Home Blog Page 117

How Futures and Options Can Add Flexibility to Your Investment Strategy

Description Stack of money coin with trading graph for financial investment

Expanding your investment horizons beyond simple stock and bond investing can open up new opportunities to profit, hedge risks, and gain valuable flexibility in your portfolio. By understanding and utilising derivatives like futures and options, retail investors can now access advanced strategies previously only available to institutions.

In this article, we’ll explore the benefits of adding futures and option trading and provide practical tips for getting started.

What Are Futures?

Futures contracts allow investors to agree to buy or sell some underlying asset at a predetermined price on a set expiration date. Futures trade on exchanges like stocks and can be used by individual investors for speculation, portfolio protection, or gaining exposure to commodities. Choosing the right platform is crucial for investors looking to optimise their trading strategies. Platforms like m.Stock not only simplifies trading but also provides significant cost benefits.

What Are Options?

Options give investors the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset at a set strike price up until the expiration date. Calls provide the option to buy, while puts give the option to sell. Investors pay a non-refundable premium upfront for this flexible right. Options can be used on stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and stock market indexes.

Benefits of Adding Futures and Options

The benefits of adding futures and options are:

1. Hedging Risks

Investors can hedge against stock losses in a declining market by buying put options or shorting stock index futures. These derivatives can provide downside protection as part of an overall risk management strategy. To trade in futures and options seamlessly, it is essential to have a trading account, which enables you to access and execute these derivative transactions efficiently.

2. Speculation Opportunities

The inherent leverage in options allows investors to benefit from short-term price moves in the underlying asset. Futures also provide speculators with opportunities to profit from commodity market moves.

3. Diversification

Futures and options give investors exposure opportunities beyond stocks and bonds, allowing improved portfolio diversification. Commodity futures can counter stock volatility.

4. Leverage Benefits

The premium paid upfront for an option controls the total risk while providing leveraged exposure to the underlying asset. Investors can benefit from significant price gains with a smaller upfront investment.

5. Income Generation

Options strategies like covered calls allow investors to generate income from existing long stock positions through the premiums received from selling call options.

Strategies for Using Futures and Options

Mentioned below are the strategies to use futures and options:

1. Hedging With Futures

Investors can lock in future prices today by buying or selling the underlying commodity futures contract. For example, farmers use futures to fix a selling price for their crop before the harvest season.

2. Protective Puts

Put options allow stocks to be hedged against potential declines at a fixed cost. Puts limit downside risk while allowing investors to keep their long stock positions.

3. Bull Call Spread

Buying call options while simultaneously selling higher strike call options caps costs but allows participation in upside rallies. This can be used to speculate on bullish price sentiment.

4. Bear Put Spread

Put spreads involve buying put options and selling the same number of closer-dated or lower-strike puts to offset part of the upfront premium cost. This structure benefits from bearish declines.

5. Covered Calls

One of the most conservative income strategies involves selling call options against existing long stock positions. Investors get paid the call premium in exchange for limiting potential stock gains above the strike price.

6. Cash Secured Puts

Put options can be sold against cash reserves to generate income from the premiums. The cash acts as collateral in case the puts are exercised below the strike price, allowing investors to buy into stock positions at potentially lower prices.

7. Arbitrage Opportunities

Savvy investors can exploit small price discrepancies between related futures contracts and the underlying asset’s spot price. These futures-cash arbitrage trades aim to lock in small, risk-free profits.

Conclusion

Investing in futures and options offers unique benefits, such as hedging risks, speculating on prices, income generation, and improved diversification compared to simple stock and bond investing. Retail investors can tap into these sophisticated tools by starting small, pursuing continuous learning, and working with licensed advisors to improve their overall returns.

Trump 2.0 and Palestinians: From Reversal to Repression and Deportations

By Dr. Dan Steinbock    

The first Trump administration reversed decades of US policies regarding Palestinians. The new one shuns genocidal atrocities. It prefers cultural genocide.

In my new book, The Fall of Israel (2025), I examine the activities of all US postwar administrations regarding the Israelis and Palestinians. The first Trump administration did not just differ from its precursors. It turned upside down five decades of US policies regarding Palestinians. In the next four years, The Trump White House will build on this reversal.

The Great Reversal           

When the new administration arrived in the White House in early 2017, Trump made David M. Friedman US ambassador to Israel. Friedman advised and represented Trump and his organization in bankruptcies involving the tycoon’s Atlantic City casinos. As a revisionist Zionist donor, he had pumped millions of dollars into illegal, extremist West Bank settlements.

When Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced Israel would lift all restrictions on settlement construction in the West Bank, Trump looked the other way. In 2016, the number of Jewish settlers in the occupied territories of the West Bank exceeded 400,000. Under Trump’s “peace to prosperity plan,” all settlements would remain under Israeli sovereignty and not a single settlement would be removed. Today, thanks to Trump and Biden administrations, the number of those settlers exceeds 750,000.

Subsequently, the US recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, moving its embassy from Tel Aviv to the Holy City. In 2018, Trump ordered the closure of the PLO office in Washington, D.C. and canceled nearly all US aid to the West Bank and Gaza, plus $360 million in annual aid previously given to the UNRWA.

In 2020-21, the US, Israel and the United Arab Emirates formalized Israel-UAE relations in a set of bilateral deals, followed by agreements with Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco. It was the US military and intelligence ties that united the signatories of the “Abraham Accords.” For decades, Palestine had been a second thought in US policy. Now it was fading away from the map.  

Trump’s regional aspirations undermine the Palestinian state, which the UN has recognized and which has increasing recognition by the international community.

The Trump administration will blame Biden for the genocidal atrocities in Gaza and support “reforming” a collaborationist Palestinian leadership. It is likely to allow further settlement expansion and Israel’s effective incorporation of the West Bank. It will foster the role of Jerusalem as Israeli capital. It will do what it can to shrink the UNRWA’s role. 

Frontline against barbarians     

The conventional wisdom is that Trump is a “transactional” president who is defined by unabashed opportunism. In reality, his advisors and insiders tout an odd mix of Western values, militarized policies, ultra-conservatism and biblical righteousness. His cabinet will be transactional, yet constrained by these ideologues.

Trump’s Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, believes that Zionism represents American frontline amid anti-Western barbarians. Hegseth has been linked with Temple Mount groups that advocate a new Temple over the Mosque of Omar and al-Aqsa. Entrenched in violent scenarios, such measures could throw the region into flames.

Trump’s ambassador to Israel, Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, opposes a two-state solution and claims “there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian.” Supporting permanent Israeli control over the occupied West Bank, he shares the Christian Evangelical belief that the return of Jews to Israel validates the biblical narrative.

Trump’s Secretary of State Marco Rubio supports a Netanyahu-style Israel and revisionist, ultra-hawkish Zionism. In the past half a decade, the top contributors of Rubio’s campaign finance feature pro-Israel America PAC and Republican Jewish Coalition. He is also a beneficiary of $1.6 million of large individual contributions. In his Wednesday talk with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Rubio underscored that “maintaining the U.S.’s steadfast support for Israel is a top priority for Trump.”

Trump’s Middle East envoy is Steve Witkoff, an aggressive real estate mogul and a close golf friend, and a fervent Zionist donor. The position favors priority. A special envoy who is also special to Trump is likely to mean that Witkoff can bypass Rubio in some critical Israel/Palestinian issues. Witkoff’s dream seems to be a Jewish unitary state in a region dominated by the Gulf empires. He is Trump’s monitor of the Gaza ceasefire and in charge of the Iran file. 

What these key actors share are ardent pro-Israel stances, intimate ties with pro-Israel groups and in several cases a theologically-bound view of Israel – and the effective willingness to recognize a Jewish unitary state with minimal Palestinian population.

Suppression and deportations 

What could prove highly controversial with the Trump administration is the proposed mobilization to crack down “pro-Palestinian” forces in America, deport Palestinian activists and use these measures as a template to crush democratic dissent.

In 2023, Elise Stefanik, a recipient of hundreds of thousands of dollars from AIPAC and the Israel lobby, gained national attention for her interrogation of leading university presidents in a televised US congressional hearing on antisemitism. Calling for students’ deportation, Stefanik claimed they “are pro-Hamas members of a mob who are calling for the eradication of Israel.” In October, she urged for a “complete reassessment” of US funding of the UN, which she accuses of fostering “extreme antisemitism.”

As Trump’s UN ambassador, Stefanik can now walk the talk, as evidenced by her confirmation hearings. When asked whether she supports Palestinian self-determination, she refused to answer. When asked if she subscribes to the viewpoint of Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and former National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s far-right leaders, that Israel has a biblical right to the West Bank, Stefanik replied, “Yes.”

According to Stefanik’s campaign finance, she raised $15.3 million in 2023-24. Her top contributor was AIPAC, but her big money came from large individual contributions ($2.9m) and particularly the opaque “other” category ($8.7m). The bulk of the money was fueled by her support from prominent Jewish Republicans – including cosmetics heir Ron Lauder, asset manager mogul Marc Rowan, casino tycoon Steve Wynn, Blackstone’s executives and Trump’s ex-ambassador David Friedman – in the wake of her grilling of university presidents.

Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, too, has called for a revocation of visas and condemned the campus protests. Another voice in the suppress-and-deport choir is Rep. Brian Mast, the new chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Like the Israeli far-right, Mast rejects the idea of innocent Palestinian civilians championing collective punishment. An evangelical Christian, he volunteered with the Israeli military in 2015 and wore his IDF uniform in Congress after October 7, 2023. Mast’s legislation would permanently cut US funding for the refugee agency UNRWA. Shunning the cease-fire in Gaza, he wants expanded weapons sales to Israel.

Last October, Rubio wrote to then-secretary of state Antony Blinken, pushing him to “immediately perform a full review and coordination effort to revoke the visas of those who have endorsed or espoused Hamas’ terrorist activity.” In this effort, Trump’s nominees in domestic affairs have sought to make the pro-Palestinian protest movement a key issue in America.

How might these initiatives proceed?

Template for repression  

A key role belongs to Kash Patel, Trump’s hand in the FBI. The blueprint is outlined in Project Esther, the plan to presumably combat antisemitism unveiled by the Heritage Foundation. It is part of the thinktank’s Project 2025, the ultra-conservative plan to fundamentally alter the US government.

Project Esther claims that “America’s virulently anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, and anti-American ‘pro-Palestinian movement’ is part of a global Hamas Support Network.” Hence, their call to “dismantle the infrastructure… dedicated to destroying capitalism and democracy.” This movement hopes to capitalize on the highly controversial Antisemitism Awareness Act, which could conflate legitimate criticism of Israel while drastically curbing freedom of speech in America.

If Project Esther prevails, the Trump crackdown seeks to deport protesters in America on student visas and target universities’ tax-exempt status. Though crafted to “combat antisemitism,” it would serve as a blueprint for other domestic initiatives seeking to repress dissent and political activism. In this self-destructive enterprise, the Palestinians serve as a convenient scapegoat and collateral damage.

The original version of the commentary was published by Informed Comment (US) on Jan. 24, 2025.

About the Author

Dr Dan SteinbockDr. Dan Steinbock is the author of The Fall of Israel, a founder of Difference Group and has served at the India, China and America Institute (US), Shanghai Institute for International Studies (China) and the EU Center (Singapore).

Biden’s Pernicious Presidential Legacies

shutterstock_2408993345 (1) (1)

By Dr. Jack Rasmus

Trump’s proposals to radically transform much of US economic and social policy are being rapidly rolled out during the first week of his administration. How much he succeeds or fails in that transformation will depend on a number of factors. High on the list of such factors is the residue of conditions and policies leftover by the Biden administration—i.e. the legacies of the Biden years. Those legacies will play an important role influencing, and perhaps even determining, how Trump may fare in implementing his plans.  So what are the legacy policies and conditions?

The most obvious economic legacy Biden leaves behind is the overhang of the worst inflation since 1980-81. Both a chronic high rate of inflation as well as a general price level that has risen at least 30%-40% over the four years of Biden’s term, when accurately estimated. Inflation has not been tamed and is now rising further—on a base level and rate already too high.

A second economic legacy—a consequence of the above—is that most US households’ real weekly earnings actually declined the past four years. Like the legacy of chronic inflation, that too promises to worsen in the very near future.

Biden’s third economic legacy is that despite a massive fiscal stimulus of $3.6 trillion during his first two years in office, in the second two years the US GDP economic growth rate has been a tepid average annual rise of 2%-2.5%. Thus a mountain of fiscal stimulus has produced a molehill of real economy recovery. More business-investor tax cuts by Trump will not change the tepid US economic growth of the Biden years—just as similar cuts in 2018 by Trump failed to do.

There was no molehill recovery, however, for financial asset wealth accumulation by wealthy investors and billionaires under Biden. In contrast to the anemic real economic growth legacy during his term, Biden’s $3.6 trillion fiscal stimulus of 2021-22 produced a record surge in 2023-24 in financial asset wealth accumulation and the creation of a record number of US billionaires. Income and wealth inequality in America accelerated. It will further under Trump, now on a base of an already record level.

A fifth economic legacy results from all the preceding four: during his four year term, no less than $7.65 trillion in cumulative US budget deficits also defines Biden’s economic legacy. As a consequence of the $7.65 trillion in budget deficits, the US national debt under Biden surged from $26.9 trillion in January 2021 to $36.2 trillion at year end 2024. That in turn resulted in annual interest payments to bondholders of $.95 trillion I 2024 alone.

A sixth economic legacy Biden leaves the US economy is a chronic and rising trade deficit of approximately $1 trillion annually.

These are all ‘legacies’, not just failed policies, since their effects will continue to be felt for years to come—by the US economy in general and especially by its middle and working class households.

But these economic legacies are not the entire story. There are more political legacies Biden leaves his successors. Here are another six political legacies worth noting as well:

In the realm of domestic politics there are at least three: first, during the Biden years, American democracy continued to atrophy and do so in a number of new ways; second, a national crisis in health care services affordability deepened; third, Biden leaves a strategically weakened Democrat Party and ineffective elections contender that will fail to recover for perhaps another decade.

It is in the sphere of geo-political action and US foreign policy, however, that Biden’s most enduring political legacies will leave an indelible imprint on the USA for years to come. These include the costly, lost US proxy war in Ukraine that has irreparably damaged US European allies’ economy; his unconditional support for genocide in Israel and GAZA that has undermined US influence throughout the middle east; and his policies of economic sanctions targeting Russia and China that have accelerated the expansion of the BRICS countries and their challenge to US global economic hegemony that has prevailed for nearly a half century.

Let’s examine each critical legacy in more detail.

1. Chronic Inflation Rate & High Price Level 

As Biden leaves office it is clear that inflation has not been tamed and in fact has recently begun to rise again, leaving a base level and rate rise upon which inflation will almost certainly rise further in 2025 and beyond.

The inflation beast that arose in 2020-21 was tamed only in part and temporarily on his watch and has begun spreading its claws once more.

Inflation surged in 2021-22 to a 9% high as estimated by the US government’s official consumer price index (see BLS monthly CPI Reports, September 2021 thru December 2024 ). That rate of increase abated in 2023-24 as global energy costs and commodity prices slowed their rate of increase. However, in closing months of 2024 energy and goods prices in general have begun drifting upward once again. The inflation beast that arose in 2020-21 was tamed only in part and temporarily on his watch and has begun spreading its claws once more.

The official US estimate of the rise in the price level for consumers since 2020 is around 24% But that number obfuscates the far more severe impact on median and other working class households’ take home pay and disposable income. Prices for many basic food staples like bread, milk, eggs, chicken, etc. have risen 30%-40% since 2020. In 2024 a Wall St. Journal survey estimated the most often purchased grocery prices had risen 35% since 2020.

The true cost of shelter (home prices, rents) has risen even more. The prices for homes nation-wide are up 39% according to the Shiller home price index. But households’ mortgage costs—i.e. what households actually pay out of their monthly budgets— are up 113%! US official price indexes like the CPI do not include mortgage interest rates. Nor any interest rate hikes paid by households for that matter.  Mortgage inflation due to rising interest costs have thus risen far faster and higher at 113% than the 39% for the price of buying a house.

The inflation for shelter (houses and rents & related costs) is even higher if home insurance costs, home repairs, and other fees that define ‘shelter’ in government statistics are included. Rents for roughly 50 million renting households typically follow home prices up and in 2023-24 rents have often made up half of the monthly rise in services price inflation in the CPI. Other services prices have also risen 30% and more—i.e. for auto, home and medical insurance; for auto repairs; and for other key and often purchased services like travel or entertainment.

Interest rates in the Biden years accelerated after March 2022 and have remained chronically high ever since, severely impacting households’ budgets: for example, interest rates on credit cards rose from 16% to 24%, bank auto loans roughly doubled to 9% on average for car purchases, while student loans surged to 6.8% and more.

When interest inflation is properly accounted for—along with increases in local government property and other taxes, fees, and other charges not considered by the government’s Consumer Price Index—the true inflation experienced by US households since January 2021 is easily 35%-40% and therefore much higher than the official CPI number of 24%.

This 35%-40% is the price level legacy left by the Biden administration—the level from which the rate of inflation for goods and services and interest rates across the board promise to rise further in 2025 under Trump as he implements tariffs and implements other policy changes that will raise prices further.

The consequence of this inflation legacy is another Biden legacy: still further declining real take home pay for tens of millions of middle class and below households.

2. US Households’ Declining Real Earnings

While the mainstream media and politicians like to cherry pick wage data to try to show wages have risen under Biden they typically cite ‘wages’ that include salaries, bonuses, and other pay to CEOs, managers and the self employed; report for only full time employed workers; ignore seasonality adjustments; or cite wages unadjusted for inflation.

According to the Federal Reserve bank’s ‘FRED’ database, Median Usual Weekly Earnings adjusted for inflation actually declined during the Biden years. After rising slightly under Obama and then from $351 per week to $378 per week during Trump’s first term, during the Biden years real median weekly earnings actually declined from $378 to $373 per week.

This combination of rising prices, chronically high interest rates, and declining real earnings during Biden’s term is further reflected in the balance sheets of US households the last four years: Household balance sheets (difference between assets and debt) serve as a kind of aggregate indicator on how well those working for wages and salaries have been doing. And per the Federal Reserve’s Financial Accounts of the US, at the close of 2020 US households’ assets totaled $859 billion, and rose to only $883 billion by the second quarter of 2024. In contrast, US households’ total liabilities (i.e. debt from excess use of credit) rose from $17.1 trillion to $20.7 trillion. The latter number reflects the surging load of debt households took on during the Biden years.

3. Weak GDP Growth Despite $3.6 Trillion Stimulus

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)—the measure of how much the real economy grew—was not all that impressive, given the huge fiscal stimulus Biden introduced into the economy during his four year term. For example, his March 2021 ‘American Relief Plan’ designed to provide support to the general economy as it tried to reopen in 2021-22 from the 2020 shutdown amounted to $1.9 trillion in government spending and tax cuts.

However, that $1.9 trillion 2021 stimulus failed to quickly boost the US economy and GDP once the economy had fully reopened in 2022. The reopening in summer and late 2021 was followed by what’s called a technical recession in the first six months of 2022 when the US economy actually contracted for two consecutive quarters—or what some might legitimately call a double dip recession, despite the virtual blackout of the term at the time by the mainstream media and politicians.

As the recession unfolded in the first half of 2022, Biden’s response was to shift what remained of spending on households left over from the $1.9 trillion American Relief Plan of March 2021 (which by the way was intended to last only six months in 2021) and to transfer those funds to subsidize business investment instead of continuing households’ Covid relief.

To that unspent Covid funding was added additional funds by Congress as it passed Biden’s three business investment subsidy bills of 2022: the Infrastructure Act, the Chip & Modernization Act and the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act that subsidized energy companies, alternative and fossil fuels. Those bills amounted to another $1.7 trillion in fiscal spending and tax cuts.

Biden’s $1.9 trillion American Relief Act plus the subsequent three business investment subsidy Acts amounted to a combined $3.6 trillion fiscal stimulus in 2021-22.

Biden thus leaves the legacy of a failure to correct this apparent crisis of US traditional fiscal-monetary policies’ failure to stimulate real economic growth—or conversely, one might add, to significantly curb inflation long term as well.

The $3.6 trillion mountain of fiscal stimulus produced a molehill of real GDP growth! GDP recovered in the second half of 2022 after its first half recession, but recorded a meager 1.9% growth rate for 2022. That was followed in 2023 and 2024 with still tepid GDP growth of 2.5% and 2.3% (the latter estimated by the CBO), respectively. The $3.6 trillion total stimulus, in other words, did not result in GDP growth in 2022-24 beyond the typical long run average GDP gain for the US economy or around 2-2.5%. Where did the stimulus go if it didn’t move the dial on the growth of the economy beyond its historical average?

The stimulus picture is even more unimpressive when one adds the 2020 additional fiscal stimulus of $3.1 trillion provided by the 2020 Cares Act in March 2020 and the Consolidated Act passed in December of 2020. That’s $6.7 trillion of combined fiscal stimulus… producing only annual GDP growth 2022-24 averaging barely 2.3% a year!

The historic low GDP growth of the economy under Biden was even weaker if one adds to the $3.6 trillion fiscal stimulus the Federal Reserve bank’s additional monetary stimulus of $4 trillion more in 2020-2022.

In short, a more than $10 trillion fiscal-monetary stimulus in 2020-2022 produced nothing more than the historically average GDP growth rate during the last three years of Biden’s administration during which the US economy had fully reopened!

This fact strongly suggests that US fiscal-monetary policies are barely working any more as instruments of economic stabilization. Biden thus leaves the legacy of a failure to correct this apparent crisis of US traditional fiscal-monetary policies’ failure to stimulate real economic growth—or conversely, one might add, to significantly curb inflation long term as well. It’s a legacy Trump inherits in turn.

4. Record Asset Wealth Accumulation & Billionaire Creation

The failure to stimulate the real US economy under Biden contrasts sharply, however, with the success of those same policies in stimulating financial asset markets in the US. After a contraction in 2020 due to the Covid shutdown and a weak recovery in 2021-22, US financial markets surged to record levels in 2023-24. US Dow, S&P 500 and Nasdaq markets recorded gains of 25-29% and more in each of the last two years.  It’s not by accident the US economy created a record number of new billionaires under Biden, whose wealth is largely associated with rising financial asset prices from stocks, bonds, derivatives, and other. Record asset wealth surge is thus also a legacy of Biden’s regime.

The combination of record asset wealth amidst tepid real GDP growth, chronic inflation, and declining real earnings for a majority of Americans suggests the failure of the massive $10.7 trillion fiscal-monetary stimulus of 2020-22 might be due to the mis-allocation of that stimulus to financial markets at the expense of real growth. That’s for another analysis; however, at minimum, it’s a ‘smoking gun’.

5. US Budget Deficits & National Debt

The record $10+ trillion Biden era stimulus was diverted to asset markets nonetheless contributed in part to the record surge in the US budget deficits under Biden, and in turn to the accelerating US National Debt (which represents cumulative annual budget deficits).

Budget deficits are a function of both insufficient tax revenue collection, on the one hand, and accelerating government spending on the other.  Insufficient tax revenues are due in turn to weak economic growth and/or tax cuts (or fraud); while spending excesses are associated mostly with discretionary spending on Defense, Wars, social programs, and rising interest payments on the national debt. For a quarter century at least, the US has been exacerbating all the above.

The US Congress and presidents have together cut taxes by at least $17 trillion since 2001. Slow economic growth in the wake of the 2008-09 crash and the Covid 2020-21 shutdown also negatively impact tax revenues, which historically account for 60% of budget shortfalls. The other 40% is due to excess spending which, in turn, is comprised of defense and supplemental war spending, interest payments on the debt, and social programs including the bailouts of the economy in 2008-10 and 2020-22. Defense & War spending since 2001 for US middle east and terrorist wars has amounted to, at minimum, another $8 trillion. Bailouts account for another roughly $5 trillion.  That’s $30 trillion. Rising interest payments on the national debt, especially since March 2022, account for most of the rest of the current national debt.

Under Biden record annual budget deficits ranging from $2.7 trillion in 2021 to $1.8 trillion in 2024 for a total $7.65 trillion cumulative deficits over the past four years. From a level of $5.5 trillion in 2000, the National Debt in turn is now $36.2 trillion—having risen from$26.9 trillion at the end of 2020 just before Biden took office to the more than $36 trillion by today.

The interest payment in 2024 to bondholders who purchased US Treasuries to fund Biden’s budget deficits is now, per latest estimates, at $.95 trillion. Interest payments to bondholders  thus now costs more than funding the Pentagon each year, approximately $885 billion per latest estimates. Moreover, the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) estimates that by 2034 the National Debt will rise, if continues at its current pace, to $56 trillion with annual interest payments of $1.7 trillion to bondholders by 2034. 

With accumulated annual budget deficits over his four year term of $7.65 trillion during his term, Biden has had the highest budget deficits and has contributed more to the national debt than any prior president.

This legacy of deficits and debt means in 2025 the US Congress will almost certainly initiate a major austerity spending policy cutting social and public spending programs, foreign aid, offshore supplemental spending, layoff 100,000 federal workers, and lesser categories of spending cuts by $200 billion or more per year.

While the problem of rising budget deficits and national debt reaches back to at least 2000, the Biden legacy is its policies have severely exacerbated the longer term trend. It provided useful political ammunition for Trump and his corporate backers to slash public spending and social programs as never before.

6. Trade Deficit & Economic-Tech War with China 

One of the economic hallmarks of the Biden administration has been to continue the trade and tech war with China that the prior Trump administration initiated in early 2018. Biden embraced and continued Trump’s tariffs as instrument of economic coercion. He then went several steps further beyond just a tariff strategy. Targeting primarily China, he launched legal actions against China companies, sought to drive them from US capital markets and prohibit their joint ventures in the US economy, pressured allies to raise tariffs and to embargo Chinese imports to their economies as well, and blocked the export of certain tech & business goods to China. Under Biden, Trump’s former tariff war with China morphed into a virtual US economic war against China.

This policy forced China to pursue access to other markets abroad and to accelerate its own internal tech development. Most notably China began penetrating markets and resource access in Africa and South America.

The record of US trade relations with most of the rest of the world was no less ineffective. The US trade deficit accelerated with rising imports into the US and slowing US exports to the rest of the world. According to the Trading Economics research site, the US trade deficit in goods alone is now running at -$1.2 trillion a year in 2024 and the overall deficit in goods and services nearly $1 trillion.

Biden leaves a legacy for the Trump administration that will make Trump’s return to raise tariffs even higher more difficult to succeed. The record trade deficit is likely an important motivator behind Trump’s policy to ‘drill baby drill’ to increase US oil and gas production in order to export to Europe to offset some of the trade deficit due to rising goods imports to the US. In other words, the Biden trade deficit legacy will be used by Trump to justify more oil and gas drilling and the further environmental issues in the US that will result.

7. Decline of Democracy in America

The Biden regime added new dimensions to the decline of American Democracy—a decline that has been occurring since at least the 1990s. These dimensions have now become embedded in the US electoral and political system. Among the changes on Biden’s watch:

The Democrat party’s adoption of a policy of systematic ballot denialism. This has included marginalizing of challengers to the Democrat party’s DNC leadership’s practice of pre-selecting its presidential candidates in lieu of an open, competitive primary system. The practice began in earnest in 2016, became even more evident with the South Carolina primary in 2020, and then deepened in the 2024 party primary cycle, as challengers such as RFkjr, Tulsi Gabbard, Maryann Williamson and others were systematically excluded from an already pre-determined primary outcome. Ballot denialism was also adopted as a policy by the DNC targeting outside third party challengers like the Greens and other 3rd parties.

Another contribution to the decline of intra-party and electoral democracy under Biden was a deepening of the influence of wealthy big donors within the party—reflected in part by those donors’ $2.9B contributions in just a few months in summer 2024; and likely more than $5B in the 2024 election cycle. The deepening of wealthy donors influence within the Democrat party extended to foreign entities as well. The Israeli political action committee, AIPAC, was allowed and encouraged by the DNC to interfere in the party’s primaries, as well as the general elections, by contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to select pro-Israel party candidates.

Further indicators of democracy decline on Biden’s watch was the cynical manipulation of the US legal system (i.e. lawfare) against challengers; a policy of enabling non-citizen immigrants to vote in elections; continuing support for the gerrymandering of seats in the US House of Representatives; and an extreme abuse of the powers of the presidential pardon system as was evident in Biden’s last actions as president—including the pre-emptive pardoning of family members and himself—that has punctured the popular myth that in America no one is above the law. All these changes are now embedded in the party system in general.

The decline of democracy in America has occurred not only within the electoral system and intra-political party practices and norms. The last quarter century has witnessed the decline of the US electoral democracy along multiple legal fronts, enabled by the US Supreme Court. From the Court’s Bush v. Gore decision in 2000 when it in effect selected the president, to its 2010 Citizens United decision which ruled spending money in elections was an act of ‘free speech’ for corporations and rich donors (including foreign), to decisions legitimizing the extreme gerrymandering that has resulted in no more than 40 seats in the US House of Representatives ever being competitive, to approving the spying, surveillance and denial of 1st amendment rights as result of the Patriot and subsequent National Defense Acts.

Among the Biden administration’s political legacies is how it presided over the atrophy of democracy within the Democrat party’s primary system, how it allowed rich donors deeper influence and control of its DNC, and how it introduced questionable anti-democracy practices like ballot denialism and non-citizen voting among its election practices

8. Increasingly Unaffordable US Health Care

The failure to stem and reverse the increasingly unaffordable healthcare system in the USA is another political legacy of the Biden years. Much is made by the party elite and its associated mainstream media how the Obama Affordable Care Act has succeeded in providing affordable health insurance. But facts reveal it has not.

The average cost of private health insurance for a typical family of four is now more than $25,000 per year, according to Kaiser Family research. And that’s just monthly premiums. It doesn’t count additional copays or deductibles now averaging $1 to $5k per year. Nor do those costs include dental, hearing or vision services. Hearing aids cost $4-$5k and the cost of a single tooth implant is $10,000 or more. Then there’s the ever-accelerating cost of prescription drugs, often hundreds of dollars per pill (costing less than $10 if purchased from the same company in Canada or abroad).  A consequence has been millions of Americans are forced to forego use of health care services even if they are formally covered by bare bones insurance with unaffordable deductibles and copays.

The Biden legacy is to have allowed the crisis in affordability to continue and worsen, citing the Affordable Care Act which is financed in large party by $900 billion a year in government subsidies to Health Insurance companies. Biden introduced a few band-aid solutions, such as limiting the cost of insulin drug costs to $35/month (but just for Medicare enrollees). The vast majority of the population of millions of diabetes patients must still contend with health insurance insulin coverage denial. Another Biden token solution to escalating prescription drug prices was to limit the cost of just six of the most often purchased drugs—which will not to take effect until 2026, however.

Also left virtually unaddressed during the Biden years has been the triple Social-Healthcare crises: the escalating national suicide rate (now >48,000/yr), chronic gun deaths (averaging 45,000/yr since 2021), and accelerating drug-related deaths from opioids. At 70,000 in 2019 US drug related deaths surged to more than 100,000 in every year of the Biden administration.

The Biden legacy to allow the continuation of the Health Care affordability crisis in America. Like Medieval physician practices of centuries ago, the unaffordable health system is ‘bleeding’ American dry. And little to nothing has also been done to reduce the epidemic of deaths from suicides and addiction. The Biden legacy is to have looked away while the patient slowly succumbs leaving the health of the nation much worse off as he leaves office.

9. Crisis Within the Democratic Party

Biden leaves his own Democrat Party in political shambles, from which it is uncertain it may recover; or if it does, not soon. Insisting on running for re-election in 2024, Biden reversed a pledge made in 2020 he would not do so. His declining mental capacities revealed in the first presidential debate in the summer of 2024 for all to see, set in motion a disastrous chain of events where party elites—led by Obama and Pelosi—removed him as presidential candidate after just months earlier maneuvering to nominate him as such. The oligarchic nature of the party was thus revealed to all.  That political oligarchy then selected an alternative weak candidate in VP Harris who publicly vowed to continue the policies of the Biden administration, thus ensuring her defeat in the general election. At the core of those policies was a strategy of Identity Politics which had increasingly defined the party since 2016. Fundamental economic issues for voters were largely ignored in the 2024 election. The Democrat party now drifts, essentially leadership and without a strategy and proposals that appeal to the voters. That drift promises to continue for years to come, during which its Republican opponent may well deepen its coalition and control of government for several election cycles to come. Biden thus leaves a Democrat party deeply and perhaps mortally wounded—thereby leaving Trump and the Republicans to run roughshod over the political system with their own anti-democracy plans in turn.

10. Costly Lost Proxy War in Ukraine 

When Biden quickly ‘cleared the deck’ with a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 it was to focus on provoking a proxy war in Ukraine. That decision has proved the most disastrous US foreign policy decision since president Lyndon Johnson’s decision in 1965 to send 500,000 US troops to Vietnam.

Nearly all military analysts now admit the proxy war in Ukraine is lost. All that remains is how the US extricates itself. The political and economic fall out from Biden’s failed military adventure in Ukraine will be felt for years yet to come: Europe has been destabilized economically and politically as result; Russia has been permanently driven into a long term military alliances with China, No. Korea and Iran; US weapons inventories have been seriously depleted; Russia has war mobilized its economy and accelerated its advanced weapons development faster than the US; global trade has been restructured to the disadvantage of the USA; US ability to compete with China has been set back for years or perhaps longer; US budget deficits have been raised by at least $250 billion in US aid to Ukraine the past three years. And that’s just a short list. It’s also a Biden failed foreign policy legacy.

11. Sanctions, Rise of the BRICS & Decline of US Hegemony 

History will likely show that Biden has done more to undermine US global economic hegemony and political influence than Russian and China presidents Putin and Xi together.

The Biden sanctions on both countries, especially Russia, have been counterproductive, impacting European allies negatively more than Russia or China. More important, Biden sanctions have likely accelerated the shift of the economies of the Global South toward the BRICS, the members of which have expanded significantly since 2022.

With the BRICS’ expansion has begun an inevitable shift in the global economy: from the central, dominant role of the US dollar as a global transaction and reserve currency to alternative currencies; a move by many economies away from the US bank-managed SWIFT International Payments system; and plans by the BRICS to create an institutional alternative to the IMF.

Biden thus leaves a most difficult legacy to Trump and presidents thereafter to address how to counter and compete with the BRICS and the emergence of an alternative global financial structure. History will therefore show Biden accelerated the decline of the US global empire by weaponizing the US dollar and escalating sanctions policies.

12. Support for Genocide in GAZA

Biden’s regime will likely mark a clear turning point in the history of US global dominance and the end to the US unipolar world that existed since the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991.

A close second to Biden foreign policy debacles in the proxy war in Ukraine and mishandling of sanctions and the US dollar is the Biden policies supporting genocide by Israel in GAZA. The US has become inextricably associated in world opinion with allowing the genocide with its unlimited military funding support to Israel—currently amounting to around $50 billion since October 2023—and US unlimited shipments of US bombs and advanced weaponry to Israel. The result has been perhaps 500,000 Palestinians killed, maimed and homeless and the virtual loss of US political influence and soft power throughout most of the Arab and Muslim world.

The legacy of Biden policy in support of genocide will mean the continued diminishment of US political influence in the region, as well as US moral influence throughout the world.

Biden foreign policy legacies will haunt US attempts to re-establish US influence and authority in the world. Biden’s regime will likely mark a clear turning point in the history of US global dominance and the end to the US unipolar world that existed since the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991.

Biden’s departure on January 20, 2025 also closes the book in the latest period in the history of Neoliberalism in the USA that has defined US policy and its evolution from the late 1970s to the present. Launched initially in the closing years of the Jimmy Carter presidency around 1978, Neoliberal economic and political policies expanded and deepened throughout the 1980s and 1990s, reaching a kind of apogee of effectiveness around 2005-07. Neoliberal policy then hit a wall with the financial crash and great recession of 2008-09. Thereafter such policies recovered only partially under Obama and Trump 2017-20 before hitting another wall with the Covid shutdown and recession of 2020-21.

Throughout Neoliberalism’s ‘weak restoration period’ of 2010-20, the internal contradictions within the Neoliberal policy mix have intensified. Those internal contradictions have deepened with the failed policies of the Biden regime.

Thus the beginning of the end of the Neoliberal restructuring of America that began in the late 1970s-early 1980s—and that has continued ever since—may well be recognized in years to come as the most notable historic legacy of the Biden years.

About the Author

jack_rasmusJack Rasmusis author of the recently published book, ‘The Scourge of Neoliberalism: US Economic Policy from Reagan to Trump’, Clarity Press, 2020. He publishes at Predicting the Global Economic Crisis

Understanding Consumer Proposal Versus Bankruptcy

US bank notes
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels

Financial distress is a reality for many, and understanding the options available can make all the difference. Two solutions often come to the fore: consumer proposals and bankruptcy. Each has its own set of rules, benefits, and implications. Here’s a straightforward breakdown of each.

What is a Consumer Proposal?

A consumer proposal is a legal agreement negotiated with your creditors. Simply put, it offers a way to pay back a portion of your debt over a manageable period.

Unlike bankruptcy, a consumer proposal for debt relief allows you to keep your assets. This is a big advantage if you have significant investments or property.

Your creditors get a portion of what they’re owed, and you get a chance to start over—including protection from pesky collection calls.

If your consumer proposal includes regular monthly payments, it can adjust to reflect changes in your financial circumstances. This flexibility can serve as a buffer during periods of unexpected financial strain, offering slight modifications without entirely derailing your repayment plan.

For those concerned about future financial stability, a consumer proposal reflects your commitment to paying off debts, which can be viewed favorably by creditors when you’re building your financial reputation back up.

Many find peace of mind knowing that a consumer proposal does not typically result in job loss. Unlike bankruptcy, there are no legal requirements to disclose your financial arrangement to employers, making it a discreet option that does not jeopardize your current position or career trajectory. 

Additionally, while a consumer proposal may temporarily impact your ability to secure traditional loans, it often makes other forms of borrowing, such as applying for a secured credit card, more accessible. This can be vital for individuals eager to start rebuilding their credit profile while maintaining manageable monthly payments.

Understanding Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy is often seen as a financial last resort. It’s a legal process that provides a fresh start by eliminating most of your debts.

However, bankruptcy can come at a cost. Prepare to lose non-exempt property, as assets may be sold to pay creditors. 

Declaring bankruptcy may also restrict your ability to secure loans for a significant period. It’s a decision not to be taken lightly.

Though it can offer relief, bankruptcy may impact your life in ways beyond financial. Employment prospects and personal relationships can sometimes be influenced, with employers and loved ones having varied perceptions of bankruptcy’s stigma.

In certain rare cases, creditors or lenders may even challenge a bankruptcy filing, which could prolong proceedings and add more complications to an already stressful situation. 

Despite its serious implications, bankruptcy can serve as a crucial learning experience, encouraging individuals to develop better financial habits. Prioritizing savings, creating detailed budgets, and understanding financial planning often emerge as key lessons during and after the process.

Furthermore, it’s important to explore if your jurisdiction offers alternatives like bankruptcy exemptions or relief options. Some regions provide assistance that can soften the impact, helping individuals maintain specific assets such as clothing, household goods, or personal vehicles, depending on specific local laws. 

The Process: Consumer Proposal vs. Bankruptcy

With a consumer proposal, the process typically includes meeting with a licensed insolvency trustee to draft a proposal. This proposal becomes binding once approved by the majority of creditors.

Bankruptcy, on the other hand, involves filing legal forms and surrendering assets to a trustee. It requires ongoing compliance, including attending financial counseling sessions. 

Both processes mandate careful preparation, as incorrect or omitted information can lead to rejections or delays. Being transparent with your trustee can facilitate hiccup-free proceedings.

Duration Matters

Timeframes vary between the two. Consumer proposals can last up to five years. Bankruptcy can end as quickly as nine months—if it’s your first time and you adhere to all conditions. 

With variable timelines, weigh whether quicker debt relief or longer-term stability fits better with your current scenario.

It is also crucial to keep in mind future financial goals. Think about upcoming expenses or financial milestones such as a new home purchase, starting a family, or continuing education that might align better with either a shorter or longer financial plan. 

When to Consider Each Option

Review your financial situation before choosing. Consumer proposals may suit those with regular income who wish to preserve certain assets. 

Bankruptcy becomes viable when debts have spiraled beyond control and asset liquidation seems the only pathway to relief. 

Individual circumstances and personal goals will dictate which option aligns best with your financial path forward. 

Financial Impacts and Recovery

Your credit report will be affected by both decisions. However, the impact of bankruptcy is often more severe, lasting for up to seven years.

Recovering from a consumer proposal can begin sooner, as it’s reflected on your credit history for a shorter span.

The ability to rebuild without the looming burden of past debt is imperative. Make an informed choice based on your future financial health.

Building new credit after bankruptcy entails securing small loans or credit cards with high interest. Although challenging, it’s crucial to pave the way for renewed financial credibility. 

Consulting a Professional

Engage with a trusted financial advisor or insolvency trustee. Their expertise can provide a clearer picture, preventing knee-jerk decisions. 

Professional guidance is invaluable. A fresh pair of eyes often reveals overlooked opportunities or strategies. 

Ultimately, the decision should empower you, steering you toward a stable financial future.

Understanding the Popularity Behind Live Roulette

A roulette table with blue LED lights around the edge taken with a shallow depth of field.

Live casino games have taken off in the last decade or so, offering players a new format for playing classic table games online. Games like Blackjack, Baccarat and Roulette are all staples of this new format that mixes an online interface with a live dealer and physical game components.

Roulette is a straightforward game of chance, centred around wagering on which of the wheel’s numbered pockets a spinning ball will land in. Where other online Roulette games use a random number generator (RNG) to determine the outcome of a spin, live Roulette sees the dealer spinning a physical wheel instead.

So, let’s take a look at a few of the factors that have made live Roulette such a popular online format.

1. Accessibility

One of the main features of live Roulette and other online casino games is the ability to play them from any device with a suitable internet connection. This means that players no longer have to travel to a land-based casino venue in order to access a game of Roulette.

With the presence of the live human dealer through the video stream, live Roulette offers a blend between online play and elements of classic casino gameplay. This option is particularly useful for players who prefer to see a physical Roulette wheel spin, rather than watch an animation of the RNG’s result.

But whether it’s a live feed of a spinning Roulette wheel or an RNG-based spin, both have the same degree of randomness and unpredictability.

2. Options

Something else that has added to the popularity of live Roulette is the degree of options it offers. There are live games that feature either European or American Roulette wheels, allowing players to choose between two of the biggest game formats.

The game’s setup also allows for a degree of customisation, as the live Roulette studio setup features a number of different high-definition cameras. This allows players to choose which particular angle or view of the table they prefer to watch, rather than being limited to a single perspective on the spin.

Plus, as the live Roulette format continues to grow, platforms have started to offer other themed options and new variants for players to choose from.

3. Straightforward design

Unlike some other table games, Roulette has a very simple core concept and game design. Beyond the wagering stage, there is no further element of player decision-making involved in the game. This makes it a straightforward game to understand once players have an idea of the table layout and the odds of its various wagers.

This isn’t unique to live Roulette as a format, but it is undeniably something that has helped to make it one of the most popular table games online.

4. Transparency

While digital Roulette games are subject to strict regulation, some players will always prefer the transparency of playing with a physical Roulette wheel. By showing all angles of the wheel and table, live Roulette offers an even higher degree of transparency for players.

As they can see every motion of the live dealer and observe the wheel spinning in real-time, the format makes its fair nature clear.

By bringing together online players with a live dealer, live Roulette offers a different type of gameplay compared to purely digital Roulette tables. That mix of online and land-based casino elements is a big part of what has made it such a popular choice for players.

Trump Signs Order to Withdraw from Paris Agreement on First Day of Second Term

3D illustration of Two Crossed Flags of USA and France

On the first day of his second term, President Donald Trump signed executive actions to pull the United States out of the Paris Agreement, a landmark climate change treaty aimed at limiting global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius, with an ideal goal of 1.5 degrees.

The withdrawal comes as the planet crossed the critical threshold of 1.5 degrees Celsius of global warming in 2024, a marker established during the 2015 Paris Climate Summit. While the Paris Agreement set ambitious climate targets, its non-binding nature allowed countries to determine their own emission reduction goals. However, the speed of climate change has surpassed expectations, with scientists warning that any sustained warming beyond 1.5 degrees will significantly impair humanity’s ability to adapt.

Despite Trump’s decision to exit the agreement, the Biden administration had submitted a bold climate target in December 2024, aiming for a 66% reduction in emissions by 2035. Experts, however, express concerns that under Trump’s leadership, the U.S. may continue to fall short of meeting global climate commitments.

International leaders have reacted with concern, highlighting the dangers of excluding the U.S. from the global effort to combat climate change. Simon Stiell, Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change, reiterated that the door remains open for the U.S. to re-engage but stressed the growing clean energy boom that nations are tapping into, which is valued at $2 trillion and rising. Countries that disregard this shift, Stiell warned, risk falling behind economically while the cost of climate disasters continues to rise.

Trump’s move is expected to intensify global debates on the future of climate diplomacy and could have long-lasting effects on future international climate negotiations.

Related Readings:

Climate-induced terrorism

Plug, plant growing inside the light bulb and United States Flag

climate-finance

Top 5 Strategies for Sustainable Business Growth

Wooden cubes with icon business strategies, action plan, goal, process, and game plan

To ensure the long-term health of your business, you must focus on growing sustainably and strategically.

In today’s competitive landscape, it’s not enough for businesses to focus solely on immediate gains. A well-calculated, sustainable strategy is a must for any business aiming for longevity and success. Sustainable business growth, at its most basic, centers on the successful development of processes that continue to glow over time and having business fuel cards. Rather than simply hitting the gas pedal and chasing quick windfalls, it’s a commitment to steady, meaningful growth that stands the test of time.

It marries economic performance and progress with an unwavering respect for the environment, vibrant community relationships, and integrity. It’s about enhancing business profitability while ensuring a positive societal impact. By focusing on needs beyond the bottom line, businesses can thrive for decades and more while adding true value to the world around them.

Sustainable business growth is the goal of many entrepreneurs and companies, but achieving it can be challenging in a competitive and dynamic market. It means being able to grow your business without compromising its stability, quality, or values. But it also means being able to adapt to changing customer needs, environmental factors, and industry trends.

Here are some tips on how you can ensure that your business grows sustainably and successfully.

1. Plan for the long term and embrace change

Planning for the long term and embracing change is crucial for sustainable growth, as they help you prepare for the future and cope with uncertainty. Planning for the long-term means setting SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) goals that align with your vision and mission, as well as developing strategies and action plans to achieve them. Embracing change means being flexible, agile, and resilient in the face of challenges, opportunities, or disruptions that may arise in the market or environment.

To plan for the long term and embrace change, you need to have a clear vision of where you want to go, monitor the trends and signals that may affect your business, learn from your mistakes and successes, and adjust your plans accordingly.

2. Create a unique brand identity

Creating a unique brand identity is quintessential for sustaining business growth over the long term. A distinctive identity sets you apart from the competition and establishes a powerful connection with your target audience. It shapes consumers’ perceptions of your business and bolsters your credibility in the marketplace. It starts with developing a clear mission and vision that reflects your sustainable growth strategy, as it’s essential to provide a guiding direction for your business’s environmentally-conscious initiatives and long-term objectives.

When it comes to designing your visual identity, such as your logo and color palette, it’s also crucial to keep sustainability in mind, ensuring that these elements convey your commitment to eco-friendly practices. Consistently communicating your sustainable practices across all marketing channels helps build trust with your audience by demonstrating your genuine commitment to sustainability and reinforcing your brand’s green credentials.

3. Diversify your customer base

Diversifying your customer base is also a fundamental part of sustainable growth. Relying too heavily on a single customer segment, no matter how popular it seems, creates a vulnerability to market shifts and economic fluctuations. By proactively seeking out new demographics, exploring untapped geographic markets, or even adapting my products to suit adjacent industries, it can significantly strengthen your business’s resilience. It’s worth mentioning that this approach doesn’t mean you have to abandon your existing customer base. Instead, consider it an opportunity to connect with another audience and offer them the same top-notch experience that helped you win over your first customers.

4. Focus on customer satisfaction and retention

Customer satisfaction and retention are crucial for sustainable growth, as they indicate how well you are delivering on your value proposition and meeting customer expectations. Satisfied customers are more likely to buy from you again, refer you to others, and provide positive feedback. Retaining customers is also more cost-effective than acquiring new ones, as it reduces marketing and sales expenses and increases lifetime value. To achieve high customer satisfaction and retention, you need to provide excellent customer service, listen to customer feedback, and continuously improve your product or service quality.

5. Monitor industry trends

One way to create a sustainable business growth plan is to monitor industry trends and monitor changes in the dynamics. This helps you explore market gaps and discover new opportunities to scale your business operations. By leveraging these insights, you can make data-driven decisions and devise a growth plan with high chances of success. Since your initiatives are backed by thorough research, you can make use of the available resources to the fullest and drive optimal returns from your efforts.

In business, it’s never a case of discovering a model or strategy that works and sticking to it for decades. The world changes quickly, and you need to be able to adapt. Keep analysing all your strategies on a regular basis to identify what works, what needs tweaking and what isn’t working and therefore it’s best to concentrate your resources elsewhere.

But remember that sustainable growth is not a one-time event or a quick fix; it is a continuous process that requires commitment, dedication, and hard work. However, the rewards are worth it: a thriving business that creates value for yourself, your customers, your employees, your partners, and your society.

The CRE Financing Revolution: What Loan Originators Need Now

Hands putting puzzle piece together on bright city background

With increasing market complexity and client expectations, loan originators need more than expertise—they need cutting-edge tools to stay competitive. CommLoan, a CRE financing marketplace, stands out as a promising solution in this space

Everyone knows that traditional workflows leave little room for the strategic aspects of a job, such as building relationships with clients and identifying innovative solutions. Now, think about loan originators. In the competitive market of commercial real estate (CRE) financing, they must act as trusted advisors, but the manual processes that dominate their role can hold them back. Fortunately, a game-changer technology by CommLoan simplifies these tasks and empowers loan originators to focus on what they do best—creating value for their clients.

The Backbone of U.S. Real Estate

The U.S. CRE financing market is a cornerstone of the nation’s economy, enabling businesses to secure the funding necessary for property acquisition, development, and operations. With billions of dollars transacted annually, the market is vast and complex, requiring the expertise of professionals to navigate its intricacies.

Loan originators play a critical role in this ecosystem. Unlike real estate brokers who primarily focus on facilitating property sales or leases, loan originators specialize in securing financing solutions tailored to the unique needs of their clients. They act as intermediaries between borrowers and lenders, leveraging their knowledge and networks to identify optimal loan structures and terms.

This specialization is vital in a market where financing options are diverse and often intricate. From traditional bank loans to alternative financing sources, the ability to match borrowers with the right lenders is both an art and a science.

Transforming Loan Origination Through Technology

The life of a loan originator in the commercial real estate sector is often a juggling act. From the moment they start their day, they are inundated with calls, emails, and meetings while sifting through stacks of paperwork. Their time is spent searching for lenders and negotiating terms — an intricate process that is often time-consuming and frustrating.

Far from replacing human expertise, technology enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of loan originators. With tools that provide access to an extensive network of lenders, streamline document handling, and offer real-time analytics, technology equips loan originators to make better, faster decisions. Instead of manually comparing loan options, originators can now leverage platforms to handle these tasks seamlessly.

eXp Realty exemplifies how technology can empower professionals in the real estate industry, specifically in the residential sector. Their AI-powered chatbot, “Luna”, provides agents with 24/7 assistance, streamlining daily tasks and enhancing client interactions. Additionally, their innovative revenue-sharing program incentivizes productivity and loyalty among agents, making them a standout player in the competitive real estate market.

In the CRE space, CommLoan’s platform connects originators to a vast marketplace of over 800 lenders, including banks, credit unions, and alternative funding sources. CommLoan frees up originators to focus on client relationships and strategic decision-making by automating processes like lender selection, borrower information gathering and loan packaging.The platform’s matching tools, for example, allows originators to present the best financing options quickly and confidently, further amplifying their value. Faster deal closures give originators a critical advantage in today’s competitive market.

Loan originators who adopt technology are better positioned to thrive in the competitive CRE market. Unlike traditional methods that take weeks, CommLoan’s technology streamlines processes, ensuring faster, more precise outcomes. The access to a broad lender network and advanced analytics gives them a significant edge, enabling faster deal closures and better outcomes for their clients. The platform’s revenue-sharing model is another innovative feature, aligning with originators’ goals and enhancing their earning potential by building a revenue stream for retirement. 

Seize the Opportunity

Technology is indispensable in an industry where speed, efficiency, and precision can determine success. CommLoan’s platform provides loan originators the tools to overcome traditional hurdles and excel in their field. By embracing such advancements, originators can redefine their role, deliver unparalleled value to their clients, and thrive in the evolving landscape of CRE financing.

Riding Safe in Burbank: Protecting Motorcyclists on California Roads

Motorcycle Group Touring Through the Scenic Redwood Highway in Northern California

Burbank, located in the heart of California, is known for its busy streets and scenic routes. For motorcyclists, it’s both a thrill and a challenge. However, sharing the road on two wheels can be risky. California consistently sees high rates of motorcycle accidents, with hundreds of lives lost each year. But here’s the thing: most of these tragedies are preventable.

As a legal team that’s seen the aftermath of too many motorcycle accidents, we want to shed light on the risks motorcyclists face and, more importantly, what you can do to stay safe.

The Reality of Motorcycle Accidents

California leads the nation in motorcycle registrations, with over 800,000 motorcycles on the road. Unfortunately, it also has some of the highest rates of motorcycle accidents. In 2021, there were 565 motorcycle fatalities statewide, a 3% increase from the previous year. Even in a relatively small city like Burbank, with its mix of local and commuter traffic, accidents are a regular concern.

One of the leading causes of motorcycle accidents is visibility—or lack thereof. Motorcycles are smaller and harder for drivers to see, particularly in blind spots or during lane changes. Add to this the high-speed traffic typical of California freeways, and it’s clear why motorcyclists face such high risks.

Another factor is lane splitting. California is the only state where lane splitting—riding between lanes of slow-moving or stopped traffic—is explicitly legal. While it can help reduce congestion and save time, it requires skill and extreme caution. Misjudging distances or encountering a distracted driver can lead to devastating consequences.

Your Safety Matters

At the Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti, we’ve worked with countless motorcycle accident victims. We’ve seen firsthand how these incidents change lives—not just for riders but for their families, too. The physical injuries, emotional trauma, and financial strain can be overwhelming. That’s why we’re passionate about sharing safety tips that can make a real difference.

Smart Safety Tips for Motorcyclists

Staying safe on the road takes more than a helmet and a prayer. Here are some actionable, lesser-known safety tips to protect yourself:

  1. Dress to Stand Out
    Many riders wear black gear because it looks cool, but it’s not ideal for visibility. Invest in bright or reflective clothing to ensure drivers see you, especially at night. Adding reflective tape to your bike can also help.
  2. Use Your Head (and Eyes)
    Keep your eyes moving, scanning the road for hazards like potholes, debris, or distracted drivers. Anticipating potential dangers gives you more time to react.
  3. Don’t Trust the Right of Way
    Even if you have the legal right of way, don’t assume other drivers will yield. Defensive riding means preparing for the worst-case scenario and always leaving yourself an out.
  4. Upgrade Your Gear
    Full-face helmets offer the best protection. Look for one with a high safety rating and ensure it fits snugly. Consider adding armor to your jacket, pants, and gloves for extra impact protection.
  5. Check Your Bike Regularly
    A well-maintained motorcycle is a safer motorcycle. Regularly inspect your tires for proper inflation, check your brakes, and ensure your lights are functioning. Small issues can become big problems when you’re riding at high speeds.
  6. Practice Your Emergency Maneuvers
    How quickly can you stop or swerve to avoid an obstacle? Practicing these skills in a safe environment can prepare you for split-second decisions on the road.
  7. Ride in the Best Lane Position
    Position yourself where you’re most visible to other drivers, typically near the center of the lane. Avoid riding in blind spots, and always make yourself known when overtaking a vehicle.
  8. Respect Weather Conditions
    Rain can make roads slick and reduce visibility. If you must ride in bad weather, slow down and increase your following distance.

The Emotional Toll of Motorcycle Accidents

It’s easy to focus on the physical injuries after an accident, but the emotional scars are just as real. Many riders struggle with anxiety, PTSD, or depression after a crash. Families often bear the burden of caregiving and financial stress.

That’s where we come in. At the Law Offices of Adrianos Facchetti, we’re not just here to win your case—we’re here to support you every step of the way. From helping you navigate insurance claims to connecting you with trusted medical professionals, we’re committed to easing your burden so you can focus on healing.

The Road Ahead

If you or a loved one has been injured in a motorcycle accident, you don’t have to face the insurance process alone. The law is on your side, and so are we. With offices in Burbank, we understand the unique challenges of riding in Southern California.

We’re here to listen, guide, and fight for you. Contact us today for a free consultation. Let’s work together to turn a difficult situation into a brighter future.

Call a Burbank Personal Injury Lawyer Today

Riding a motorcycle offers freedom and adventure, but it also comes with responsibility. By taking proactive steps to protect yourself, you can enjoy the ride while minimizing risks. Remember, safety isn’t just about you—it’s about the people who care about you, too.

Ride smart, ride safe, and know that if the unexpected happens, you’ve got a personal injury lawyer in Burbank ready to stand by your side.

Foreign Investment Control in France – A Practical Guide for Investors (Updated)

Foreign Investment Control in France

By Olivia Lê Horovitz

1. What is the control of foreign investments in France?

Foreign investment control is a system of prior authorization of certain investments strictly defined by law, implemented by the Ministry of the Economy. This mechanism has been in force in France since 1966.

To carry out this control, the Ministry of the Economy, to which the Secretary of the General Directorate of the Treasury (“DGT“) reports, is responsible for examining certain investment transactions involving French entities to determine whether such transactions could be detrimental to public security, public order or the national defense interests of France.

2. Which foreign investments are subject to the control of the Ministry of Economy?

In France, the principle is that foreign investments are free. Only in exceptional cases are certain operations subject to prior authorization by the Ministry of the Economy. In 2023, 309 applications were examined by the DGT.

Thus, the Ministry in charge of the economy will only proceed with an audit if three cumulative criteria are met:

  • The presence of a foreign investor;
  • An investment operation as defined in article R 151-2 of the Monetary and Financial Code;
  • Intervening in a sensitive sector.

The definition of a foreign investor is broad. It includes individuals of foreign nationality or tax residence, as well as entities incorporated under foreign law, but also entities incorporated under French law that are controlled by one or more of the above-mentioned persons or entities.

For investors from outside the European Union, prior authorization is also required to cross the threshold of 25% of the voting rights in a French-law entity.

The concept of an investment transaction varies according to the origin of the investor. Regardless of the nationality of the foreign investor, acquisitions of control or of all or part of a branch of activity of an entity governed by French law are subject to authorization. In addition, for investors from outside the European Union, prior authorization is also required to cross the threshold of 25% of the voting rights in a French-law entity. A temporary measure lowering the threshold for holding voting rights (10%) in listed French companies triggering foreign investment control[1] has been extended until December 31, 2023[2].

Since January 2024, the scope of foreign investments subject to authorization has been extended. Decree no. 2023-1293 of December 28, 2023, consolidates the system for monitoring the crossing of the 10% voting rights threshold in companies listed on a regulated market by non-European investors, introduced by Decree no. 2020-892 of July 22, 2020.

Finally, and this is the most delicate criterion to handle, the operation must take place in a sensitive sector. These are activities set out by regulation, which fall within the sectors of defense and security, the press, energy or critical technologies.

3. Are intra-group transactions subject to foreign investment control?

When the investment is made between companies all belonging to the same group (i.e., held more than 50% of the capital or voting rights, directly or indirectly by the same shareholder), the authorization is deemed to have been granted.[3]

Similarly, there is no need to file an application for authorization when the foreign Investor crosses the 25% threshold of an entity over which it has previously acquired control following the issuance of an authorization, or when the foreign investor acquires control of a company and has already received authorization in connection with the previous crossing of the 25% threshold of the capital or voting rights.

Article R.151-7 I has been rewritten since the Decree of December 28, 2023, on foreign investment in France, and now states, more concisely, that: “The investor is exempt from the authorization requirement […] when the investor of last resort in the chain of control, […], had, prior to the investment, already acquired control within the meaning of Article L.233-3 of the French Commercial Code.” This amendment, introduced by the Decree of December 28, 2023, is a legislative change designed to simplify the exemptions applicable to intra-group reorganizations.

There are two exceptions to these exemptions: where the investment results in the violation of a condition that had been accepted by the investor in a previous authorization procedure, or where the purpose of the investment is to transfer abroad all or part of a branch of a sensitive activity.[4]

4. What are the “sensitive” sectors of activity, requiring investment control?

Sensitive sectors are sectors affecting national defense interests or likely to affect public order, public safety and activities essential to guaranteeing the country’s interests.

A decree of the Council of State (“Conseil d’Etat”) sets the restrictive list of sectors and activities presenting such challenges. The list of these sectors was supplemented in 2014 to cover, in particular, critical infrastructure operation activities (“Montebourg” extension), by the decree of November 28, 2018, which came into force on January 1, 2019, to cover future technologies, aerospace, hosting of certain data, and by the decree of December 31, 2019, which came into force on April 1, 2020, which includes new sectors, in particular to take into account developments in the European regulation of March 19, 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investment in the Union, such as print media and online press services for political and general information, food safety, energy storage and critical technologies.

An order dated September 10, 2021 (the Order) has made several changes to the current regulations relating to the control of foreign investments, applicable since January 1, 2022. The Order extends the definition of critical technologies mentioned in 1° of III of Article R. 151-3 of the Monetary and Financial Code to include cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, robotics, additive manufacturing, semiconductors, quantum technologies, energy storage, biotechnologies and technologies involved in the production of renewable energy (solar, wind, hydraulic, biomass or geothermal energy), considering current developments and challenges in this sector. Henceforth, foreign investments in research and development activities involving such technologies will be subject to the prior control procedure.

Article R. 151-3 of the Monetary and Financial Code identifies the sectors of activity in which foreign investments are subject to prior authorization. There are three types: activities that are sensitive in nature (R 151-3, I), activities involving infrastructure, goods or services that are essential to guarantee public security and public order (R 151-3, II), and research and development activities involving critical technologies and dual-use goods and technologies intended for implementation in one of the other activities mentioned above (R 151-3, III).

Activities that are sensitive by nature are those that are likely to affect the interests of national defense, participate in the exercise of public authority, or are likely to affect public order and public safety. Without claiming to provide an exhaustive list, we can mention:

  • activities related to weapons, ammunition, powders and explosive substances for military purposes;
  • activities related to dual-use goods and technologies;
  • cryptology or communication interception activities;
  • or activities related to the illicit use of pathogens or toxic agents.

Regarding the second category of sensitive sectors: activities involving infrastructure, goods or services that are essential to guarantee public security and public order, the focus is on identifying these infrastructures, goods and services. These include infrastructure, goods or services that are essential to the continuity of water and energy supplies, to the operation of communication and transport networks and services (as well as space operations), to the protection of public health or food safety, or to the dissemination of information.

Finally, the last category, added in 2019, concerns research and development activities involving dual-use goods (listed in Annex I of the Council Regulation (EC) of May 5, 2009), as well as critical technologies (cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, robotics, additive manufacturing, semiconductors, quantum technologies, energy storage), which was extended to biotechnologies by order of April 27, 2020[5] (in the context of research into an anti-covid vaccine), and completed again by order of September 10, 2021[6], by adding technologies involved in the production of renewable energy.[7]

Since the Decree of December 28, 2023, on foreign investment in France, amending Article R151-3 of the CMF[8] and in order to prevent circumvention attempts, control of foreign investment in France now extends to takeovers of French branches of foreign entities, as well as to the processing and extraction of critical raw materials.

The list of critical technologies has been extended once again to research and development activities in the fields of photonics and low-carbon energy production technologies when they are to be applied in strategic sectors.

In addition, activities essential to prison security are explicitly included in the scope of control.

5. What to do when in doubt about the “sensitivity” of the activity?

The definition of sensitive sectors in the Monetary and Financial Code is broad and relatively unclear. As a result, foreign investors often have doubts about the eligibility of their operations for the foreign investment control process.

To remedy this and to allow the parties to secure the planned transaction, article R. 151-4 of the Monetary and Financial Code provides for a prior application procedure. This allows the investor or the target to obtain a ruling from the administration as to whether the activity of the French entity falls within the scope of foreign investment control.

To initiate this procedure of prior request for examination, it is sufficient to submit a simplified file to the DGT. However, the deadline for a response from the French administration is two calendar months, which is still significant in terms of the timetable for the transaction, and this opinion does not dispense with the need for an application for authorization, if necessary. This is why, in practice, most investors file complete applications for authorization to avoid delays.

6. How does the examination of a request for authorization proceed?

The application for authorization, containing all the information required under Articles L.151-3 and R.151-1 et seq. of the Monetary and Financial Code, as well as the European notification form for the transaction, must be sent to the DGT, which is responsible for examining it on behalf of the Minister of the Economy. To do this, it relies on the Interministerial Committee on Foreign Investment in France (CIIEF). This Committee brings together administrative officials and institutions with expertise in the sectors subject to control. When specific expertise is required, other French government departments may be mobilized.[9]

The Minister has 30 working days from the date of receipt of a complete application to give his opinion. The period is suspended due to any request for additional information. At the end of this period, he must then indicate to the investor either that:

  • the investment is not subject to foreign investment control,
  • it is authorized without condition,
  • it falls within the scope of the law, but that further examination is necessary to determine whether the preservation of national interests can be guaranteed by attaching conditions to the authorization.[10]

If there is no response within this timeframe, the request is deemed to be rejected, contrary to the former regulation. It is therefore important to obtain a response before the end of this period.

If, at the end of this first phase of appraisal, the Minister has concluded that further examination is necessary, he must notify the investor of the opening of a second phase of appraisal lasting a maximum of 45 working days. At the end of this second phase, the Minister may authorize the transaction with or without conditions or refuse the transaction. In the absence of a response within this 45-day period, the application is deemed to be rejected.

The purpose of these instruction phases is to allow the DGT to analyze the impact of the investment operation on public security, public order, and national defense interests. To this end, and during these two instruction phases, the Minister may communicate with the investor and the target to obtain any document or information necessary for the execution of his mission, without being able to oppose legally protected secrets.[11] 

As a result of the above, the maximum statutory period for obtaining a decision from the Minister is 75 working days.[12]

The control procedure is protected by strict confidentiality rules. The transmission of documents within the framework of the investigation can only be communicated to the agents of the administration in charge of investigating the files. The decision is not made public.

7. What are the consequences of the Minister’s decision?

Whatever the Minister’s decision, it can be appealed before the Administrative Court of Paris within 2 months.

If the transaction has been authorized with conditions, compliance with these conditions will be monitored by the competent ministerial departments throughout the period of their application.

If the Minister has authorized the transaction, with or without conditions, the investor must make a declaration within two months of the completion of its investment, in accordance with Article 3 of the Decree of December 31, 2019, on foreign investments in France. Such a declaration is not required when the Minister has concluded that the investment does not fall within the scope of foreign investment control. However, all FDI transactions must be reported to the Banque de France within 20 working days from the date of actual completion, provided that the transaction is worth more than EUR 15 million.

If the transaction has been authorized with conditions, compliance with these conditions will be monitored by the competent ministerial departments throughout the period of their application.

8. What are the sanctions when an operation falling within the scope of the control is carried out without authorization?

The penalty for failure to obtain authorization is severe: any commitment, agreement or contractual clause that directly or indirectly makes an investment subject to the control of the Minister of the Economy without the required authorization having first been obtained is null and void.[13]

In addition, the Minister of Economy may also order the investor to:

  • to file an application for a regularization permit;
  • to restore the previous situation at its own expense, and/or;
  • to modify the investment. [14]

These injunctions may be accompanied by a penalty payment and/or protective measures (suspension of voting rights attached to the investor’s shares, prohibition on the distribution of dividends, suspension of the free disposal of assets, appointment of a trustee to ensure the protection of national interests, etc.), in order to prevent risks of harm to public order, public security or national defense.[15]

These decisions or injunctions can only be made after the investor has been given formal notice, except in urgent or exceptional circumstances.[16]

The Minister of the Economy may also impose a fine in proportion to the seriousness of the breach, which may not exceed the highest of the following amounts:

  • double the amount of the irregular investment;
  • 10% of the amount of the annual turnover (excluding tax) of the target company of the irregular investment;
  • 1 million euros for individuals;
  • 5 million for legal entities.[17]

These financial penalties are also applicable in the event of fraudulent obtaining of authorization, or failure to comply with injunctions issued by the Minister of the Economy.[18]

Finally, the making of a foreign investment without prior authorization is subject to criminal sanctions. Thus, the investor is liable to five years’ imprisonment, confiscation of the property and assets resulting from the offence, a fine equal to at least the amount and at most twice the amount of the offence, as well as a ban on carrying out a commercial activity or a public function.[19]

9. What happens when the conditions of the authorization are not respected?

If the investor has not complied with one or more conditions attached to the authorization of the Minister in charge of the Economy, the Minister shall take one or more of the following measures:

  • He may withdraw the authorization issued;
  • require the investor to comply with initial conditions within a specified period; and/or
  • impose compliance with newly established conditions.

10. What are the European regulations on screening foreign investments?

Given the proximity and degree of interconnectedness between different European Union (“EU”) member states, making a foreign investment within one member state has the potential to pose a risk to the security or public order of one or more other member states. To limit this risk, Regulation 2019/453 establishing a framework for screening foreign direct investment (“FDI”) in the EU was adopted in March 2019, and entered into force on October 11, 2020. This regulation does not create a mechanism for screening FDI at the EU level, but it establishes a framework for the screening by member states of FDI occurring on their territory, as well as a mechanism for cooperation between those member states and the European Commission regarding FDI that may undermine security or public order.

Within the framework of this cooperation mechanism, Member States must notify the European Commission and other Member States of any investment subject to screening on their territory and transmit to them certain information (identity of the parties, sectors of operation, amount of the operation, location of the operation, etc.) by secure means. In practice, this translates into the communication of a form entitled “Request for information from the investor” which must be annexed to the request for authorization of the operation addressed to the Minister of the Economy. The Member States and the Commission study this information and may request additional information and issue comments or opinions on the proposed transaction. The DGT is not bound by these opinions but must “duly take them into account” by considering the measures available in its national law. In the case of investments considered to affect projects or programs of interest to the EU (listed in an annex to the Regulation), the member state hosting the planned investment must take “the utmost account” of the Commission’s opinions and justify any non-compliant decision. 

The cooperation mechanism may also be implemented at the initiative of another Member State or the European Commission, even when an FDI project planned or carried out in France is not subject to the control of the Minister of the Economy, if the project is likely to affect the security or public order of more than one Member State, or projects or programs of interest to the Union, and this within 15 months of the completion of the investment. The regulation provides an indicative list of factors to be taken into account in identifying investments likely to affect security or public order. It includes consideration of the effects of the investment on critical infrastructure, critical technologies, energy and raw material supplies, access to or control of sensitive information, or the freedom and pluralism of the media. Member States and the Commission may also consider whether the investor is controlled by the government of a third country, has a history of involvement in activities that undermine security or public order, or whether there are serious risks that the investor may engage in criminal or illegal activities.

Investors can rest assured that the exchanges that take place under this cooperation mechanism are strictly confidential. This mechanism is the only one through which France exchanges information on foreign investments on its territory.

The European Commission, in the fourth edition of its annual report, dated October 17, 2024, on the filtering of foreign investment from third countries, stressed the need for greater collaboration between Member States and called on to oblige all Member States to adopt this instrument at national level.[20]. According to the report, over 1,500 transactions have been notified by Member States to the EU cooperation mechanism since the EU regulation came into force in 2020, with 85% of notifications coming from just 7 Member States. In January 2024, the Commission therefore tabled a legislative proposal to revise the regulation, which would oblige all EU Member States to set up an FDI screening mechanism to harmonize national rules.

However, the differences in regulations between Member States are significant and the lack of uniformity of law between Member States can make the process cumbersome as a multi-jurisdictional operation may result in different regulations being applied.

In addition, in some areas and depending on the circumstances, it may be difficult for parties to determine whether or not to file a permit application. In many cases, as a matter of prudence and in view of the potential sanctions, it may seem more reasonable to file a clearance application. It is therefore important to anticipate in the timing of an investment transaction the time frame for obtaining a response, which may vary considerably from one jurisdiction to another, and the potential consequences of a refusal or a conditional approval.

As such, understanding these regulations, while recognizing the discretionary power of the State, has become essential in the upstream preparation of an M&A or investment transaction in order to understand the timeframes, the risks and to consider possible remedies.

Attorney Disclaimer

This summary is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with Rimon Electa Law Selas. or its affiliates. Prior results referred to in these materials do not guarantee or suggest a similar result in other matters.

About the Author

Olivia Lê Horovitz

Olivia Lê Horovitz is a founding Partner of Rimôn’s Paris Office. She represents clients during FDI clearance of transactions in France.  Her practice is primarily focused on cross-border mergers and acquisitions as well as private equity transactions. She represents clients in a variety of complex multijurisdictional acquisition transactions, including acquisition or sale of businesses, distressed companies, restructurings, divestitures, spin offs, recapitalizations, joint ventures and complex commercial contracts. Ms. Lê Horovitz regularly advises foreign companies wishing to invest in Europe in the context of private or public acquisitions as well as French companies looking to expand internationally.

If you are looking for advice on foreign direct investment regulation in France or cross border M&A issues, please contact Olivia Lê Horovitz for more information.    

  • Olivia Lê Horovitz
  • Founding Partner of Paris Office
  • RIMÔN ELECTA LAW
  • +33 (0) 620802963,
  • [email protected]
  • 215, Rue du Faubourg Saint-Honoré, 75008, Paris, France

References:

EDITOR'S PICK OF THE WEEK

CFO's new mandate. CFO explaining the presentation

The Performance and Transformation Orchestrator: The CFO’s New Mandate in the Age of AI

By Terence Tse CFOs are evolving into AI-driven transformation orchestrators, balancing finance, technology, and strategy while upskilling teams, managing risks, and driving measurable business value. A key insight from this year’s AI for CFOs event, organized...

WISE DECISION MAKER GUIDE

POWER INFLUENCERS

Emerging Trends

The Future of Global Trade