Immutable Blockchain

Blockchains using proof of work are commonly referred to as immutable ledgers, meaning that it is incredibly difficult to change the information stored in them. For instance, changes made to a transaction’s history or coins distributed can be enforced on such blockchains, though these actions require immense computational power and long hours to complete successfully. Therefore, although not entirely indestructible, these chain systems remain one of the most secure databases available today. Many genuine people have invested in this crypto at Chain Reaction trading and now making millions of profits from this digital currency.

Blockchains may not be error-free, but they do boast a high degree of immutability when compared to other digital money systems. The developers of many cryptocurrencies have gone the extra mile to ensure that their blockchains act as reliable and unalterable ledgers without needing to rely on a central authority for accuracy. As such, these cryptocurrency blockchains achieve an unprecedented level of trustworthiness when it comes to recordkeeping and data management.

What are 51% of attacks on public blockchains?

Malicious actors can attempt to modify the history of a blockchain through a 51% attack (also known as double-spending). This attack enables attackers to re-spend coins that have already been spent, potentially leading to serious consequences. In a 51% attack scenario, the attacker can manipulate a blockchain by having enough computing power (hashing power) to create more blocks than everyone else on the chain. This allows them to alter transactions in favour of their accounts while draining funds from other users. By taking control of a majority of hashing power within an ecosystem, malicious attackers can essentially rewrite history and take what they want.

Whilst undertaking a 51% attack on popular blockchains may appear simple, the reality is far more complex. Significant capital would be needed to procure high-grade mining equipment and an immense amount of electricity to run it. Additionally, such an economic venture wouldn’t be worthwhile since it could lead to a sharp decline in the value of the targeted cryptocurrency.

Immutability and Blockchain Forks

Hard forks can have drastic implications on a blockchain, as demonstrated by Bitcoin Cash. They also offer the opportunity to redistribute coins, like in the famous case of Ethereum’s DAO Fork. In 2016, an exploit targeted a major smart contract known as the Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), resulting in 3.6 million ETH being stolen (equal to about 50 million USD at that time). To lessen the impact of this attack, most Ethereum users voted for a fork which returned all previously stolen tokens to the accounts from which they were taken.

The implementation of the hard fork would not have been possible without a majority vote, in which the “yes” camp decisively won. DAO investors likely supported it to retrieve their stolen ETH. Despite this, they relinquished immutability and DAO’s core value of “code is law,” indicating they valued recovering lost funds over operational continuity.

What is the practical finality of cryptocurrency transactions?

When a transaction is conducted on the blockchain, it must be confirmed – usually by being incorporated into a block. Yet, in many cases this isn’t enough for merchants and exchanges that deal with crypto; they require that additional blocks are added to the blockchain after the one containing your transaction. This provides further assurance of finality since including in any particular block does not guarantee total confirmation of the trade. 

Ultimately, no crypto transactions can ever reach complete certainty. Several external factors can potentially cause the last block of a blockchain to be invalid, like malicious miners or network disruptions. This may lead to validators rejecting it and continuing on an alternative path. Although unlikely, there is still a slight chance of this happening. With each successive block added to the one with your transaction, the probability that it will be permanently recorded increases.

Disclaimer: This article contains sponsored marketing content. It is intended for promotional purposes and should not be considered as an endorsement or recommendation by our website. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and exercise their own judgment before making any decisions based on the information provided in this article.