A Brexit-Style Revolution in the USA? The Real Differences between Clinton and Trump

By Takis Fotopoulus

There is no doubt that the forthcoming US Presidential elections are perhaps the most controversial ones in the US history. This has nothing of course to do with the various personal “scandals” supposedly marring the two candidates, i.e. the emails scandal vs. the sexual utterances that are incompatible with the political correctness imposed by the ideology of globalisation. These are obvious diversions created by the system itself in order to disorient the American victims of globalisation from the real issues of these elections.

In fact, if we talk about real politics rather than politicking, the personalities of the two candidates matter little, as both are “products of the system” and in this sense one could argue that there is no real difference between them. Yet, there is a crucial difference between these two candidates, which was not present in previous post war candidates, who were simply ‘products of the system’ distinguished only by their differences as regards usually minor aspects of economic policies, i.e. more liberal/neoliberal or, alternatively, more state interventionist measures.

Yet, none of these candidates ever questioned the very fundamentals of a system, which eventually – helped by the post war US hegemony – led to the emergence of a new phenomenon: the multinational corporations. This marked the rise of the New World Order (NWO) of neoliberal globalisation, as well as the emergence of a Transnational Elite that informally runs it, with the help of the transnational economic and political-military institutions that the same elites created, such as the IMF, WB, WTO and NATO). These fundamentals may well be summarised by what is called euphemistically ‘the four “freedoms”’, i.e. the free movement of goods and services, as well as of capital and labour. This is what the US elections (and the Brexit referendum before that) is all about.

Please login or register to continue reading... Registration is simple and it is free!

About the Author

Takis Fotopoulos is a political philosopher and economist who founded the inclusive democracy movement. He is noted for his synthesis of the classical democracy with the libertarian socialism and the radical currents in the new social movements. He is the editor of The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy (which succeeded Democracy & Nature). He was previously (1969 1989) Senior Lecturer in Economics at the University of North London. In his seminal work Towards An Inclusive Democracy (London & New York: Cassell, 1997), which has been translated into French, German, Spanish, Italian, Greek and Chinese, the foundations of the inclusive democracy project were set. He is also the author of over 2,000 articles in British, American and Greek books, journals, magazines and newspapers, several of which have been translated into over twenty languages

1. See James Petras, “Obama versus Trump, Putin and Erdogan: Can Coups Defeat Elected Governments?”, Global Research,10/8/2016 http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-versus-trump-putin-and-erdogan-can-coups-defeat-elected-governments/5540500
2. Aditya Chakrabortty, “I hate Trump, but on the issue of free trade he has a point”, The Guardian, 19/10/2016

3. Joseph E. Stiglitz, “Globalization and its New Discontents”,Project Syndicate, 5/8/2016 https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/globalization-new-discontents-by-joseph-e–stiglitz-2016-08
4. Sam Joiner, “Richest 62 in world worth the same as poorest 3.5 billion”, The Times, 18/1/2016
5. Will Pavia, “Poor Americans have same life expectancy as Sudanese”, The Times, 13/4/2016
6. Claire Jones & Alec Barker, “Do more to help globalization’s losers, say champions of liberalism”, Financial Times, 13/9/2016
7. David Charter, Juncker calls for more union to beat ‘galloping populism’, The Times, 14/9/2016
8. Anand  Giridharadas, “Besieged Globalists Ponder What Went Wrong”, New York Times, 26/9/2016
9. Robert Epstein, “Google has power to control elections, can shift millions of votes to Clinton”, RT, 1/11/2016 https://www.rt.com/op-edge/364910-robert-epstein-google-hillary-clinton/
10. Patrick Martin, “Why the CIA is for Hillary Clinton”, Global Research, 6/8/2016 http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-the-cia-is-for-hillary-clinton/5539997
11. Slavoj Žižek, “The Hillary Clinton Consensus Is Damaging Democracy”, Newsweek, 12/8/2016 http://europe.newsweek.com/slavoj-zizek-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-us-presidential-election-bernie-489993?rm=eu
12. see e.g. Sam Fleming and Patti Waldmeir, “Donald Trump’s trade message resonates in car country”, Financial Times, 8/8/2016
13. Prof. Michel Chossudovsky,” Rockefeller, Ford Foundations Behind World Social Forum (WSF). The Corporate Funding of Social Activism

Global Research, 11/8/2016 http://www.globalresearch.ca/rockefeller-ford-foundations-behind-world-social-forum-wsf-the-corporate-funding-of-social-activism/5540552
14. See e.g. “Globalization is barbarous, multinationals rule world – Marine Le Pen”, RT, 8/12/2014 http://rt.com/news/212435-france-pen-globalization-barbarity/
15. Francis Elliott et al. ‘Working class prefers Ukip to Labour”, The Times, 25/11/2014|

16. Philip Aldrick, “Brexit was just the start of a global revolt, IMF warns”, The Times, 5/10/2016
17. Chris Marsden & Julie Hyland, ““Seismic Shock”: UK Vote to Leave the EU Triggers Economic and Political Crisis, Global Research, 24/6/2016 http://www.globalresearch.ca/seismic-shock-uk-vote-to-leave-the-eu-triggers-economic-and-political-crisis/5532656?print=1
18. G. Soros, “The promise of Regrexit”, Project Syndicate, 8/7/2016 https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-promise-of-regrexit-by-george-soros-2016-07
19. Dominic Lawson, “OK, you’re angry. But ignore the vote and tanks could be on the streets”, Sunday Times, 3/7/2016

20. Philip Aldrick, “Economy defies Brexit slowdown fears”, The Times, 27/0/2016
21. “Soros warns of EU disintegration”, BBC News, 25/6/2016 http://www.bbc.com/news/business-36630468
22. See Towards An Inclusive Democracy, op.cit. ch. 6

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of The World Financial Review.