The newly opened international airport in Nuuk has seen an influx of visitors lately, as journalists and political figures alike arrive to witness firsthand the growing geopolitical interest in Greenland. Among them is Tom Dans, a private equity investor and Trump supporter, who is vocal about Greenland’s strategic significance to the United States.
Dans, an American with Arctic interests, argues that “Greenland is the front door for North America,” reinforcing the island’s importance in U.S. national security and resource expansion. However, the sentiment on the ground is more divided.
Greenland, legally a part of the Kingdom of Denmark, has long been supported by Danish financial grants and infrastructure. Yet, tensions over its colonial history and aspirations for self-determination remain. Influencer Qupanuk Olsen, who has built a large following showcasing Greenlandic and Inuit culture, openly criticizes Danish influence, pointing to historical injustices such as forced contraceptive implants on Inuit women in the mid-20th century.
“Why should we just be taken by another colonizer?” Olsen asks, skeptical of U.S. intentions despite its growing economic and military presence on the island. The U.S. already operates an Arctic base in Greenland and has vested interests in its untapped mineral resources.
Meanwhile, local politician Aqqalu C. Jerimiassen, leader of the Atassut party, warns against a hasty break from Denmark, citing Greenland’s reliance on Danish welfare support, including healthcare and education. “We might be ready someday, but not today, not tomorrow,” he says.
With elections approaching, Greenland’s future remains uncertain. What is clear is that the island stands at a pivotal moment, caught between its colonial past, its present under Danish rule, and a future that could see closer ties to the United States—or full independence.
Related Readings:
.
