As the world advances deep into the 21st Century at the start of the second decade, technology and its practical applications have never been greater. Smartphone technology now acts as a primary human-machine interface between a house and its occupants, virtual reality has been made possible and artificial intelligence has inched ever closer to passing the Turing test with Google Duplex[1].
AI has been around since 1955 and although the practical applications have been somewhat underwhelming, the mathematical aspect of the concept in both theory and practice can aid humans with some of the nosy complex problems around; even the first Logic Theorem succeeded at solving 38 of the 52 theorems in Principia Mathematica.
What About Impractical Applications?
AI is now used to control and manage critical infrastructures such as power plants, traffic systems, and high-level manufacturing as well as everyday usage in video gaming, online chatbots, and self-parking vehicles[2]. But AI has some applications born out of pure mathematical functional requirements that the human brain isn’t capable of calculating at speed, if at all, such as lightning-fast trading on permissionless blockchain platforms like Solanax.
Automated Market Maker
Very precise and fast algorithms that provide liquidity to the exchange, automated market makers (AMMs) have, because of their precision, recently been successful at creating prediction markets such as Facebook sports betting application Yoopick that enabled users to predict plays with far more accuracy than usual[3] as well as demonstrating practical trade applications.
Decentralized Exchange
The rise of cryptocurrency has essentially changed the financial world with hugely successful virtual digital assets like Bitcoin, which achieved prices in excess of $60,000 in April 2021[4] however the currency is now in a deflated state. The decentralized nature of cryptocurrency means that a decentralized exchange (DEX) is necessary for the safe and legal trade of assets, without the need for established banks to play a central role in trading and asset movement.
How AMM DEXs are Being Used Today
AMMs were first used in the 1990s as a way to remove the human element when creating order books that caused issues such as slippage and latency in price discovery on the markets[5], and modern blockchain technology provided by platforms like Ethereum is now being used to facilitate trading transactions on the DEX by AMMs across various platforms.
Solanax in particular allows for permissionless, lightning-fast, low-cost transactions and is expected to replace established blockchain platforms as the new crypto standard for DEX platforms. There are various reasons why Solanax is becoming more popular but primarily that Etehreum is becoming more expensive to use while Solanax is cheaper and faster.
Future Revolution
Real artificial intelligence doesn’t resemble that of Hollywood movies but rather revolves around the concept of machine learning that essentially allows for analysis and decision-making faster than the human brain. Complex mathematical calculations can be made in a split second on the right platform which makes AI useful for such things as trading.
AMMs working on DEX seem to make sense as a concept for quick trading and when applied to blockchain transactions for cryptocurrency it just makes sense. However, established DEX networks such as Ethereum are now beginning to become expensive to use and the technology isn’t as fast as contemporary platforms, but if the future of the markets is cryptocurrency, then the future of crypto is in the hands of cutting-edge platforms like Solanax.
References:
- Dataconomy. Which AI has Come Closest to Passing the Turing Test? https://dataconomy.com/2021/03/which-ai-closest-passing-turing-test/
- Towards Data Science. How Artificial Intelligence Is Impacting Our Everyday Lives. https://towardsdatascience.com/how-artificial-intelligence-is-impacting-our-everyday-lives-eae3b63379e1
- Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. Automated Market Makers That Enable NewSettings. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sandholm/automatedMarketMakersThatEnableNewSettings.AMMA-11.pdf
- CoinDesk. Bitcoin Interactive Graph. https://www.coindesk.com/price/bitcoin
- CoinMarketCap. Automated Market Maker. https://coinmarketcap.com/alexandria/glossary/automated-market-maker-amm



























































Apple between US China Wars
By Dr. Dan Steinbock
America’s most valuable $2 trillion company is no longer immune to US geopolitics. Apple’s global success is an anomaly to the protectionist Trump-Biden administrations – for all the wrong reasons.
Recently, Apple announced a set of additional privacy protections. The “private relay” feature will not be available to users in China. After the announcement, New York Times reported that Apple had given in to Beijing.
In fact, in addition to China, the privacy feature will not be available to users in many countries, including Belarus, Colombia, Egypt, Kazakhstan, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkmenistan, and Uganda.
Yet, Times only targeted China.
No multinational can ignore local responsiveness
Since the 1980s, the leading multinationals have sought to reconcile global efficiencies with responsiveness to local markets. Nonetheless, many American technology giants still earn the bulk of their revenues in the high-income US and Western European markets.
In contrast, Apple has proved more innovative in global markets. In China, the company is trying to adjust to local market practices, just as all foreign and especially Chinese companies face great adjustment pressures in the US.
There’s a difference, though. Apple and other foreign ICT giants remain welcome in the Chinese mainland.
Yet, the reverse no longer applies, as evidenced by a decade of increasing persecution of Chinese technology companies in America from Huawei to Tik Tok, and the consequent plunge of Chinese FDI in America.
Where’s the money
Still another protectionist assumption is the idea that “the Chinese are taking away American jobs.” The assumption is flawed.
In August 2018, Apple became the first publicly-traded US company valued at over $1 trillion; today its market capitalization amounts to $2.2 trillion. Its products are said to have some 1.7 billion users worldwide. Let’s illustrate the point with the value captured as a percent of the retail price of a smartphone (iPhone 7).
Apple captures a whopping 42% of the retail price of each iPhone sold. The rest goes to the cost of materials (22%), distribution (15%), IP licenses (5%), and countries like South Korea (1%), Japan (1%) and Taiwan (1%). Labor costs in China account for only1 percent of the total (Figure 1)
Figure 1: Value capture for iPhone 7
Usually, multinationals’ revenues contribute to consumer welfare via progressive taxation. However, US companies tend to minimize taxes via creative accounting and tax havens, so there’s a gap between what’s paid officially and effectively.
Since the 1980s, these disruptive changes have dramatically contributed to erosion in progressive taxation, consumer welfare and thus to income polarization in America. That’s America’s challenge, however; not China’s.
Apple, offshoring and Taiwan
If the value capture isn’t the issue, what about offshoring to China? That’s the third misguided assumption.
Apple’s “Greater China” market includes not just China, but Hong Kong and Taiwan. It has assembled most of its products in China for a quarter of a century, thanks to Foxconn (Hon Hai), the huge Taiwanese multinational electronics contract manufacturer founded by Taiwanese billionaire Terry Gou.
Moreover, work conditions at Foxconn factories have been a matter of public debate since the early 2010s. The basic salary for a worker at a Foxconn facility is about $315 per month; less than 10% of the median American salary.
In June 2017, Foxconn said it would build a $10 billion TV manufacturing plant in southeastern Wisconsin that would initially employ 3,000 workers set to increase to 13,000, in return for the highest subsidies in US history. A few months later, a plant was launched in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin (Figure 2).
Figure 2: The Rise and Fall of Foxconn’s US venture
Source: Wikimedia Commons
However, Foxconn began soon reconsidering its initial plant plans and the high labor costs in the US. After Biden’s election triumph, Foxconn announced it would reduce its planned investment to $672 million with 1,454 new jobs.
As long as per capita incomes will differ significantly among countries, opportunities for offshoring will abound.
US geopolitics vs Chinese market potential
And the final misguided protectionist assumption. What if Apple would refocus its operations into the US, as it is being pressured to do?
In the past decade, Apple’s quarterly revenues from Greater China have increased to $21.3 billion (1Q 2021). Its revenues from China remain around 15% of the total. That’s still significantly less relative to highly exposed US companies in China.
Last year, Apple had a great year in China, where full year shipments returned to the 2018 level, driven by both iPhone 11 and iPhone 12 models. It has recently added a dozen new Chinese suppliers. Chinese market is vital to Apple’s global future.
The developer community of Apple’s iOS app ecosystem has surged to over 4.4 million third-party developers in China. Moreover, China’s shipment of wearable devices notched robust year-on-year expansion in the first quarter of 2021.
To position for the lucrative electric car future, Apple is in early-stage talks with BYD and CATL, and possible other companies over battery supplies for the “Apple Car,”. Chinese car market is critical to Apple since rapid growth remains in the mainland.
Over time, Apple’s revenues from China have potential to increase significantly, thanks to its innovative ecosystem which is hard to replicate by the competitors. Yet, the White House could derail Apple’s plans, which rely on economics, not on geopolitics.
Who’s undermining US competitiveness
To sustain its global position, Apple is trying to navigate amid the US Cold War against China. If it ignores US views, it will face pressures in the US; its largest current market. If it neglects Chinese views, it risks failure in China; its pivotal future market. What is certain is that
Apple’s greatest challenge is not China, but the underlying conflict between its ecosystem and Trump-Biden protectionism.
About the Author
Dr. Dan Steinbock is an internationally recognized strategist of the multipolar world and the founder of Difference Group. He has served at the India, China and America Institute (USA), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore). For more, see https://www.differencegroup.net
A longer version of the commentary was published by China-US Focus on June 25, 2021. It is based on Dr Steinbock’s fully-referenced global briefing https://www.differencegroup.net/apple-between-us-china