Real estate remains a cornerstone of global investment portfolios, with certain cities attracting disproportionate attention from international buyers. London, New York, and Singapore have long been benchmarks for property investors, combining stability with global prestige. In recent years, however, Dubai has moved into this league, posting record-breaking sales volumes and attracting both institutional and private investors.
One reason Dubai is being evaluated alongside these established hubs is its combination of high rental yields and comparatively lower entry prices. While London and New York are known for multi-million-dollar thresholds, investors exploring apartments for sale in Dubai often find far more square footage and higher income potential for the same capital outlay.
Price per Square Foot
A direct comparison shows the cost differences among these four hubs:
Dubai: Average $550–650/sq ft; luxury stock from $1,000–2,000
London: Prime central districts $2,000–3,000/sq ft; some areas above $5,000
New York: $1,500–2,500/sq ft in prime zones
Singapore: $1,500–2,000/sq ft in key districts
This illustrates why a $1 million budget stretches far further in Dubai, often buying a large two-bedroom apartment with modern amenities, compared to a compact unit in London or Singapore.
Rental Yields
Rental income is a decisive factor for investors. Dubai consistently offers yields of 6–8% in central communities, with emerging districts sometimes reaching double digits. By contrast:
London: 2–4%
New York: 3–4%
Singapore: 2–3.5%
This gap explains why institutional funds and private investors are increasingly allocating a share of their portfolios to Dubai, even if they continue to hold assets in more mature markets.
Transaction Volumes and Growth
Dubai has not only attracted attention through affordability and yields, but also through sheer sales activity. In the first half of 2025, real estate transactions reached AED 431 billion (~USD 117 billion), a 25% increase year-on-year. Property values have risen more than 120% since 2020, driven by strong demand from international buyers.
By contrast, London and New York have faced slower growth in the same period, with rising mortgage rates tempering demand. Singapore’s growth has been steady but regulated by government cooling measures designed to limit speculation.
Buyer Profiles
Each hub attracts a distinct buyer base:
Dubai: Russian, Indian, European, and increasingly American investors. The absence of property taxes and investor-friendly visa programs are major incentives.
London: Traditional safe-haven for Middle Eastern and Asian investors seeking asset preservation.
New York: Favored by domestic U.S. investors and global high-net-worth individuals looking for trophy assets.
Singapore: Strong interest from regional Asian investors, especially those prioritizing stability and governance.
Dubai’s diversity of demand, paired with residency pathways tied to property ownership, has supported rapid absorption of new supply.
Capital Appreciation
Villas in Dubai’s prime communities have seen resale premiums of 15–20% in recent years, and luxury apartments in Downtown and Palm Jumeirah continue to command significant appreciation.
In London, appreciation has been uneven, with Brexit and higher transaction taxes dampening performance.
New York has recovered from pandemic lows but faces cyclical volatility.
Singapore remains steady, but price caps and stamp duties limit runaway growth.
Policy and Regulation
Transparency and investor protection shape long-term confidence.
Dubai: Escrow account rules, the Real Estate Regulatory Agency (RERA), and Al Sa’fat green building codes provide structured oversight.
London: Strict planning laws and rising stamp duty costs can complicate investment strategies.
New York: Tenant protection laws and high property taxes influence yield calculations.
Singapore: Heavy reliance on government cooling measures keeps speculation under control but restricts rapid gains.
Dubai’s regulatory framework has matured significantly in the last decade, offering more reassurance to foreign investors than many emerging markets.
Market Signals to Watch
Supply levels: Dubai is adding nearly 30,000 new villas and apartments in 2025 to meet demand, while London and Singapore face chronic housing shortages.
Infrastructure: Metro expansions in Dubai and Singapore boost connectivity, while New York and London grapple with aging systems.
Investor incentives: Visa-linked property ownership in Dubai and favorable tax regimes contrast with higher levies in Western markets.
A Comparative Lens for Global Investors
For investors weighing where to allocate capital, the contrast is clear:
London and New York provide long-standing prestige but with lower yields and higher costs.
Singapore offers unmatched stability but is constrained by strict government controls.
Dubai presents higher risk-adjusted returns, significant capital appreciation, and more accessible pricing.
These differences mean investors are no longer looking at Dubai as a niche emerging market, but as a core option to sit alongside London, Singapore, and New York in globally diversified real estate portfolios.
The South Korean government said it is working to bring home its citizens detained during a massive immigration raid at a Hyundai facility in Ellabell, Georgia last week.
Federal and immigration authorities arrested 475 people as part of an investigation into alleged unlawful employment practices. More than 300 of those detained were South Korean nationals, a government spokesperson told NBC News. U.S. officials, who executed the raid with a search warrant, said the workers were in the country illegally.
President Lee Jae Myung’s office confirmed on Sunday that the detainees will be flown back to South Korea on a chartered plane. Hyundai, when asked for comment on Monday, pointed CNBC to its earlier statement saying the company is “committed to full compliance with all laws and regulations in every market.”
The operation was the largest single-site enforcement action in the history of the Department of Homeland Security, according to Steven Schrank, the special agent in charge of Homeland Security Investigations in Georgia. He said those detained were employed by contractors and subcontractors rather than Hyundai directly.
U.S. Attorney Margaret Heap said more than 400 agents took part in the sweep. “The goal of this operation is to reduce illegal employment and prevent employers from gaining an unfair advantage by hiring unauthorized workers,” Heap said. “Another goal is to protect unauthorized workers from exploitation.”
White House border czar Tom Homan told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday that more workplace raids are planned. “We’re going to do more worksite enforcement operations,” he said. “These companies that hire illegal aliens, they undercut their competition that’s paying U.S. citizen salaries.”
The Georgia site is home to both Hyundai and LG Energy Solution, which are building a $7.6 billion battery manufacturing plant. The project, which began construction in 2022, employs more than 1,200 people and has already started producing electric vehicles. LG Energy Solution said 47 of its workers were among those detained, along with about 250 from “equipment partner companies.”
Hyundai stressed on Friday that none of those arrested were direct employees of the automaker. The company added Monday that business travel to the United States continues, though some trips are subject to internal review.
South Korea’s foreign ministry expressed “concern and regret” to the U.S. Embassy in a statement, urging officials to protect the rights of its citizens. “In the course of U.S. law enforcement, the economic activities of our investment firms and the rights and interests of our nationals must not be unjustly infringed upon,” ministry spokesperson Lee Jae-woong said.
On Truth Social, President Donald Trump called on foreign companies to respect American immigration laws. “Your Investments are welcome, and we encourage you to LEGALLY bring your very smart people, with great technical talent, to build World Class products, and we will make it quickly and legally possible for you to do so. What we ask in return is that you hire and train American Workers,” he wrote.
Trump later told reporters the enforcement action had no bearing on U.S.–South Korea economic ties, saying Washington maintains “a great relationship” with Seoul.
Although AI is a hot topic in the media, we hear little about its military uses. AI, machine learning, and the brain-computer interface will undoubtedly have a dramatic effect on battlefields of the future, and hence potentially on global balances of power. Are we prepared for that?
Any machine could rebel, from a toaster to a Terminator, and so it’s crucial to learn the common strengths and weaknesses of every robot enemy. Pity the fate of the ignorant when the robot masses decide to stop working and to start invading.
Many years ago – never mind how many – as a graduate student at MIT, I was treated to alluring conversations about a relatively new research lab involved with machine vision, robots, and artificial intelligence. In the late 1960s, a whole department was devoted to artificial intelligence; the thinking was that machines could outsmart humans in various ways, including beating them at games like chess. Some staff and PhD students in the math department had switched departments because their instincts portended extraordinary excitement about the potential of a new research lab at MIT called MIT AI, a spin-off from what was then a small department researching operating systems, artificial intelligence, and computation theory. AI was then crude or, at most, narrow by today’s standards; indeed, some AI specialists working specific tasks call it “Narrow AI” (NAI).
The most exciting advance was a joke played by Professor Joseph Weizenbaum, who programmed a computer named ELIZA to act as if it were a human psychotherapist; it responded to users’ words by reorganizing the words to repeat them as plausible questions. Expectations were high, coming from a promising paradigm shift in believing that fundamental digital machine language, represented by sequences of 0s and 1s, could someday mimic human biochemical signals that trigger cognition. After all, in those days, computer buffs felt that everything hinged on computer models. And they were somewhat right. In that future, the MIT AI Research Lab was able to easily recruit young research staff and PhD students from the math department. I was not one of them, but I did go to a meeting with the director, Professor Marvin Minsky, who never said the word “artificial” but rather talked incessantly about what he called “intelligent machines.” I thought all machines worked intelligently but could not accept the simplest notion of an equivalence between machine and human intelligence, which must include imagination and emotions.
In 1987, we had a comprehensive understanding of how a machine can have what we think of as intelligence. That was 39 years ago, when an IBM computer known as Deep Blue beat the chess champion of the world, Garry Kasparov, in a chess match. Kasparov had that unique human skill of being able to process five moves ahead and possibly far more when needed. [3] For any chess match, the number of possible moves, countermoves, and outcomes is as vast as the number of stars in the universe. [4]
It depends on the nature of the position. Chess is a complicated game. But in positions where everything is forced – one move, one answer – I can calculate something between ten and fifteen moves ahead. But that happens very rarely. Usually, the positions are more complicated than that – one move, then five answers, each of them having five answers. You have to use your intuition in cases like that, your positional understanding. It’s very good if you can calculate five, six, maybe seven moves ahead.
In the 39 years that have passed, artificial intelligence has moved from being able to spot far more than just five chess moves ahead. Doing so for chess is far harder than beating anyone in checkers. These days, AI can go further to beat anyone in a match of Go, one of the oldest games in history. With data banks of millions of possible outcomes in games like chess and Go, AI is the master winner of all games that require 100 percent of skill, but that does not eliminate games of partial luck. For games, AI doesn’t fully know the difference between skill and luck; it feeds itself on its immense collection of data that points to all possible outcomes.
For games, AI doesn’t fully know the difference between skill and luck; it feeds itself on its immense collection of data that points to all possible outcomes.
We have been inundated by the news media’s volume of AI reporting, especially after witnessing the explosion on November 30, 2022, when OpenAI released ChatGPT, a tool to generate text, speech, and videos simply by user commands. From the opinions of political pundits to those of experts, we seem to be somewhat enlightened on the advantages and dangers. It is and will always be considered another dawn of the digital revolution, a societal future shock that brings with it bewilderment regarding what it is. We might not know what it is, but we do know it includes harmful effects of mis- and disinformation, raising the question of preparedness for such a blow against the way we build and process truthful information.
What about war? Not chess, Go, or any competitive sport, but rather a sustained armed conflict causing battle-related human fatalities. All wars are deeply connected. AI could, or at least should, admit that its cyber-appendages can draw strong and elastic associations between one war and all.
The strongest connection is the unknown probability of winning. Like chess, the fundamental military model, each planned move of an armed conflict goes through a maze of possible realignment combat actions, each leading to the next. The “and then what” question arises. And just as in chess, that forward action is one of a myriad of others likely to be missed by the military commanders on one side or the other. That’s where military AI comes in: to foresee not just the ensuing realignment of combat decisions but also those in three, four, five, or 25 undisclosed possible adjustments down the line.
The most current brutal wars
Take the Ukraine-Russia war as an example. Russia failed to perceive beyond the second tier of possible consequences of its invasion. Military intelligence reports suggested that the invasion began with poor planning, readiness, and aged equipment. But had they relied on even the least sophisticated AI tools, the strategic moves would have advanced far more effectively. AI would have warned of the challenges, such as Ukraine’s military high motivation and Russia’s low combat readiness. These are warnings that AI does quite well. It would have signaled the likely finding that the West could supply Ukraine with the most sophisticated military equipment that would halt Russian air and sea operations. It would have given instructions on organization structure and even steps to avoid losing 16,071 military personnel killed in action in that first year after the invasion.
Another example is the Gaza War. After almost two years of war, we do not see a plan to end the Hamas-Israel conflict, other than an expansion of its military offensive in the Gaza Strip, codenamed Operation Gideon Chariots, aimed at defeating Hamas by destroying its military and taking control over most of Gaza. It seems clear that the Israeli Defense Forces are aiming to destroy Hamas, with a failure to see a few more possible strategies to gain any sense of what is likely to happen, say, in the third year of the war. AI would have warned the IDF about the possibility of hunger and a humanitarian catastrophe. It could have advised a plan among many that could have avoided the current explosion of international upsets. Instead, Israel has locked itself into a plan to demolish Hamas.
Wait! What and who is left of Hamas? With most of its military leaders in the Gaza Strip assassinated, what could be left to demolish? That war is essentially over. So, what is Israel’s next goal if there is no one left to kill? Perhaps it is the return of hostages. But is there a clear next move that will free a hostage or two? Or is there some secret political plan? As Ami Ayalon, an Israeli politician and former head of Shin Bet, Israel’s secret service, and commander-in-chief of the Navy, recently wrote in Foreign Affairs, “Wars without a clear political goal cannot be won. They cannot be ended. The longer the vacuum in Israel’s planning persists, the more international actors will have to come together to prevent an even worse catastrophe than the one currently unfolding.” [9] You see, here is the problem. With almost 75 percent of Gaza being taken by the IDF, and with over a third of Hamas fighters killed, Israel’s initial mission to defeat Hamas and bring back the living and dead hostages could be on the brink of being achieved. And yet, the war continues elusively. The IDF reported, “From the intelligence and findings on the ground, most of the Hamas Brigades have been dismantled. It is estimated that most of the battalions are at a low level of competency and can no longer function as a military framework.” [10] And yet, new fighters, perhaps thousands of recent recruits, in northern Gaza have appeared to rebuild brigades. “Hamas can draw on these 2 million people for recruits. Most Gazans are young, with many under the age of 25. This means Hamas needs to recruit a few percent, and it has many forces.” As the Times of Israel put it, “Hamas returned. Or perhaps Hamas never left.” [11]
Hamas Commanders in Gaza
Israel, being one of a half-dozen leaders in AI, must have had AI intelligence flagging the likely possibility that among the 2.1 million Gazans and Palestinian refugees remaining in Gaza, there is enough of a pool of reinvigorated young recruits to reinflate the forces and battalions needed to keep the war going. On July 28, Ron Dermer, Israel’s Minister for Strategic Affairs, spoke with David Friedman, a former US Ambassador, saying, “No outside force will be able to take control of Gaza if there are still 20,000 Hamas terrorists running around the territory. No investor will rebuild Gaza if Hamas remains, and things could flare up again. This is our opportunity to put Gaza on a different track and ensure security for decades to come.” [12] So, did AI give Israel that information earlier to pack some reasoning into its ongoing Gaza plans? Most likely, but they must not have been taken seriously, because political and commercial plans trumped reason. The warnings about new recruits must have been considered in planning adjustments as the war continued; Hamas lost 20,000 fighters in the beginning, but in two years of the war, it gained 20,000 to refill its brigades and battalions. Filling ranks to continue the war indefinitely was surely flagged from the beginning. AI would have warned that the active military objective would keep the war going chaotically under its chosen plan because every killing angers a noncombatant young person willing to die to satisfy emotional revenge. Did anyone listen to AI, or was its plan dead on arrival?
A sister of artificial intelligence: machine learning
While AI is, and will continue to be, used in armed conflicts to improve decision-making, machine learning (ML) contributes to enhancing autonomous weapons systems , “exacerbate existing power imbalances, and blur the lines of accountability in warfare.” [13] Those are two distinct but intertwined roles.
While AI is, and will continue to be, used in armed conflicts to improve decision-making, machine learning contributes to enhancing autonomous weapons systems.
For the past decade, the thermostat in my house has been learning my habits. It’s not AI per se, but ML. There is a difference. AI reaches for data; billions of pieces associated in one way or another with other pieces that can be algorithmized. ML has a correction function, a guessing game that makes decisions based on routines that work and those that don’t. Its functioning is not unlike human decision-making if we consider that we decide on the roads to take that are best for living well. My smart thermostat is just a guessing machine that goes by my routines, nothing more. The same works for my car’s lane change assist system that alerts me to dangers and could – if turned on – offer steering assistance with the help of sensors and cameras. It is just following what it knows and sees as potential hazards. Some of the newer cars collect data to be later used for the next level of safety. So, AI and ML mingle to help each other. Each has a function.
Here is the right question to ask: though AI can check human error and likely improve some efficiency, what could happen when its systems malfunction or become weaponized? ML could fail and turn a machine into a weapon; however, it does not make decisions – humans do. Self-driving cars control steering and braking by cameras and sensors to avoid calamities. And, in a stretched sense, they rely on physical data supported by precise satellite and road reports. Military AI is different. For that, ML is joined at the hip with AI. My article “Wars Of The Future Are Coming. Are We Ready?” reports on concerns that autonomous warfare strategies with mechanical soldiers might save lives, mostly on the side of who is using them, but how it behaves has moral and social ramifications following “the foundations of humanity itself, and who we are as a people.” [14] Some good may come from AI- and ML-supported future wars of autonomous battling; however, dangers could come from those new tools of warfare that could be used by criminal players, crime syndicates, militias, and terrorists. Military theaters are constantly reviewing how far they can go with international law restrictions.
How far can they go?
These days, almost all military operations include intelligence gathering, surveillance, pattern analysis, and analysis of enemy behavior, to optimize military strategies. NATO tells us that AI is used to identify and communicate risks or threats and give an advantage in preparing for attack.[15]Even though the US, China, the UK, the European Union, and countries in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, signed a declaration in the UK (the Bletchley Park Declaration), agreeing that there are advantages, challenges, and risks, and warn that AI and ML could go wrongly in armed conflicts, they speedily continue to develop that technology with no hesitation. [16]The risks include autonomous fighter jets ready to attack without the human trait of instinctive hesitation.
Unmanned Fighter Jet Photo credit: U.S. Air Force / Kyle Brasier Public Doman
The photo above shows an X-62A VISTA, a modified F-16. Although it is a two-seater plane, generally, no humans are sitting in those seats during test flights. On May 2, 2024, however, Frank Kendall, former United States Secretary of the Air Force, flew in one of those seats while the X-62A entered a dogfight against a conventionally controlled F-16. “The dueling F-16s came nearly nose to nose in a series of maneuvers within 1,000 feet of each other, according to the Associated Press, which witnessed the aerial confrontation. The Air Force hasn’t disclosed a winner.” With that success, the U.S. Air Force plans to have over 1,000 autonomous fighter jets ready by 2028.[17] “It’s a security risk not to have it. At this point, we must have it,” Kendall said after he landed. That brings us to a new kind of warfare.
Could AI-ML bring on more wars? AI can roughly sift through the data of two enemies to compare their military capabilities and the weight and balance of their powers. When that happens, an inevitable persuasive argument rises to aggressive heights of influence: the use of force to gain property or political advantage. AI can tell a leader whether a military success is achievable. The most noteworthy example is WWI. Although AI was not involved, since it didn’t yet exist, considerable data showed the balance of military power to be on the side of Germany. With that advantage, the Kaiser was able to play his cards of force. That force mistakenly drummed up his country’s capabilities to battle. AI, now with all its data-sifting analysis, could easily make the same mistake, for war has hidden complexities that ride on the view that war is biologically necessary for some animal species that struggle with subsistence and fight for existence. No surprise: leaders with high military power, especially those with grandiose self-image, instinctually weigh their odds in decision-making and conflict-planning. Military advantages tend to be triumphalist itches for wars. The military historian and Prussian general Friedrich Adams Julius von Bernhardi, who was “the first German to ride through the Arc de Triomphe when the Germans entered Paris”, wrote in his best-selling 1911 book Germany and the Next War, “[War] is a biological necessity … the natural law, upon which all the laws of Nature rest, the law of the struggle for existence.” [18] That primordial impulse will always be with us, along with the good, bad, and acceptable human urges that brought us to this stage of existence.
Delegating lethality decisions to machines
How does AI tweak the advantages or balances of power, if it does? The Vietnam War has an answer: the American strategy was based on chess, while the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army, under a cultural difference, played their guerrilla war as if it were a game of Go. They are very different strategies! In chess, we take out the most valuable pieces. In Go, we encompass territory. But the strongest tweak comes from AI’s decision-making after analyzing data that could be true, false, or weak. When AI sifts through its data, it can fact-check at fantastic speeds, easily corroborating a million sides, if there are that many. When it comes to a final decision without human oversight – because, in war moves, the mass of possible actions, procedures, and episodes could be too enormous without a capacity for help from someone like Garry Kasparov – potential mistakes leading to accidental escalation are likely. That is because AI algorithms, with all their speed and capacity, can also generate realistic but fake information and shoddy, junk, or manipulated science using their own tools to flood the web, and be confused by their own creations and how they interpret them. Remember that a half-billion pieces of disinformation come from AI sifting through the world of data that it hopes to analyze without human reliance, and thereby without regard for even the smallest range of human values. But that is only one part of military AI. Another is weapon automation, and all the speed-of-light tools of administering robotic command and control attack networks in black-box deliberation and unpredictable decision-making, soon after compiling neutral and biased data, whether for preemptively defensive or offensive conclusions.
When AI sifts through its data, it can fact-check at fantastic speeds, easily corroborating a million sides, if there are that many.
Military AI is used for planning warfare strategies that save lives, and autonomous weaponry that sidesteps moral and social ramifications. Future wars could be less lethal if wars are to become robot against robot. How they advance regarding killing will depend on the brilliance of human strategic planning, not on AI decision-making, but rather on the continued sales of new tools used by criminal players, crime syndicates, militias, and terrorists. [19] So much can go wrong with weapons tied to AI autonomy that have neither fear nor emotions. Of course, military planners understand that there are natural biases that need overseeing with hopes that commitments sensibly follow international law restrictions before funding. Lives could be saved, and machines that fight without care can replace soldiers. War would then become a platform of entertainment. However, war is never simple. Moral codes of robot specs depend on how tactical intelligence is programmed regarding robot sensors that could clash with objectives, Those conflicting situations ignoring the human brain, as Daniel Wilson said, “might go berserk not knowing when to click the off switch.”
AI moves so fast that sometimes it is so far ahead of its game that it does not find rare but essential hidden nuances of change. It scans data to learn immense amounts of information, while uncovering intelligence treasures by sifting through garbage. It cannot learn much when human ideas swiftly surface as paradigm shifts, vis-à-vis the recent switch from trench warfare using tanks and armored personnel carriers to the simplicities of automated drone wars. The Ukrainian military did not invent the drone; the overwhelming drone strategy has changed the war’s dynamic to maintain an edge by drones, causing more than 80 percent of Russian frontline casualties and the destruction of almost 90 percent of Russian tanks and armored vehicles. The brilliance of Ukraine’s AI drone approach offsets the balance of power; Russia thought it had an enormous advantage with its tanks, missiles, armored personnel carriers, and planes, but its war plans, with all its AI planning, totally missed “Operation Spiderweb” backing Ukrainian warrior pride, morale, and its creations of cheap (less than $800) one-way lethal drones following simple algorithms that overwhelm enemy combatants in frontline foxholes and hitting high-value targets and multiple airbases deep inside Russian territory.
Time is moving from an epoch of nuclear deterrence hopes to AI’s military intelligence defenses. The might of nuclear deterrence depends on survival and retaliation power after a nuclear attack, making a first strike suicidal. Sam Winter-Levy and Nikita Lalwani, both at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote in Foreign Affairs that if a state can use AI to pinpoint locations of nuclear submarines and missile sites, and to disable command-and-control networks, then, with a risky first strike, it would tip the balance of power to a position of absolute dominance. [20]Of course, any first strike, even an action that hints at such a blow, would be dangerously boosting an arms race.
Brain-computer interface
According to RAND, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization, the U.S. Department of Defense (rebranded as Department of War [21]) is developing brain-computer-interface (BCI) technologies for humans with neural implants to have cognitive and AI data exchanges with a computer. BCI development began as research for people with disabilities, enabling prosthetic limbs, voice recognition, and many other hopeful neurological benefits through practical means. The technology started at the dawn of the 20th century with the invention of the electroencephalogram (EEG). By the early 70s, cortical activity through BCI, including visual control of computer cursors, was rapidly experimented with human brain implant units that interacted with digital devices.
BCI neurological advances are helping people with disabilities. Now, though, the military is seeding ideas centered on human-machine decision-making in combat scenarios and military planning and tactics. After all, the military’s mission is to win wars. That harbors a frightening question: will neurotechnology advance to a level that permits combatants in conflict to ethically control weapons by thought, without fear, anxiety, or other emotions that follow a more efficient mission through control of behavior?
What?! Could a special forces unit, using BCI techniques, send and receive thoughts to and from unit commanders, enabling real-time, rapid response to threats? Yes! Dr. Al Emondi, program manager in DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office, [22] said, “Smart systems will significantly impact how our troops operate in the future, and now is the time to be thinking about what human-machine teaming will actually look like, and how it could offer what it needs to accomplish. If we put the best scientists on this problem, we will disrupt current neural interface approaches and open the door to practical, high-performance interfaces.” [23] DARPA says the U.S. military will be ready for BCI by 2050, a relatively long time from now, so there is time for human rights agencies to step up their duty to safeguard the human dignity that incorporates emotions, thinking, imagining, and the perception of reason.
As Minsky is purported to have said, although I cannot find citation evidence, “the brain is a meat machine.” Following that metaphor, and the significant advances over the last 50 years, I don’t see any evidence of that, though I do worry about how long it might be preserved.
Joseph Mazuris an Emeritus Professor of Mathematics at Emerson College’s Marlboro Institute for Liberal Arts & Interdisciplinary Studies. He is a recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim, Bogliasco, and Rockefeller Foundations, and the author of eight acclaimed popular nonfiction books. His latest book is The Clock Mirage: Our Myth of Measured Time (Yale).
[1] Marwala Tshilidzi. “Militarization of AI Has Severe Implications for Global Security and Warfare,” United Nations University, UNU Centre, 2023-07-24, https://unu.edu/article/militarization-ai-has-severe-implications-global-security-and-warfare.
[2] Daniel H. Wilson, How to Survive a Robot Uprising: Tips on Defending Yourself Against the Coming Rebellion (New York: Bloomsbury, 2005) 14.
[20] San Wubter-Levy and Nikita Lalwani, “The End of Mutual Assured Destruction,” Foreign Affairs, (August 7, 2025). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/artificial-intelligence-end-mutual-assured-destruction?check_logged_in=1
[21] Mr. Hegseth, the U.S. Secretary of Defense said. “As the president has said, we’re not just defense, we’re offense.” “https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/us/politics/trump-war-department-defense-history.html
[22] DARPA is the U.S. Department of Defense agency responsible for fostering revolutionary technologies for national security.
Microlearning has emerged as a dynamic approach to corporate education, breaking down complex topics into concise, focused lessons that are easier to digest and apply. For corporations striving to remain competitive in the age of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI), this strategy offers a powerful way to upskill employees without disrupting daily operations.
By delivering bite-sized, actionable content tailored to specific roles, microlearning empowers employees to absorb information at their own pace, practice what they’ve learned, and quickly apply new skills. For businesses navigating the complexities of digital transformation, this approach provides the agility needed to stay ahead of the curve.
Why Corporations Need Microlearning for Gen AI Education
In today’s fast-paced business environment, corporate leaders face the challenge of equipping employees with the skills required to harness the power of technologies like Gen AI. The vast potential of Gen AI for streamlining processes, enhancing decision-making, and driving innovation makes it an essential area of focus. Yet traditional training programs, which often demand significant time and resources, are no longer practical for many companies.
In today’s fast-paced business environment, corporate leaders face the challenge of equipping employees with the skills required to harness the power of technologies like Gen AI.
Microlearning offers a solution by making education flexible, personalized, and accessible. Lessons typically last 10–15 minutes and are delivered through formats that cater to different learning styles, such as videos, interactive exercises, and quizzes. This format is ideal for employees juggling demanding workloads, as it allows them to integrate learning into their schedules seamlessly.
Furthermore, microlearning ensures relevance by offering tailored learning paths. For example, a marketing team can focus on modules that explore Gen AI-powered audience segmentation, while a customer service team might learn about automated response systems and predictive analytics. This customization ensures that training is directly applicable, increasing engagement and retention.
Client Case Study in Gen AI Education: Microlearning in Action
To illustrate how microlearning can transform corporate training, consider the case of a multinational consumer packaged goods (CPG) firm that sought to integrate Gen AI into its operations. The company recognized the potential of AI tools to enhance productivity and innovation but faced several challenges:
Time Constraints: Employees were already stretched thin, managing tight deadlines and critical projects.
Skill Gaps: Teams varied widely in their familiarity with AI technologies, requiring training tailored to different levels of expertise.
Scalability: With offices spread across multiple time zones, delivering consistent, high-quality training to a global workforce was a major challenge.
To address these challenges, the company asked me to help it adopt a microlearning strategy.
Designing a Microlearning Program
We began by identifying the key areas where Gen AI could make an immediate impact, including sales forecasting, product development, and customer experience management. Working with subject matter experts, they created a series of microlearning modules tailored to specific roles and objectives.
For example:
Sales Teams: Modules focused on using AI tools to predict customer needs, improve lead scoring, and optimize outreach strategies.
Product Developers: Training covered AI-driven design tools and algorithms to accelerate prototyping and refine product features.
Customer Support Teams: Lessons explored AI chatbots, sentiment analysis, and personalized service recommendations.
Each module was designed to be engaging and interactive, encouraging employees to apply what they learned immediately. The content was hosted on a mobile-friendly Learning Management System (LMS), ensuring accessibility for employees regardless of location or time zone.
Making Learning Flexible and Personalized
Flexibility was a cornerstone of the program. Employees could access the modules whenever it suited them, such as during breaks, commutes, or downtime between meetings. The LMS also included progress tracking, enabling participants to monitor their development and revisit areas where they needed additional support.
To enhance engagement, we helped the company incorporate gamification elements, such as badges and leaderboards, to motivate learners and celebrate achievements. Employees could also choose their own learning paths, selecting modules that aligned with their roles and career aspirations. This personalization ensured that training was not only relevant but also empowering, as employees felt a greater sense of ownership over their learning journey.
Support and Mentorship
From our experience with other companies, self-paced learning works best with guidance, so we helped the company pair the microlearning program with optional mentorship opportunities. Experienced AI practitioners within the organization served as mentors, hosting weekly virtual office hours where employees could ask questions and receive advice.
For instance, a sales manager might consult a mentor about integrating AI tools into an existing CRM system, while a customer support specialist could seek tips on optimizing chatbot responses for better customer satisfaction. These interactions provided valuable context and practical insights, reinforcing the concepts covered in the microlearning modules.
Results That Speak for Themselves
After six months, the microlearning initiative delivered measurable results across multiple metrics:
Increased Efficiency: Sales teams reported a 22% reduction in time spent on lead qualification, thanks to AI-enhanced processes.
Improved Innovation: Product developers cut prototyping time by 18%, enabling faster iteration and delivery of new products.
Enhanced Customer Experience: Customer satisfaction scores improved by 26%, as support teams used AI tools to provide quicker, more personalized service.
These results not only demonstrated the immediate impact of microlearning but also highlighted its long-term potential to drive operational excellence and competitive advantage.
Building a Culture of Continuous Learning
Beyond the tangible outcomes, the microlearning program had a profound effect on the company’s culture. Employees became more confident and proactive in experimenting with AI tools, sharing their learnings with colleagues, and proposing new applications for the technology.
For example, a marketing team used insights from their training to develop an AI-powered campaign that outperformed previous efforts by 30%. Similarly, a regional office implemented an AI tool for inventory management, significantly reducing waste and costs. These successes reinforced a culture of continuous learning and innovation, where employees were empowered to take initiative and explore the possibilities of emerging technologies.
Microlearning is not a one-and-done solution; it is a dynamic approach that evolves with the needs of the business. As Gen AI capabilities advance, companies can expand their training libraries to cover new applications, ensuring that employees remain at the forefront of innovation.
For example, future modules might focus on advanced AI ethics, regulatory compliance, or integrating AI into sustainability initiatives, while managing risks. By continuously updating and refining their microlearning programs, corporations can maintain a skilled and adaptable workforce ready to tackle the challenges of tomorrow.
The Strategic Advantage of Gen AI Education Through Microlearning
By tailoring training to the unique needs of different teams and roles, microlearning ensures that every employee can contribute meaningfully to the company’s success.
For corporations, microlearning offers a strategic advantage in an increasingly competitive landscape. It allows businesses to upskill employees quickly and efficiently, driving productivity and innovation while minimizing disruption. Moreover, by tailoring training to the unique needs of different teams and roles, microlearning ensures that every employee can contribute meaningfully to the company’s success. Whether it’s a sales representative using AI to close deals faster or an operations manager leveraging AI for process optimization, the benefits of this approach extend across the organization.
By embracing microlearning, corporations not only enhance their operational capabilities but also foster a culture of growth, adaptability, and forward-thinking. In an era defined by rapid technological change, this mindset is critical for long-term success. Microlearning represents the future of corporate education. Its ability to deliver focused, engaging, and personalized training makes it the ideal approach for equipping employees with the skills they need to thrive in the age of Gen AI. By adopting this strategy, corporations can ensure that their teams are not just keeping up with change but leading it, driving innovation and setting new benchmarks for success.
Establishing and running a business comes with various responsibilities. To ensure sustainability and set your company on the journey to success, several factors require your attention. One of which is how you are affecting the environment.
It is essential to focus on reducing carbon emissions, as it not only shrinks your carbon footprint but also helps you set an excellent example for your clients and partners. No matter the size of your business, your changes to reduce greenhouse gas make a significant difference.
If you are a business owner struggling to reduce your carbon footprint, worry not. Here are some simple and easy ways to help you in this regard.
1. Improve Energy Efficiency
Lowering overall energy consumption directly reduces greenhouse gas emissions. It means that by focusing on making your building, equipment, and processes energy efficient, you can save on your energy bills. It will ultimately strengthen your company’s bottom line, leading to success.
Here is how you can improve the energy efficiency of your business:
Upgrade to LED Lighting
The old incandescent bulbs consume a large amount of energy. Replacing them with LEDs can help you save a lot of money on electricity bills.
Use Programmable Thermostat
A programmable thermostat regulates your office’s heating and cooling based on your specific needs and preferences. By using them, you can avoid unnecessary energy consumption when the space is empty.
Encourage Good Habits
You must remind your staff to shut down all the devices at the end of the day. Moreover, ask them to use energy-saving settings on their monitors.
2. Consider Eco-Friendly Packaging
For packaging, you must consider using materials with low environmental impact. Additionally, optimise your packaging design for less waste and consider streamlining your production and distribution. In this way, you can save a lot of energy and reduce pollution.
Eco friendly packaging not only decreases greenhouse gas emissions and waste but also enhances your brand reputation. It is a wise approach to cut your operational costs and attract environmentally conscious consumers.
3. Reduce Business Travel Emissions
As a business owner, you must encourage your employees to walk or use public transport instead of driving to work. Moreover, to minimise the need for travel, embrace virtual meetings and opt for video conferencing.
4. Apply the Three R’s: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
When it comes to environmental protection, following the principle of the three R’s (Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle) is essential. You must consider how to apply it to every aspect of your business. From office supplies to the core operation of your company, consider what can be reduced, reused, and recycled.
5. Support Sustainable Supply Chains
To protect the environment, you must prioritise purchasing products and materials from suppliers who demonstrate environmentally friendly practices. In this way, you can significantly contribute to lowering the carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions.
Moreover, encouraging the use of recycled products and opting for reusable options can make a big difference. So you must consider making some essential changes in the supply chains of your business to ensure a healthy and safe environment.
Zürich, Switzerland – Rothinvest.com is a financial firm that focuses on making its services more open and available to a wide audience. The company’s latest work centers on providing an accessible digital platform designed to deliver better outcomes for clients. The development reflects the continuing need for reliable financial services that adapt to modern expectations of speed, clarity, and usability.
Accessible Platform For Financial Needs
The current era has shown that accessibility plays a major role in shaping financial experiences. By focusing on an open digital system, users are now able to interact with resources in a more straightforward manner. Reports on Rothinvest review highlight that accessibility remains one of the strongest aspects of its system, pointing to the way the platform supports smoother financial engagement without unnecessary complexity.
Enhancing Outcomes Through Practical Features
A financial service must not only be functional but also provide practical outcomes that add value. The platform has been refined with the aim of helping clients carry out important activities with greater ease. Key features are streamlined to reduce friction, ensuring that outcomes remain reliable across different types of financial needs. According to a recent Rothinvest review, this emphasis on steady results has gained notable recognition among those who rely on dependable digital systems in the financial sector.
Strong Focus On Reliability
Reliability continues to be a core standard within the industry. The platform developed by the company is created to align with these standards while ensuring flexibility for different requirements. This ensures that financial outcomes are consistent regardless of the level of use. A Rothinvest review also points out that stability is a recurring element, with users frequently acknowledging the strength of the platform in maintaining reliable access and execution.
Meeting Expectations In A Changing Financial Landscape
The financial world is shifting rapidly, and access to tools that meet modern expectations is vital. The company’s platform is positioned to align with these expectations, providing a clear and secure pathway for individuals and organizations to manage financial matters. Rothinvest reviews show that many have recognized its ability to adapt to an evolving environment, maintaining an effective balance between innovation and usability.
Transparent And Clear Service Delivery
Clarity is an essential factor in financial services, as users expect straightforward communication and transparent features. The company has worked to ensure that these standards are present in its digital offering. By maintaining clarity across its functions, the platform ensures users are well-informed and confident in their usage. Rothinvest review feedback has underlined this transparency as a significant value, noting that it helps create a stronger sense of trust in the system.
About Rothinvest.com
Rothinvest.com is a financial services company dedicated to providing solutions that emphasize accessibility, reliability, and transparency. With its digital platform, the company continues to prioritize outcomes that meet the needs of a wide range of clients, ensuring that financial interactions remain both effective and straightforward. Its operations are centered on simplifying financial access while maintaining high standards of security and consistency.
The company plays a significant role in aligning digital resources with the evolving needs of the financial landscape. By enhancing its services with an accessible digital platform, it demonstrates an ongoing commitment to improving financial outcomes without creating barriers. Rothinvest continues to be recognized as a firm that supports dependable, clear, and outcome-driven solutions across the financial sector.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba will resign to prevent a split in his ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), local media reported Sunday, throwing the world’s fourth-largest economy into renewed political uncertainty.
The Prime Minister’s Office did not immediately respond to requests for comment, but officials confirmed Ishiba will address the nation at a 6 p.m. (0900 GMT) press conference.
Ishiba has faced mounting pressure since taking office in September last year, as his coalition lost control of both houses of parliament amid public anger over rising living costs. He had previously rejected calls to quit following the LDP’s defeat in July’s upper house elections.
Market concerns over Japan’s political outlook drove the yen lower and pushed the yield on 30-year government bonds to a record high last week. The LDP had been set to vote Monday on whether to hold an emergency leadership contest, fueling speculation about Ishiba’s departure.
Attention now turns to possible successors, including Sanae Takaichi, a fiscal dove who has criticized the Bank of Japan’s rate hikes. Takaichi narrowly lost to Ishiba in the party’s last leadership runoff.
If confirmed, Ishiba’s final act as leader will have been securing a $550 billion investment pledge in a trade deal with the United States in exchange for reduced U.S. tariffs on Japanese autos, a key industry targeted by President Donald Trump.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping and North Korea’s Kim Jong Un vowed to deepen strategic coordination during their first formal summit in six years, following a joint display of unity with Russian President Vladimir Putin at a military parade in Beijing.
Xi hosted Kim on Thursday at the Great Hall of the People, where the two leaders reaffirmed that their partnership will not waver “no matter how the international situation changes,” according to Chinese state media. Xi described China and North Korea as “good neighbors, good friends and good comrades bound by shared destiny,” while urging stronger coordination on global and regional affairs.
Kim pledged that North Korea will “invariably support” China in safeguarding its sovereignty and development interests, the Korean Central News Agency reported. The summit comes as Pyongyang has drawn closer to Moscow, supplying troops to aid Russia’s war in Ukraine.
Notably, China’s readout made no mention of “denuclearization of the Korea Peninsular,” a break from past meetings. Analysts said the omission reflects a tacit acknowledgment of North Korea’s nuclear status. “Beijing and Pyongyang spoke warmly of friendship while leaving the issue of denuclearization untouched – effectively acquiescing to North Korea’s nuclear status,” said Wu Qiang, a Beijing-based analyst.
The high-profile summit followed Wednesday’s military parade marking 80 years since the end of World War II, where Xi, Putin and Kim appeared together publicly for the first time. The event, attended by 26 foreign leaders including Iran and Pakistan, showcased China’s growing bloc with Russia and North Korea in defiance of Western influence.
Experts say Xi’s meeting with Kim underscores Beijing’s attempt to reassert its role as Pyongyang’s key ally, even as North Korea strengthens ties with Moscow through a defense pact signed last year. China remains North Korea’s biggest trading partner and only formal military ally, providing a crucial lifeline to its heavily sanctioned economy.
President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs face a critical showdown after a federal appeals court ruled that he illegally relied on emergency powers to impose duties on imports. The decision, if upheld by the Supreme Court, could force the Treasury Department to return more than $210 billion collected from American businesses.
Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to raise tariffs as high as 50% on goods from India and Brazil and up to 145% on Chinese imports. On Tuesday, he acknowledged that the court’s ruling could mean the government would have to “give back” the revenue but insisted the tariffs are vital to protecting U.S. industries.
“It’s a very important decision, and frankly, if they make the wrong decision, it would be a devastation for our country,” Trump told reporters. His administration is preparing an appeal to the Supreme Court as early as Wednesday to keep the tariffs in place past an October 14 deadline.
Trade experts say the high court will likely take the case. If it rules against Trump, tariff collections would end immediately, though refunding businesses may take years. Options range from blanket repayments to requiring importers to file claims or an administrative process overseen by Customs.
Law firms are already advising clients to file protests to preserve refund rights. Some businesses have been approached by investment firms offering to buy claims at a discount, providing quick liquidity but risking a smaller payout later.
While companies may welcome potential refunds, economists warn of ripple effects. Returning billions could force the government to borrow more, driving Treasury yields higher and raising borrowing costs across the economy. The 30-year yield briefly touched 5% Wednesday, its highest in months.
Refunds could also stoke inflation if paired with Trump’s push for lower interest rates. Analysts say the combination could remind investors of the high-inflation era under the Biden administration.
For now, the tariffs remain in place, but the stakes for Trump’s trade policy — and the economy — will soon rest with the Supreme Court.
Running a salon often means juggling phone calls, scheduling, payments, and client follow-ups on top of delivering great service. These repetitive tasks can take hours each week and leave staff with less time to focus on clients. Salon software automates many of these daily operations, which saves time, reduces errors, and helps the team work more efficiently.
With the right tools, tasks such as appointment booking, confirmations, inventory control, and even marketing can run in the background. This creates a smoother experience for clients while giving staff more freedom to focus on service instead of paperwork. Automation also helps reduce no-shows, keep products in stock, and encourage repeat visits without extra effort.
Technology now goes beyond simple scheduling systems. AI-powered tools can handle client communication, suggest retail products, and even personalize promotions. As a result, salons can operate with less stress while still delivering consistent service that keeps clients coming back.
Automating Core Salon Operations with Software
Modern salon software helps reduce repetitive tasks, improve accuracy, and give staff more time to focus on clients. By automating scheduling, communication, and team management, owners can cut down on errors and streamline daily operations.
Appointment Booking and Calendar Management
A salon booking system allows clients to set appointments online at any time, which reduces the need for phone calls and manual scheduling. This makes the process faster for both clients and staff. Automated confirmations and waitlist features also help minimize no-shows.
Systems such as TimeTailor, salon booking system include features like real-time availability, service menus, and built-in buffer times. These tools prevent double-booking and give stylists enough time between clients for preparation.
Clear visibility of the calendar also helps managers track peak hours and adjust service capacity. Staff can quickly check schedules on their devices, which reduces confusion and avoids last-minute changes.
Client Communication and Reminders
Automated reminders sent by text or email lower the chance of missed appointments. Software can schedule these notifications to go out 24–48 hours before a visit, which gives clients enough time to confirm or reschedule.
Follow-up messages after appointments can include satisfaction surveys, rebooking prompts, or product suggestions. This creates a consistent communication flow without extra work for staff.
Birthday messages or loyalty rewards can also be sent automatically. By personalizing these messages with client history, the salon strengthens relationships while saving time.
Staff Scheduling and Shift Planning
Automated scheduling tools reduce the effort needed to create fair and accurate staff rosters. Managers can set rules for availability, service specialties, and time-off requests. The system then generates a schedule that balances workload and avoids conflicts.
Shift changes or last-minute updates can trigger instant notifications to staff. This keeps everyone informed without long group chats or phone calls.
Some platforms also analyze booking patterns to predict busy periods. This helps managers assign more staff during peak hours while reducing labor costs during slower times. As a result, the team works more efficiently and with less stress.
Leveraging AI-Powered Tools for Salon Efficiency
AI-powered automation helps salons save time on repetitive tasks, reduce errors, and improve client interactions. From customer communication to financial management and marketing, the right tools allow teams to focus on service while software handles the background work.
AI Chatbots and Virtual Assistants for Customer Service
AI chatbots and virtual assistants allow salons to handle appointment requests, missed calls, and client questions without staff involvement. Tools such as Tidio, Chatfuel, Zendesk AI, or Freshdesk can answer common inquiries, confirm bookings, and even send SMS reminders.
Unlike standard booking systems, these assistants work 24/7. A client can schedule a haircut late at night, and the system updates the calendar instantly. This reduces scheduling errors and cuts down on no-shows.
AI assistants also collect feedback after appointments. By using survey tools such as Survicate or Qualaroo, salons can gather opinions quickly and identify patterns in client satisfaction. This creates a smoother experience for customers while giving staff more time for in-person service.
Automated Invoicing, Payments, and Financial Tracking
Automated invoicing and payment tools remove the need for manual billing. Systems like QuickBooks Online, Xero, Wave, and Zoho Books allow salons to send invoices, set up payment reminders, and track income with minimal input.
AI-based accounting tools also help with financial forecasting. By analyzing past sales and seasonal demand, they predict future revenue and expenses. This helps salon owners plan staffing levels, order supplies, and manage cash flow with greater accuracy.
Integration with scheduling software means invoices can be generated immediately after a service. Automatic payment collection speeds up transactions, reduces errors, and keeps records organized. Staff no longer spend hours balancing books, which frees them to focus on client care.
Marketing, Feedback Collection, and Analytics
AI tools support marketing by creating personalized campaigns. Email assistants and AI writing tools such as Jasper AI, Copy.ai, or even ChatGPT help craft messages that fit client preferences. Social media planning with platforms like Buffer or Later allows salons to post consistent content without daily effort.
Analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Hubspot, or AI-driven analytics tools measure campaign performance. They track which promotions attract bookings and which posts drive engagement. This data helps owners decide where to invest their marketing budget.
Feedback collection also plays a major role. Automated surveys sent after visits provide insights into client needs. Combined with tools like Fathom, Float, or transcription assistants such as Otter.ai and Fireflies.ai, salons can review conversations and identify opportunities for improvement. This approach creates a continuous loop of data-driven decisions that support steady growth.
Conclusion
Salon software helps teams reduce repetitive tasks and focus more on client service. Features like automated booking, digital payments, and inventory tracking save time and cut down on errors.
It also supports smoother communication through reminders, follow-ups, and loyalty rewards that run without constant staff input. As a result, staff can dedicate more energy to creative work and client care.
By using these tools in daily operations, salons create a more organized workflow, improve accuracy, and free up valuable time that benefits both the team and the clients.
By Terence Tse
CFOs are evolving into AI-driven transformation orchestrators, balancing finance, technology, and strategy while upskilling teams, managing risks, and driving measurable business value.
A key insight from this year’s AI for CFOs event, organized...
The World Financial Review uses cookies to improve site functionality, provide you with a better browsing experience, and to enable our partners to advertise to you. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this Site, and how you can decline them, is provided in our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions. By clicking on the accept button and using this Site, you consent to our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions. ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Joseph Mazur
Dr. Gleb Tsipursky
