By Gilles Paché
In today’s retail landscape, efficiency is not always the golden rule. Some of the largest large retailers have mastered the art of controlled chaos, using supply chain failures to stimulate demand and boost profits. In short, what if chaotic logistics was the key to marketing success? Gilles Paché sets out to explore how unpredictability exacerbates consumer desire, influences pricing strategies and gives companies a competitive edge.
Regularly reading the trade press and listening to Europe’s top executives makes it clear that logistics is a crucial factor in the success of the retail sector—whether offline, online, or both. A seamless supply chain, optimized inventory levels, and strict delivery management are generally considered essential for ensuring customer satisfaction, maximizing company profitability, and delivering strong returns to shareholders. In e-commerce, the quality of fulfillment operations is often highlighted as critical for building a sustainable competitive advantage [1]. However, this dominant view overlooks a far more complex reality: powerful large retailers are thriving despite logistics that, by conventional performance standards, would be deemed “chaotic.” Yet, rather than being a weakness, these inefficiencies appear to drive sales. This raises an intriguing question: could what is typically seen as logistical underperformance serve as a powerful lever for marketing success?
There is no doubt that this perspective on supply chain management is iconoclastic—perhaps even provocative. But is it really? On the contrary, three key insights highlight the relevance of a heterodox approach to logistics—thinking outside the box, as I explored in a recent book [2]. First, stockouts in-store or online, along with extended wait times, can unexpectedly enhance a product’s appeal and create a sense of desirable scarcity, increasing consumer demand. Second, chaotic logistics can foster an opportunistic and agile business model, prioritizing adaptability and responsiveness over rigid planning while reducing operational constraints. Third, what appears to be logistical inefficiency can serve as a strategic justification for pricing and assortment management policies that maximize a large retailer’s profitability and strengthen its market position. A closer and more nuanced analysis of these perspectives reveals their strategic significance.
Perceived Scarcity: Amplifying Demand
Traditionally, stockouts in-store or online are viewed as failures that harm a large retailer’s profitability. However, research suggests that, in certain contexts, product unavailability can have the opposite effect, as demonstrated by Barton et al.’s [3] meta-analysis. When a product becomes difficult to obtain, its scarcity enhances its perceived value. Faced with the possibility of missing out, consumers feel a heightened urgency to purchase, increasing the likelihood of a sale. This phenomenon aligns with scarcity theory, which posits that goods perceived as rare or difficult to access are often seen as more valuable [4]. Large retailers can strategically leverage this mechanism, turning a disruption into a powerful driver of desirability. By applying this approach, a large retailer can encourage customers to return frequently—whether to physical stores or online—fostering loyalty while generating sustained demand for products that are not always in stock.
On the other hand, companies like Brico Dépôt (home improvement and DIY), Costco (warehouse club and wholesale), and Action (non-food consumer goods) deliberately employ strategies that make their products temporarily inaccessible. These large retailers cultivate a “treasure hunt” experience, where consumers understand that if they do not act quickly, the product may soon be gone [5]. While this is not a new approach, it has become increasingly prevalent in sectors such as food, electronics, and fashion, where promotional items and exclusive products are often available in limited quantities. The scarcity of products on shelves—or the speed at which certain items sell out—compels customers to return frequently, ensuring they do not miss out on a deal. Rather than viewing stock discontinuity as a weakness, these businesses harness it as a strategic tool to attract shoppers, maintain steady foot traffic, and stimulate impulse purchases. Not only does this approach drive rapid inventory turnover, but it also fosters a sense of anticipation and excitement that strengthens brand loyalty.
Some companies take this approach even further, turning logistical constraints into strategic selling points. Announcing long wait times or limited quantities becomes an intentional marketing tool, leveraging consumer psychology. Shoppers, eager to acquire something rare or exclusive, often accept delays or less-than-ideal conditions if it means securing a coveted product. This phenomenon is particularly evident in luxury markets, where scarcity is not just a supply issue but a core branding strategy [6]. Hermès, with its highly sought-after Birkin bags, and Rolex, with long waiting lists for premium watches, deliberately cultivate exclusivity to heighten desirability. Even outside luxury, brands use similar tactics. Limited-edition sneakers from Nike or Adidas are released in small batches to generate hype, while electronics companies such as Sony and Nvidia leverage supply shortages to sustain demand for PlayStation consoles and graphics cards. The perception of rarity fuels anticipation, making products seem even more valuable and desirable.
A similar dynamic is at play with Aramisauto, a key player in the French car distribution market. Unlike traditional franchised dealerships, which maintain planned inventories and predictable delivery schedules, Aramisauto operates with an opportunistic sourcing model. The company buys vehicles in bulk whenever manufacturers like Renault or Stellantis need to offload unsold stock. As a result, its vehicle selection is constantly changing, with no guarantee that a specific model will be available at any given time. Delivery times also fluctuate significantly, ranging from a few days to several months, depending on the vehicle’s origin and logistical factors. However, this approach offers a significant advantage: by acquiring cars at deeply discounted prices, Aramisauto can sell new vehicles at prices up to 30% lower than traditional franchised dealerships. While the unpredictability may frustrate buyers seeking a specific model, the ever-changing inventory creates a sense of urgency, prompting quicker purchasing decisions.
Logistical Chaos and Marketing Agility
Large retailers that excel at accurately forecasting demand, optimally managing stock, and minimizing costs are often seen as “masters of logistics.” In contrast, a more “chaotic” approach enables some companies to respond better to unexpected challenges. Hard-discount companies like Aldi and Action exemplify the urgent need for organized logistical chaos. Rather than relying on rigid forecasts and constantly renewed stocks, they frequently adjust their offerings in response to market opportunities. This strategy allows them to secure highly competitive prices by negotiating exceptional deals with suppliers [7], without being constrained by long-term assortment planning. The fluctuating assortment also becomes a key asset in attracting consumers, as customers know they will not always find the same products with each visit, fostering a sense of excitement and anticipation. This dynamic keeps customers coming back, enhancing both engagement and sales potential.
This business model is based on a high level of responsiveness to buying opportunities, allowing these companies to offer a wide range of products while staying highly competitive. Logistical chaos, therefore, becomes a key advantage for hard-discount companies, which leverage it to quickly adapt to a constantly changing market. By replacing rigid planning with resilient flexibility, these companies optimize operating costs while minimizing waste. In addition, they benefit significantly by reducing fixed costs related to logistical facilities. Reactive inventory management minimizes the need for large warehouses or centralized platforms, instead favoring local supply systems like urban micro fulfillment centers [8]. This operating model not only enables them to stay agile in the face of market fluctuations but also allows them to rapidly adjust their offerings to shifting economic conditions, particularly during times of crisis or inflation. The adaptability of this approach supports long-term sustainability, even in uncertain times.
Moreover, this approach provides significant financial flexibility, which can be reinvested into other strategic areas, such as marketing or customer experience management. For instance, a large retailer adopting this logic can allocate additional resources to promotions, advertising campaigns, or enhancing store design. This strategy can be an effective means of retaining price-sensitive customers while simultaneously boosting foot traffic and increasing sales. Furthermore, the variability in product offerings creates a dynamic buying environment, where consumers are encouraged to return frequently, fearing they might miss out on valuable opportunities. Rather than focusing on occasional stockouts, these large retailers embrace controlled instability, a tactic that does not necessarily harm their overall performance. By leveraging more fluid and opportunistic logistics, they successfully combine competitiveness with adaptability to shifting consumer trends, ensuring sustainable profitability, and long-term growth in an unpredictable, rapidly evolving market.
This is particularly evident in the case of Action, founded in 1993 in the Netherlands, which has experienced significant growth across Europe in recent years, largely driven by its strategic pricing approach. The large retailer consistently offers nearly 1,500 items priced under one euro, covering a wide range of products, from household goods to office supplies. This pricing strategy encourages frequent store visits, as customers aim to take advantage of the deals, even at the expense of leaving the shelves in disarray. The product assortment is regularly updated, creating a sense of urgency that drives impulse purchases, as customers are aware that stock levels are limited, and high-demand items may sell out quickly. At the core of Action’s approach is this “bargain-hunting” dynamic, which ensures a steady flow of shoppers without the need for active management of stockouts. Conversely, when products are unavailable, customers often attribute the shortage to their own delay in arriving at the store.
Inefficient Logistics: A Winning Strategy
Instead of fighting against stockout situations in-store or online, large retailers have increasingly recognized that it makes strategic sense to integrate these occurrences as a key competitive lever. Rather than viewing stockouts as failures, they deliberately cultivate them to maintain an aura of scarcity around their products. By controlling supply and artificially extending delivery times, these companies create a sense of urgency and heightened consumer desire. This phenomenon is particularly effective in sectors where exclusivity, originality, and prestige are key values, such as luxury or limited-edition products. More surprisingly, logistical inefficiencies are also used strategically as leverage to justify price hikes, because when supply difficulties are cited, companies find it easier to convince their customers that price increases are unavoidable [9], as we witnessed during the Covid-19 pandemic and the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia. This strategy successfully capitalizes on consumer behavior, leveraging scarcity to boost demand and sales.
Founded in France in 2011, Le Slip Français (“The French Brief”) exemplifies how intentionally creating logistical inefficiencies can become a powerful marketing strategy. Specializing in the production and physical distribution of high-quality, locally made underwear for men and women, the brand quickly set itself apart with its unique marketing approach. This includes releasing limited-edition collections, which generates a sense of urgency, encouraging customers to make purchases before items sell out. The company intentionally limits production and distribution, leveraging consumers’ desire for rare and exclusive products to build an emotional connection with its audience. Through its strategic scarcity, Le Slip Français creates an aspirational image of exclusivity and desirability. The brand has successfully turned the logistical challenges faced by its competitors into a strategic advantage. Far from diminishing the perceived value of its offer, these disruptions enhance it, creating anticipation and loyalty among its growing customer portfolio.
Large retailers adopting this innovative strategy are not only boosting their margins, but they are also shaping customers’ perceptions of the product assortment value. By maintaining a degree of opacity around the causes of stockouts, they transform a logistical constraint into a potent marketing argument. The temporary absence of an item heightens the desire to purchase it once it becomes available again, either in-store or online. Powerful large retailers take advantage of this dynamic to segment their customer base, offering programs that guarantee priority access to items in short supply. This enhances the feeling of exclusivity and strengthens the loyalty of regular buyers, especially when they are given timely updates after a stockout [10]. The phenomenon extends beyond luxury goods, as limited promotions and seasonal offers are based on similar principles. Therefore, far from being a mere logistical inconvenience, stockouts are increasingly becoming a powerful lever, influencing purchasing decisions and justifying higher prices.
Large retailers not only increase their margins but also shape customers’ perceptions of the value of their products. By maintaining a certain level of opacity around the causes of stockouts, they turn a logistical constraint into a powerful marketing tool. The temporary absence of an item heightens the desire to purchase it once it is back on the shelves, creating a sense of urgency that fosters impulse buying. This phenomenon was observed and studied in the context of panic buying after lockdowns were lifted during the Covid-19 pandemic [11]. Some large retailers capitalize on this dynamic to segment their customer base, offering priority access to high-demand products. This reinforces the sense of exclusivity, strengthening the loyalty of regular buyers and encouraging anticipatory behavior among occasional shoppers. The phenomenon extends beyond luxury items, as limited promotions and seasonal offers operate on similar principles. By deliberately orchestrating logistical chaos, large retailers create the illusion of controlled scarcity, which paradoxically drives increased consumption.
A Deeper Understanding of Contexts
There is no denying it: achieving a high level of logistical performance is generally considered to be an inescapable imperative in the retail industry, and this managerial doxa is taught to MBA students around the world. Yet some companies in the retail industry are succeeding by adopting a more innovative approach that defies this logic. Far from being systematically perceived as harmful, stockouts in shops or online create a scarcity effect that benefits demand. Similarly, chaotic logistics enhance commercial agility, reduce fixed costs, and encourage a more opportunistic approach to conquering new markets. Finally, apparent logistical inefficiency is sometimes used as a strategic lever to justify higher prices, generate in-store traffic, or stand out from the competition. This non-traditional approach has proven successful, even in rapidly shifting market conditions. In short, has not the time come for a serious rethink of the classic performance criteria in the retail industry?
Rather than striving for ultra-optimized logistics at all costs, powerful large retailers are capitalizing on a certain degree of disorder and unpredictability to maximize marketing impact. This approach, grounded in flexibility and responsiveness, offers significant advantages in a competitive environment where consumer expectations are rapidly shifting. While unpredictability may seem risky at times, it allows companies to stand out by providing a more memorable and unique shopping experience. Of course, this is not to say that logistical chaos is always the best choice—this business model is not suitable for every sector or company. It is essential to carefully define the specific contexts in which this approach is beneficial versus harmful [12]. Therefore, additional research is needed to better understand the conditions under which a successful balance between order and chaos can become a sustainable, long-term competitive strategy. Understanding these nuances will help businesses adapt to changing markets and continuously improve their approach.
About the Author
Gilles Paché is Professor of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at Aix-Marseille University, and Director of Research at the CERGAM Lab, in Aix-en-Provence, France. He has more than 650 publications in the forms of journal papers, books, edited books, edited proceedings, edited special issues, book chapters, conference papers and reports, including the recent two books: Variations sur la consommation et la distribution: Individus, expériences, systèmes (2022), and Heterodox logistics (2023).
References
[1] Anonymous (2023). Behind every successful E-commerce order: The art of logistics fulfillment. The World Financial Review [online]. 18 December. Available on: https://worldfinancialreview.com/behind-every-successful-e-commerce-order-the-art-of-logistics-fulfillment/
[2] Paché, G. (2023). Heterodox logistics. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.
[3] Barton, B., Zlatevska, N., and Oppewal, H. (2022). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 741-758.
[4] Robbins, L. (2007 [1932]). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Auburn (AL): Ludwig von Mises Institute.
[5] Rouquet, A., and Paché, G. (2017). Re-enchanting logistics: The cases of pick-your-own farm and large retail stores. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 21-29.
[6] Fan, L. (2019). Effects of resource scarcity in consumer behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
[7] Voigt, K.-I., Buliga, O., and Michl, K. (2017). Business model pioneers: Management for professionals. Cham: Springer.
[8] Karaoulanis, A. (2024). The role of micro fulfilment centers in alleviating, in a sustainable way, the urban last mile logistics problem: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 20, Article 8774.
[9] Khalil, M., and Lewis, V. (2024). Price and output responses to supply disruptions in times of high uncertainty. CEPR VoxEU [online], 22 April. Available on: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/price-and-output-responses-supply-disruptions-times-high-uncertainty
[10] Kumar, P., Rossiter Hofer, A., and Peinkofer, S. (2023). The role of scarcity-inducing post-stockout disclosures on consumer response to stockouts. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 53, No. 9, pp. 946-966.
[11] Cham, T.-H., Cheng, B.-L., Lee, Y.-H., and Cheah, J.-H. (2023). Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying. Current Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 22, pp. 19116-19136.
[12] Breugelmans, E., Campo, K., and Gijsbrechts, E. (2006). Opportunities for active stock-out management in online stores: The impact of the stock-out policy on online stock-out reactions. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 215-228.
White Neo Colonialism Fantasies and Trump’s Gaza ‘Riviera’ Plan
By Marcelina Horrillo Husillos, Journalist and Correspondent at The World Financial Review
U.S. President Donald Trump shared his vision of a Gaza Strip to clear its nearly 2 million Palestinian inhabitants by relocating them to new homes else were, so that the US could send troops to the Strip, take ownership, develop it into an international beach resort under U.S. control and build the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
To see an American president endorse what would be the forcible expulsion of Palestinians from their home – many made makeshift shelters in the ruins of their homes destroyed in Israeli’s onslaught against Hamas -, is an open amoral encouragement of an exodus that would subvert decades of US policy, international law and basic humanity showed the most imperialist reflex, after he’s already threatened to annex the Panama Canal, Greenland and Canada. He envisaged a real estate deal whereby he’d assume responsibility for Gaza and mastermind a job-creating urban regeneration project, included renewable energy, a light rail system, airports and harbors, digital governance and beachfront hotels. He called it an American “ownership position.” A better phrase would be colonialism for the 21st century.
In Trump’s recent public pronouncements on Gaza, there’s a crucial missing element — any sense that the Palestinian people would have a choice in their own destiny. As Aaron David Miller, a former US Middle East peace negotiator, said on CNN: “It’s not a real estate deal for them, it’s not even a humanitarian issue for them. It’s an existential issue.”
Gaza Riviera’s Plan Coined
Media reports suggest Trump’s idea was based on a 49-page document drawn up by Washington-based economics professor Joseph Pelzman last summer, and it revived an idea floated by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner a year ago.
During a Podcast talk last August, Pelzman said that in order to make his plan happen, Gaza needs to be “completely emptied out,” ; the US “can lean on Egypt” to accept refugees from Gaza because the country is in debt to the US, he suggested.
Kushner was Trump’s senior White House adviser in his first term and played a key role in the Abraham Accords between Tel Aviv and four Arab countries in 2020. His Saudi-backed firm Affinity Partners “received the green-light from Israeli regulators to double its stake in Phoenix Financial Ltd”, which is a major Israeli financial firm and funds the construction of illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The nod from Israeli regulators came days before Trump’s inauguration.
He stated that “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable… if people would focus on building up livelihoods… It’s a little bit of an unfortunate situation there but, from Israel’s perspective, I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up.”
Trump’s February 5 statements on taking over and owning Gaza and resettling Gaza’s Palestinian population elsewhere, in “a beautiful area with homes and safety they can live out their lives in peace and harmony” because “the only reason the Palestinians want to go back to Gaza is they have no alternative. It’s right now a demolition site… Virtually every building is down.” reaffirm previous talks around the subject to make 2 million Palestinians leave their homes and never return, something that could be classified as ethnic cleansing.
Old Rooted 21st White Colonialism
White colonial dreams of rights to other peoples’ lands can be traced as far back as the 1479 Treaty of Alcacovas, which established the principle that an area outside of Europe could be claimed by a European country, and was followed within 50 years by the Treaty of Tordesillas and the Treaty of Saragossa with which the Portuguese and the Spanish purported to divide the globe between themselves. There is a clear line from that to the infamous Berlin West Africa Conference 400 years later, attended by the US and all major European powers which established the legal claim by Europeans that all of Africa could be occupied by whoever could take it.
Similar proposals were enabled free trade laid out by the Berlin Conference 140 years ago gave birth to the horror that was the Congo Free State – a veritable hell that in 23 years claimed the lives of up to 13 million Congolese. The conference also supercharged and militarised what became known as the Scramble for Africa, which was accompanied by brutal wars of conquest, disease and campaigns of extermination. More than a century later, Africans are still living with the impact.
The precedent of using the protection and development of capitalism to justify colonial occupation is today reflected in Trump’s assertion that he will rebuild and internationalise Gaza, creating jobs and prosperity for “everyone”. In essence, Trump is unwittingly attempting to base his colonial claim on to Gaza on the doctrine: that he can impose American rule, in this case through expulsion of the natives, and that he will enable trade to flourish.
Real State over Dead Bodies
Since its inception, Israel has operated as a colonial power, fragmenting, dominating, and erasing the indigenous population. From the Nakba, when 750,000 Palestinians were violently cleansed, to the ongoing annihilation of Gaza, Israel’s actions mirror the extractive, exploitative logic of European colonial regimes. Like the First Nations in Canada or the Aboriginal peoples of Australia, Palestinians are treated as obstacles to progress: “progress” that envisions Gaza as Dubai, another capitalist playground.
Latest figures just before the ceasefire went into effect recorded at least 61,709 people killed, including 17,492 children. The figure for missing or presumed dead is 14,222 while 111,588 people, mostly women and children, have been wounded, a majority with life-altering injuries. Nearly 80 percent of Gaza’s infrastructure, especially in the north, has been completely destroyed.
The International Court of Justice has issued two advisory opinions concerning Israel and Palestine, the 9 July 2004 Advisory Opinion on the Wall, and the 19 July 2024 Advisory Opinion on Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. The ICJ has no option but to issue a judgment confirming that Israel has perpetrated genocide, and that the issue of “intent” has been established. It is a continuation of the Nakba, a continuation of the Zionist dream of taking the entire territory for the Israelis and expel the native Palestinians, as if they were not human, as if they did not matter, as if they had no rights.
At present, after 15 months of bombardment, Gaza is a “demolition site” in Trump’s words, that will require 10-15 years of reconstruction. His proposal drawn shocked reactions from Palestinians, Arab neighbouring countries and Western audiences who say it would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing and illegal under international law. However, the Gulf countries see a potential source of investment in rebuilding Gaza, Saudis have consistently said they won’t agree to this unless a clear path toward Palestinian statehood opens up, strongly rejecting offering any finance while a pathway to an independent Palestinian state remains closed.
Conclusion
Colonial fantasies thrive on illusion. Past and present, imperial powers imagine emptying lands, redrawing borders, and erasing histories to achieve their ambitions. What Trump is proposing in Gaza and elsewhere is a return to old colonialism, and geopolitics run by the law of the jungle. That, after all, is what colonialism is in its most fundamental form. Your fate is decided not by you, but by some ruler in a foreign capital, simply because they are stronger, and there is nothing you can do about it. Trump’s obliviousness to the aspirations of Palestinians and his assumption that they’d prefer a modern housing development elsewhere showed a stunning naivety about the causes of the conflict. But it was reflected in an interaction in the Oval Office when he asked, “Why would they want to return? The place has been hell.” A reporter replied: “But it’s their home, sir. Why would they leave?”
It’s notable that two of the territories Trump has fixated on, Greenland and Gaza, are in some ways two of the last remaining holdovers of the colonial age. That’s not to say they’re the same: Greenland is an autonomous territory with meaningful self-rule, albeit ultimately under Danish sovereignty, while the status of Gaza is, to say the least, highly contested. (Hamas still largely controls internal governance; Israel maintains external control, while the UN and many human rights groups view it as occupied territory.) But both are home to a recognized people with a long claim to the land. And both are considered in some circles to be examples of the unfinished business of decolonization.
Ultimately, Gaza’s story is not only one of rubble or colonial violence but of enduring defiance. Palestinian resistance, like that of colonized peoples before them, reminds us that the colonial fantasy is doomed to fail. Tragically, this failure always comes at an unbearable human cost for which we must struggle to ensure that the perpetrators are finally held accountable.