By Luca Collina
As we ride the transformative wave of AI, it’s crucial to reflect on the past, particularly the dot-com era’s exuberance and subsequent recalibration. Luca Collina considers the parallels between the early internet frenzy and today’s AI hype, offering a cautionary yet optimistic view on harnessing technology responsibly for future progress.
OUTLINE:
- Introduction: Discussing the journey from the excitement of the internet (dot-com bubble) to the focus on AI today.
- Importance: Both promised world-changing impacts, showing successes and lessons.
- The post-bubble economy of the late 1990s: The belief that everything the internet would do to revolutionise business and life would be forced in consequence of wayward, unplanned growth to crash.
- The rise of AI: AI, built on solid research and real-world implementation, is truly disrupting industries and bringing this dot-com-like zeal alive.
- Learning from the Past: The dot-com bubble offers lessons on cautious, sustainable growth amid AI hype.
- Dot-com versus AI: Both herald the scene of financial optimism but admit little recklessness committed in the past this time around, when AI signals real industry improvements.
- Building a brighter future: AI should focus more on clearly outlined benefits, sustainable models, and ethical considerations in deliberations. It would clear the way for regulations for the good of society and participation among other groups toward transparency and trust.
- Conclusion: An AI-balanced approach. As learned from the dot-com age, the question is essential to the quest for knowledge about humanity in the technology age.
Key messages:
- AI will be as transformative as the internet but, at this point, we must cherish the lessons from the dot-com era about hype and failure and approach AI to develop impartially and sustainably.
- AI develops on a more solid foundation than the dot-com bubble, but the hype and peaks of investment in AI development throw us back to that time, and we need caution about unrealistic expectations.
- For AI to benefit society, ethical guidelines and regulations and the involvement of all relevant stakeholders are crucial. They should not be preceded by mistakes of uncontrolled increase without second thought.
- Ultimately, when the development of advanced AI capabilities is an acquired fact, humanity has to reflect on its living conditions and values in a technological society.
On this journey from historical insights to current realities, we probe into the trajectory of technology evolution. It all started during the dot-com (e-commerce) era, when the internet first promised to re-engineer our world. Upon reflecting on the historical journey of change which that technology has undertaken, we can tell a story that started in the dot-com era and opened up portals for us to be excited and envision the possibilities in the world.
Throughout the century, the e-commerce (dot-com) bubble symbolised the emergence of the Internet, a technology poised to reshape commerce, communication, and daily life. Some established companies quickly skyrocketed to billion-dollar valuations, while many others faded away during the market downturn.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has catapulted as a cutting-edge frontier for humanity and global business, captivating organisations led by entrepreneurs and benefiting society. It can transform humanity and move industries forward by boosting productivity.
Beneath this excitement lies an echo of history. The hype surrounding AI is marked by surging investments and grand expectations reminiscent of the vitality seen during the dot-com era. Unlike the internet start-ups of the 1990s that were still in their early stages, AI is grounded in years of research, development, and real-world applications. This contrast brings us to reflect on how we perceive hype and draws parallels between lessons learned from bubbles like dot-coms and their relevance to today’s enthusiasm for AI.
Comparing dot-com and AI
Given this look back into the wake of the dot-com era, it seems the lessons learned became more than just historical footnotes but guiding lights to be followed.
Reflecting on the dot-com bubble and drawing parallels with the enthusiasm surrounding AI offers insights for navigating future technological advancements. Historical lessons can guide us in envisioning a future where technology contributes to improvement, leveraging our knowledge and potential for progress1. It’s imperative to factor in experiences when making decisions in this era, comparing the dot-com phenomenon with today’s AI excitement to gain a perspective, and we find similarities that offer valuable insights.
During the dot-com time, there was a lot of investing and optimism2. This often resulted in valuations that might have been too high compared with what the technology could do.
We are now seeing a lot of enthusiasm for AI. It’s not just about money gains; there is an environment with ideas for change. The dot-com era and the current AI hype share a mix of excitement and speculation. As dreams of big transformations drive investments, there is sometimes a tendency to overlook the question of whether the technology is ready. Today’s AI improvements are built on proven research across many industries. This strong base should guide AI in solving problems and making helpful models. But the history of dot-com teaches us an important lesson. Enthusiasm can help progress, but it can also cause market problems if expectations are too high3 and growth plans are not sustainable. After the dot-com bubble burst, the tech industry had to consider itself and adjust. Experts worry that something like this could happen again with AI today. In the UK, the funds for AI start-ups from 2021-3 increased by 66 per cent, with an increased turnover of 77 per cent4. In the US, more than 25 per cent of investments were directed to AI start-ups; from 2018 to 2022, the amount was 12 per cent5.
We can learn how people saw media stories during the dot-com bubble time. Back then, people were excited about the internet6. But then setbacks happened, and businesses failed. Now, people are excited about AI again. But there are still worries about things like jobs being impacted and ethical issues.
A crucial takeaway from the dot-com era is the lack of regulations and ethical considerations7. In the dot-com era, involving various stakeholders in decision-making was rare. The focus was more on growth, taking advantage of the internet boom rather than establishing sustainable practices or considering the long-term effects on all stakeholders. Moreover, there was a lack of emphasis on transparency and accountability during that time.
Many companies went public with more than one idea related to the internet, resulting in valuations that did not have solid business models or revenue streams to back them up. The lack of transparency about the feasibility of these business models and the absence of accountability when they failed all played a role in causing the bubble to burst.
The bubble’s aftermath underscored the need for frameworks that drive progress and safeguard stakeholders. In AI, these considerations extend to addressing privacy, bias, and broader societal impacts. The challenge lies in establishing measures and ethical standards that can navigate the complexities of AI development while ensuring alignment with values and overall well-being8.
Why this comprehensive comparison?
In exploring the advancements in technology, the emphasis is on striking a balance between maintaining a hopeful outlook on progress and acknowledging the practical constraints that cater to both business requirements and everyday individuals. The primary aim is to devise truly effective solutions in real-life scenarios.
The dot-com bubble is instructive in a few ways, but generally, it gives a lesson with realistic and critically evaluated implications. This reflection of the expectations at the time, compared with the artificial intelligence capabilities today and in the future, should be noted in perspective. Realising the probable change at some point is essential; however, limitations must also be accepted. We must not turn a blind eye to the risks due to our enthusiasm for AI capabilities.
“The best and safest thing is to keep a balance in your life and acknowledge the great powers around us and in us. If you can do that and live that way, you are a wise man.” 9
Summary
This pivot from the dot-com bubble to today’s AI mania marks an essential stage of technology evolution, with several contrasts and some similarities. Suppose the dot-com era revelled in pure optimism and untamed investments in largely speculative ventures. In that case, the AI revolution rests upon a much firmer base of research, development, and practical applications across industries. However, the spectre of overvaluation and unrealistic expectations looms large, reminiscent of the past.
Therefore, the dot-com bubble epitomises a good lesson that protects stakeholders while encouraging innovation. From jobs displacement to ethical dilemmas and social impacts, the considerable technological progress of the ’90s could easily give us pause today to consider such a balanced view of the possible hazards in AI.
The way forward must be one of treating carefully and balancing innovation with prudence:
Prioritise sustainable growth10: The focus is on investing in AI technologies with practical, straightforward applications and a way toward profitable revenue. The approach will aid in escaping the pitfalls of speculative ventures that characterised the dot-com era and align technology with strategy.
Ethical and regulatory frameworks11: Follow ethical standards and regulations and develop frameworks12 on privacy, bias, and the broader societal impacts of AI. This would make it viable to ensure that the development of AI is really beneficial to, and in conformance with, societal values and well-being.
Engaging stakeholders13: It is important to engage investors, consumers, ethicists, and policy developers, among others, in making decisions. Involving stakeholders from such a view will create transparency, accountability, and trust in AI technologies.
Education and awareness: These will work to increase employees’ and the public’s knowledge in relation to the potential advantages and limitations of AI through the use of education and media. Well-informed people are vital in ensuring realistic expectations and supporting AI advances14.
Conclusion
The dot-com era offers valuable lessons, guiding the AI revolution to address the need for a more balanced approach that weighs optimism with practicality. Study the past and plan a strategy and approach to AI that make a huge effort to make things better, while reducing the possible risks. It is, therefore, a strategic blueprint towards guiding the full realisation of AI potential by bringing positive results to business and society.
“By promising widespread automation, AI prompts fundamental questions about how we want to organise our economy and society. The pursuit of AI brings us face to face with basic, intimate questions about consciousness, intelligence, creativity: in short, what it means to be human.”15
About the Author
Luca Collina is a management and transformational consultant who has managed transformational projects and Automation internationally (Tunisia, China, Malaysia, Russia). He now helps companies understand how GEN-AI technology impacts business, use technology wisely, and avoid problems. He has an MBA in Consulting, has received academic awards for his research, and is a published author. Thinkers360 named him one of the Top Voices, Globally and in EMEA in 2023. Luca continuously upgrades his knowledge with experience and research to transfer it. He ecently developed interactive courses on “AI & Business” and “Human Centric AI”.
References
1. S. Tejani, 2021. “Five Lessons From A Dotcom-Bubble Veteran For Today’s Retail Investors”, FORBES.
2. Morris, J.J., & Alam, P., 2008. “Analysis of the Dot-Com Bubble of the 1990s”. Available at SSRN 1152412.
3. E. Siegel, 2023. “The AI Hype Cycle Is Distracting Companies”, HBR.
4-5. Pineiro, F.A., 2023. “Average funding for AI startups increased by 66%, Startups 100 Index data reveals”, Startups (https://startups.co.uk/news/average-funding-for-ai-startups-increased-by-66-startups-100-index-data-reveals/).
6. Howcroft, D., 2001. “After the gold rush: deconstructing the myths of the dot.com market”, Journal of Information Technology, 16, pp. 195-204.
7. Jennings, M., 2005. “Ethics and Investment Management: True Reform”, Financial Analysts Journal, 61, pp. 45 – 58.
8. Osman, N., & d’Inverno, M., 2023. “A computational framework of human values for ethical AI”, ArXiv, abs/2305.02748.
9. Euripides.
10. M. Milic, 2023. “Strategy, Not Technology, Is the Key to Winning with GenAI”, HBR.
11. Raji, I.D., Smart, A., White R.N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., Barnes, P., 2020. “Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing”, in FAT* 2020 – Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 33–44).
12. Collina, L., Warnes, B., 2024. “Cultivating Executive Trust in the Age of AI Governance”, The European Business Review.
13. Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., & Langbort, C., 2014. “Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. Data and discrimination: converting critical concerns into productive inquiry”, pp. 1-23.
14. Buhmann, A., & Fieseler, C., 2021. “Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence”, Technology in Society, 64, pp. 101475.
15. Rob Toews.
