stabilized apartment complex is different from 60% on a hospitality asset.

4. What Is the Master Tenant Strategy?

In a DST, a master tenant lease is used to satisfy IRS requirements. If the DST is a single-tenant triple net lease (NNN) property, such as a Walgreens or a FedEx facility, the credit of that specific company is the primary security. Understanding the lease term is also highly important.

A property with only two years left on a lease is much harder to sell or refinance than one with 10 years remaining.

5. What Are the Exit Projections?

Every DST should have a clear business plan for the eventual sale. The first step to understanding exit projections is identifying if the sponsor has plans to renovate, effectively adding value, or is simply collecting rent.

It is also worth asking if the sponsor offers the ability to perform a 721 UPREIT exchange at the end of the term. This allows investors to trade their DST interest for shares in a larger Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), offering even greater diversification and liquidity.

6. How Much Capital Is Held in the Property’s Reserve Fund?

Reserve funds are highly important in the world of DSTs. Due to the strict no capital call rule, sponsors or managers are legally not allowed to ask for more money once the investment is finalized. If a house needs a new roof, the installation fee should already be within the fund.

Understanding the reserve fund can help investors feel confident that their income is protected. If the reserve fund is too low, managers may withdraw money from the monthly income check if an expensive repair is required.

Sera Capital’s Consultative Approach

Choosing a DST is a life-altering decision for most investors, particularly those in their 60s and 70s who are looking to secure their family’s legacy. This is where Sera Capital distinguishes itself from commission-based brokers.

With a national reach and a fiduciary approach, Sera Capital prioritizes educational value over sales tactics. It operates with a “family helping families” ethos, providing a consultative environment where fees are transparent and the long-term goal is exit planning rather than just a one-time transaction.

Beyond standard Delaware Statutory Trusts for 1031 exchanges, its deep expertise extends to:

  • 721 UPREIT exchanges for ultimate portfolio diversification.
  • NNN property investments for steady, passive income.
  • Qualified opportunity zone and structured installment sales for advanced tax deferral.

By taking a holistic view of a family’s real estate partnership, it ensures that the selected DST is a perfect fit for the client’s risk tolerance and income needs.

The Growing Market Size of the Humidor Industry and the Rise of the Electric Humidor

Six Cuban cigars on a stone table with a lighter, cutter and a wooden humidor
In recent years, the humidor industry has quietly emerged as a market of increasing interest. Once a niche accessory for cigar aficionados, the humidor is now evolving into a broader luxury lifestyle product category. Underpinning this expansion are rising disposable incomes, growing interest in premium cigars, and a surge in demand for sophisticated storage solutions. These developments are driving the humidor market toward new levels of growth and recognition. Industry research places the global cigar humidor market at roughly 350 million dollars in 2023, with projections to reach nearly 600 million dollars by 2030, growing at an annual rate of nearly eight percent. Meanwhile, the desk top humidor market, valued at around 160 million dollars in 2024, is expected to surpass 200 million dollars by 2031. Within this broader market, the electric humidor segment is emerging as a particularly exciting area. The global electric cigar humidor market, estimated at about 25 million dollars in 2024, is projected to rise to more than 35 million dollars over the next decade.

Market Drivers and Dynamics

Several forces are shaping this upward trajectory. First is the growing perception of cigars as luxury lifestyle products rather than simple tobacco goods. The global premium cigar market continues to expand as consumers seek craftsmanship and tradition in their leisure purchases. As more people invest in quality cigars, the need for proper storage naturally follows.

Another major factor is the home lifestyle boom. In recent years, more homeowners have invested in personal spaces for relaxation such as home bars, lounges, and entertainment rooms. Within these environments, a well-designed humidor serves as both a practical tool and a decorative centerpiece. The humidor has become a sign of taste and refinement, often displayed as proudly as fine spirits or artwork.

Technology has also become a key driver. Modern humidors incorporate intelligent systems that automatically monitor and adjust temperature and humidity, eliminating guesswork and preserving cigars in ideal conditions. The luxury electric humidor, which generally uses a  compressor cooling system, has brought this convenience and precision to a wider audience of collectors.

Desktop Humidors and Their Place in the Market

Desktop humidors continue to play a central role in the industry. These compact units appeal to collectors who want reliable storage without requiring a large cabinet or complex setup. Their accessible size and affordability make them an entry point for new cigar enthusiasts while still offering the craftsmanship and design that experienced collectors appreciate.

The desktop humidor market, while mature, continues to grow steadily. Its success is driven by versatility, elegant finishes, and the blending of traditional cedar construction with modern humidity systems. Many electric desktop humidors now include digital displays, humidity sensors, and quiet circulation fans that ensure consistent performance in smaller spaces.

The Electric Humidor Segment

The electric humidor segment represents the technological future of cigar storage. These units are designed with precision climate control, digital monitoring, and advanced humidity management that remove the uncertainties of manual maintenance. They are particularly popular among serious collectors who value accuracy and convenience.

Electric humidors feature components such as dual-zone temperature systems, automated humidity sensors, and built-in fans for even air distribution. Some models are equipped with touchscreen controls and LED lighting, transforming cigar storage into an interactive experience. As consumers grow more comfortable with smart home technology, the electric humidor is naturally becoming part of that connected ecosystem.

Although this segment remains smaller in scale than traditional wooden humidors, it is expanding rapidly as prices become more competitive and awareness increases. The steady rise in luxury home ownership and the spread of premium cigar culture across Asia, North America, and Europe will continue to fuel its growth.

Challenges and Opportunities for Manufacturers

The humidor industry faces both opportunities and challenges. One ongoing challenge is educating consumers about the value difference between standard storage and climate-controlled models. Electric humidors often come at a higher price, so brands must clearly demonstrate the advantages of precision technology and long-term preservation.

At the same time, these challenges create opportunities for innovation. Brands that combine craftsmanship with sustainability and intelligent design will stand out in a competitive market. Energy-efficient components, responsibly sourced materials, and quiet operation are now key expectations among buyers.

Another major opportunity lies in e-commerce and digital marketing. As the luxury retail landscape shifts online, manufacturers and distributors who invest in direct-to-consumer platforms and transparent logistics can reach new audiences worldwide.

Looking Ahead

The future of the humidor industry lies in the seamless integration of technology, sustainability, and craftsmanship. Electric humidors are expected to become more mainstream as their efficiency and precision appeal to a broader demographic. Desktop humidors will continue to anchor the market by offering an elegant and accessible starting point for new collectors.

As the overall market approaches a half-billion-dollar valuation, the humidor is no longer just a storage box, it is a statement piece that embodies culture, patience, and luxury. Whether through handcrafted cedar boxes or state-of-the-art electric cabinets, the industry is poised for steady and sophisticated growth in the years ahead.

Trump’s 2026 SOTU Speech: Economic Obfuscation & Political Theatre

Trump’s 2026 SOTU Speech

By Dr. Jack Rasmus

Trump’s 2026 State of the Union speech was historic—but only in the sense of the longest ever at 1 hour and 47 minutes. Apart from that, the speech was one third misrepresentations about the state of the American economy followed by more than an hour of pure political theater which has come to increasingly presidential SOTU addresses in recent years.

The misrepresentations of the state of the economy covered topics like inflation and cost of living, record stock market prices and asset wealth creation, his $5 trillion tax cuts almost all of which have accrued to corporations, businesses and investors, and his tariffs which have little to do with trade or economics and everything to do with raising revenue for defense spending and political intimidation of other countries.

Jobs

Treated very briefly in passing was the topic of jobs. Trump’s avoidance of the topic is understandable—given that this past year the US economy has created a total of only 181,000 jobs; i.e. barely 15,000 jobs month, a level which isn’t even sufficient to provide employment for new entrants to the labor force which ordinarily averages at least 100,000 every month.

Trump’s avoidance of the topic is understandable—given that this past year the US economy has created a total of only 181,000 jobs.

On the topic of jobs, Trump also made no mention whatsoever of the current unemployment level. When including involuntary part time, temp, and discouraged workers, as well as full time employed, per the government’s own estimates unemployment has been averaging around 8%. That’s more than 11 million US workers jobless! Moreover, even that 8% number excludes the 10 million workers who are self-employed independent contractors which government statistics conveniently ignore by classifying them as business owners, not workers. So the actual unemployment number of unemployed is thus at least 10% when properly estimated.

Trump made passing reference to the fact that the 181,000 jobs created were 100% in the private sector—without indicating the number of course. Nor did he bother to mention that he managed to fire 27,000 federal government workers. It’s true, as he said, the US economy is at the highest employment levels ever in 2025—by 181,000 jobs of course.

Economic Growth

Another economic topic, this time completely unmentioned, was the overall real growth of the economy in 2025. Measured in Gross Domestic Product terms, GDP, the most generally accepted indicator, the US economy grew only 2.2% in all of last year! That’s down from 2.4% in 2024 before he was elected. More ominous, in the last three months of 2025 the economy slowed rapidly even more to only 1.4%. And it was actually even much slower, since the inflation adjustment used by the government, called the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) price index notoriously underestimates inflation which, in turn, boosts the reported GDP numbers. If properly inflation adjusted, actual GDP in 2025 was closer to 1% than even the reported 2.2%.

Nevertheless, Trump on several occasions bragged “we’re the hottest country in the world!”

As for future economic growth Trump continually says other countries have promised to invest $18 trillion in the US economy! But virtually all of that are just verbal pledges, mostly designed no doubt to placate Trump during negotiations over tariffs. It’s difficult to see how the Europeans, Japanese and others—all of whose economies are either in recession or stagnant—are going to invest that amount in America’s economy instead of their own.

Inflation

Trump did spend some time repeatedly claiming that inflation was reduced dramatically during his first year in office. More than once he proclaimed “inflation is plummeting”. He referenced what is called ‘core’ inflation in the PCE price index, which conveniently excludes food prices, housing costs, mortgage rates, and all other kinds of interest rates on autos, credit cards, and other loans—all of which rose last year.

And there was a big problem with the PCE price-inflation index, whether ‘core’ or what’s called ‘headline’, which includes food and energy prices.

Readers might think the PCE is constructed by the government going out and surveying a large sample of the millions of goods and services in the economy. It doesn’t. It takes a conglomeration of other surveys and estimations performed by the US Labor and Commerce Departments, puts their results together somehow, adds assumptions of its down, employs questionable methodologies, and comes up with a number that grossly underestimates actual prices in general.  And here’s a bigger problem with the PCE in 2025. In the fourth quarter of 2025 the government shut down for six of the twelve weeks in the October-December period. During that period there were no surveys done by either the Labor or Commerce departments on which the PCE could be based. So half of the quarter had no data available at all. That didn’t stop the government from making up number for the six weeks that it just plugged in the missing six weeks. It said it ‘imputed’ the data. In translation it means it just made up the numbers to smooth out the twelve weeks’ results.

The PCE is also notorious for deriving prices from non-price data. For example, it doesn’t actually ask insurance companies how much they raised their prices last year. It takes their profits (which they conveniently underestimate in order to pay lower taxes) and it ‘derives’ the industry prices from their profits! There’s scores of such questionable methods employed. And remember, no housing prices, no mortgage rate hikes, and no higher interest charges of any kind.

Trump said nothing in his speech about the huge price hikes now penetrating the economy as a result of the cuts to Medicaid and ACA subsidies. Consumers now have to absorb the huge cost increases if they want to continue prior levels of medical insurance coverage. Many won’t. But none of the loss of subsidies will be counted as price increases or be reflected in the PCE.

Stock Markets

Trump always likes to brag that the stock market is doing so great. And it is true that the three main US stock markets—the DOW, S&P 500, and Nasdaq—all hit record levels in 2025. And then they began crashing in 2026 and have all continued to trend down. Why? Because in 2025 they were almost all pumped up by speculative investing in the Artificial Intelligence bubble. In recent weeks, investors have begun getting cold feet about AI, however. The big & tech companies have been pouring hundreds of billions into developing AI but it is becoming increasingly clear to investors they may not be able to recoup the profits on the over-investing. AI is also threatening to undermine the profits of other tech, banks, transport and other companies. So their stock prices are falling as well.

The cryptocurrency markets are now in even greater freefall. The only game that is ‘hot’ is gold and silver. And their escalating rise is the result of Trump/US sanctions, tariff policy, and the devaluation of the US dollar which is now exceeding 10% so far since Trump took office. The US dollar is not doing so good but Trump said nothing about that. If it’s hot, it’s a ‘hot potato’ that other countries are dumping.

Taxation

Trump has been touting his $5 trillion 2025 tax act which his Republican run Congress quickly passed as the first measure out of the box last spring 2025.  Half of the $5 trillion wasn’t even new, however. It represented Trump’s 2018 $4.5 trillion package of tax cuts, more than half of which were for large corporations. In 2018 those tax cuts were made permanent forever and didn’t even come up for renewal in Trump’s 2025 tax package. So no net new tax stimulus from that.

What was up for renewal in 2025 were proposals for small business and individuals. The small business provisions were sweetened even more compared to 2018. So were the individual income tax cuts that benefit mostly those with incomes over $250,000 a year.

When touting his 2025 tax bill Trump likes to remind us, and he did again in his speech, that he cut taxes on tips, overtime pay, and social security. But even a brief summary of those provisions in the 2025 tax act reveal something far less. It doesn’t mean no tax on all tips. For example, a worker making $50K/yr and earning $5k on tips will get a tax deduction of only $600. The no tax on overtime pay is capped at only $12k/yr. And the so-called no tax on social security income is a big misrepresentation. It was reduced by Trump’s Congress to a tepid $6k additional tax deduction not an elimination of any tax on social security income. Moreover, all these so-called working class tax cuts phase out completely by 2028—in contrast to the corporate, business, and wealthy individual tax cuts were are now permanent forever!

Trump may be right when he calls his 2025 cuts “the largest tax cuts in history”, but it’s the largest for investors, corporations and businesses with a small token crumb thrown at American workers and all packaged in a heap of misrepresentations and outright lies.

Since 2001, by the way, presidents and Congresses of both parties have passed tax cuts totally more than $20 trillion, eighty percent of which have accrued to businesses and the wealthy.

That $20 trillion contributed significantly to the US economy’s 2025 $1.77 trillion US budget deficit and the US national debt rising from around $36.5 trillion when Trump took office to its current level just shy of $39 trillion. The other major contributions to those deficits and debt are the $9 trillion spent on wars, the Pentagon’s now $1 trillion/yr war budget, and the $1.2 trillion now paid annually to investors in US Treasury securities to pay interest on that debt. No mention of that either, of course. Or that his budget deficit in 2025 was virtually the same as Biden’s $1.8 trillion in 2024! Not a word in his speech about the out of controls annual deficits and debt. Yes, the US economy is ‘hot’, as in the barn is about to burn down hot.

Tariffs

Trump spent some time hyping his tariff policies. He bragged how his tariffs have brought in hundreds of billions of dollars of new revenues—the exact number he avoided citing since it appears, per the recent Supreme Court decision, he’ll have to give some of that back.

One would have thought he’d say something about how tariffs have reduced imports and thus reduced the USA’s annual almost $1 trillion trade deficit. But he didn’t. Why? Because the tariffs haven’t reduced that trade deficit all that much. They’re not about trade or trade deficits. The tariffs are about raising revenues for a government running $1.8 trillion budget deficits and in desperate need of new revenue sources since it’s simultaneously cutting tax revenues—and it needs to raise more funds to pay for its accelerating defense-war costs. Total US war-defense costs, not just Pentagon spending, are now running $2.1 trillion a year. And Trump says he wants to give the Pentagon, now at $1 trillion, another $400 billion for weapons in his 2027 budget. Tariffs are thus about ‘shaking down’ US allies and the rest of the world economy to generate more US government revenue to pay for tax cuts and more war spending. 

Tariffs are also a tool for intimidating foreign governments to ‘toe the line’ on US foreign policy. In that sense, they are an addition to US sanctions policies which haven’t worked all that well in that regard in recent years.

Trump’s tariff policies are all over the map. They are causing real economic strain for many US small businesses and farmers who are losing markets and revenues, as well as to some extent to consumers whose prices for goods imports are rising.

It is true that Trump has raised the average rate of tariffs on imports to the US from a previous 2.4% to around 13%. And those who think legislation or the Supreme Court will prevent him from raising them further are naively mistaken. His vision is tariffs are the economic panacea for all that ails the US economy. As he put it at one point, obviously departing from his prepared speech, he wants tariffs to someday even replace the individual income tax!

That will mean a regressive de facto sales tax on goods imports of at least 30%. At that level, domestic US producers will have sufficient cover to raise prices on US produced goods by at least 10% on average. Double digit chronic inflation anyone?

These were the main economic measures Trump addressed. When considered in more detail, Trump’s touting of the US economy’s performance in 2025 amounts to misrepresentation at best, and outright lies in most cases. 

The Trump economy and the USA is ‘hot’ only in the sense it is becoming domestically, and globally, an internal combustion engine heating up as result of insufficient coolant.

The US economy is not robustly growing but slowing. Jobs are barely being created. Inflation is nearly twice that reported by the PCE index, which is over-inflating US GDP in turn. The stock market bubbles of 2025 have begun unwinding, the AI hype has peaked, and the US dollar devaluation is accelerating and the worse since the 1970s. The US budget deficits and national debt continue surging out of control and interest payments to rich holders of US Treasury securities are escalating past $1.2 trillion a year! The tax cuts of 2025, like those of 2018, will provide little if any real stimulus to the economy and the working class cuts are a sham of what’s claimed. Pledges by other countries to invest in the US aren’t worth the verbal assurances given or the paper they’re written on, if in fact they were written. Tariffs are about raising revenue and political intimidation of allies and the rest of the world alike. They are a reflection of the fact the US empire is running short of funds and is searching for radical funding alternatives in lieu of economic growth or debt financing now approaching its limits. Tariffs in turn are upending global supply chains and global trade and will lead to other countries’ turning further away from the US dollar, thus ensuring its further devaluation.

In short, the Trump economy and the USA is ‘hot’ only in the sense it is becoming domestically, and globally, an internal combustion engine heating up as result of insufficient coolant. And when engines become so ‘hot’, their mechanical working parts eventually just freeze up.

About the Author

jack_rasmusJack Rasmus is author of the recently published book, ‘The Scourge of Neoliberalism: US Economic Policy from Reagan to Trump’, Clarity Press, 2020. He publishes at Predicting the Global Economic Crisis

A Pro-Trump EEOC Puts Brakes on RTO

Office life

By Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

Badge lines formed before sunrise, commuter trains filled past standing room, and managers refreshed headcount dashboards as agencies prepared for a reset. President Trump’s January 20, 2025 memorandum delivered a blunt operational direction: end broad remote work and restore full-time, in-person duty stations.

Employees who use telework as a disability accommodation read it as a civil rights test, because their workday depends on more than convenience.

Many leaders treated it as a fast lane back to 2019 norms. Employees who use telework as a disability accommodation read it as a civil rights test, because their workday depends on more than convenience. Many agencies delayed and denied telework requests for those with disabilities despite the widespread use of such accommodations previously, resulting in labor conflicts and lawsuits. That tension sat unresolved until recently, when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission published federal guidance that tightened the legal and practical limits around any sweeping return-to-office push.

The guidance warned agencies against a blanket approach to denying or rescinding recurring telework accommodations and emphasized individualized assessments. That point matters because a top-down return-to-office order tempts managers to solve compliance with a single line: everyone returns, no exceptions. The EEOC signaled that approach creates legal exposure when disability accommodations sit in the mix.

The commission’s composition amplified the moment. The EEOC regained a working quorum after Brittany Bull Panuccio began service, confirmed by the agency’s tenure announcement. Panuccio joined Chair Andrea Lucas to form a Trump-appointed majority. In that context, the guidance carried extra weight: a pro-Trump majority still drew a compliance boundary that constrained the harshest versions of Trump’s own return-to-office drive.

That boundary sits on federal disability law. For executive-branch employment, the framework runs through the Rehabilitation Act, which bars disability discrimination and requires reasonable accommodation for qualified employees. The EEOC’s FAQ emphasizes a central legal idea: agencies must evaluate whether telework enables an employee to perform essential functions, and they must do that evaluation case by case. Telework can qualify as a reasonable accommodation, and the EEOC has long treated it that way in its telework accommodation guidance, which explains how to assess essential functions and run the interactive process.

The February 2026 guidance also clarified an important management lever. When multiple effective accommodations exist, an agency can select an option other than telework. That line keeps the guidance credible with leaders because it protects operational flexibility. The constraint comes from process and proof. The EEOC warned that rescinding previously granted telework without individualized assessment invites liability when telework functions as the only effective accommodation for a given employee. In practice, that forces managers to define essential functions with precision, document why an in-office requirement matters to the role, and engage employees in a real interactive process rather than a scripted denial.

Private-sector enforcement shows why the EEOC took this stance. For example, the EEOC sued a contractor over an alleged denial of remote work for an employee after a stroke, outlined in the agency’s Osmose lawsuit release. The alleged facts underscore a recurring theme: when duties center on screens, tickets, and customer communications, physical presence often looks less like an essential function and more like a management preference. Courts also back employers when evidence supports in-person essential functions. These outcomes converge on one lesson that the federal guidance reinforces: the facts decide, and the paperwork matters.

Leaders who treat telework accommodations as disposable risk shrinking their talent pool at the same moment competition for specialized skills remains fierce.

The broader workforce trend sharpens the stakes. Labor-force participation among people with disabilities reached record levels in the pandemic era, with remote and flexible work frequently credited as a key driver, according to a SHRM data brief. Leaders who treat telework accommodations as disposable risk shrinking their talent pool at the same moment competition for specialized skills remains fierce.

This episode shows how institutions constrain executive pressure. Even with a Trump-appointed majority, the EEOC put individualized assessment and disability rights ahead of speed, and it gave agencies a clear warning against blanket telework denials under return-to-office mandates. Return-to-office can still move forward, but it must move through the legal gate the EEOC just tightened: a real interactive process, a role-specific essential-function analysis, and a documented decision that respects disability rights while pursuing operational goals.

About the Author

Dr. Gleb TsipurskyDr. Gleb Tsipursky was named “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with Generative AI. He serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his two most recent ones are Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams and ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI. His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles and 550 interviews in Harvard Business ReviewInc. MagazineUSA TodayCBS NewsFox NewsTimeBusiness InsiderFortuneThe New York Times, and elsewhere. His writing was translated into Chinese, Spanish, Russian, Polish, Korean, French, Vietnamese, German, and other languages. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consultingcoaching, and speaking and training for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox. It also comes from over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist, with 8 years as a lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill and 7 years as a professor at Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

Are We Overusing Air Conditioning

overuse of air conditioning

Air conditioning is now a standard part of modern HVAC systems, built into how we design homes, offices, and entire cities. What started as a breakthrough for comfort and safety has quietly become a default solution for temperature control. But the real question isn’t whether HVAC cooling works, it’s whether we’ve begun relying on it in place of smarter design, adaptation, and resilience.

Are We Seeing Overuse of Air Conditioning

The issue isn’t simply “people use AC too much.” The deeper concern is the overuse of air conditioning as a built-in assumption. We now design buildings expecting mechanical cooling to fix everything. We’re not just seeing behavioral overuse, we’re seeing design dependency. So the overuse isn’t just personal preference. It’s architectural and systemic.

Modern homes are often tightly sealed, built with large glass surfaces, poorly shaded, and designed without cross-ventilation. Buildings are now constructed assuming mechanical cooling will compensate for poor orientation, excessive glass, lack of shading, and minimal airflow strategy. AC isn’t supplementing design, it’s replacing it.

Instead of using passive cooling like shade, airflow, and insulation strategy, we rely on mechanical cooling as the default solution. That creates a cycle: hotter cities lead to more AC use, which expels more heat outdoors, which makes cities even hotter. That feedback loop fuels the overuse of air conditioning at scale. When architecture stops solving climate, machines take over.

Can You Overuse an AC?

When indoor comfort standards drop to 68-70°F in summer, people physiologically adapt to cooler indoor climates. Humans are adaptable, and when we live in narrow temperature bands (68-72°F year-round), our thermal tolerance shrinks. Mild heat feels intolerable, tolerance to warmth decreases, and natural temperature swings feel “wrong.” That’s how comfort baselines shift.

It already has, but the deeper shift is biological. Over time, we don’t just prefer cooler air, we lose flexibility.

The bigger risk isn’t health panic headlines claiming air conditioning bad for health. The real issue is resilience. Overdependence reduces our ability to function during power outages, extreme weather, or grid strain. That’s where the conversation about overuse belongs.

Is Air Conditioning Bad for Health

The idea that air conditioning bad for health is a common narrative, but it’s oversimplified. Air conditioning itself isn’t harmful – a lack of proper air conditioner service is.

AC protects people from heat stroke, sleep disruption, and cardiovascular strain during heat waves. It reduces heat-related illness, improves sleep quality, lowers humidity and mold growth, and improves filtration when filters are clean. In fact, many measurable health effects of air conditioning during extreme heat are positive, especially for vulnerable populations.

Concerns about the effects of air conditioning on health usually stem from dirty filters, mold inside ductwork, extremely low temperatures, neglected AC maintenance, very dry indoor air, poor ventilation, and static environments. When air is over-dried or recirculated without fresh intake, discomfort follows, not because cooling is inherently dangerous, but because the indoor ecosystem is poorly managed.

Blaming AC entirely feeds the “air conditioning bad for health” myth. The system isn’t the problem, neglect and imbalance are.

Effects of Air Conditioning on Health Indoors

The effects of air conditioning on health depend entirely on how the system is operated. Reduced heat stress, lower humidity that limits dust mites and mold, filtered airborne particles, and a more stable indoor environment for asthma sufferers are clear benefits.

Negative outcomes appear when systems are mismanaged. The real health effects of air conditioning become noticeable when humidity drops too low, airflow is too aggressive, or temperatures are set unnaturally cold. Dry eyes, throat irritation, sinus congestion, headaches, and muscle stiffness usually result from imbalance, not from cooling itself.

Very cold indoor environments can trigger subtle vasoconstriction, increase muscular tension, and create low-level thermal stress. This is why people in overly cooled offices report fatigue or brain fog. These are contextual effects of air conditioning on health, not evidence that cooling technology is inherently unsafe.

Long-Term Health Effects of Air Conditioning

There’s no strong evidence that AC causes serious long-term disease in healthy individuals. In fact, during extreme heat events, the measurable health effects of air conditioning include lower mortality rates and reduced hospitalizations.

The better long-term question is about adaptation. Repeated claims that air conditioning bad for health often miss the bigger issue: reduced environmental resilience. If we never experience moderate warmth, our acclimatization capacity declines.

Long-term behavioral patterns may include reduced outdoor heat exposure, lower heat tolerance, increased sedentary indoor time, and chronic dryness sensitivity. These are subtle effects of air conditioning on health, but they relate more to environmental narrowing than to pathology. The conversation isn’t about illness, it’s about adaptability.

Signs of Overuse of Air Conditioning

The overuse of air conditioning isn’t about runtime hours. It’s about context and dependency.

Setting temperatures below 70°F during summer, feeling cold indoors while it’s hot outside, running cooling during mild evenings, or keeping windows closed year-round are lifestyle signals. Complaints of dryness or constant indoor chill may reflect the excessive use of air conditioner, not a flaw in the technology itself.

Forget thermostat numbers. Look for perception shifts: temperature shock when stepping outside, viewing 75°F as “too hot,” or rarely using passive airflow strategies. These patterns suggest dependency.

A practical test: if you need a sweater inside in August, the system may be compensating more than necessary, a subtle form of overuse of air conditioning.

When Excessive Use of Air Conditioner Becomes a Habit

The excessive use of air conditioner becomes a habit when the thermostat is the first response instead of the last. Lowering the temperature the moment it feels slightly warm removes seasonal awareness from daily life.

Instead of adjusting clothing, using ceiling fans, opening windows at night, shifting activity timing, or using shading strategically, we default to mechanical cooling. That shift marks the difference between comfort management and dependency.

Over time, that automatic response reinforces both physiological narrowing and behavioral reliance, a quieter but more meaningful outcome than headlines claiming air conditioning bad for health.

Is the Overuse of Air Conditioning a Modern Problem

The overuse of air conditioning reflects how we design buildings and cities. Sealed glass towers in hot climates, identical indoor temperatures year-round, aesthetics prioritized over passive cooling, these choices drive reliance.

At the urban scale, the excessive use of air conditioner systems increases heat rejection into city streets, intensifying urban heat islands and further raising demand. That loop isn’t about individual preference; it’s structural.

Air conditioning is one of the greatest public health inventions of the last century. The discussion isn’t whether it’s good or bad. The measurable health effects of air conditioning during heat waves are lifesaving. The challenge is designing systems where it isn’t the only strategy.

The future isn’t less cooling, it’s smarter cooling: insulation, shading, passive-first design, zoned systems, ceiling fans, moderate setpoints (74-78°F), humidity balance, and fresh air integration. That’s a far more intelligent conversation than framing it as simply “air conditioning bad for health.”

Supreme Court Tariff Ruling Hands China a Strategic Edge

The Supreme Court of the United States decision to strike down former President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs has rattled US trade partners — but it may have strengthened China’s position.

The ruling came just weeks before Trump is scheduled to meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing for a three-day summit focused on trade, technology and Taiwan. For years, Trump relied on tariffs as a primary negotiating tool. The court, however, found that he exceeded his authority by invoking emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Although Trump quickly moved to reimpose temporary 15% tariffs under a different trade statute, the decision stripped away one of Washington’s strongest pressure tactics.

Chinese commentators framed the ruling as a win for Beijing. Since the first trade war erupted in 2018, China has worked to reduce its exposure to US tariffs by diversifying agricultural imports and expanding trade with other markets. Last year, it recorded a record $1.2 trillion trade surplus, buoyed by redirecting exports abroad.

Beijing has also tightened controls on rare earth mineral exports, materials critical to advanced electronics and defense systems, reinforcing its leverage.

Analysts at Morgan Stanley estimate that average US tariffs on Chinese goods could fall significantly under the revised framework, narrowing the gap between China and other Asian exporters.

While tensions remain high, the court’s decision shifts momentum, at least temporarily, toward Beijing as both sides prepare for high-stakes talks.

Related Readings:

Global Tariffs raised

USA China and Iran

Trade - USA and China

Twin Screw Extrusion: A Versatile Technology

Twin Screw Extrusion

In the industrial sector, there is a constant search for technological solutions that can make production processes more efficient and cost-effective, without compromising the quality of the final product. Twin screw extrusion is a classic example of advanced and versatile technology which is used in several industrial sectors, including polymers, food, and pharmaceuticals.

The main feature of twin screw extrusion is that it turns complex materials into regular, repeatable products. In other words, this technology allows you to work with different ingredients or polymers (complex materials) and convert them into regular products that can be produced over and over again with identical features (repeatable).

How does a twin-screw extruder work?

In the industrial sector, extrusion is carried out using special machines called extruders, which can be single screw, twin screw, or triple-screw. During processing, the raw material is mechanically transformed and shaped through a die.

A key part of the extruder is the cylinder, which contains the two screws. It represents the “heart” of the system, because it is inside the cylinder that the material undergoes the various processing stages that lead to a homogeneous distribution of the various ingredients (polymers, food, chemicals, etc.).

The screws contained in the cylinder can be co-rotating – the most common – or counter-rotating. In the first case, they rotate in the same direction, while in the second case, they rotate in opposite directions. The choice between co-rotating and counter-rotating screws depends on the type of processing required. For example, the counter-rotating are particularly suitable for applications where high compression force is required.

Twin-screw or single-screw extruders?

As mentioned above, the choice between twin screw and single screw extruders essentially depends on the type of processing. It is worth pointing out the differences between the two options, as both have pros and cons.

For example, from a cost perspective, twin screw extruders are definitely more expensive, as this type of machine is capable of delivering the highest quality performance with complex and/or heat-sensitive materials. For less complex processes, a single screw extruder is a perfectly suitable choice, as it offers good performance, lower energy consumption, and very simple maintenance.

Therefore, the choice should be made according to processing requirements: for less complex processes, single screw extrusion is an efficient and economically attractive solution. If, on the other hand, higher performance is required (blending of complex, viscous, and abrasive materials, precise temperature control, etc.), the twin screw extruder remains the preferred choice for most. A good example is compounding, which refers to mixing polymers with additives, colorants, and different types of fibers to create a material with specific features.

Twin-screw extrusion: which are the main areas of application?

One of the sectors that makes the most use of twin screw extrusion is the plastics industry. Here it is used for compounding, for the production of plastics reinforced with carbon or glass fibers, for the processing of thermoplastics (PVC, PP, PE, PET, and similar products), recycled materials, etc.

Extrusion is also used in the food industry for the production of snacks, pasta, cereal-based products, vegetable proteins, etc. This technology is also used in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. The high level of precision guaranteed by twin screw extruders is essential in the preparation of materials for the production of granules, capsules, and tablets, where the equal distribution of active ingredients and excipients is a prerequisite. In fact, it is necessary to get rid of the risk of differences between batches.

What are the characteristics of twin-screw extrusion?

The twin screw extrusion process has some interesting aspects. Among these, one of the main ones is the intensive and homogeneous mixing of materials, including those that are more difficult to process (and for which single-screw extrusion may not be adequate). This feature ensures homogeneity and repeatability, two fundamental aspects in certain specific industrial sectors. Modern extruders also guarantee maximum precision in terms of temperature control (which in some processes does not always have to be the same) and pressure.

However, it is important to keep in mind that the quality guaranteed by a twin screw extruder involves a significant upfront investment, which should be taken into account when calculating the costs to be recovered over time. Operating and maintenance costs are also generally high because this is a very complex machine. The training of those who will use it is yet another thing to think about, as this type of machine requires qualified operators.

EDITOR'S PICK OF THE WEEK

CFO's new mandate. CFO explaining the presentation

The Performance and Transformation Orchestrator: The CFO’s New Mandate in the Age of AI

By Terence Tse CFOs are evolving into AI-driven transformation orchestrators, balancing finance, technology, and strategy while upskilling teams, managing risks, and driving measurable business value. A key insight from this year’s AI for CFOs event, organized...

WISE DECISION MAKER GUIDE

POWER INFLUENCERS

Emerging Trends

The Future of Global Trade