The Philippines garnered substantial international attention in 2016, owing largely to President Rodrigo Duterte’s controversies. Lost in the Philippines’ political drama, however, was the country’s strong economic performance. This article examines the Philippines’ business climate in 2017, and its leadership prospects and priorities as chair of ASEAN.
The Philippines garnered substantial international attention in 2016, owing largely to President Rodrigo Duterte’s rise to power, his litany of controversial remarks, and contentious war on drugs campaign. Lost in the Philippines’ political drama, however, was the country’s strong economic performance.
The Philippines posted a robust 6.8 percent GDP growth rate in 2016, outperforming popular investment spots such as China (6.7 percent) and Vietnam (6.2 percent). This follows years of sturdy growth under the previous Aquino administration, where growth averaged 6.2 percent per year.
FDI into the Philippines also increased in 2016, reaching US$6.2 billion in net inflows through the first 10 months of the year – a 22.2 percent increase over the US$5.1 billion accumulated over the same period the previous year. In 2015, total FDI amounted to US$5.7 billion. Intercompany borrowings accounted for almost two thirds of net FDI inflows (US$3.9 billion) in 2016, up 34.9 percent from US$2.9 billion in 2015. Despite improved FDI, the Philippines continues to lag behind fellow ASEAN countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand in this regard.
The Philippines’ strong economic performance is projected to continue into 2017, primarily on the back of healthy domestic spending, infrastructure development, and remittances. As opposed to many emerging Asian economies that are reliant on affordable exports, the Philippine economy is primarily bolstered by consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of GDP and grew by seven percent year-on-year.
Consequently, the Philippines may be better positioned than its more export-reliant neighbours to weather 2017’s uncertain global economic climate.
Standard Chartered projects the Philippines’ economy to grow by 6.7 percent in 2017, while HSBC projects 6.5 percent growth. Meanwhile, the Philippine government is targeting growth between 6.5 and 7.5 percent in 2017 and to grow between 7-8 percent per year in the medium term, while aiming to attract US$7 billion in FDI over the coming year.
One of the Duterte administration’s main initiatives in 2017 will be rolling out the Comprehensive Tax Reform Program (CTRP). The reform will see the highest personal income tax bracket rate reduced from 32 percent to 25 percent and corporate income tax lowered from 30 to 25 percent. The initiative aims to make the Philippines’ tax environment more competitive with its ASEAN peers, as the region as a whole has been gradually harmonising and lowering tax rates.
To offset losses from lowered personal income and corporate income tax rates, the government will expand the value-added tax (VAT) base by reducing exemptions, and add taxes on automobiles and fuel excise, among other measures.
Additionally, the government has announced that it will expand the tax collection powers of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), which will resume conducting field audits, and is also debating a tax amnesty to raise revenues and bring more companies into the formal tax regime.
Tax forms will also be simplified to encourage tax compliance and make the process more approachable for small taxpayers. Complicated and burdensome administrative measures, both in time and cost, often deter small taxpayers from participating in the official tax system.
Also to this end, Project Repeal: The Philippine Red Tape Challenge aims to improve the country’s inefficient bureaucracy – the Philippines is ranked 106th in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business index – by streamlining administrative and regulatory procedures and to remove unnecessary laws.
The tax reforms are projected to add an additional PHP 206.8 billion to government coffers, and the BIR is aiming to collect a record PHP 1.829 trillion in 2017. From January to November 2016, the BIR collected PHP 1.45 trillion in taxes.
The Philippine Development Plan covering the years 2017-2022 is set to be unveiled in the coming months, which will be a 10-point plan outlining measures and goals to raise the country’s standard of living. While more details will be released when the plan is officially announced, its central aim is to cut poverty incidence from 21.6 percent in 2016 to 14 percent by 2020.
The previous plan, which covered the years 2011-2016, sought to reduce multidimensional poverty from 2008’s levels of 28.2 percent to 16-18 percent by 2016. The plan calls for inclusive growth, fostering a trust-based society, and developing a knowledge-driven economy.
President Duterte’s pledge for economic growth to be more inclusive and tangibly raise the standards of living of the Philippines’ most vulnerable citizens ties into the goals of the Philippine Development Plan. Notably, point zero of the plan sets to achieve peace and order, which falls in line with Duterte’s drug eradication and crime reduction campaign and ties into a number of his economic and social policies.
In 2016, Duterte also signed an executive order that officially adopted the broader AmBisyon Natin 2040 project as the country’s long-term development vision. AmBisyon Natin 2040 envisions the Philippines tripling GDP per capita to US$11,000 and becoming a high-income country by 2040 by maintaining GDP growth of at least 6.5 percent per year.
The Philippines will chair ASEAN for 2017, meaning that it will host a series of summits and events concerning the regional bloc’s integration and political, economic, and social issues, and will be expected to champion particular initiatives.
Areas of focus for the Philippines will be to reduce the cost of doing business across ASEAN, harmonise safety codes for products and services throughout the region, and support the creation of innovation-driven economies. Beginning in April, the government will host a series of nine conferences geared towards multinational small and mediums sized enterprises (MSMEs), startups, and attracting investment.
As has been the case in recent years, 2017’s ASEAN summits will be notable for how the regional bloc approaches an increasingly aggressive China. Duterte shocked the political world when he renounced the US in favour of China despite the contentious land disputes in which they are engaged in the South China Sea, and ASEAN as a unit has growing divisions over how they view China and its rise.
Property, infrastructure, and consumption have all been important elements of the Philippines’ growth in recent years, and this should remain the case in 2017. The Philippines has long had a substantial infrastructure deficit, and Duterte seeks to address this by incrementally raising spending on hard infrastructure from five percent of GDP to seven percent by 2022.
For 2017, infrastructure spending is earmarked at PHP 850 billion – 5.3 percent of GDP. The Philippines has a wide variety of infrastructure needs, from the construction of new ports, airports, bridges, and expressways to electricity generation and telecommunications infrastructure.
The China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is already involved in two new projects in the Metro Manila region targetting flood prevention and mass rapid transport, and the government hopes to attract foreign funds, expertise, and technology to bridge its various infrastructure shortages. It is hoped that improved infrastructure will benefit multiple facets of the economy, including tourism, access to energy, and reducing the country’s infamous congestion.
Other sectors of the economy will benefit from the Philippines’ well-equipped workforce and sizeable service industry. Only three percent of employers in the Philippines cite inadequate skills in the workforce – the lowest rate in ASEAN. The Philippines is known for its Information Technology and Business Process Outsourcing (IT-BPO) industry, which will continue to be a key growth area in 2017.
As reflected in the Philippines’ development goals, the government hopes to parlay this area of expertise into higher value-added services, emphasising innovation, research and development, and the establishment of a knowledge-driven economy. The government also aims to expand its industry and manufacturing sector by leveraging the Philippines’ innovative capabilities in order to produce more highly value-added products than regional rivals skilled in mass-producing cheap exports.
The Philippines’ economy appears well positioned for another year of steady growth in 2017 despite significant global political and economic uncertainty. However, the Philippines itself may contribute to this uncertainty under the unpredictable leadership of Duterte and his controversial anti-drug campaign and bold pivot to China.
That being said, increased investment from China would help mitigate any losses that may be incurred as a result of new US president Donald Trump’s protectionist tendencies, and Duterte has been building upon his predecessor’s macroeconomic reforms. There is also potential for a rapprochement between the Philippines and the US, as there appears to be more goodwill between Duterte and Trump than there was between Duterte and Obama.
Despite the focus on China and the US in the Philippines’ political and economic relationships, Japan is consistently the biggest provider of FDI into the Philippines – providing 28 percent of the total in 2015 – and Duterte paid a state visit to the country in late 2016, securing more investments in the process.
While the Philippines has traditionally lagged behind its Southeast Asian neighbours in attracting FDI, it is making steady progress to close the gap, and its economy as a whole looks quietly set for another year of potent growth.
This original post was released by the ASEAN Briefing last February 3, 2017.
Image Courtesy of KING RODRIGUEZ/PPD
About the Author
Alexander Koty contributes to Editorial and Research operations for Asia Briefing in Shanghai, China. He specialises in political and economic analysis, advising companies entering China and Southeast Asia’s rapidly changing business environments. His work as an editor and analyst includes producing business intelligence and commentary for Asia Briefing websites, magazines, business and tax guides, and special issue reports.