The Finance Bill 2019-21 completed its tenth Bill Committee stage on June 18, 2020, and entered into the report stage on July 1, 2020. The Bill contains a series of amendments to the draft Finance Bill clauses published in 2019, especially concerning the COVID-19 pandemic.
Old Items in Finance Bill 2020 Affecting Business Owners
Finance Bill 2020 contains several provisions that impact business owners. One significant item in the bill that affects businesses is the annual allowance on pension contributions for tax benefits. According to amendments that came into force on April 6, 2016, the government introduced the concept of the tapered annual allowance, wherein individuals or business owners with threshold income higher than £110,000 and adjusted income exceeding £150,000 are affected by tapered annual allowance. The standard annual allowance of £40,000 is reduced by £1 for every £2 of adjusted income more than £150,000. Moreover, the minimum limit of annual allowance stands at £10,000 with adjusted income of £210,000 and above and cannot taper further down, according to the old items in the Finance Bill 2020.
Additionally, according to the treatment of taxes in Finance Bill 2020, if a business enters into insolvency, most of the taxes paid by its employees and customers and temporarily held by the firm, will go to fund public services rather than being paid to other creditors. The Finance Bill 2020 also contains a provision for a reduced capital gains tax of 10%, on the disposal of all or part of a business. The lifetime limit on qualifying gains was also brought down from £10 million to £1 million to provide tax relief to entrepreneurs.
Amendments to the 2019-21 Finance Bill that affect businesses
Finance Bill 2019-21 calls for amendments to some of these items and the addition of new clauses. The changes will have both positive and negative impacts on business owners and have their own benefits and drawbacks.
- Revisions to Threshold Income, Adjusted Income, and Tapered Annual Allowance: First and foremost, the Finance Bill 2019-21 calls for an amendment of threshold income to £200,000 and adjusted income to £240,000. The Bill also proposes for revision of tapered annual allowance from the current £10,000 to a minimum of £4,000.
- Taxation of Coronavirus Support Scheme Payments: The Finance Bill 2019-21 requests addition of a new clause related to the grants issued to support businesses and employers during COVID-19. The new provision states that any payments made under the support schemes, including the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, Self-Employment Income Support Scheme, Coronavirus Statutory Sick Pay rebate Scheme, and others, will be considered as taxable income. Such grants will be included as revenue for income tax and other tax purposes. The new clause and new Schedule also give HMRC the powers to recover payments from businesses that received the grants that they were not entitled to, by imposing a 100% tax charge.
- Interest on Unpaid Tax In Case of National Disaster: The new clause 23 of Finance Bill 2019-21 amends Section 135 of the Finance Act 2008 regarding interest on unpaid tax during disasters of national significance. The clause allows HMRC to define which tax payments deferred during national emergency situations will not attract interest or surcharges. The new clause comes in support of the government’s announcement of deferral of traders’ VAT until the end of the financial year. Such changes made in direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic will begin to fall under Section 135 of the Finance Act and will allow for interest-free deferrals of sums due to HMRC. The section can also be applied retrospectively and will enable HMRC to disapply interests and surcharges for the periods impacted by the coronavirus.
- Tax in Insolvency: The Finance Bill 2019-21 also calls for the amendment of Section 386 of Finance Bill 2020 referring to businesses entering insolvency. The change will alter the status of HMRC in insolvency proceedings, move it up the creditor hierarchy, and make it a secondary preferential creditor instead of an unsecured creditor. The amendment will ensure more of the taxes paid in good faith go to public services rather than other creditors and banks.
As a bottom line, the Finance Bill 2019-21 focuses on amending the rules and regulations in line with the current economic circumstances owing to the coronavirus pandemic. The changes will lead to a few benefits to the business owners, including modifications to threshold income and tapered annual allowance or deferral of interest on unpaid taxes and surcharges. However, the amendment also supports the UK government and ensures that the support payments made by the government during the COVID-19 pandemic are fair, taxable, and rightful.

























































The Structural Changes in a Post-Pandemic Global Finance
By Chan Kung and Wei Hongxu
In many ways, COVID-19 has had a huge impact on the world. Under the presence of increased global trade frictions and the unfolding of anti-globalization, countries are beginning to see large changes in their economy and society, with the impact of the pandemic exceeding that of other general infectious diseases. The havoc that it wreaked and the prevention-control efforts made towards the global economy will go down as one of the most historical moments in life, with many believing that the damage caused to be comparable to that of the Great Depression. It not only disrupted economic growth, but posed numerous long-term effects to global trade, finance, and industrial chains too.
The question is, how does the economic depression affect the world? ANBOUND’s chief researcher Chan Kung believes the main structural impact lies in the financial sector. In order to cope with the pandemic, major global economies have adopted unique policies, some even with unlimited easing means to stimulate the financial market and real economy to cope with COVID-19 on many levels. That said, the financial market itself has experienced numerous violent fluctuations as the pandemic spread. Stock markets saw never-before-seen declines with abysmal rate of recovery and these changes accelerate the global monetary environment’s evolution and the laws of financial markets.
On one end, the series of derivative impacts of the pandemic has caused the real economy and financial system to become more independent of each other. When the pandemic triggered a large-scale economic contraction and an “economic depression”, the divergence between financial markets and the real economy became more apparent too. International organizations including the IMF and the World Bank, official agencies of the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the Federal Reserve, and other major research institutions and investment banks worldwide believe the world is now in a state of “economic depression”, and warns that the full extent of the economic downturn’s effects have yet to be realized. Ironically though, the financial market, backed by sky-high liquidity, has moved to a “bull market” amidst the depression following its fall in March, while Wall Street stock markets have experienced a surge in record as well. This reflects the increasing divergence between the financial system and the real economy after the 2008 financial crisis. The super loose monetary environment has pushed asset price bubbles up and formed a relatively independent self-circulation, while the financial system gains more significance in the economy.
On the other, policy influence on the financial market has become greater, and conversely, the market’s own regulatory role will become weaker as the central bank enters the market. Currently, central banks in various countries purchase assets in the financial market on the grounds of promoting “monetary easing”, which has the effect of easing the liquidity crisis and prevent the financial market from collapsing. However, with the market value dwindling and the mentality of survival of the fittest no longer favored, financial market participants will seek out new asset valuation, pricing models, and new asset allocation tools. Specifically, the rise of the stock market has clearly departed from the past value theory, and it is more of a post-excess liquidity bubble. The reason for that is not the way assets are priced, but that the “asset shortages” supported by endless funding sources has stirred an imbalance between supply and demand. Funding support are reliant on having more needs, while price is a tool for capital allocation, yet it is only a classification tool for stock assets. The market does not look at the performance of listed companies, but rather the momentum. If any, during a time of crisis, the bull market is proof of an economic depression.
The pandemic has caused the current global monetary system to experience topsy-turvy changes. The negative interest rate or zero interest rate monetary environment brought by the super easing policy has been further “popularized”, and its long-term effect on the economy has become more unpredictable. Both Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and the People’s Bank of China Governor Yi Gang said the stimulus plan always has an “exit” problem, but the current monetary easing exit is becoming more of a challenge, although one might argue that “borrowing to repay” is completely justified. Countries around the world, including the United States, have yet to find an answer to the “exit”. The “living within one’s means” financial theory has given way to “soft currency economics.” The world’s monetary system based on sovereign credit has changed, and the central bank’s monetary policy will slowly become ineffective in the future.
The practice of stimulus policies in countries in a pandemic-affected world shows the credit and monetary system that supports the global economy is facing theoretical and practical challenges. Unorthodox monetary theories are becoming a norm. The relationship between debt, deficit, and inflation has seen many unique changes, making traditional monetary and financial theories increasingly difficult to explain and be applied. The soft currency economics represented by modern currency theory is not a mainstream currency theory, and is even considered by many economists to be a “heresy.” However, the current pandemic has produced large amounts of money, which is equivalent to locking in reality. Central banks everywhere have adopted more realistic policy choices, provided they can stabilize the market.
All in all, it can be surmised that the impact of the pandemic is concentrated in the financial sector. It has not only changed the financial market itself, but the monetary and financial theory system too. Therefore, the structural impact caused by COVID-19 and future finance are no longer as we know it.
Final analysis conclusion:
The changes caused by COVID-19 towards the global economy and society possess structural and long-term characteristics, and it is mainly centered in the financial sector. Such “virtual” economic field is not only growing in size, it is also changing the very foundation and internal laws as we know it, no thanks to the pandemic.
About the Authors