Home Blog Page 109

Federal Reserve Stuck in Neutral as Uncertainty Looms Over U.S. Economy

National flag of United States of America dollar

The Federal Reserve is holding its ground as economic uncertainty clouds the outlook, with policymakers emphasizing that monetary policy is “well-positioned” but hesitant to shift gears amid risks from trade policies, inflation, and financial stability concerns.

Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic captured the cautious tone, warning of “crosscurrents” affecting decision-making, including potential shifts in tax and regulatory policies. Minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee’s January meeting echoed similar sentiments, highlighting “elevated uncertainty” in trade, immigration, and fiscal policies.

St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem acknowledged inflation risks but maintained that current policy, with interest rates at 4.25%-4.5%, remains “modestly restrictive.” Meanwhile, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee expressed concerns over potential tariff shocks but refrained from signaling a policy shift.

Adding to the tension, Moody’s Analytics Chief Economist Mark Zandi flagged the fragility of the U.S. bond market, warning of a potential sell-off due to rising debt levels and stressed financial systems.

Despite market expectations for rate cuts, policymakers remain hesitant, awaiting clearer signs of inflation cooling before adjusting their stance. As economic uncertainty persists, the Fed is stuck in neutral, bracing for potential storms ahead.

Related Readings:

Employees over American flag

FED cut rate

United States of America flag painted on a concrete wall

AI Adoption & Change Management: Overcoming Impostor Syndrome for Workforce Success

By Luca Collina MBA and Dr. Casey LaFrance          

It is in recruitment and management that the topic of Impostor syndrome is typically discussed. But as businesses take on Generative AI (GenAI), even long service workers could feel self-doubt. This makes it hard to implement technical change. Which countermeasures can remove or reduce the effect of impostor syndrome?

Challenges of Impostor Syndrome in AI Adoption

Talents Poaching & Training

Impostor Syndrome (IS)  is a problem in the minds of candidates and recruitment leaders. Some form of inferiority complex stands firm in 70% of people—rising to 75% on the part of powerful women. That wobbles confidence, and it can lead to second-guessing hiring decisions or missing out on top talent. Impostor. (IS) stops both internal and external candidates from applying for AI roles, deeming themselves unworthy for the role before even trying.  

 Gender Differences and AI, Building Workplace Equality 

Another significant aspect to address in terms of AI is its impact on gender equality in the workplace. International Monetary Fund found the percentage of existing jobs, which belong to men, susceptible to loss because of AI-driven automation in the future, perhaps for its sheer volume, is no more than 1%– a much lower number than that belonging to women, at around 11%. How women get ready for their future will surely be altered.  

What these points underscore is yet another layer of complexity in fostering an inclusive and safe workplace. Impostor Syndrome may be one of the biggest obstacles to change management, and AI adoption. Leaders hesitate on AI decisions, fearing mistakes. Change managers provide structured support to build confidence and close skill gaps

Evaluating the effects of emotional AI on organizations  

Building trust and managing Change while integrating AI

A strong change management framework must integrate AI with trust-building.

Change managers lead engagement, training, and feedback., following these steps:

  • Establish psychological safety through open channels that allow employees to voice their concernsand ask for help. Implement mentorship programmes forgaining confidence.
  • Create safe spaces for employees to safely share AI-service related fears withoutbeing criticised.
  • Expanding on Step 1, you can promote a cultureof “humility “— starting with CMs and, later, senior staff acting as peers to better support employees.
  • Initiate stress management programs like mindfulness, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), mental resiliencetraining, guided meditation, etc., that can help employees deal with Impostor Syndrome. Although these are not direct CM tasks, it is highly suggestedthat we design and oversee these initiatives and

complete the connections between training→ companies’ goals→Performance ←→ Workforce wellbeing.

Crafting emotional bridges for a better AI literacy

(AI) literacy programs need to address technical training and the emotional barriers surrounding AI-related skills. A viable approach might be:

  • AI learning paths, which train beginners and intermediate users over different levels.
  • AI learning modules specific to one’s role for staff members to bridge any gaps they may have in their skills that make them nervous.
  • AI learning networks developed from group discussions that break the mould, combined with AI pilot projects designed to carry on this experience of lessons in common.

 AI literacy programs should take technical training as only one aspect of how staff can handle their emotional issues of learning:  

  • AI learning paths with beginner, intermediate and advanced training segments. ·
  • AI applications tailored for use by job type so that workers do not feel anxious about gaps in skill level
  • AI learning communities is a direction in which our educational system not only goes to novice users of this technology. Workers across different professions are all brought together, sharing insights gained from their skills and backgrounds. Maybe this general idea would replace todays on-campus only approach to learning.

Support Mechanisms  

Specialized Solutions for Impostor Syndrome 

If you are suffering from Impostor Syndrome, you don’t need a generic AI learning programme.  

Adaptive learning platforms, such as Coursera’s AI assistant, that offer real-time feedback and adjust difficulty depending on progress.

Chatbots powered by AI that provide psychological support, such as Woebot, which offers cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) guidance and mental health counselling.

Anonymous self-assessment tools such as Pymetrics, which leverages neurosciencebased AI to help employees understand their strengths and areas that need improvement.

Assessing AI Adoption Beyond the Lens of Productivity

Success should be also measured in the level of confidence employees feel and their psychological well-being, not just their productivity. Effective methods include  a. Surveys of confidence measuring the perception of employees on AI; b. Use pre- and post-AI adoption surveys to measure how comfortable employees are and their willingness to engage with AI-fuelled tasks.

American Express used sentiment analysis based on artificial intelligence (AI) to lift employee satisfaction by 15 % over 12 months.

Integrate AI learning into performance and reward the increased value of ownership.

“Challenges:” When appraisals are implemented through AI, is it possible that human tolerance will disappear and be replaced by formulaic decisions? Monitoring workers’ excellent performances by AI is seen as an invasion of personal privacy. It can also make workers question their value and what they are doing.  

“Mitigations”: We cannot put all our hope in AI. Adding the human touch remains necessary; otherwise, decision-making will become increasingly sterile.  

IBM has been using AI appraisals and manager reviews. By elucidating the process and providing means to appeal against decisions made, trust can be built up and resistance undermined.

Change Managers – how to mitigate impostor syndrome in AI adoption?

Impostor Syndrome could block the uptake of AI. While they must adapt and change to embrace AI adoption, (IS) can affect leaders and employees alike, which means change management is key. Change managers should cultivate psychological safety, enhance AI literacy, and develop learning networks to ease transitions. You hear all about productivity, but success is based on confidence and well-being. Striking a balance between automation and human judgment, they are defining the of future of work. These are the new literacies and competencies of contemporary change managers that will achieve safe AI deployment and workforce resilience.

About the Authors

lucaLuca Collina is a transformational and AI Business consultant at TRANSFORAGE TCA LTD. Awarded by York St John University with Business –Postgraduate Programme Prize and by CMCE (Centre for Management Consulting Excellence-UK) for his paper in Technology and Consulting .  Published Academic author. Thought leader with THINKERS360 in GEN-AI, Business Continuity, and Education.

Dr. Casey LaFranceDr. Casey LaFrance is a professor & Grad Programme Director at Western Illinois University.

XRP Investor’s Guide: How to Maximize Investment Returns with BYDFi Platform

Smart investing

XRP (Ripple Coin), the core digital asset of the Ripple network, has always been considered one of the most promising tokens. With a series of positive developments unfolding, the investment outlook for XRP has become increasingly optimistic:

1. Brazil Approves First XRP Spot ETF

On February 19, 2025, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse announced on Twitter (X) that Brazil’s securities regulator has approved the country’s first XRP spot exchange-traded fund (ETF). At the same time, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) confirmed that it has acknowledged several XRP spot ETF applications, including from Bitwise, 21Shares, and Grayscale. The SEC has called for public comments on the filings within 21 days of their publication in the Federal Register, after which it will decide whether to approve, reject, or initiate further procedures. This move not only opens up new market opportunities for XRP but could also attract more institutional investors and capital inflows, potentially reshaping the cryptocurrency market.

2. Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Is Coming to an End

For the past four years, Ripple has been locked in a legal battle with the SEC. Recently, the SEC has signaled it may drop the case, removing it from its website and reassigning Tenreiro (the lead litigator for the SEC in the Ripple case, who had accused the company of conducting unregistered securities offerings via XRP token sales) away from cryptocurrency-related tasks. This suggests the case may soon be coming to a close. Furthermore, Ripple’s business in the U.S. has experienced significant growth, supported by policies under the Trump administration, and XRP’s price has soared by over 300% since Trump’s election.

3. Ripple’s Brand Revitalization and Market Expansion

Ripple has announced a strategic shift, focusing even more on cross-border payments and stablecoin integration. As global demand for digital currency payments grows, XRP is poised to gain wider market recognition as a core technology for the payments industry. By 2025, it is expected that 80% of Japanese banks will adopt Ripple technology for international remittances and payments. SBI Group CEO Yoshitaka Kitao stated that XRP offers greater practical value for cross-border payments than Bitcoin. As RippleNet’s adoption increases, demand for XRP is set to rise, laying the foundation for future price growth.

BYDFi Supports Diverse Investor Profiles to Capture XRP Opportunities

As one of the top three cryptocurrencies by market cap, XRP provides rich trading opportunities for investors, whether they’re looking for short-term fluctuations or long-term value appreciation. BYDFi, with its diverse set of trading features, caters to various investor needs. Whether you’re a beginner or an experienced trader, BYDFi provides tailored solutions to help users succeed in XRP trading.

1. Short-Term Traders: Maximizing Returns Through High Leverage and Short-Term Strategies

XRP’s price volatility presents lucrative opportunities for short-term investors. By utilizing technical analysis and high leverage strategies, traders can amplify their returns:

  • Real-Time Technical Analysis: BYDFi provides a variety of technical analysis tools, including candlestick charts, MACD, and RSI, enabling traders to quickly identify market trends and respond accordingly.
  • Cross and Isolated Margin Modes: Depending on their risk tolerance, short-term traders can opt for either isolated or cross margin modes. The isolated mode helps reduce the risk of a single position, while cross margin is suited for those seeking higher returns.
  • High Leverage: BYDFi’s perpetual contracts with up to 150x leverage help users rapidly expand positions and seize opportunities created by market volatility.

2. Long-Term Holders: Steady Growth Through Stable Investment Strategies

For those who see long-term potential in XRP, BYDFi offers investment strategies designed to foster steady growth:

  • Spot Trading: Users can engage in long-term holdings with low trading fees and a stable platform, reducing the risks associated with frequent trading.
  • Auto-Invest Strategy: The feature enables long-term investors to purchase XRP regularly, averaging out costs and mitigating the impact of market volatility.
  • Martingale Strategy: The Martingale strategy allows investors to increase their position size when the market declines, aiming to reduce average entry costs and position themselves for greater returns when the market recovers.

3. Professional Traders: Advanced Tools and Multi-Strategy Portfolio Management

For seasoned traders, BYDFi offers an array of advanced tools and flexible strategies to optimize portfolio management:

  • Perpetual Contract Trading: With both coin-margined and USDT-margined contracts, traders can leverage up to 150x, supporting a range of strategies, such as long, short, and hedging. The platform also supports short-term arbitrage and hedging for Coin-M Contracts.
  • Sub-Wallet Function: The sub-wallet feature allows users to allocate funds across different trading strategies, offering precise capital management to reduce risk and increase returns.
  • Advanced Charts and Candlestick Analysis: BYDFi provides in-depth technical analysis tools like advanced candlestick charts, market depth analysis, and real-time data, allowing professional traders to monitor market movements and make informed decisions.
  • Contract Copy trading profit-sharing: Professional traders can earn additional income through the copy trading feature, with a 10% profit-sharing model, offering extra earnings for their expertise.

4. New Users: Learning the Basics and Gaining Expertise in XRP Trading

For newcomers to the world of XRP, BYDFi provides a suite of easy-to-use tools and educational resources to help users gradually master crypto trading:

  • Easy XRP Purchase: Global users can purchase XRP with over 90 fiat currencies via a variety of payment methods such as credit cards, bank transfers, and Google Pay. The platform’s “Convert” feature also allows users to instantly convert other digital assets into XRP, providing a fast and convenient trading experience.
  • Demo Trading: The Demo Trading feature enables users to practice on a risk-free account, getting comfortable with platform operations while gaining valuable experience.
  • Start copy trading from $10: New users can follow experienced traders to learn their strategies and gradually improve their skills.
  • Educational Resources: BYDFi’s comprehensive Help Center and Buy Coin Guide feature support beginners in understanding the fundamentals of crypto and how to navigate market fluctuations.

Currently, BYDFi allows users to trade without the need for KYC verification, providing a convenient option for those seeking to maintain privacy. This feature significantly enhances its appeal to users concerned with privacy and data security. Additionally, the platform offers new users benefits up to 8100 USDT, with VIP users enjoying reduced trading fees. For more details, visit BYDFi’s official website or download the BYDFi app.

About BYDFi

Founded in 2020, BYDFi is a Forbes-certified global top-10 crypto exchange trusted by over 1,000,000 users worldwide. The platform offers a variety of trading tools and is set to launch “MOONX,” an on-chain trading tool specifically designed for Memecoin traders. MOONX integrates Safeheron’s top-tier security technology to ensure the safety of users’ trades. For more information, stay tuned to BYDFi’s official channels.

BYDFi offers 24/7 multilingual customer support to ensure that users can receive timely assistance whenever they encounter issues. BYDFi is committed to providing every user with a world-class cryptocurrency trading experience. BUIDL Your Dream Finance.

Twitter( X )| LinkedIn| Facebook | Telegram| YouTube

The photo in the article is provided by the company(s) mentioned in the article and used with permission.

A Financial Tool with Wider Implications

Miniature car model, coins stack, calculator and saving account book or financial statement on office desk table

Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) car finance has become one of the most popular ways to purchase a vehicle in the UK and beyond. It offers an attractive alternative to traditional car loans by allowing individuals to pay lower monthly installments with the option to buy the vehicle at the end of the term. However, while the concept is appealing, it is essential to consider its wider financial implications, particularly in relation to mortgages, property investment, and insurance policies.

Understanding PCP Car Finance and Its Structure

PCP car finance is structured differently from conventional hire purchase agreements. Instead of paying off the entire cost of the car in equal installments, buyers pay a deposit followed by lower monthly payments. At the end of the term, they can either return the car, pay a final balloon payment to own it outright, or trade it in for a new deal.

While this flexibility appeals to many, there are financial considerations that extend beyond the automotive industry. This type of financing affects credit scores, long-term debt obligations, and future borrowing potential, particularly for larger financial commitments such as property purchases.

PCP Car Finance and Mortgage Eligibility

One often-overlooked aspect of PCP car finance is its impact on mortgage eligibility. Mortgage lenders assess an applicant’s financial commitments when determining their borrowing potential. Since PCP car finance agreements involve ongoing financial obligations, they can reduce an individual’s affordability when applying for a mortgage.

For instance, a significant monthly car payment may be viewed as a liability that limits disposable income. This can lead to lenders offering lower mortgage amounts or, in some cases, rejecting applications due to perceived financial strain. It is crucial for individuals planning to buy property to consider how their car finance agreement might affect their mortgage prospects.

The Connection Between Car Finance and Property Investment

Property investors, in particular, need to be mindful of their financial obligations, including those tied to PCP car finance. Real estate investments often require strong financial standing and the ability to secure financing for multiple properties. Having an ongoing PCP agreement might affect an investor’s debt-to-income ratio, reducing their borrowing power.

Additionally, property investors who use buy-to-let mortgages need to maintain a robust financial profile to secure favorable loan terms. While PCP car finance is a manageable expense for many, it is an added financial burden that could influence lenders’ risk assessments.

Insurance Considerations for PCP-Financed Vehicles

When purchasing a vehicle through PCP car finance, insurance is a key consideration. Unlike outright ownership, financed cars typically require comprehensive insurance coverage, as lenders need assurance that their asset is protected. This often results in higher insurance premiums compared to standard car insurance policies.

Another factor to consider is Guaranteed Asset Protection (GAP) insurance, which covers the difference between the car’s value and the remaining finance amount in case of a total loss. While beneficial, it adds to the overall cost of ownership. Consumers should carefully evaluate these additional expenses to determine whether a PCP agreement is financially viable in the long run.

The Role of Reclaim 247 in Financial Transparency

In recent years, concerns have arisen regarding the mis-selling of financial products, including PCP car finance agreements. Reclaim 247 is one of the companies that assist consumers in identifying potential mis-selling cases and reclaiming funds lost due to unfair financial agreements. Their work highlights the importance of financial transparency and consumer protection, ensuring that individuals fully understand the terms and conditions of their financial commitments.

Alternatives to PCP Car Finance for Financial Stability

For individuals who prioritize financial stability, alternatives to PCP car finance may be worth exploring. These include:

  • Traditional Car Loans – These involve straightforward repayment structures and result in full ownership at the end of the loan term.
  • Leasing Agreements – Leasing can be an attractive option for those who prefer driving new cars without the commitment of ownership.
  • Outright Purchases – If financially feasible, buying a vehicle outright can eliminate monthly payments and long-term financial obligations.

By exploring these alternatives, individuals can align their financial commitments with their broader goals, such as homeownership or property investment.

Planning Financial Commitments Wisely

Before entering into any financial agreement, whether it is PCP car finance, a mortgage, or an insurance policy, careful planning is essential. Individuals should assess their current and future financial needs to ensure they are not overburdened by multiple financial obligations. Consulting a financial advisor can also provide valuable insights into how different financial products interact and affect overall financial health.

Conclusion

PCP car finance is a popular but complex financial tool that extends beyond the automotive industry. Its impact on mortgage eligibility, property investment potential, and insurance requirements highlights the need for careful financial planning. While the flexibility of PCP agreements is appealing, individuals must consider the long-term consequences before committing.

Organizations like Reclaim 247 emphasize the importance of financial awareness, ensuring that consumers make informed decisions. As financial markets evolve, staying informed and evaluating all available options will remain crucial for achieving financial stability and success.

White Neo Colonialism Fantasies and Trump’s Gaza ‘Riviera’ Plan

The large Palestinian flag is waiving above the city.

By Marcelina Horrillo Husillos, Journalist and Correspondent at The World Financial Review 

U.S. President Donald Trump shared his vision of a Gaza Strip to clear its nearly 2 million Palestinian inhabitants by relocating them to new homes else were, so that the US could send troops to the Strip, take ownership, develop it into an international beach resort under U.S. control and build the “Riviera of the Middle East.”

To see an American president endorse what would be the forcible expulsion of Palestinians from their home – many made makeshift shelters in the ruins of their homes destroyed in Israeli’s onslaught against Hamas -, is an open amoral encouragement of an exodus that would subvert decades of US policy, international law and basic humanity showed the most imperialist reflex, after he’s already threatened to annex the Panama Canal, Greenland and Canada. He envisaged a real estate deal whereby he’d assume responsibility for Gaza and mastermind a job-creating urban regeneration project, included renewable energy, a light rail system, airports and harbors, digital governance and beachfront hotels. He called it an American “ownership position.” A better phrase would be colonialism for the 21st century.

In Trump’s recent public pronouncements on Gaza, there’s a crucial missing element — any sense that the Palestinian people would have a choice in their own destiny. As Aaron David Miller, a former US Middle East peace negotiator, said on CNN: “It’s not a real estate deal for them, it’s not even a humanitarian issue for them. It’s an existential issue.”

Gaza Riviera’s Plan Coined

Media reports suggest Trump’s idea was based on a 49-page document drawn up by Washington-based economics professor Joseph Pelzman last summer, and it revived an idea floated by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner a year ago.

During a Podcast talk last August, Pelzman said that in order to make his plan happen, Gaza needs to be “completely emptied out,” ; the US “can lean on Egypt” to accept refugees from Gaza because the country is in debt to the US, he suggested.

The only reason the Palestinians want to go back to Gaza is they have no alternative.

Kushner was Trump’s senior White House adviser in his first term and played a key role in the Abraham Accords between Tel Aviv and four Arab countries in 2020. His Saudi-backed firm Affinity Partners “received the green-light from Israeli regulators to double its stake in Phoenix Financial Ltd”, which is a major Israeli financial firm and funds the construction of illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The nod from Israeli regulators came days before Trump’s inauguration.

He stated that “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable… if people would focus on building up livelihoods… It’s a little bit of an unfortunate situation there but, from Israel’s perspective, I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up.”

Trump’s February 5 statements on taking over and owning Gaza and resettling Gaza’s Palestinian population elsewhere, in “a beautiful area with homes and safety they can live out their lives in peace and harmony” because “the only reason the Palestinians want to go back to Gaza is they have no alternative. It’s right now a demolition site… Virtually every building is down.” reaffirm previous talks around the subject to make 2 million Palestinians leave their homes and never return, something that could be classified as ethnic cleansing.

Old Rooted 21st White Colonialism

White colonial dreams of rights to other peoples’ lands can be traced as far back as the 1479 Treaty of Alcacovas, which established the principle that an area outside of Europe could be claimed by a European country, and was followed within 50 years by the Treaty of Tordesillas and the Treaty of Saragossa with which the Portuguese and the Spanish purported to divide the globe between themselves. There is a clear line from that to the infamous Berlin West Africa Conference 400 years later, attended by the US and all major European powers which established the legal claim by Europeans that all of Africa could be occupied by whoever could take it.

Similar proposals were enabled free trade laid out by the Berlin Conference 140 years ago gave birth to the horror that was the Congo Free State – a veritable hell that in 23 years claimed the lives of up to 13 million Congolese. The conference also supercharged and militarised what became known as the Scramble for Africa, which was accompanied by brutal wars of conquest, disease and campaigns of extermination. More than a century later, Africans are still living with the impact.

The precedent of using the protection and development of capitalism to justify colonial occupation is today reflected in Trump’s assertion that he will rebuild and internationalise Gaza, creating jobs and prosperity for “everyone”. In essence, Trump is unwittingly attempting to base his colonial claim on to Gaza on the doctrine: that he can impose American rule, in this case through expulsion of the natives, and that he will enable trade to flourish.

Real State over Dead Bodies

Since its inception, Israel has operated as a colonial power, fragmenting, dominating, and erasing the indigenous population. From the Nakba, when 750,000 Palestinians were violently cleansed, to the ongoing annihilation of Gaza, Israel’s actions mirror the extractive, exploitative logic of European colonial regimes. Like the First Nations in Canada or the Aboriginal peoples of Australia, Palestinians are treated as obstacles to progress: “progress” that envisions Gaza as Dubai, another capitalist playground.

Latest figures just before the ceasefire went into effect recorded at least 61,709 people killed, including 17,492 children. The figure for missing or presumed dead is 14,222 while 111,588 people, mostly women and children, have been wounded, a majority with life-altering injuries. Nearly 80 percent of Gaza’s infrastructure, especially in the north, has been completely destroyed.

The International Court of Justice has issued two advisory opinions concerning Israel and Palestine, the 9 July 2004 Advisory Opinion on the Wall, and the 19 July 2024 Advisory Opinion on Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. The ICJ has no option but to issue a judgment confirming that Israel has perpetrated genocide, and that the issue of “intent” has been established.  It is a continuation of the Nakba, a continuation of the Zionist dream of taking the entire territory for the Israelis and expel the native Palestinians, as if they were not human, as if they did not matter, as if they had no rights.

At present, after 15 months of bombardment, Gaza is a “demolition site” in Trump’s words, that will require 10-15 years of reconstruction. His proposal drawn shocked reactions from Palestinians, Arab neighbouring countries and Western audiences who say it would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing and illegal under international law. However, the Gulf countries see a potential source of investment in rebuilding Gaza, Saudis have consistently said they won’t agree to this unless a clear path toward Palestinian statehood opens up, strongly rejecting offering any finance while a pathway to an independent Palestinian state remains closed.

Conclusion

Your fate is decided not by you, but by some ruler in a foreign capital, simply because they are stronger, and there is nothing you can do about it.

Colonial fantasies thrive on illusion. Past and present, imperial powers imagine emptying lands, redrawing borders, and erasing histories to achieve their ambitions. What Trump is proposing in Gaza and elsewhere is a return to old colonialism, and geopolitics run by the law of the jungle. That, after all, is what colonialism is in its most fundamental form. Your fate is decided not by you, but by some ruler in a foreign capital, simply because they are stronger, and there is nothing you can do about it. Trump’s obliviousness to the aspirations of Palestinians and his assumption that they’d prefer a modern housing development elsewhere showed a stunning naivety about the causes of the conflict. But it was reflected in an interaction in the Oval Office when he asked, “Why would they want to return? The place has been hell.” A reporter replied: “But it’s their home, sir. Why would they leave?”

It’s notable that two of the territories Trump has fixated on, Greenland and Gaza, are in some ways two of the last remaining holdovers of the colonial age. That’s not to say they’re the same: Greenland is an autonomous territory with meaningful self-rule, albeit ultimately under Danish sovereignty, while the status of Gaza is, to say the least, highly contested. (Hamas still largely controls internal governance; Israel maintains external control, while the UN and many human rights groups view it as occupied territory.) But both are home to a recognized people with a long claim to the land. And both are considered in some circles to be examples of the unfinished business of decolonization.

Ultimately, Gaza’s story is not only one of rubble or colonial violence but of enduring defiance. Palestinian resistance, like that of colonized peoples before them, reminds us that the colonial fantasy is doomed to fail. Tragically, this failure always comes at an unbearable human cost for which we must struggle to ensure that the perpetrators are finally held accountable.

FINQ’s CEO Eldad Tamir Wants AI To Make You Money

Eldad Tamir, CEO of FINQ
Photo courtesy of FINQ

In an era where artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various industries, Eldad Tamir, the CEO and founder of FINQ, is at the forefront of integrating AI into the financial sector to enhance investment outcomes. Tamir’s vision is clear: he wants AI to empower everyday investors, instilling in them the confidence to make smarter, data-driven decisions that can potentially grow their wealth. But how exactly is FINQ achieving this, and what does it mean for the average investor?

The Promise of AI in Investing

AI has already made significant inroads into the financial sector. According to a report by PwC, AI could contribute up to $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030, with the financial services industry being one of the primary beneficiaries. For investors, AI offers the ability to analyze vast amounts of data, identify patterns, and make predictions with a level of speed and accuracy that humans simply cannot match.

FINQ is leveraging this potential to create tools that simplify investing for everyone. By using AI to process and interpret complex financial data, FINQ aims to level the playing field, giving individual investors access to insights once reserved for Wall Street professionals.

Eldad Tamir’s Vision for FINQ

Eldad Tamir, a seasoned entrepreneur with a finance and technology background, founded FINQ to make investing more accessible and transparent. Tamir believes AI can help investors cut through the noise of financial markets and focus on what truly matters: making informed decisions that align with their goals.

The financial world is drowning in data overload, but much of it is difficult for the average person to navigate. FINQ aims to use AI to filter out the noise and provide actionable insights to help people make better investment choices.

How FINQ’s AI Works

FINQ’s platform uses advanced machine learning algorithms to analyze various data sources, including market trends, company financials, and news sentiments. The AI then distills this information into easy-to-understand insights, such as which stocks will likely outperform or underperform based on current conditions.

One key feature of FINQ’s platform is its ability to offer easy-to-follow model portfolios designed to beat the market, each for a different investment strategy: long, short, or market-neutral. The AI continuously analyzes market data to rank the 500 leading stocks in the United States. Based on these relative and continuous rankings, it constructs model portfolios purely backed by objectives and data—this is the shift to AI-based investing. This approach ensures that users can follow data-driven investment strategies without the need for expensive financial advisors.

The Impact of AI-Driven Investing

The potential benefits of AI-driven investing are significant. According to a study by Deloitte, AI-powered investment tools can improve portfolio performance by up to 20% compared to traditional methods. This is largely due to the ability of AI to identify opportunities and risks that humans might overlook.

The performance of FINQ’s AI-driven model portfolios, which outperformed the SPY by over 20% between August 24, 2022, and October 17, 2023, is a testament to its innovative approach. This outperformance can be attributed to several factors, including the AI’s ability to quickly adapt to changing market conditions, its lack of emotions and irrational reactions as the market shifts and changes, and its focus on long-term investment strategies.

The performance of FINQ’s AI-driven portfolios, which outperformed the S&P 500 by over 20% between August 24, 2022, and October 17, 2023, is a testament to its innovative approach. This outperformance can be attributed to several factors, including the AI’s ability to quickly adapt to changing market conditions, its personalized recommendations based on individual investors’ needs, and its focus on long-term investment strategies.

The launch of STOCKS-AI version 2.0 further exemplifies the platform’s success. Backtested data from December 2022 to September 2024 indicates that this upgraded algorithm delivered 127.60%, surpassing the S&P 500’s gains of 43.75% during the same period. This performance highlights the efficacy of AI in adapting to real-time market dynamics and generating superior returns.

The Future of AI Investing

Tamir envisions a financial landscape where AI plays an integral role in wealth management and investment strategies. He acknowledges the rapid advancements in AI technology and emphasizes the need for financial institutions to adapt accordingly. Tamir asserts that traditional methods cannot match the efficacy and speed of AI, which is continually improving. He believes embracing AI is essential for individuals aiming to thrive in the evolving financial sector.

In conclusion, Eldad Tamir’s leadership at FINQ exemplifies the transformative potential of AI in the investment domain. By offering data-driven, unbiased, and accessible investment solutions, FINQ is redefining traditional investment paradigms and empowering individuals to achieve financial success through the strategic application of artificial intelligence.

Rethinking FDI: Can Europe Compete as the US Attracts a Record Share of Global Investment? 

Money of the United States and Europe and two Flags on a dark background

By Julia Khandoshko 

Fresh statistics show an interesting trend: new FDI projects in the US increased to 14.3% in 2024, reaching the record. Meanwhile, major European countries lack investments and seem to lag behind. This raises a question: Will Trump’s tariffs change the situation and what will Europe do to remain competitive? 

Investments in the US will continue to grow 

The new period for tracking new investment inflow has started with a major event both in economics and politics — Trump’s inauguration. As a president now, his second term is marked with a large number of provocative statements and actions. On Monday, 10 February, he substantially raised aluminium tariffs to 25% from 10%, aiming to make national manufacturing stronger. As tariffs make it more expensive to import goods into the United States, it creates incentives to move production inside the country. This means that investments in manufacturing in the United States will become even more appealing and, therefore, profitable.  

Thus, Trump is actively promoting a strategy of protectionism, creating favourable conditions for domestic production and, at the same time, making it more difficult to import goods from abroad. For companies focused on the American market, it is more logical to launch a business inside the country in order to avoid additional costs associated with trade barriers. That is why the flow of foreign direct investment to the United States will only continue to grow — the tougher the trade restrictions, the more companies prefer to move production to America itself in order to remain competitive in the largest and most promising market. 

What about Europe? 

Europe, although not that demonstratively like the USA, protects its economy with strict regulatory restrictions. ESG standards (environmental, social and governance) have become the main tool, which makes it more difficult for new investors to enter the market and create a more closed economic environment. In fact, the EU relies not on direct protection from external competition but on creating conditions under which it becomes beneficial to work in Europe only for those who fully comply with the established rules.  

To understand what I mean, let’s look at some evidence. If you’ve ever been to Europe, you may have noticed that all plastic bottles now come with caps that remain fixed. This change was implemented for two key reasons. First, there is a strong environmental incentive—millions of plastic caps that previously ended up as waste are now less likely to pollute the environment. Second, it serves as yet another regulatory requirement that companies must comply with in order to operate within the European market.  

It turns out that Europe’s strategy is to regulate the market through strict environmental and social requirements, which at the same time limits competition and supports local producers. Companies that do not comply with ESG standards lose the opportunity to operate in the EU market, even if their products are cheaper or more technologically advanced. On the one hand, this makes the European economy more stable in the long term, and on the other hand, it reduces its attractiveness to investors who find it easier to work in a more flexible environment. 

Not as simple as it seems 

The economic rivalry between the United States and Europe is far from as straightforward as it might seem at first glance. Although many believe that the American economy is significantly superior to the European one, a more thorough analysis reveals that the gap between them is not so drastic. If we take into account the GDP of the entire EU, as well as economic ties with neighbouring countries, we can see that Europe as a whole still remains one of the world’s largest economies.   

But this competition isn’t just about investment or economic size—it’s also a fight for leadership in key industries. Take, for example, automobiles—here, Europe still has the edge. For example, the world leaders from the region, Volkswagen Group, BMW, and Mercedes, don’t just dominate the premium segment—they’re also pushing ahead in electric vehicles and self-driving technology.  

At the same time, Europe is not afraid to set limits and protect its own market. A good example is the tariffs on Chinese electric cars, designed to keep European automakers competitive. Unlike the U.S., which openly uses trade barriers and subsidies, Europe plays a longer, more strategic game. 

Therefore, in the end, it’s not just about how many startups appear and how much investments they attract—it’s about who stays on top in the long run. And no matter how much innovation happens elsewhere, big players will last. Is there any difference in how many small enterprises you have if leading auto concerns will sweep all competitors in 15 years?

 

About the Author 

Julia KhandoshkoJulia Khandoshko, CEO at the European broker Mind Money. She is an experienced C-level executive and financial services professional with over 10 years of experience in technology innovation and capital markets. 

Aid in Decline: Rethinking Overseas Development Assistance in a Changing World

group of volunteers help solve environmental problems. global teamwork and business.

By Christopher Burke  

Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) has long been a cornerstone of international cooperation aimed at reducing poverty, improving livelihoods and fostering sustainable development in the Global South. While Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) figures indicate a marginal increase in ODA over recent years, the future of aid as a robust foreign policy instrument looks increasingly uncertain.   

Governments once at the forefront of global development efforts are either withdrawing or reshaping their approach in ways that prioritize strategic corporate and national interests over traditional humanitarian and development goals. The closure of dedicated aid agencies, the shifting priorities of donor countries and the rising influence of private foundations and corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives all suggest that ODA–as we have known it–is on the decline.  

Declining Role of Traditional Donors 

Bilateral aid agencies such as the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID), the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) and Australian Aid (AUSAID) historically played a leading role in shaping international development. The closure or absorption of these agencies into broader government departments reflects a shift in priorities.  

British Prime Minister has announced the country’s aid budget is to be cut from 0.5 percent to 0.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to cover the costs of increasing defense expenditure. The UK folded DFID into the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in 2020. Critics argued the move diluted the focus on poverty alleviation and sustainable development–aligning aid more closely with geopolitical and commercial interests. AUSAID was merged into the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) in 2013 while CIDA was integrated into Global Affairs Canada the same year.  These shifts underscore how ODA is becoming more closely linked to national foreign policy objectives rather than being guided solely by development imperatives.  

The United States of America, once the world’s largest aid donor, is undergoing a seismic shift in development strategy. The sudden closure of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the implications for Washington’s foreign policy are still being digested. USAID has been criticized for inefficiencies and strategic misalignments, but its dissolution is not out of sync with the broader trend amongst donor countries to downsize or dismantle development sections or departments. These trends clearly indicate ODA is being deprioritized by traditional development partners–making way for alternative funding mechanisms. 

 Diminishing Role of ODA as a Foreign Policy Tool 

For decades, ODA served as an essential instrument of foreign policy providing donor nations with opportunities to strengthen diplomatic ties, promote stability and expand economic influence. The Marshall Plan, Cold War-era development programs and more recent infrastructure initiatives in Africa and Asia demonstrate how aid has been wielded as a tool of strategic engagement. In today’s increasingly multipolar world, emerging economies such as China, India and Turkey play increasingly significant roles in development financing as traditional development partners reevaluate their commitments. 

Western countries appear less inclined to use ODA as a means of influence, focusing instead on trade agreements, security partnerships and economic investments. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has demonstrated an alternative model of development financing prioritizing infrastructure and economic growth over social development objectives. Rather than reinforcing traditional aid commitments, Western development partners appear to be retreating leaving a vacuum increasingly filled by alternative models of development assistance.  

The recent halt in U.S. foreign aid disbursements has underscored a critical vulnerability in global development: the over-reliance on donor-driven models. As the Global Programs Director at Oxfam International in Kenya Adama Coulibaly argues, the disruption of aid flows has not just caused temporary funding gaps, but exposed deep structural weaknesses in the sector. International non-government organizations (INGOs) and local development actors have been forced to re-organize, highlighting the urgent need to shift power, resources and financial autonomy to more resilient, locally-led models that are not so easily destabilized by geopolitical decisions. 

The Rise of Foundations and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 

As traditional government-led ODA recedes, philanthropic foundations and corporate CSR initiatives are stepping up to fill the gap. Private actors such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, Mastercard Foundation and the Open Society Foundation have expanded their roles in global health, education and social development. Their ability to deploy large sums of capital rapidly and with relatively less bureaucracy positions them as attractive partners in development efforts. 

A fundamental lesson from the shifting aid landscape is the necessity for alternative financing mechanisms that empower communities rather than reinforce dependency. Coulibaly’s emphasis on South-South philanthropy, remittance-driven investment and community-based savings models such as rotating savings and credit association (ROSCA) and tontines provide compelling ways to rethink development finance. These models have long demonstrated resilience and provide viable paths forward to reduce reliance on Northern donors and foster genuine local ownership of development initiatives.  

Corporations are aligning their strategies with environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Multinational companies are recognizing that long-term profitability is closely linked to sustainable and inclusive growth increasingly incorporating social impact into their business models. CSR programs, once viewed as peripheral to business strategy, are now becoming a central part of corporate identity and stakeholder engagement.  

While this shift presents opportunities associated with increased funding and innovative approaches to development; it also raises important questions. Unlike traditional ODA that is, at least in principle, accountable to taxpayers and subject to parliamentary oversight; private and corporate-led initiatives are often less transparent. Motives behind corporate philanthropy is oftentimes more closely aligned more with brand-building and market expansion than genuine social transformation. An unchecked reliance on private actors can lead to fragmented development efforts with priorities dictated by neo-liberal corporate interests rather than comprehensive, country-led development strategies.  

The Future of Development Finance 

The future of ODA is likely to be shaped by a more diversified landscape where traditional government-to-government aid plays a diminished role while private philanthropy, CSR and blended finance models take center stage. Several key trends are expected to influence this transformation. 

A major shift is the increased involvement of the private sector in development. As the effective implementation of ESG aligned with the SDGs becomes more integral to corporate strategies; businesses will be increasingly interested to embed development objectives into operations. Bigger businesses engaging in larger scale more long-term projects are usually better resourced to manage social and environmental issues.    

Multinational operators, usually more closely tied to international value chains, generally demonstrate greater compliance with global standards–not withstanding notable exceptions. Micro, small and medium sized enterprises (MSME) are often less well equipped to oversee and manage the implementation of effective ESG initiatives. Many MSME’s are more inclined to satisfy the bare minimum standards and have demonstrated a higher tendency to cut corners wherever possible.  Ensuring compliance and evaluating whether contributions genuinely address development needs remains a crucial challenge. 

Another critical trend is the continued expansion of South-South cooperation. Emerging economies are increasingly playing an active role in development assistance, providing alternatives to the traditional Western-led ODA framework. Initiatives such as China’s BRI, India’s development partnerships and Turkey’s growing engagement in Africa illustrate this shift indicative of a broader redistribution of development influence. 

As traditional ODA declines, INGOs are at a crossroads. Without meaningful reform, many INGOs will struggle to remain relevant and collapse under outdated structures or fail to transition into meaningful partnerships with local actors. This shift is already apparent as an increasing number of institutions recognize that effective impact requires deeper localization. The challenge for the sector is not only financial adaptation, but the decolonization of aid governance, decision-making and leadership.  

Blended finance approaches are emerging as a significant development model. By combining public, private and philanthropic capital, these mechanisms, including impact investing, development bonds and social enterprises are gaining traction. These approaches aim to maximize financial sustainability and effectiveness leveraging multiple funding sources. 

Technology is also revolutionizing development finance. Digital finance, artificial intelligence and blockchain innovations are poised to transform development assistance including many aspects of aid delivery, monitoring and evaluation. As technology advances, development partners and implementing institutions will need to adapt to remain effective and responsive to evolving needs.  

ODA will continue to evolve moving away from traditional donor-driven models toward a more dynamic and multifaceted development landscape. The challenge will be to ensure these changes contribute to genuine development progress and prioritizes equity, accountability and long-term impact over short-term economic or geopolitical interests.

About the Author 

Christopher BurkeChristopher Burke is a senior advisor at WMC Africa, a communications and advisory agency in Kampala, Uganda.  He has over 25 years’ experience working on a range of issues in social, political and economic development with a strong focus on governance, environmental issues, renewable and non-renewable extractives, international relations and peace-building based in Asia and Africa.

Bad Business: Why Pinkwashing is Not Women-Centered Design, and Never Will Be? 

Pink woman figure walking up on golden coin ladder

By Rathi Mani-Kandt

Let’s talk about the pink elephant in the financial inclusion room: why don’t financial service providers design products intentionally for women? 

The success of all products and services hinges on a few critical elements – it must add value to the user’s life, address a problem they face, and be deeply rooted in their lived realities. While some in the financial inclusion industry have undertaken exercises in customer-centricity, many have not – and they continue to leave business opportunities on the table when it comes to women, who have proven to be excellent clients.  

Pinkwashing – where companies superficially design for women by simply turning products pink – will no longer cut it. Financial inclusion means women have access to useful and affordable financial products and services that truly respond to her realities. 

While access to finance has grown in the past decade, it has largely benefited men and excluded women. Women face systemic barriers to participation in the formal financial sector, fundamentally operating with less of everything: less mobility, less access to education, training, and financial services, fewer rights, fewer assets, less market access, less negotiation power, less control – the list goes on and on. The solution isn’t just “pink-wrapped” bank accounts but creating an environment where women entrepreneurs also have access to credit, insurance, and financial products. Designing for people facing the greatest barriers – often women — makes financial products more convenient, adaptable, and accessible for all. By addressing the challenges of those struggling most to start businesses or access credit, we create better solutions that drive economic growth and profitability.[1]

So how do we come together to design for these needs?  

Design for differences – don’t just “Pink-It and Shrink-It” 

Everywhere you look, the world is not equally designed for men and women.  

  • Women experiencing medical emergencies in public are 23% more likely to die than men because CPR training focuses on “male” mannequins, leaving bystanders hesitant to perform chest compressions on women. 
  • When astronaut Anne McClain needed a medium spacesuit for a spacewalk, she was grounded because there was no space suit available in her smaller size.  
  • Women face twice as many adverse medication side effects since drug dosages have long been based on male-centric clinical trials. 

This snapshot reveals a clear problem: the world we live in is often designed-by-men-for-men. No matter the sector, the distinct needs of women are frequently overlooked or inadequately addressed. To create a market system that truly serves women, we must fundamentally rethink our approach to designing financial services.  
 
Enter women-centered design (WCD). Building on the foundations of human-centered design, this approach involves actively listening to women, testing products and services with them, and iterating based on their feedback. WCD doesn’t exclude men, but rather, results in products that are more flexible, have fewer requirements, and are more convenient for all – expanding choice not just for women, but for many segments of the market – while also driving profitability. To better understand it, let’s take a look at an example in a sport over 5 billion of us love – soccer.

The soccer industry long relied on a “pink-it and shrink-it” approach to women’s cleats -resizing and recoloring men’s cleats for women. Not made to support their feet, female athletes are 2–8 times more likely to tear an ACL due to poorly designed cleats. Women-owned IDA Sports, seeing an opportunity to create more effective and safe products for women and also tap into a new market opportunity, addressed this by creating cleats based on women’s physiology, posted consecutive tripled year-over-year revenue growth in 2023 and 2024

This shift demonstrates the power of intentional, women-centered design—an approach that can be both inclusive and moneymaking. Our experiences affirm that, while the process requires time and dedication, designing specifically with and for women not only leads to successful products for them, and even attracts male customers, highlighting the strong market appeal for the work. 

Women-Centered Design for entrepreneurs: An intentional approach 

Nguyen Thi Huong, Thanh Hoa Vietnam 
Image from: Can Van Linh/CARE  

What does WCD look like for women entrepreneurs? At CARE, through our Strive Women program, we work with women to ensure they feel equipped to grow their businesses, so they gain economic power in their households, communities, and economies. Grounded in WCD principles, addressing the syndrome of pinkwashing is at the very core of what we do.  

Through the Ignite program, phase one of Strive Women, CARE successfully used WCD in partnership with financial service providers to adapt a portfolio of financial products. 

  • In Peru: Collaborating with microfinance institution Financiera Confianza identifying barriers such as the requirement for a husband’s signature on loans and the demand for short-term loans. In response, we developed flexible loan products that also included health insurance for breast cancer screenings. These were delivered by trusted loan officers and supported by digital technology. 
  • In Vietnam: Partnering with commercial bank VPBank creating affordable digital services tailored for women who were time-constrained and digitally capable that needed to access services quickly. With Thanh Hoa MFI, launching a highly successful loan product that increased loan amounts without raising requirements. 
  • In Pakistan: With partner UBank, eliminating male guarantor requirements and leveraging gold as collateral-  based on the insight that South Asian women have one particular asset  – gold for marriage.  

In each of these countries, we achieved significant success, with low non-performing loan rates and high demand for the women-centered products. In Pakistan, we even had 100% repayment on one loan product. Global data confirms this – showing that women are better savers, better repayors, more loyal clients, and are just good for business. 

A new chapter in women’s economic growth 

While our Women’s Entrepreneurship practice at CARE focuses on tailoring financial products to women’s needs, the lessons learned have far-reaching implications. Financial service providers, donors, and development organizations must move beyond brightly-colored marketing gimmicks and prioritize listening to target audiences and designing to address the specific barriers they face. The success of CARE’s programming illustrates that designing with women not only leads to meaningful inclusion but also unlocks untapped markets and build stronger businesses. Other organizations can leverage these insights to create innovative, impactful solutions in their respective sectors—whether it’s healthcare, education, or climate resilience. 

We invite you to contribute to this journey, accelerating progress and enabling women to thrive. Together, a significant impact on women’s economic growth worldwide is within reach.

About CARE: Founded in 1945 with the creation of the CARE Package®, CARE is a leading humanitarian organization fighting global poverty. CARE places special focus on working alongside women and girls. Equipped with the proper resources, women and girls have the power to lift whole families and entire communities out of poverty. In 2024, CARE worked in 121 countries, reaching 53 million people through 1,450 projects. To learn more, visit www.care.org.

About Strive Women: Mastercard Strive is a portfolio of philanthropic programs supported by the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth and funded by the Mastercard Impact Fund. With programs around the world, Mastercard Strive aims to support 18 million small businesses to go digital, get capital, and access networks and know-how. Strive Women started in 2023 as an evolution of the Ignite program and uses women-centered design to deliver tailored financial products and support services, such as digital skills building and strengthening women’s networks. The program addresses the unique barriers faced by women-led businesses in Pakistan, Peru, and Vietnam. Strive Women aims to reach over 6 million entrepreneurs through its campaigns.

In the regions where CARE operates, structural disparities for women and girls are profound. Around 2.4 billion women of working age are not afforded equal economic opportunity and more than 1 billion women do not have access to finance. In lower and middle income countries, there are 265 million fewer women than men using mobile internet. Globally, 496 million women make up nearly two-thirds of the worlds illiterate adults, highlighting a significant gap in literacy. Addressing these challenges is crucial, as enhancing women’s economic participation can drive business growth, expand the financial sector, and foster overall market development. 

About the Author

Rathi Mani-KandtRathi Mani-Kandt is the Director of Women’s Entrepreneurship and Financial Inclusion at CARE. With over 15 years of experience, she specializes in designing financial and non-financial services that work for low-income populations, particularly low-income women. Rathi’s work focuses on supporting women-owned micro and small businesses through innovative, tailored products and support services.  

The Art of Controlled Chaos: How Logistical Inefficiency Drives Retail Performance 

By Gilles Paché  

In today’s retail landscape, efficiency is not always the golden rule. Some of the largest large retailers have mastered the art of controlled chaos, using supply chain failures to stimulate demand and boost profits. In short, what if chaotic logistics was the key to marketing success? Gilles Paché sets out to explore how unpredictability exacerbates consumer desire, influences pricing strategies and gives companies a competitive edge.  

Regularly reading the trade press and listening to Europe’s top executives makes it clear that logistics is a crucial factor in the success of the retail sector—whether offline, online, or both. A seamless supply chain, optimized inventory levels, and strict delivery management are generally considered essential for ensuring customer satisfaction, maximizing company profitability, and delivering strong returns to shareholders. In e-commerce, the quality of fulfillment operations is often highlighted as critical for building a sustainable competitive advantage [1]. However, this dominant view overlooks a far more complex reality: powerful large retailers are thriving despite logistics that, by conventional performance standards, would be deemed “chaotic.” Yet, rather than being a weakness, these inefficiencies appear to drive sales. This raises an intriguing question: could what is typically seen as logistical underperformance serve as a powerful lever for marketing success? 

There is no doubt that this perspective on supply chain management is iconoclastic—perhaps even provocative. But is it really? On the contrary, three key insights highlight the relevance of a heterodox approach to logistics—thinking outside the box, as I explored in a recent book [2]. First, stockouts in-store or online, along with extended wait times, can unexpectedly enhance a product’s appeal and create a sense of desirable scarcity, increasing consumer demand. Second, chaotic logistics can foster an opportunistic and agile business model, prioritizing adaptability and responsiveness over rigid planning while reducing operational constraints. Third, what appears to be logistical inefficiency can serve as a strategic justification for pricing and assortment management policies that maximize a large retailer’s profitability and strengthen its market position. A closer and more nuanced analysis of these perspectives reveals their strategic significance.  

Perceived Scarcity: Amplifying Demand 

Traditionally, stockouts in-store or online are viewed as failures that harm a large retailer’s profitability. However, research suggests that, in certain contexts, product unavailability can have the opposite effect, as demonstrated by Barton et al.’s [3] meta-analysis. When a product becomes difficult to obtain, its scarcity enhances its perceived value. Faced with the possibility of missing out, consumers feel a heightened urgency to purchase, increasing the likelihood of a sale. This phenomenon aligns with scarcity theory, which posits that goods perceived as rare or difficult to access are often seen as more valuable [4]. Large retailers can strategically leverage this mechanism, turning a disruption into a powerful driver of desirability. By applying this approach, a large retailer can encourage customers to return frequently—whether to physical stores or online—fostering loyalty while generating sustained demand for products that are not always in stock. 

On the other hand, companies like Brico Dépôt (home improvement and DIY), Costco (warehouse club and wholesale), and Action (non-food consumer goods) deliberately employ strategies that make their products temporarily inaccessible. These large retailers cultivate a “treasure hunt” experience, where consumers understand that if they do not act quickly, the product may soon be gone [5]. While this is not a new approach, it has become increasingly prevalent in sectors such as food, electronics, and fashion, where promotional items and exclusive products are often available in limited quantities. The scarcity of products on shelves—or the speed at which certain items sell out—compels customers to return frequently, ensuring they do not miss out on a deal. Rather than viewing stock discontinuity as a weakness, these businesses harness it as a strategic tool to attract shoppers, maintain steady foot traffic, and stimulate impulse purchases. Not only does this approach drive rapid inventory turnover, but it also fosters a sense of anticipation and excitement that strengthens brand loyalty. 

Some companies take this approach even further, turning logistical constraints into strategic selling points. Announcing long wait times or limited quantities becomes an intentional marketing tool, leveraging consumer psychology. Shoppers, eager to acquire something rare or exclusive, often accept delays or less-than-ideal conditions if it means securing a coveted product. This phenomenon is particularly evident in luxury markets, where scarcity is not just a supply issue but a core branding strategy [6]. Hermès, with its highly sought-after Birkin bags, and Rolex, with long waiting lists for premium watches, deliberately cultivate exclusivity to heighten desirability. Even outside luxury, brands use similar tactics. Limited-edition sneakers from Nike or Adidas are released in small batches to generate hype, while electronics companies such as Sony and Nvidia leverage supply shortages to sustain demand for PlayStation consoles and graphics cards. The perception of rarity fuels anticipation, making products seem even more valuable and desirable. 

A similar dynamic is at play with Aramisauto, a key player in the French car distribution market. Unlike traditional franchised dealerships, which maintain planned inventories and predictable delivery schedules, Aramisauto operates with an opportunistic sourcing model. The company buys vehicles in bulk whenever manufacturers like Renault or Stellantis need to offload unsold stock. As a result, its vehicle selection is constantly changing, with no guarantee that a specific model will be available at any given time. Delivery times also fluctuate significantly, ranging from a few days to several months, depending on the vehicle’s origin and logistical factors. However, this approach offers a significant advantage: by acquiring cars at deeply discounted prices, Aramisauto can sell new vehicles at prices up to 30% lower than traditional franchised dealerships. While the unpredictability may frustrate buyers seeking a specific model, the ever-changing inventory creates a sense of urgency, prompting quicker purchasing decisions.  

Logistical Chaos and Marketing Agility 

Large retailers that excel at accurately forecasting demand, optimally managing stock, and minimizing costs are often seen as “masters of logistics.” In contrast, a more “chaotic” approach enables some companies to respond better to unexpected challenges. Hard-discount companies like Aldi and Action exemplify the urgent need for organized logistical chaos. Rather than relying on rigid forecasts and constantly renewed stocks, they frequently adjust their offerings in response to market opportunities. This strategy allows them to secure highly competitive prices by negotiating exceptional deals with suppliers [7], without being constrained by long-term assortment planning. The fluctuating assortment also becomes a key asset in attracting consumers, as customers know they will not always find the same products with each visit, fostering a sense of excitement and anticipation. This dynamic keeps customers coming back, enhancing both engagement and sales potential. 

This business model is based on a high level of responsiveness to buying opportunities, allowing these companies to offer a wide range of products while staying highly competitive. Logistical chaos, therefore, becomes a key advantage for hard-discount companies, which leverage it to quickly adapt to a constantly changing market. By replacing rigid planning with resilient flexibility, these companies optimize operating costs while minimizing waste. In addition, they benefit significantly by reducing fixed costs related to logistical facilities. Reactive inventory management minimizes the need for large warehouses or centralized platforms, instead favoring local supply systems like urban micro fulfillment centers [8]. This operating model not only enables them to stay agile in the face of market fluctuations but also allows them to rapidly adjust their offerings to shifting economic conditions, particularly during times of crisis or inflation. The adaptability of this approach supports long-term sustainability, even in uncertain times. 

Moreover, this approach provides significant financial flexibility, which can be reinvested into other strategic areas, such as marketing or customer experience management. For instance, a large retailer adopting this logic can allocate additional resources to promotions, advertising campaigns, or enhancing store design. This strategy can be an effective means of retaining price-sensitive customers while simultaneously boosting foot traffic and increasing sales. Furthermore, the variability in product offerings creates a dynamic buying environment, where consumers are encouraged to return frequently, fearing they might miss out on valuable opportunities. Rather than focusing on occasional stockouts, these large retailers embrace controlled instability, a tactic that does not necessarily harm their overall performance. By leveraging more fluid and opportunistic logistics, they successfully combine competitiveness with adaptability to shifting consumer trends, ensuring sustainable profitability, and long-term growth in an unpredictable, rapidly evolving market. 

This is particularly evident in the case of Action, founded in 1993 in the Netherlands, which has experienced significant growth across Europe in recent years, largely driven by its strategic pricing approach. The large retailer consistently offers nearly 1,500 items priced under one euro, covering a wide range of products, from household goods to office supplies. This pricing strategy encourages frequent store visits, as customers aim to take advantage of the deals, even at the expense of leaving the shelves in disarray. The product assortment is regularly updated, creating a sense of urgency that drives impulse purchases, as customers are aware that stock levels are limited, and high-demand items may sell out quickly. At the core of Action’s approach is this “bargain-hunting” dynamic, which ensures a steady flow of shoppers without the need for active management of stockouts. Conversely, when products are unavailable, customers often attribute the shortage to their own delay in arriving at the store.  

Inefficient Logistics: A Winning Strategy 

Instead of fighting against stockout situations in-store or online, large retailers have increasingly recognized that it makes strategic sense to integrate these occurrences as a key competitive lever. Rather than viewing stockouts as failures, they deliberately cultivate them to maintain an aura of scarcity around their products. By controlling supply and artificially extending delivery times, these companies create a sense of urgency and heightened consumer desire. This phenomenon is particularly effective in sectors where exclusivity, originality, and prestige are key values, such as luxury or limited-edition products. More surprisingly, logistical inefficiencies are also used strategically as leverage to justify price hikes, because when supply difficulties are cited, companies find it easier to convince their customers that price increases are unavoidable [9], as we witnessed during the Covid-19 pandemic and the ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia. This strategy successfully capitalizes on consumer behavior, leveraging scarcity to boost demand and sales. 

Founded in France in 2011, Le Slip Français (“The French Brief”) exemplifies how intentionally creating logistical inefficiencies can become a powerful marketing strategy. Specializing in the production and physical distribution of high-quality, locally made underwear for men and women, the brand quickly set itself apart with its unique marketing approach. This includes releasing limited-edition collections, which generates a sense of urgency, encouraging customers to make purchases before items sell out. The company intentionally limits production and distribution, leveraging consumers’ desire for rare and exclusive products to build an emotional connection with its audience. Through its strategic scarcity, Le Slip Français creates an aspirational image of exclusivity and desirability. The brand has successfully turned the logistical challenges faced by its competitors into a strategic advantage. Far from diminishing the perceived value of its offer, these disruptions enhance it, creating anticipation and loyalty among its growing customer portfolio. 

Large retailers adopting this innovative strategy are not only boosting their margins, but they are also shaping customers’ perceptions of the product assortment value. By maintaining a degree of opacity around the causes of stockouts, they transform a logistical constraint into a potent marketing argument. The temporary absence of an item heightens the desire to purchase it once it becomes available again, either in-store or online. Powerful large retailers take advantage of this dynamic to segment their customer base, offering programs that guarantee priority access to items in short supply. This enhances the feeling of exclusivity and strengthens the loyalty of regular buyers, especially when they are given timely updates after a stockout [10]. The phenomenon extends beyond luxury goods, as limited promotions and seasonal offers are based on similar principles. Therefore, far from being a mere logistical inconvenience, stockouts are increasingly becoming a powerful lever, influencing purchasing decisions and justifying higher prices. 

Large retailers not only increase their margins but also shape customers’ perceptions of the value of their products. By maintaining a certain level of opacity around the causes of stockouts, they turn a logistical constraint into a powerful marketing tool. The temporary absence of an item heightens the desire to purchase it once it is back on the shelves, creating a sense of urgency that fosters impulse buying. This phenomenon was observed and studied in the context of panic buying after lockdowns were lifted during the Covid-19 pandemic [11]. Some large retailers capitalize on this dynamic to segment their customer base, offering priority access to high-demand products. This reinforces the sense of exclusivity, strengthening the loyalty of regular buyers and encouraging anticipatory behavior among occasional shoppers. The phenomenon extends beyond luxury items, as limited promotions and seasonal offers operate on similar principles. By deliberately orchestrating logistical chaos, large retailers create the illusion of controlled scarcity, which paradoxically drives increased consumption.  

A Deeper Understanding of Contexts 

There is no denying it: achieving a high level of logistical performance is generally considered to be an inescapable imperative in the retail industry, and this managerial doxa is taught to MBA students around the world. Yet some companies in the retail industry are succeeding by adopting a more innovative approach that defies this logic. Far from being systematically perceived as harmful, stockouts in shops or online create a scarcity effect that benefits demand. Similarly, chaotic logistics enhance commercial agility, reduce fixed costs, and encourage a more opportunistic approach to conquering new markets. Finally, apparent logistical inefficiency is sometimes used as a strategic lever to justify higher prices, generate in-store traffic, or stand out from the competition. This non-traditional approach has proven successful, even in rapidly shifting market conditions. In short, has not the time come for a serious rethink of the classic performance criteria in the retail industry? 

Rather than striving for ultra-optimized logistics at all costs, powerful large retailers are capitalizing on a certain degree of disorder and unpredictability to maximize marketing impact. This approach, grounded in flexibility and responsiveness, offers significant advantages in a competitive environment where consumer expectations are rapidly shifting. While unpredictability may seem risky at times, it allows companies to stand out by providing a more memorable and unique shopping experience. Of course, this is not to say that logistical chaos is always the best choice—this business model is not suitable for every sector or company. It is essential to carefully define the specific contexts in which this approach is beneficial versus harmful [12]. Therefore, additional research is needed to better understand the conditions under which a successful balance between order and chaos can become a sustainable, long-term competitive strategy. Understanding these nuances will help businesses adapt to changing markets and continuously improve their approach.

About the Author

Gilles-PacheGilles Paché is Professor of Marketing and Supply Chain Management at Aix-Marseille University, and Director of Research at the CERGAM Lab, in Aix-en-Provence, France. He has more than 650 publications in the forms of journal papers, books, edited books, edited proceedings, edited special issues, book chapters, conference papers and reports, including the recent two books: Variations sur la consommation et la distribution: Individus, expériences, systèmes (2022), and Heterodox logistics (2023). 

References 

[1] Anonymous (2023). Behind every successful E-commerce order: The art of logistics fulfillment. The World Financial Review [online]. 18 December. Available on: https://worldfinancialreview.com/behind-every-successful-e-commerce-order-the-art-of-logistics-fulfillment/ 

[2] Paché, G. (2023). Heterodox logistics. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille. 

[3] Barton, B., Zlatevska, N., and Oppewal, H. (2022). Scarcity tactics in marketing: A meta-analysis of product scarcity effects on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 741-758. 

[4] Robbins, L. (2007 [1932]). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Auburn (AL): Ludwig von Mises Institute. 

[5] Rouquet, A., and Paché, G. (2017). Re-enchanting logistics: The cases of pick-your-own farm and large retail stores. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 21-29. 

[6] Fan, L. (2019). Effects of resource scarcity in consumer behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University. 

[7] Voigt, K.-I., Buliga, O., and Michl, K. (2017). Business model pioneers: Management for professionals. Cham: Springer. 

[8] Karaoulanis, A. (2024). The role of micro fulfilment centers in alleviating, in a sustainable way, the urban last mile logistics problem: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, Vol. 16, No. 20, Article 8774. 

[9] Khalil, M., and Lewis, V. (2024). Price and output responses to supply disruptions in times of high uncertainty. CEPR VoxEU [online], 22 April. Available on: https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/price-and-output-responses-supply-disruptions-times-high-uncertainty 

[10] Kumar, P., Rossiter Hofer, A., and Peinkofer, S. (2023). The role of scarcity-inducing post-stockout disclosures on consumer response to stockouts. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 53, No. 9, pp. 946-966. 

[11] Cham, T.-H., Cheng, B.-L., Lee, Y.-H., and Cheah, J.-H. (2023). Should I buy or not? Revisiting the concept and measurement of panic buying. Current Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 22, pp. 19116-19136. 

[12] Breugelmans, E., Campo, K., and Gijsbrechts, E. (2006). Opportunities for active stock-out management in online stores: The impact of the stock-out policy on online stock-out reactions. Journal of Retailing, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 215-228.

EDITOR'S PICK OF THE WEEK

CFO's new mandate. CFO explaining the presentation

The Performance and Transformation Orchestrator: The CFO’s New Mandate in the Age of AI

By Terence Tse CFOs are evolving into AI-driven transformation orchestrators, balancing finance, technology, and strategy while upskilling teams, managing risks, and driving measurable business value. A key insight from this year’s AI for CFOs event, organized...

WISE DECISION MAKER GUIDE

POWER INFLUENCERS

Emerging Trends

The Future of Global Trade