Home Blog Page 78

6 Reasons Why a Business Should Use Solar Energy

Today, environmental responsibility and long-term cost savings are no longer optional but essential; forward-thinking businesses are re-evaluating how they consume energy. One solution continues to rise above the rest: solar energy. Once considered a niche investment, solar power has now become a strategic imperative for enterprises across industries.

As industrial hubs expand and energy demands surge, relying solely on conventional power sources is no longer sustainable. Instead, businesses are increasingly opting to deploy solar systems and supporting electrical instruments that enable self-sufficient energy operations. For organisations committed to growth, resilience, and sustainability, the case for incorporating solar energy has never been stronger.

Cost Efficiency and Long-term Savings

One of the key reasons businesses adopt solar energy is to lower their expenses. With rising electricity tariffs, the operational burden on enterprises continues to escalate. Solar installations, though initially capital-intensive, offer remarkable long-term savings. Once installed, solar panels produce energy at virtually zero marginal cost. 

Energy Independence and Reliability

Relying solely on grid power often exposes businesses to energy price volatility and unexpected downtime. Employing solar energy systems reduces this dependency by enabling partial or complete off-grid operations. This is particularly advantageous for industrial plants and critical infrastructure where uninterrupted power is vital. With the integration of energy storage devices and smart control instruments, businesses can optimise usage and ensure consistent energy availability.

Sustainability and Brand Perception

Modern consumers are increasingly inclined toward supporting environmentally responsible companies. Using solar energy not only helps companies reduce their carbon footprint but also reflects a true commitment to sustainable practices. This can significantly enhance brand perception and customer loyalty. 

Regulatory Compliance and Incentives

Governments globally are strengthening energy regulations and offering a range of incentives to encourage the adoption of renewable energy sources. In India, schemes such as the Accelerated Depreciation Benefit and subsidies through MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy) encourage businesses to adopt solar energy solutions. These schemes not only make solar systems more accessible but also improve a company’s compliance profile.

Moreover, integrating solar energy aligns with many ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) frameworks that are increasingly being used by investors to evaluate corporate performance. 

Scalable and Low-maintenance Technology

Modern solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are designed to be modular and can easily be scaled to accommodate different energy demands. Whether a business is small-scale or enterprise-level, it can deploy solar panels and associated electrical equipment in a phased or full-scale manner. Furthermore, solar systems have minimal moving parts, making them highly durable and low on maintenance. 

Data-driven Energy Management

Integrating solar energy systems with smart meters, inverters, and monitoring tools allows for the collection and analysis of real-time data. Businesses can now employ advanced analytical tools to track energy consumption, optimise load distribution, and forecast demand patterns. This data-driven approach not only ensures energy efficiency but also enables businesses to detect faults and deploy preventive maintenance measures swiftly.

Why Partnering with a Reputed Electrical Brand Matters?

While the shift to solar energy offers undeniable advantages, the quality of installation and equipment plays a pivotal role in determining long-term success. Collaborating with a reputed electrical brand ensures access to high-grade materials, compliance with international safety standards, and precision in system deployment. Trusted brands also offer after-sales support, periodic maintenance, and advanced diagnostic tools, which are critical for seamless operation.

Moreover, these brands bring years of technical expertise, helping businesses customise solutions that are scalable, future-proof, and tailored to specific industrial needs. By choosing to work with a reputable name, companies significantly reduce the risk of technical failures and regulatory lapses.

New Research Shows How to Seize Hybrid Advantage for Business Growth

By Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

The way we work has been fundamentally reshaped, and there’s no turning back the clock. Hybrid work, once a makeshift response to crisis, now stands as a formidable operating model, ready to unleash significant value for those organizations bold enough to embrace it with strategic rigor, according to a new analysis of hybrid work best practices from International Workplace Group (IWG).

Beyond the Hype: The Real, Compelling Case for Hybrid Work

The data compellingly supports the shift to hybrid models. Groundbreaking studies from institutions like Stanford University and the University of Chicago, alongside research from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, reveal a powerful narrative: organizations see reduced turnover, uplifted morale, deeper employee engagement, enhanced work-life balance, and remarkably, sustained gains in productivity when their people can work from home for significant periods. What fuels this surge? It’s the confluence of fewer unscheduled interruptions, the liberty for individuals to align demanding tasks with their personal peak-focus hours, and the elimination of soul-crushing commutes that once drained precious energy before the workday even commenced. This isn’t just a perk; it’s a profound enhancement of the human capacity to perform.

Recruitment dynamics have also been irrevocably altered. Employers who embrace hybrid work are no longer tethered to high-cost city centers, allowing them to tap into far broader and more diverse talent pools while keeping compensation competitive. The alternative, clinging to outdated notions that equate physical presence with commitment, is a fast track to a structural talent deficit. Today’s high performers, especially, weigh flexibility heavily, comparing opportunities across diverse sectors, not just within their own. If a banking analyst faces a five-day commute at a legacy firm versus a two-day office rhythm at a fintech, the financial premium required to retain that analyst can quickly become unsustainable. Furthermore, hybrid work dramatically expands an organization’s “idea surface area,” fostering unexpected and rapid innovation as people from different regions connect and trade early concepts in shared digital spaces. Companies that grasp this, treating location flexibility as a potent lever for enduring advantage, will undoubtedly set the competitive pace for the next decade.

Building Your Fortress of Flexibility: Principles and Infrastructure

To transform flexibility from a haphazard arrangement into a disciplined operating system, a robust hybrid strategy must stand on clear principles and be supported by thoughtfully engineered infrastructure. Three core principles form the bedrock: establishing unambiguous company guardrails, reserving genuine autonomy for teams to design their work patterns, and crucially, replacing outdated assumptions with verifiable, performance-based results. This means headquarters defines the non-negotiables—security protocols, regulatory compliance, customer coverage windows, and essential safety limits. Within this robust framework, each team gains the power to choose a cadence that genuinely fits its unique workflow and objectives. Imagine a marketing group converging on Tuesdays and Thursdays for high-energy storyboarding sessions, while a research lab blocks three consecutive days onsite for complex experiments. This local choice fuels ownership and ensures schedules align with real tasks, not archaic traditions.

This employee-centered approach thrives on continuous feedback. Quarterly five-minute pulse surveys can uncover where staff work best, which rituals feel redundant, and what tools would genuinely sharpen their focus. Sharing these anonymized results transparently, perhaps as heat maps and concise action lists on an intranet, demonstrates that leadership is actively listening and responsive. This public data also effectively curbs debates based on mere anecdotes, forcing any argument for a blanket policy to confront company-wide evidence. Performance, not mere presence, becomes the currency of success. Time-in-seat is retired as a proxy for contribution; instead, teams post measurable indicators—like code merged, proposal cycle times, or customer satisfaction deltas—on dynamic, living dashboards. This focus on outcomes is exemplified by companies like Ancestry.com, which empowered individual teams to determine their optimal blend of in-office and remote work based on strategic goals, leading to enhanced team satisfaction and productivity.

The foundational infrastructure for this dynamic model is a fusion of digital tools and intelligently designed physical space. At its heart lies a unified collaboration suite, seamlessly blending persistent chat, asynchronous video messaging, and Kanban-style project boards into a single, searchable workspace. To ensure every meeting, regardless of participant location, is an equitable experience, shared rooms are outfitted with high-definition audio-visual kits, including auto-tracking cameras and beam-forming microphones, all easily launched with a single touch.

Recognizing the home office as a vital extension of corporate real estate, leading organizations provide substantial stipends for ergonomic setups and annual refreshes to maintain comfort and bandwidth. This comprehensive approach, as demonstrated by HP’s commitment to providing consistent, high-quality technology across home and office environments, significantly reduces friction and makes hybrid work both effective and widely accepted. Physical headquarters transform into collaboration hubs, featuring bookable project studios, sound-insulated focus pods, and café-style social zones that catalyze informal brainstorming and relationship building.

Co-working spaces provide a third venue for effective flexibility. Hybrid work succeeds when employees can choose a professional workspace minutes from their front door, with IWG a great example of a service provider in this space. It operates more than 4,000 flexible offices across 120 countries, giving companies an instant, global infrastructure that lets staff work locally without lengthy commutes. Mark Dixon, IWG’s founder and CEO, explains, “Employees want to continue with the reduced commute and increased family time they have experienced, choosing a work base closer to home rather than enduring time‑consuming trips to a central HQ.”

Powering Progress: People, Culture, and Continuous Evolution in the Hybrid Age

A truly successful hybrid model extends beyond physical spaces and digital tools; it requires a sophisticated architecture of people systems, a vibrant culture of collaboration, and an unwavering commitment to continuous evolution. This begins with role-based flexibility tiers that logically tie location expectations to the nature of the work itself, not arbitrary managerial preferences. For instance, lab technicians needing specialized equipment might be primarily onsite, while product designers alternate home and office days to balance focused individual tasks with collaborative ideation. Clear “core hours” ensure availability for essential real-time decision-making, complemented by explicit response-time guidelines for communication outside this window. Designing these policies is a collaborative effort, involving cross-functional working groups, employee surveys, and pilot programs to test and refine approaches before a full rollout. Paychex, for example, actively sought employee input to co-design its hybrid model, fostering buy-in by emphasizing “presence with purpose” and exploring flexible options that respect both company goals and worker well-being.

Nurturing a hybrid culture demands clear, predictable communication norms. Teams should default to concise written updates, reserving meetings strictly for discussion and decisions, capped at sensible lengths to prevent video fatigue. Simple status indicators, like an emoji system for availability, can eliminate disruptive “got a sec?” pings that shatter concentration. Belonging and trust are cultivated through intentional, lightweight rituals: virtual coworking rooms, one-page “user manuals” outlining working preferences, and opt-in social channels that allow personalities to surface organically. Cambia Health Solutions provides an excellent example by encouraging teams to use office time intentionally for activities best done together, like strategic planning, while also promoting inclusive practices to ensure all voices, even quieter ones, are heard. Leadership and management training become paramount, focusing on facilitating mixed-presence meetings as interactive workshops, overcoming proximity bias, and shifting coaching conversations from surveillance to unlocking potential.

Continuous learning and development are woven into the fabric of this evolving ecosystem. Newcomers might be matched with both functional and cross-disciplinary mentors, fostering a 360-degree learning loop. Atlassian, with its “Team Anywhere” strategy, invests in structured in-person “Team Gatherings” to deliberately foster connection and support learning, recognizing that optional office attendance alone isn’t sufficient. Artificial intelligence emerges as a powerful magnifier of every hybrid worker’s reach, automating routine tasks like meeting summaries and action item generation, and personalizing support at scale. This allows strategic decision-makers to leverage AI for scenario planning, simulating the impact of different hybrid configurations on costs, retention, and even emissions. Finally, robust measurement underpins accountability. Key performance indicators such as voluntary turnover, productivity per full-time equivalent, employee Net Promoter Score, collaboration density, and an aggregate wellbeing index provide a clear view of operational health. This data, combined with regular “hybrid experience” microsurveys and a scientific cadence of piloting, analyzing, and scaling changes, ensures the model doesn’t fossilize but continually adapts and improves.

Conclusion

The journey to a high-performing hybrid work model is not a tentative step but a decisive stride towards a more agile, resilient, and talent-rich future. It moves from an abstract aspiration to a disciplined system through distinct phases: discovery grounds decisions in data, strategy design converts insights into actionable policies and metrics, piloting tests assumptions in a controlled manner, scaling spreads proven practices, and sustainment weaves these new norms into the very DNA of the company. By embracing this comprehensive approach, you treat flexibility as an engine of measurable value—unlocking higher retention, accelerating innovation, and optimizing costs. Leaders who adopt this playbook build organizations poised to outperform rivals and offer a work arrangement that masterfully aligns personal autonomy with clear, verifiable accountability, setting the stage for enduring success in the dynamic decade ahead.

About the Author

Dr. Gleb TsipurskyDr. Gleb Tsipursky was named “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with hybrid work and Generative AI. He serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his two most recent ones are Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams and ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI. His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles in prominent venues such as Harvard Business ReviewFortune, and Fast Company. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox and over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist at UNC-Chapel Hill and Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

How Middle Powers Like Kazakhstan are Rewriting the FDI Playbook

It is not a secret that global growth is stalling, geopolitical fragmentation is accelerating, and multilateralism is under strain. In this situation, the role of mid-sized economies – or “middle powers” – in shaping the future of foreign direct investment (FDI) is gaining renewed significance. This dynamic is especially visible in Central Asia, a region increasingly at the crossroads of global trade and energy transition. At the recent meeting of Kazakhstan’s Foreign Investors’ Council (FIC) in Astana, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev offered a compelling case for how emerging powers can remain attractive to international investors by building trust through structural credibility, legal predictability, and strategic alignment with global trends.

Kazakhstan is far from the only country attempting this. But its model, anchored in institutional reform, geographic leverage, and digital ambition, offers instructive lessons for other emerging markets.

Reform Agenda Tailored to Investor Confidence

Despite rising global uncertainty, developing economies can still demonstrate resilience through intentional reform. Tokayev noted that Kazakhstan’s GDP grew by 6% in the first five months of 2025, led by transport, logistics, construction, trade, and processing industry. He emphasized that this growth is being underpinned not only by natural resource wealth, but by policy choices designed to improve the country’s investment ecosystem.

Among these is the establishment of an “Investment Headquarters,” a rapid-response mechanism that has already resolved issues surrounding 137 projects worth $70 billion, while helping initiate 140 legislative amendments to remove systemic investor barriers. In parallel, the introduction of a “prosecutor’s filter,” which prevents inspections, lawsuits, or penalties on investors without prior approval from the Prosecutor General’s Office, sends a message that legal stability and investor protection are central to the country’s development strategy.

As multilateral investment treaties face political backlash and global FDI becomes more selective, countries like Kazakhstan must compete on institutional predictability. The state must be seen not only as a regulator, but as a partner in investment.

Critical Minerals and Strategic Geography

Yet institutional reform alone is not enough. Kazakhstan’s geographic positioning, as a key junction on the Eurasian landmass and a core component of the emerging Middle Corridor, gives it leverage in the ongoing reconfiguration of global supply chains.

Kazakhstan is also betting big on its role in the critical minerals race. With a rich subsoil resource base, transparent subsoil legislation, and a new tax code designed to incentivize in-country processing, the country is positioning itself as a credible value chain. Tokayev’s remarks highlighted active cooperation with global mining giants such as Rio Tinto, Fortescue, Ivanhoe, First Quantum, and Glencore, whose CEO, Gary Nagle, met with the President on the sidelines to discuss new joint ventures.

Kazakhstan’s massive infrastructure modernisation plan aims to reinforce its role as a strategic transit hub linking Europe and Asia. By 2029, the country plans to reconstruct 11,000 kilometres of existing railways and lay an additional 5,000 kilometres of new highways. This year, 830 kilometres of new railway track will be launched along the Dostyk–Moiynty route, two years ahead of schedule, a move expected to increase corridor capacity fivefold. Other similarly ambitious infrastructure projects are on the way.

In the context of today’s global trade politics, Kazakhstan’s physical infrastructure may become as valuable as its natural one.

Digital Ambition in the Age of Crypto

While much attention has focused on Kazakhstan’s traditional strengths in mining and energy, Tokayev used the FIC meeting to signal that the next frontier lies in digital sovereignty, artificial intelligence, and fintech innovation.

Kazakhstan is currently ranked in the top 30 countries in the UN’s global digitalisation index. The number of fintech companies has quadrupled since 2018, with over 4,000 entities, including crypto exchanges and payment providers, now registered at the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC). According to Tokayev, more than 89% of transactions in Kazakhstan are already cashless, and mobile banking has grown by 460% in the last four years.

One of the more intriguing proposals presented at the Council was the development of “CryptoCity” – a pilot zone where cryptocurrencies could be used to purchase goods and services. This experiment, if successful, could place Kazakhstan at the forefront of regulated digital finance innovation among emerging markets.

Tokayev also stressed that AI is now seen as a strategic sector. Here, cooperation with global players is critical. Wabtec, for example, is investing $200 million into Kazakhstan’s rolling stock sector with an eye toward next-generation fuel technologies and digital rail systems.

Global Partnerships and Challenges to Watch

Odile Renaud-Basso, President of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), confirmed that EBRD investments in Kazakhstan tripled in 2024 compared to the previous year, reaching nearly €1 billion. Meanwhile, Citi Bank CEO David Livingstone reiterated the bank’s interest in supporting Kazakhstan’s SME sector, while Philip Morris International’s regional president Marco Mariotti noted the company’s plans to deepen its presence in Kazakhstan’s innovation ecosystem.

These are long-cycle players looking for regulatory trust, infrastructure stability, and alignment with global ESG and digital standards.

That said, Kazakhstan’s reform narrative will only hold if it continues to deliver. Two challenges stand out. First, institutional capacity. While reforms like the prosecutor’s filter and the Investment Headquarters are promising, their long-term effectiveness will depend on implementation at regional and local levels, often the weakest link in emerging economies.

Second, while Kazakhstan has made strides in attracting FDI, the next hurdle is ensuring that capital inflows translate into long-term productivity gains across a broader range of sectors. Moving beyond resource dependency will require stronger SME ecosystems and sustained efforts to build local capacity in high-tech, value-added industries.

Overall, Kazakhstan’s FDI strategy reflects the future of middle power statecraft in an age of fragmentation. Legal reform, supply chain positioning, and digital transformation are being combined into a hybrid investment model that speaks to both current needs and future demands.

For international observers and investors alike, Kazakhstan is an example of how resource-rich states can reimagine their global relevance in the 21st century.

Trump Secures NATO Pledge as Article 5 Support Wavers

NATO leaders pledged on Wednesday to significantly boost defense spending, handing President Donald Trump a political victory at a carefully choreographed summit in the Netherlands.

The agreement to increase defense budgets to 5 percent of GDP by 2035 marked a sharp escalation from the current 2 percent target. Trump, who has long criticized allies for underfunding the alliance, called the commitment “very big news” and a step toward a “very strong” NATO.

But even as leaders moved to meet his demands, Trump reignited doubts about his stance on the alliance’s collective defense clause. Speaking aboard Air Force One before arriving, the U.S. president wavered when asked about Article 5, saying, “It depends on your definition” and adding that he was “committed to being their friends and helping them.”

His comments fueled unease among European allies already wary of Trump’s transactional approach to international partnerships.

The summit’s host, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, sought to downplay the friction. “There is absolute clarity that the United States is totally committed to NATO,” he said. Still, the meeting was visibly shaped around keeping Trump engaged — from an abbreviated agenda to a shortened final communiqué stripped of language that might provoke him.

Trump met briefly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, though Ukraine’s war with Russia was notably de-emphasized. Rutte, who has known Trump since his days as Dutch prime minister, privately credited him with pushing Europe to invest more in defense. Trump later shared Rutte’s note on social media.

While some leaders privately expressed discomfort with the flattery, few openly challenged the tone. In public, Rutte leaned into the theatrics, backing Trump’s remarks comparing Iran and Israel to brawling children by saying, “Then daddy has to use strong language.”

Despite ongoing skepticism over Trump’s long-term commitment, NATO’s show of unity — however curated — marked a rare moment of alignment between the alliance and a president who once called it “obsolete.”

Related Readings:

Sweden and USA shaking hands for business

NATO-Alliance-1024x761

NATO Commits to Boosting Defence Spending to 5 Percent by 2035

Trump’s Dream of Escalation Dominance: The Israel/US Proxy War for Regime Change in Iran

By Dan Steinbock             

The Israel/US Iran offensive is not about nuclear weapons. It is about Iran’s abundant oil and gas reserves. It is a joint effort to overthrow Iranian leaders to restore pre-1979 rule.                  

After just a month in the office, it was abundantly clear that the Trump administration was seeking expansion in North America, Hemispheric defense across the Americas and spheres-of-influence domination in critical world regions. Funded by America’s ultra-rich financiers, Trump’s cabinet was transactional, yet constrained by interventionist neoconservative ideologues.

At the time, I predicted that “miscalculations could re-inflame Gaza and spark regional escalation via Iran.” That’s where we are now.

President’s Trump’s Iran strikes do mark a turning point in US foreign policy under his leadership. Far from fulfilling his “America First” peace agenda, his administration has now purposely reignited tensions in the region, in its misguided effort at escalation dominance. It is a regime change effort, and Trump has indicated as much.

The deception campaigns          

Not so long ago, President Trump reiterated that Iran will never have nuclear weapons. Yet, according to US intelligence, Iran was up to three years away from being able to produce and deliver a nuclear weapon. So, while Israel built its case for war, the US didn’t buy it. The problem is that Trump did. Hence, his public rebuke of Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence. In the process, a misguided concept of Israel’s national security morphed into an even more twisted view of US national security.

Not so long ago, the Iran-US negotiations still proceeded promisingly. Yet, expectations were revised overnight on Thursday June 12, when the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) claimed Iran wasn’t complying with its nuclear obligations. That triggered a slate of efforts – but mainly diplomatic measures – to restore the UN sanctions on Tehran later this year. Whether intended or not, the phrasing of IAEA’s chief Rafael Grossi was now seized by regime-change afficionados as an excuse for massive military intervention.

Through the process, U.S. diplomacy, including Special Envoy Witkoff’s talks and President Trump’s personal reassurances, served as a bilateral ploy, basically to cover for the Israeli surprise attack. And so it was that on Friday June 13 Israel began a major military operation against Iran.

Building on disinformation, these deception campaigns have reaped extraordinary short-term, but mainly military and tactical benefits.

A second deception campaign ensued on last Thursday, when President Trump said that he will decide whether the US will take military action in the growing Israel-Iran conflict “within two weeks.” Once again, diplomatic efforts served as a ruse for Israel’s military attack in which the US would intervene when necessary.

Building on disinformation, these deception campaigns have reaped extraordinary short-term, but mainly military and tactical benefits. By the same token, they are likely to undermine US’s international credibility for years to come.       

Militarized Objectives                  

There’s a pattern here. In 2012, Karl W. Eikenberry, ex-US ambassador to and commanding general of Afghanistan, warned of “the erosion of appropriate levels of executive, congressional, and media oversight of the American armed forces.” The conclusion of the 35-year army veteran? In the past 50 years, US foreign policy has become “excessively reliant on military power.”

In my book, The Fall of Israel (2025), I show that these trends have got far worse in the past decade. With 800 military bases in almost 90 countries, plus hundreds of such bases within the U.S., America has the biggest collection of military bases occupying foreign lands in history. The military presence abroad seems to correlate with U.S. forces engaging in military conflicts, which lead to more bases, which foster more conflicts.

Stunningly, supported by this global web, the U.S. has been in war, engaged in combat, or has otherwise employed its forces in foreign countries in all but 11 years of its existence. Today the powerful State Department serves effectively as a cover for the Pentagon, ridden by revolving doors with the mighty big defense contractors – the only ones benefiting from these misguided wars.

As former US defense secretary Robert Gates once put it, the US military has more musicians in its marching bands than the State Department has diplomats. The quip is valid. By the early 2020s, the total number of foreign service members from all foreign service agencies was about 15,600. By contrast, the US Department of Defense has over 1.3 million active-duty service members. Adding the reserve military, the figure increases to 2.1 million; and the employees of the US Homeland Security and intelligence community, another 360,000.

Personnel resources of U.S. Military and Diplomacy
Personnel resources of U.S. Military and Diplomacy
Source: Steinbock (2025) The Fall of Israel

Unsurprisingly, these lethal developments in Iran occur against the backdrop of the continuing US/NATO-led proxy war in Ukraine against Russia and Israel’s genocidal atrocities in Gaza and ethnic cleansing in the West Bank.

In the past, military action was the last resort of American diplomacy. Now diplomacy is just a thinly-veiled cover for US military force.

Fragment Iran, restore Shah-like rule, exploit energy reserves  

The ongoing offensive against Iran is a joint US-Israeli effort. Israel’s task has been to “soften” the military targets and initiate regime change operations by “taking down” Iran’s critical infrastructure, nuclear facilities, military and political elites and scientific leaders. The US has fostered these goals by deceptive diplomacy, intelligence, arms transfers and financing.

The ultimate objective is the obliteration of the Iran-led Axis of Resistance in the region. Hence, the Biden and Trump administrations’ tacit acceptance of Israel’s obliteration of Gaza, the destruction of Hezbollah’s footholds in Southern Lebanon, the efforts to rule-and-divide goals in Syria and Iraq, and the bombing of the Houthis in Yemen.

To neoconservative hawks, Iran is the ultimate prize, but a fragmented and balkanized Iran. It is Iraq 2003 déjà vu all over again, as a misrepresentation of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) is portrayed as a raison d’être for a misguided military action against a sovereign state.

The disintegration of Iranian state seeks to undermine all opposition, while paving way to pro-US forces, including the exiled but well-funded Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), which was long on the US terrorist list but is today the neocons’ darling, and Reza Pahlavi, the self-proclaimed Crown Prince of Iran touting the overthrow of the Islamic Republic to restore the pre-1979 status quo ante. In due time, these will be replaced by US proconsuls and compadre rulers.

It is these lucrative resources that have paced the West’s external interventions in the country for a century.

In the White House, regime change in Iran has huge regional economic and geopolitical importance. The Strait of Hormuz, is one of the world’s most important oil chokepoints. Iran is also the OPEC’s fourth-largest crude oil producer and the world’s third-largest dry natural gas producer. Most importantly, it holds some of the world’s largest deposits of proved oil and natural gas reserves. It is these lucrative resources that have paced the West’s external interventions in the country for a century.

End of America as a “neutral broker”

As President Trump recently posted on social media, “if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!”

In the past, military action was the last resort of American diplomacy. Now diplomacy is just a thinly-veiled cover for US military force.

The gloves are off.

In the short term, the Trump administration’s double-game can bring great tactical military benefits. In the long-run, it is undermining US international credibility.

The fantasy of America as a “neutral broker” is now in ashes.

The original version – “Trump’s bunker-busters are just a small part of Israel-US Proxy War for Regime Change in Iran” – was published by TRT Global on June 23, 2025 https://trt.global/world/article/b8452418f65c

About the Author

Dr Dan SteinbockThe author of The Fall of Israel (2025), Dr. Dan Steinbock is an internationally-renowned visionary of the multipolar world and the founder of Difference Group. He has served at the India, China and America Institute (USA), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net

Designers are Using Gen AI to Pilot Production-Level Code

By Dr. Gleb Tsipursky 

At the epicenter of a rapidly transforming work landscape, Upwork has been leading an ambitious integration of generative AI into the heart of its marketplace. Dave Bottoms, GM Marketplace and SVP of Product at Upwork, described in an interview with me the organization’s journey as a decisive response to the disruptive emergence of ChatGPT at the end of 2022. Rather than approaching Gen AI as merely a tactical addition, Upwork saw it as a fundamental driver reshaping both talent productivity and the structure of work itself.

Developers embraced AI tools as productivity enhancers rather than job threats, transforming check-in rates, deployment velocity, and overall cycle times.

The company quickly established Upwork Labs, a dedicated experimental group tasked with identifying and implementing AI across its platform. A key early initiative was an AI-driven job post generator, a tool that automatically crafted optimized job postings using machine learning models. This innovation dramatically accelerated the hiring process by simplifying job post creation and enhancing discoverability, reflecting Upwork’s broader philosophy: use AI to eliminate friction without undermining the human element.

Internally, the Upwork engineering teams piloted GitHub Copilot to boost productivity, initially focusing on zero-to-one projects with minimal interdependencies. Over eighteen months, this cautious experimentation blossomed into adoption across nearly all teams. Developers embraced AI tools as productivity enhancers rather than job threats, transforming check-in rates, deployment velocity, and overall cycle times. Daily deployments, once an aspiration, became the new standard, improving scalability, reliability, and bug rates across the board.

Designers Step Into Production with Gen AI

Perhaps the most surprising development, Bottoms noted, is that designers—not just engineers—have begun producing production-level code through Gen AI tools. Upwork’s design teams, rooted in platforms like Figma, are now leveraging emerging features such as Dev Mode to export high-fidelity prototypes directly into code ready for deployment. This leap represents a fundamental shift: designers are no longer merely suggesting user experiences; they are building them.

The rise of this capability signals a profound evolution in the role of design. Traditionally, wireframes and mockups were translated into specifications that engineers would interpret. Now, designers can rapidly test, validate, and implement ideas without the intermediary step, dramatically accelerating product iteration cycles. The impact on productivity and creative agility is striking, with designers engaging in a level of technical execution previously reserved for engineers.

Alongside designers, product managers at Upwork are also experimenting with Gen AI to prototype and validate concepts faster than ever. The tools available today allow product thinkers to move from an idea to a functional demonstration in record time, setting a new tempo for innovation across the organization.

Balancing Productivity Gains with Workforce Anxiety

Despite the clear productivity advantages, Upwork acknowledges the anxiety that Gen AI adoption stirs among both internal teams and freelance talent on its platform. Developers initially worried about displacement are now largely reassured given Upwork’s focus on AI as a companion, not a competitor. True value remains rooted in understanding customer pain points, system architecture, and the nuanced application of technology—skills that no AI has yet mastered independently.

Among Upwork freelancers, similar shifts are underway. Categories like writing and translation have seen changes in human demand, as AI tools have automated many basic tasks. However, new opportunities have risen for those willing to adapt. Instead of straightforward translation, the platform now sees demand for local language experts who can fine-tune AI outputs to ensure cultural and linguistic authenticity. In writing, the emphasis is shifting toward editorial oversight, quality assurance, and SEO refinement rather than original content creation alone.

True value remains rooted in understanding customer pain points, system architecture, and the nuanced application of technology—skills that no AI has yet mastered independently.

Bottoms emphasized that freelancers who master AI-enhanced workflows are not just surviving; they are thriving. They move up the value chain by increasing their project volume and ensuring higher-quality outcomes. In a sense, AI has expanded the definition of expertise itself, rewarding those who can both collaborate with machines and provide human judgment where it still matters most.

Charting a Future of Humans Plus AI

Looking ahead, Upwork’s vision is clear: the next three to five years will be defined by a powerful synergy between humans and AI. Upwork’s mindful AI, Uma,  already powers smarter client-freelancer matching. But the ambitions go further. Bottoms envisions a future where not just humans, but agentic AI entities operate within the marketplace, acting on behalf of clients and freelancers alike.

Clients might one day deploy AI agents to search for talent, review freelancer proposals, and even collaborate on project management. Freelancers could have AI assistants finding jobs, preparing applications, and managing client communications. Upwork’s two-sided marketplace is poised to evolve into a richer, more complex ecosystem that remains deeply human but vastly more efficient.

Through it all, Upwork’s commitment to responsible AI use remains paramount. Rather than replacing humans, the company is empowering individuals to become more capable, more productive, and more valuable. As designers push into coding, as engineers deploy daily, and as product teams innovate faster than ever, one truth is emerging unmistakably: Gen AI is not just enhancing work at Upwork; it is fundamentally redefining it.

About the Author

Dr. Gleb TsipurskyDr. Gleb Tsipursky was named “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with hybrid work and Generative AI. He serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his two most recent ones are Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams and ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI. His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles in prominent venues such as Harvard Business ReviewFortune, and Fast Company. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox and over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist at UNC-Chapel Hill and Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

NATO Commits to Boosting Defence Spending to 5 Percent by 2035

NATO leaders have pledged to increase defence spending to 5 percent of their nations’ economic output by 2035, a significant shift driven in part by pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump.

The agreement, reached Wednesday at a summit in The Hague, was described by Trump as a “big win for Europe and Western civilisation.” It marks the alliance’s most ambitious financial commitment in decades.

In a joint statement, leaders cited the “profound” threats posed by Russia and terrorism, reaffirming their shared responsibility under NATO’s collective defence clause. However, unlike last year’s declaration, the final document did not directly condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“This is a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance that our leaders have begun to build,” said NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. He stressed that the pact sends a clear signal of resolve in the face of growing global tensions.

The plan requires allies to devote at least 3.5 percent of their GDP to core military spending, with an additional 1.5 percent set aside for investments linked to security infrastructure. Trump, attending his first NATO summit since 2019, called the move a “big success.”

While most leaders endorsed the shift, the proposal drew criticism from some quarters. French President Emmanuel Macron questioned Trump’s simultaneous support for higher spending and tariff disputes within the alliance, calling it contradictory. Spain and Belgium also voiced concerns over the financial targets, though they ultimately signed on to the agreement.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the spending hike represents a milestone for NATO unity. “We live in a very volatile world and today is about the strength of our alliance,” he said.

Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines and acknowledged that efforts to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine remained challenging. He hinted at possible increases in U.S. support, including more air defence systems.

Despite some internal friction, NATO members emerged from the summit with a renewed commitment to collective security and support for Ukraine. The defence investment pledge, while controversial, marks a turning point in the alliance’s strategic posture.

Related Readings:

NATO-Alliance-1024x761

Sweden and USA shaking hands for business

threat to ukraine

Flexibility Requires Mentoring Managers Well

By Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

As companies rush to recalibrate workplace expectations in the wake of a more distributed workforce, one truth continues to crystallize: flexibility without leadership development is just chaos with good intentions. At ScienceSoft, a US-based software development company with an international presence, Head of PMO Pavel Ilyusenko understands that the success of hybrid and remote work hinges not only on strategy, but on skilled execution—particularly from the managers steering dispersed teams.

While much of the conversation surrounding flexible work revolves around where people work, Ilyusenko shifted the focus to how managers work in our interview. From his perspective, nurturing high performance in a flexible environment means cultivating a new breed of manager—one who mentors, guides, and supports teams without defaulting to micromanagement. In his words, “In remote work, the role of PM becomes the critical one.”

Building a Culture Without Walls

The company leans into a hybrid model that empowers employees to work remotely when they need deep focus, or to come into the office for collaboration and meetings.

ScienceSoft’s approach to flexible work is far from tentative. The company leans into a hybrid model that empowers employees to work remotely when they need deep focus, or to come into the office for collaboration and meetings. Some team members, particularly those in nearshore and offshore locations, work fully remotely. The decision to adopt such a strategy is not about reacting to trends but rather aligning with the way software engineers actually do their best work.

“The hybrid model supports those needs by giving engineers control over their environment,” Ilyusenko explains. “It helps attract talent regardless of location and scale engineering teams more efficiently.” The result is a workforce that stretches across borders without losing cohesion or culture.

This cohesion, he emphasizes, is achieved through deliberate and frequent communication. The company uses familiar digital tools—Microsoft Teams, Asana, Jira, Confluence—but the real driver of success lies in how those tools are used. “It’s all about not the tools, but the approach that we cultivate within the teams,” he says. Team-building events, regular meetings, and a culture of open communication are baked into the daily workflow, not bolted on as an afterthought.

Mentoring as a Management Mandate

But flexible work, by its very nature, can blur accountability, fracture culture, and erode alignment if left unmanaged. That’s where leadership development becomes not a luxury but a necessity. ScienceSoft’s leadership understood early that success in a remote or hybrid model requires more than process—it demands mentoring.

“We pay more attention to mentoring and professional development of our project managers,” Ilyusenko says. Managers are not just expected to keep projects on track; they’re coached to lead without resorting to top-down oversight. This means building trust, giving autonomy, and staying closely attuned to both team performance and individual needs.

Mentorship isn’t left to chance. It is tracked, assessed, and fine-tuned through a combination of hard metrics and human feedback. Project outcomes such as delivery timelines, adherence to budget, and defect rates are monitored alongside client satisfaction scores like NPS and CSAT. But these metrics are enriched by softer indicators—direct feedback from team members about their managers, insights into leadership development, and even conversations with clients about improvement opportunities.

The result is a feedback loop that supports continuous growth, both for the manager and their team. Ilyusenko’s team doesn’t rely solely on performance data to evaluate effectiveness; they triangulate it with human insight. “We measure their success by gathering feedback from their teams and tracking their growth and leadership skills,” he says.

Turning Consistency into Competitive Advantage

One of the less obvious but more critical challenges in a hybrid environment is the consistency of execution across geographies and roles. ScienceSoft confronts this by standardizing its project management processes across the company, ensuring that no matter where employees are located, the way they approach and complete projects remains uniform.

One of the less obvious but more critical challenges in a hybrid environment is the consistency of execution across geographies and roles.

This consistency creates what Ilyusenko calls “virtual rooms”—cohesive digital workspaces where teams can collaborate seamlessly. Whether an employee is logging in from a home office in Europe or joining a stand-up from a coworking space in North America, they’re operating within the same structure, guided by the same expectations, and supported by managers trained to lead under flexible conditions.

The emphasis on process discipline doesn’t constrain innovation—it protects it. By removing ambiguity from the workflow, ScienceSoft allows teams to focus on problem-solving and delivery rather than coordination and confusion.

The Steady Future of Flexible Work

While other organizations oscillate between in-office mandates and fully remote experiments, ScienceSoft’s path forward is measured and steady. “I would say that things will remain pretty much the same,” Ilyusenko reflects. “Expanding the workforce will require not only local people to be involved, but also people from all over the world.”

This is not inertia—it’s intentionality. By resisting the urge to overcorrect or chase the next big thing in workplace design, ScienceSoft anchors its remote and hybrid strategy in what works: flexibility, communication, mentoring, and consistency. Its bet is that a well-led team, empowered by choice and supported by strong processes, will outperform even the most closely monitored in-office staff.

As companies across sectors continue to navigate the complexity of flexible work, the lesson from ScienceSoft is clear: adaptability alone is not enough. To truly thrive, flexibility must be matched by mentorship. And that mentorship must begin at the top—with managers who are trained not just to manage tasks, but to develop people.

About the Author

Dr. Gleb TsipurskyDr. Gleb Tsipursky was named “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times for helping leaders overcome frustrations with hybrid work and Generative AI. He serves as the CEO of the future-of-work consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his two most recent ones are Returning to the Office and Leading Hybrid and Remote Teams and ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI. His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles in prominent venues such as Harvard Business ReviewFortune, and Fast Company. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox and over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist at UNC-Chapel Hill and Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

Digital Justice is Not a Fantasy: A Journey Into the Future with Elias Carter, Architect of Algorithmic Fairness

By Emma Lockhart

We meet in transit. Wrocław Główny, car 12. Amid the noise of the railway station, the smell of takeaway coffee, and loudspeaker announcements, our conversation begins with a pause. This interview wasn’t meant to take place in a studio — and that was the point.

“I no longer live by a corporate schedule,” says Elias Carter shortly after he sits down across from me. He’s wearing blue geometric glasses. He smells like green tea and microprocessors.

Once the lead machine learning architect at Tamga, Carter is now an independent researcher in algorithmic ethics, a digital rights consultant, and a vocal critic of corporate AI maximalism. We talk about the past and future of fintech — and about the people he’s still trying to help through technology.

Journalist: Elias, you spent nearly six years inside Tamga. Now you’re on the outside. What exactly were you doing there — and why did it matter?

Elias Carter: In short — we were building an exoskeleton for the financial sector. Not for banks — for people. Tamga wasn’t just another fintech startup. It was an engineering lab for justice. Imagine being denied a loan just because you don’t own property in a capital city or don’t have a traditional full-time job. We operated from a different philosophy: what if it’s more important that you reliably pay for parking every month than where you were born?

Journalist: You’re talking about those 1,500 “nontraditional” variables?

Elias: Exactly. We trained our system to think differently. It wasn’t just about credit history. It included educational paths, behavioral patterns, whether you have a driver’s license, or even how often you update your operating system. We were building a digital portrait that reflected reliability as a behavioral constant — not just financial solvency.

Journalist: So it wasn’t just about making loans more accessible?

Elias: No. It was about justice. Tamga became something like Google Translate for the banking system. We translated sentences like “I always pay my debts, but the system won’t let me in” into a language the algorithm could understand. Without that translation, many people simply had no chance.

When a neural network learns empathy

Journalist: Tell me about Scorector. Is it really like GPS for your credit life?

Elias: That’s one way to put it. Scorector is a kind of credit therapist. It doesn’t just assess — it educates. “Here’s where you slipped, here’s how to fix it.” We built an algorithm that evolved from observer to mentor. It can tell you: “Pay off this debt first, wait 60 days before taking a new loan — and your score will improve by 15 points.”

Journalist: And it actually works?

Elias: More than you’d think. Over 10,000 users have already improved their credit scores. For some, that meant their first-ever decent loan, their first business, their first mortgage. These aren’t just numbers. It’s a real, living economy of small victories.

Szybka Gotówka and the phenomenon of lightning-fast lending

Journalist: What about Szybka Gotówka? That’s more than just a lending platform, right?

Elias: It’s like Tesla on steroids — but for credit. Fifteen minutes from application to payout. But the magic isn’t in the speed. It’s in the understanding. The model runs on 1,500 behavioral and social variables. We’re not guessing who will repay — we know. And we don’t exclude people based on stereotypes.

A freelancer, a taxi driver, a blogger — a traditional bank says “too unstable.” Our model says: “They’ve paid rent on time for 36 months, work with verified clients, and their cash flow is steady. They’re reliable.” This isn’t an alternative. It’s a new moral architecture for finance.

Journalist: But all of this rests on machine decisions. What if they’re wrong?

Elias: And humans don’t make mistakes?

Szybka Gotówka is a system that learns. It has analyzed hundreds of thousands of repayment scenarios.

The result?

  • Over 1 million loans issued
  • 85% fully automated
  • Zero paperwork
  • And most importantly: no discrimination based on origin, address, or employment type

An ecosystem of trust

Journalist: But how did you make money from this?

Elias: Tamga didn’t sell loans. We sold fairness infrastructure. Our clients — banks, investment funds, microfinance institutions — paid for access to accurate scoring models. We charged fees on disbursed amounts and license royalties for platform usage.

It wasn’t just a fintech company. It was an institution of trust. Algorithm + ethics + transparency = growth. Everyone won.

Journalist: So, what’s next?

Elias (pauses): More regulation, more data politicization, more demand for transparency. And that’s a good thing. Justice needs both precision and context. I believe the next phase for Tamga — or its ideological successors — is real-time personalized financial navigation.

Imagine your AI assistant saying:

  • “Don’t take a loan now — interest rates will drop in three months.”
  • “This mortgage isn’t favorable. Wait — a better bank offer is coming.”
  • “You can safely borrow if you cut back on subscriptions.”

That’s the intuitive financial interface we should all have. That’s the future we should build.

Living unplugged

Journalist: And what are you doing now?

Elias: Like a disconnected cable from a data center. First — silence. Then — fresh air. I’m reading Umberto Eco and Herbert Marcuse. Growing rosemary. Advising projects that aren’t building yet another AI slot machine but aim to shift the paradigm. The most dangerous illness in fintech is the illusion that scalability equals meaning. I stand for a future where every user is treated not as a data point, but as a person.

Advice to newcomers

Journalist: What advice would you give to those just entering fintech?

Elias: Don’t confuse data with truth. Learn Python, yes — but also study the history of social exclusion. Look beyond APIs — look into the faces of those your models might exclude. Fair fintech isn’t just about algorithms. It’s about building a world where technology amplifies justice instead of replacing it.

Station: Lublin.
Elias Carter stands up, nods lightly, and walks away. On the table, he leaves a business card. It reads only one phrase:

“Justice can be calculated — but only if you choose to want it.”

Epilogue: The Numbers behind the story

As Elias disappears — both literally and metaphorically — I’m left alone in the compartment. But his words linger, like background processes running silently. This wasn’t a typical news piece: there’s no “new feature,” “investment round,” or “market leadership.” This was something else — a story about rethinking the ethics of finance.

I open my laptop and start digging through the numbers. Tamga wasn’t just code and models. It was:

  • Over 1,500 behavioral variables that redefined credit risk
  • 1,000,000+ loans issued, 85% of which were fully automated
  • More than 10,000 users trained by Scorector to understand credit discipline
  • 15 minutes from loan application to money in the account

It wasn’t just about finance. It was about dignity, trust, and the possibility of fairness — coded into the future.

About TAMGA

TAMGA is an international fintech company that develops and delivers technological and marketing solutions for the financial sector.

The company’s mission is to improve financial literacy and make financial products simple and accessible to everyone.

TAMGA promotes the principles of responsible lending. Its consumer credit terms are personalized, helping borrowers avoid over-indebtedness.

The TAMGA lending platform enables banks and financial institutions to tailor their loan offerings in line with internal policies and business needs.
By leveraging rich behavioral data, the platform achieves higher approval rates and lower interest rates while maintaining the same level of credit risk.

TAMGA’s product portfolio includes platforms for automating offline and online lending processes, online user verification and financial profiling services, credit scoring and improvement systems, installment payment solutions, and credit comparison websites.

Stocks Jump, Oil Sinks After Iran’s Missiles Appear to Miss U.S. Targets

Oil prices plunged and U.S. stocks climbed Monday as investors bet that Iran’s missile launches toward American military bases would not escalate into broader conflict.

Crude prices fell sharply after reports suggested the strikes, aimed at sites in Iraq and Qatar, were intercepted. West Texas Intermediate dropped 7.2% to $68.51 a barrel — its steepest single-day fall since early April — pulling oil below $70 for the first time in nearly three weeks. That marks a dramatic reversal from Sunday, when prices surged to nearly $78.

Stocks rebounded on the retreat in energy prices. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 374 points, or 0.89%, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq gained nearly 1% each. Analysts said cooling oil prices reduced fears of inflationary pressure on businesses and consumers.

“The market is reading this as a symbolic strike rather than a serious escalation,” said Kirk Lippold, former U.S. Navy commander. “Each missile carries risk, but Iran’s restraint suggests it’s not looking to prolong the confrontation.”

Investors appear to be hoping this marks the end of Iran’s response to recent U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Officials in Doha were reportedly warned ahead of time about the incoming missiles, which some experts view as an effort to avoid casualties and keep diplomatic options open.

In contrast, Iran previously launched what it described as “hundreds” of missiles at Israel in mid-June, a much larger response to earlier hostilities.

Despite the geopolitical tension, so-called safe-haven assets like gold and government bonds saw little movement. Gold rose just 0.2%, while U.S. Treasury yields dipped slightly. The dollar also slipped 0.3% after rising earlier in the day.

Rapidan Energy’s Bob McNally said markets are waiting for a real supply disruption before pricing in a major oil shock. “We’ve seen many false alarms. Unless Iran actually blocks energy flows, spikes will be short-lived,” he said.

Still, some uncertainty remains. Iran’s state media has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz — a key global oil route — but there’s been no move yet. Traders and analysts say that would be the true trigger for a deeper crisis and higher prices.

For now, Wall Street is cautiously optimistic that the worst may be over — at least for energy markets.

Related Readings:

airstrikes

USA and Iran small flags on burning dark background. Concept of crisis of war and political conflicts between nations.

EDITOR'S PICK OF THE WEEK

CFO's new mandate. CFO explaining the presentation

The Performance and Transformation Orchestrator: The CFO’s New Mandate in the Age of AI

By Terence Tse CFOs are evolving into AI-driven transformation orchestrators, balancing finance, technology, and strategy while upskilling teams, managing risks, and driving measurable business value. A key insight from this year’s AI for CFOs event, organized...

WISE DECISION MAKER GUIDE

POWER INFLUENCERS

Emerging Trends

The Future of Global Trade